Islamic militia in 2017

Dear lefty pol /Islamicstate/ and /Islam/ mod here, as a person familiar with both peaceful pacifist Islam and violent jihadist Islam I've come to propose an idea of sorts and was wondering what your opinion on it was I asked Holla Forums and atypical results happened I asked /Islam/ and they were more or less not interested due to possible fear of being monitored by the FBI.

Now here's some info about me I've given three FBI interviews, I'm currently disabled but waiting for a judge to sign off on my SSI again, and I've been featured in a memri article. So I'm not worried about the FBI or charges for conspiracy or anything because I'm not doing anything illegal.

So here's the plan, make an NGO designed and targeted at, at risk Muslim youth, train the and reeducate them with CVE assistance & create a moderate Muslim militia inclusive of various sects and ideologies. The goal is to advocate for shariah for Libya and secure the country for them/with them since they already have a semi functioning constitution ( needs a bill of rights, examples of how shariah will be implemented and some context for certain things )

Seen here icrc.org/ihl-nat/0/5dd60b37b2348210c12570530033dd2f/$FILE/Constitution.Libya.EN.doc

The best bet to do this is to secure the oilfields and generate revenue for additional soldiers then work on peace treaties between tribes and work on unifying Libya once again under an Islamic republic.

My plan is to assist them in doing this and to assure mutual aid to all parties willing to come to peace talks over Libya if this is a success then the model (of a moderate Muslim army/militia) can be replicated, further funded and utilized in Yemen and Afghanistan to restore broken or disfuntional states. By creating Islamic republics we can gurentee individual and minority rights are firmly protected, peace is assured by appealing to the aspect or shariah law which most Muslim counties want and democracy is installed to provide voices to communities and ensure that all parties are represents and heard.

I submit to you my plan as a means of identifying any problems I might have within it or surrounding its parameters, I'm open to changing it and would like some feedback thank you. also happy 4th of July.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=EU2AIxkxiwg
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

REMOVE JIHAD SECULARISM OR DEATH

That doesn't answer any of the questioned presented

Why the fuck would anyone want to support a muslim militia? And fuel Islamic fundamentalism?

Because it's moderate, duh! Instead of beheading you outright if you're not a Muslim they'll just tax you and discriminate against you instead!

Dear OP, this thread is a a tank ship loaded with oil barrels, and a single spark will make it explode, so you better prepare yourself

How so?


Actually the goal is to bring everyone to the table for peace talks there wouldn't be an instance of taxation due to religious preference. Maybe if your Christian or Jewish but I don't think that's an issue.


It wouldn't be fueling fundamentalism. It would be creating a diverse group capable of spreading both democracy and shariah law.

Holla Forums isn't sympathetic to anyone but other leftists, "Moderate islamists" are not good enough
Are you a liberal or something like that? Holla Forums isn't liberal and dosn't like liberals

I think how to deal with extremism is address the psychological and economic problems of the individuals. This will take away their vulnerabilities at the source. I am not sure how well that could be pulled off in Libya though.

What is so moderate about forming a militia?

Will that only apply to Muslims or everyone in the country? If it only applies to Muslims then what would you do when someone leaves Islam? Would non Muslims be given equal rights and have secular law? Does each ideology of Islam get its own sharia? Sorry if this is covered in the doc, I did not want to download it just to view it.

so it is a representative democracy? Does each group get their own representative? Is the number or representatives proportionate to the size of the group or are they on equal representation?

I have an idea. How about instead of fueling islamic imperialism and fundamentalism we instead support secular and socialist militias that already exist in the middle east. After a serious of revolutions a la arab spring, we unite the Arab world under socialism calling the super state, The United Socialist Arab Republic (USAR). We then get money from literal domination of the oil market, use that to find social programs and diversify the economy. Become the worlds superpower and destroy american imperialism

This is PRECISELY one of the issues that will cause this thread to erupt into a shitfest.
Don't say I didn't warn you.

This is bait

First time posting here. As for what I am, I'm complicated.


We're inclusive

In Libya it would apply to everyone, takfir is prohibited so nothing happens to apostates as far as I'm aware.
As for non Muslims it would be appropriate for them to have secular laws in my opinion
As for each ideology no, only Sunni Islamic shariah would be appropriate.
I Don't think the doc covered your questions but I would advocate for secular laws for non Muslims.

Yes and yes


Nah, I like my idea better.

Besides that conflicts with American interests I don't think the state department will help me if it goes against US interests.


An Islamic republic can exist. Iran is an example although I dislike the Shia.


Well what's wrong with a tax?

...

If I were retarded I'd be incapable of starting this thread… In any case it's more along the lines of wanting to create a Muslim militia is the main focal point

...

OP, what gave you the idea you would find success with this idea on leftypol? Serious question.

If Non-Muslims have secular laws then how is it that Sharia applies to everyone? Would that mean you would base secular law on sharia law? Or did you just misunderstand and thought I meant every Muslim instead of every person.


Then what happens when democracy votes goes against something in sharia law?
Do the things they vote on only apply to their own group or does it apply to every Libyan?

Giving certain people additional taxes because of their religion, ethnicity or whatever not related to the economics is discriminatory towards given identities.

fuckoff troll. your boogeyman shit belongs in Holla Forums

Things muslims need to learn to stop being stupid

1.Separation of church and state
2 secularism
3.freedom of religion

There, islam will now be out of the dark ages and into the enlightenment

I was just curious what the left thought of the idea. Success is nessicarily agreement with the idea.

