This has been your friendly reminder that Kant was right, and is the ultimate rebuttal to Stirner

This has been your friendly reminder that Kant was right, and is the ultimate rebuttal to Stirner.

Crooked teeth consequentialist Anglos need not apply.

the CI is an incoherent concept that denies circumstances while at the same time requiring them to make sense.

What am I reading? Was Aristotle a rebuttal of Marx too?

Just because someone came earlier doesn't mean his arguments don't rebut the assertions of a later one.

If you think that Stirner was unaware of Kant or the assertions he made, then you're sorely mistaken.

The Categorical Imperative is my property.

Friendly reminder that all of reality is mediated within consciousness and that human finitude is a pre-critical holdover unabandoned by poor transcendental Kant.

Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable.

K-On is garbage for mouthbreathers, patricians watch ARIA.

I agree, K-On is an awful show.

...

almost as shit as your posts

nah jk, you'd have to go on Holla Forums or Holla Forums to find anything as shit as your posts

Metaphysics of morals, not critique of pure reason my lad.

Stirner was probably the brightest of the Hegelians. I think it's kind of silly to think that he didn't engage with Kant's work.

I agree that Kant BTFO the filthy Anglo untermensch, but I mean he was also highly influenced by Hume.

Reminder that Nietzsche destroyed Kant and the English.


dis nigga gets it

BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT THE UBERMENSCH

...

Cioran, Nietzsche and practically everyone after Kant BTFO him.

I prefer him to consequentialists though

This.
You don't have to go into religion and Hegel to find a really good criticism of Kant and indeed most of positivist thought from the greeks onwards, you just have to get into pretty basic Nietzsche, and that should do it for you.

Nietzsche is seriously underestimated amongst leftists.

We have Stirner who is like Nietzsche but actually good.

Correctme if I am wrong, but Stirner is Nietzsche taken to its own radical, logical conclussion.

Both of you should just read Nietzsche and Stirner and stop memeing.

There is plenty about Nietzsche that is good that Stirner never even touches upon like slave and master morality, transvaluation of all values and his perspectives on free will.

Stirner is good and touches upon things that Nietzsche never mention, but they are not quite the same, in the sense that Bakunin and Kropotkin are not the same, but share a lot in common.

Man, I need to read more philosophy so I can argue with you pedantic douchebags more.
Meh, I'll just go over to /Nazipol/ and hammer on my keyboard about Judeo-Marxist conspiracies.

For real, this.

Stirner and Nietzsche are entirely complementary to each other. There's no need to put them in some kind of pissing match.

...

black flag, not even once

…

There is absolutely no problem with that.

nihilism and nietzshe contradict, nietzshe and socialism contradict, nihilism and socialism aren't really a natural fit but is the least objectionable link at least

Not really, you just don't have a deep understanding of Nietzsche or nihilism.

In this case I think Nihilism is to be understood like "Existentialism" and Nietzsche and anarchist socialism certainly don't necessarily contradict each other.
The whole idea of the Übermensch, he who is neither master or slave comes pretty close to it.

not really

I don't know much about Nietzsche, but I do know that nihilism and socialism are perfectly compatible because nihilism doesn't imply hedonist politics like aynclapism.

i totally agree

You're right but you need to move beyond Nietzsche already.

check em fag

Nietzsche is Stirner watered down.

t. Someone who has never read either of them

I've read Stirner

That doesn't make my point any less true. The statement that Nietzsche is Stirner watered down is beyond retarded, and clearly you've not read Nietzsche or if you did you got nothing out of him. Like you clearly got nothing out of reading Stirner.

HOLY SHIT HE DID IT THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN

AHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

t. someone who never read Kierkegaard

...

...

Nigga, do I need to make another bookshelf thread to show you how much of a retard you are Mr. "Oh Hegel was an existentialist"


Not an argument frankly. Socratic irony is A. okay

Keep drinking that poisonous "cure" to life itself then mate.
Meanwhile the rest of us will transvaluate society and kill your weak christian death-cult.