How is this legal

These would be fine today but we all know the lobbyists and degenerates in the education system would push for a whole lot of homosexual content; thus making it automatically unsuitable for children.

Because giant corporations in the US can buy their way out of prosecution. Where the hell have you been for the last 100 years?

For the same reason that children nudism is legal, because it's not sexual in and of itself.

You can literally find nude children totally exposed legally on google and other search engine by looking for child nudism, or family nudism.

i like to also bing search
-naked child
-young naked girl
-tween girls naked
-family nudism
-PureNudism
-girl puberty
-child genitals
-hymen vagina
-virgin girl vagina
-naked children
-nude children
-nude art
Get very creative with the searches sometimes lead to very interesting fines. Like for example I was looking for girls in panties one time
Lead me to a lot of family blogs a few months ago. Lots of parents like to take pictures of their children going to the toilet. I shit you not: Half the shots were close-up vaginal shots with the piss stream clearly visible. Counts as child pornography if you or I took the photo. But if the parent took the photo it is perfectly normal. If this was the Holla Forums of old I'd post some I saved.
Also a few hard boy peckers that I couldn't help but not save. And I'm not even a boyfag. Parents really seem to think it is funny to have a small boy with morning wood

Gboyza
Biqle
VK
dropbox
kidb
icdn
dirt
vk
UPIC
ZEED5
Converting Tag
play toy
Watchcinema
arhivach Onion Converting
adanih
Sonnenfreunde
Mottoki
bbs
xxgasm
onion
Idnes Rajce

Put ru inthe search with any of these in Bing

Google is too good at filtering

-young naked girl

Nice try, FBI

I'd be careful on that one tbh.
Most pictures there are legal but people do sneak some less than legal one on there. Best to avoid

Actually search it then go to related searches. It is like a rabbit hole. Within 10 minutes you can find sites with real cp if you aren't scared.

That's bound to be a search full of nasty results.

...

degenerates (FBI) out !

how is it supposed to work to legalise possession but not production? if it's not getting produced, then no one can possess it

and then if someone possesses it, won't they just be presumed to have produced it?

antis pls kys

Easy. It's just like marijuana in certain states of the USA. Illegal to produce. Fine to purchase and consume via a certified government establishment. Same principals.

Possession of a certain thing does not mean you produced it. Heck, some pedophiles are even willing to make it retro so for instance: All child pornography made before 1995 legal and able to be distributed/viewed/possessed with no ramifications. That makes it so all the "victims" of said videos are all grown up and nobody is actively getting hurt anymore. Seems like a good idea to me.

I'm not a pedo fuck but I think it works much the same way as journalists who film crimes - technically the image shows the crime but the person holding the image is not the criminal. There was a court case in NY a few years back where it was rules that simply having CP on your computer does not prove that the person in possession of the CP committed any crime (basically a professor was told by a student that one of the lab laptops they were using had CP on it, he contacted the police and he was arrested but the courts said that unless the police could prove he himself had downloaded it/produced it then he was innocent).

Alos, by legalizing it's possession it would be harder for the sick fucks who make it to put it up online since the internet has great capacity of figuring shit out from just little hints and clues (like where Shia was putting his flags).

They would not legalize possession for two reasons. One is that they need to be seen to getting results, so it is easy for them to claim they are dealing with 'the issue' by rounding up a few casual fappers. Second and this is more strongly linked with the growing social distortion, feminists despise men and the idea that they could gratify themselves over images of young bodies is abhorrent. They are bitter, twisted and project their bile into the political and legal system. Decriminalization would, in their view, only result in more exploitation of minors (they mean girls but they pretend they give a damn about boys too) and (though they wouldn't say so publicly) diminish even further the appeal of the modern woman; the 'sex sells but don't look at me as sexy' hypocrisy.

in the computer world, if it was ever produced at all, it can be copy and pasted to have more without more production. unless you count distributing as production.

I'd be ok with pedo hentaï, but children will regret getting naked for your bizzare fetish once they grow up and what's on the internet is there forever.

...

Why do I get the feeling that Holla Forums has become a cesspool of spooks trying to honeypot anyone dumb enough to stumble into this shithole?

yes

...