Really makes me think

It really does

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=AzlMeTxVdH8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

youtube.com/watch?v=AzlMeTxVdH8

We should get rid of that flag…..

We won't

I know :'(

You'll learn to respect me :')

...

...

...

Looks like your average Holla Forums poster. But I appreciate the only arguments you can make about feminism are up to including "THERE ARE FAT FREAKS WITH MENTAL DISORDERS ;_;" when you're well aware among yourselves, always on the internet, there is similar.

i know its hard for you to cope with cognitive dissonance but you only make ass of yourself with your replies

My favorite part of this is you still think I'm an anarcha-feminist

That's a litteral LARPer

Pic related is an irl MAGAutist

why would you ruse me in such a way, comrade?

ok

nice """Logic""" you got there :^)

How am I "pretending to be retarded" by putting on a flag? It's better than actually being retarded like you


Oh I'm an anarchist and a feminist. Just not an anarcha-feminist lmao.

One dresses up like Naruto and LARPS ideology from the manga he reads.

The other attended a Trump rally wearing his usual clothes.

like these guys

i know Holla Forums has a doublestandard fetish but come on now

Yeah, it makes me think that/leftypol/ is filled with eternally triggered sheltered white suburban manchildren whose castration anxiety guides their political views.

Time to start using this flag since it triggers so many people.

damn thats really impressive mental gymnastics

I don't know who it triggers but im duying out of laughter every time i see it

No it doesn't. You don't laugh that hard on the internet, nobody does.

you're in some buttpained argument with a feminist over which strawman makes the most sense. you're clearly upset

...

you have no idea

yeah because i might die from all the laughter

but that is supposed to be you.I really dont get it

I do have an idea.


You're not laughing, you're staring at your monitor completely straight faced.

It's you

Do they say why? I don't get what I'm supposed to be bootyblasted about.

...

...

we used to get competent trolls who were at least funny.
what happened?

they probably grew out of their authority fetishism. Now what we are seeing are younger, stupider trolls.

but we're on Holla Forums, dunce

Because according to Holla Forums: anything != economic determinism = "idpol"

Not even socialist/Marxist feminism or anarcha-feminism is acceptable, because Holla Forums has residual Holla Forums and GG fears about the SJW boogeyman conspiring to castrate them.

Yoshimi was named after the drummer and co-writer of Boredoms. I don't know if she's featured on the album though.

Soft Bulletin is bettur tho.

pls, Holla Forums absorbed 4chan culture. we're not that separate

Truuu

but i'm actually laughing after all i'm not mentally ill suicidal alanarch-fem with bipolar disorded


i'm not trying to be funny.i feel bad for you actually.

what??

Also what the fuck us an alanarch

you

Dude can you be more coherent please

its not my fault you can't into reading comprehension

man, the flaming lips are great.

I wish I had a webm of the amv of this song synced to 'Asuka's last stand' from end of evangelion.

Nah. You're incoherent

ok whatever helps you sleep at night

K

I'm sure otherwise your scathing critique would have kept them awake questioning their beliefs.

Tell me, have you ever considered using your talents to serve humanity and help give us an edge in a hostile universe?

if they ever questioned their beliefs in the first place they were not going to be associated with things like feminism and anarchism but when youre insecure nothing can help you T B H.

Lol, k

no

Hey, maybe if you asked me questions about it, you'd see my rationale. It seems you have a rationale for rejecting it, why not ask me some questions about it?

K e K

And what is your story?I can't wait to hear it.

...

K Y S F A M

I asked you why youre anarchy feminist.

(deep kek)

I'm not an anarcha-feminist. I'm a feminist who's an anarchist. This is because the order of the world is always unquestioned as reality; despite its complexity it is quick to judge alternatives to it as too complicated and complex. The right order, in order, no matter complexity can function fine if its structured in a way to prevent easy destruction; perhaps the complexity of itself can lend to that. This is how the economy thrives.

The problem is that the economic powers aren't leading us to a future any of us want, the gap between rich and poor widens as it has always done throughout history. The liberal middle classes quickly jump into hysterics and nonsense when they start being among the poor, as always in history. Most of all, it thrives off war for a quarter of its success, there will never be a time from now on where we are not extracting money from the chaos we create in the near east.

In order for an alternative to be made, it has to confront every portion of the problem itself, the problem of Late-Capitalism and its state benefactors. That, is anarchy. I'm not sure which would be better, small scale organization or large. Large would easily become a state from its organization.

State socialism is a problem because it is always, bar none overcome by Capital. Capital has no weakness for standards or morals, it hires contras, it kills in order to survive.

Anarchy in this sense, is the only way forward to destroy the orders indoctrinated into us, various and many.

On top of this, feminism of a kind is the only way to keep women safe in a transitory period.

it is a mystery

yeah im le summergaf xd(eksdee)

but you dont deserve it and after all we are E Q U A L

What?

...

you sure are lol

What argument.

well you reap what you sow.after all if you think anarchy is going to be like in your dreams GET READY FOR A BLAST.

okaye fellowe redditre

Exactly.

A world without a state and market will likely exist outside of my lifetime or yours. It will take place after this society we live in is long gone. There is no reason to think or suggest organization comes always inevitably in the form of Capital. Capitalism has only existed for a small fraction of human history.

I also don't think your working definition of anarchy is necessarily read or correct. It seems to me you just think a world without a state is formless chaos. It is not. We do not need a state to make our lives organized, yet when we exist within one we are born to rely on a state, making our reliance self-proving within it.

Do you realise that if there is no capitalism there is no place for your feelings?You have no idea what youre going to lose when capitalism ends.

How is that?


Did you read what I posted?

You will see…thats why I can't wait for capitalism to crumble…it made things like you exist.
I don't think you understand how humans work.

I'm saying what has been said in radical circles since the mid 19th century.


Muh human nashure

...

yeah they were really sane people e t c .
yeah like I said already just wait for it.

?

Philosophers may not be sane, but they've been pushers and movers of how civilization works for over a thousand years.

Saying someone isn't sane is not an argument. Einstein wasn't sane, Nash wasn't sane. Yet nonetheless correct.

Again, did you read what I wrote? I said Capitalism is not ending in my lifetime or yours.

Not the philosophers you think though
But I tell you that it will very soon…

Why keep making these threads?

Its my first and last thread here my mentally disabled friend

k

Let's be honest, we're addicted to bait. He's merely providing our fix.

i obliterated everyone against me you gommie kid

y'sure did.

It's not particularly well-conceived bait.


XD

yep i bodied down everyone here.

(You)

(Me) but you know its true