Doesn't have to apply to non Muslims as they can pay Jizya and have their own set of laws.


Not sure the constitution didn't cover that, I suppose the shura council wouldn't allow it, that's why I said it needs some revision.


Islam doesn't work that way.

meh.
Violence isn't not the solution brother, you will attracted people that's will burn out every single "hope" of unity, remember Afghanistan .

Are you a communist?
No? then GTFO

I think so too, but sometimes violence is needed.

Jizya is extortion. It would lead to conflict in itself and an eventual uprising of the oppressed. It makes no sense to apply an Islamic concept on non Muslims. It is oppressive because it lowers non Muslims economic status and i used to represent a lower social status. Muslims of various branches of Islam and Non-Muslims should be all seen equally a part of the nation. Using Jizya is a form of Nationalism.

You guys are communist???

It's cheaper than paying zakat, but I suppose I see your point.

WE ARE LENIN'S GRANDCHILDREN!

… Exept for some that are Bakunin's…

Yes. You may as well delete the thread now

this thread is fucking special

Ill just let it die off

This shit is hilarious!
OP tought we were liberals and kept a straight face for a whole thread
This! This is what absolute madmen do!

why are you here ?

the islamic state is one of the most classcucked organizations in the middle east atm

also your predecessors destroyed socialism in the middle east and went to war with the USSR under the guise of being anti-communist and pro-capitalist

we hate islam just as much as Holla Forums does, just not for the same reason. now please kill yourself degenerate fascist.

Didn't you guys read the thread? OP tought we were liberals the whole time, see
Keks like this are rare to come by.

oh god. he even refused to delete the thread and hope that some dumb socdem cuck might want to support him

It's mostly a mix of communists, socialists, and anarchists but a few other political views too.


So if I get this right you think sharia should be the law on the governmental level and the secular or other religious laws are not associated with the government which is the purpose of the tax because you are treating these people like people renting national land?

I think that is doing things backwards.. The government and legal system should be primarily secular but if you want sharia you could have sharia allowed and regulated by the secular system. So sharia would be the exception to the rule. What this does is satisfy Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The law would make sure sharia only carried out in a controlled manner with specific punishments specified to prevent things becoming too brutal. You make sure to write in that no jizya or zakat is paid by the non-Muslims and no apostasy punishment.

For proposed laws that are not covered in sharia both Muslims and non Muslims vote for it one vote per person because it applies to everyone.

For voting on proposed laws which cover subjects already mentioned in sharia law the votes are counted differently because the Muslims already have sharia law while the law for others is not set yet or is able to change. Either you count the votes in a weighted method, for example lets scale this down and pretend there are only 110 people, 100 of which are Muslims and 10 non Muslims. Each Muslim's vote is worth one but each non-Muslim's vote is worth 10 so 10 non-Muslims have equal power to 100 Muslims. If that is too complicated to you then you can have it so proposed laws already mentioned in sharia will only be voted on by non-Muslims.

When they said Islamic state I don't think they mean ISIS/Daesh. An Islamic state is any Islamic government.


Just to be clear my posts are mostly humouring the possibility of them actually going through with things and trying to make some influence on what is done. Which I hope is not interpreted as support since I would not actively encourage forming an army or any violence. So that means so far no one has encouraged him.

If you were not so verbose with your posts people will see you're "humoring"

...

True but I have time on my hands and think the same thing can be accomplished in a non violent way. I think what I described would be a step for future changes to take place if it were done through some means. It sets up a situation where people choose to be ruled by sharia from Islam by being Muslims or choose not to be Muslims to be free from that and under protection of the law.

Friendly reminder there is no good reason whatsoever to believe your religion is true, nor any other for that matter.

I am a Muslim Communist, OP. The last time we support you pro-Sharia fucktwits against imperialists you backstabbed us. Why should we trust you again?

anyone else feel like this is some lazy cia agent assuming that communists sympathize with muslims because of cold war propaganda?

Fucking modernists

OP is a Wahhabi subhuman.

Don't listen to him.

Kek

I'd say less lazy and more just really fucking out of touch. He probably hasn't updated his who those dang dirty commies are probably friends with list in 30 years.

Salam Alaykum OP.

I highly doubt everyone here has the understanding of Shariah that you and I probably have and what you aim to create so it's understandable that the thread devolved pretty badly. Just some quick advice, there's no point in getting the opinion of Kafirs on matters such as our sectarianism since they're all generally uneducated on the subject.

Always remember, death to Wahhabi apostates and Eid Mubarak.

Your assumptions are unfounded. I read up on various religions because they interest me. I am familiar with sharia.

The fuck's a kafir?

Non Muslim.

Not to be confused with kefir, which is quite tasty. It's like the Muslim equivalent of goyim.

LAMOOO

Islam is idiotic.
Leftypol, do you realize that muslims believe in genies? That's like listening to some child talk about the tooth fairy or Santa Claus.
I swear, religion is getting so desperate, so absurd, I still wonder why idiots keep babbling on about "muh Islamic Communism".
It's like listening to Christians talk about demons and demonic possessions.

Here's a spooky video that will chill your bones.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=EU2AIxkxiwg

I always thought it was funny when the Muslim kids at school used to point out proudly that they believed in genies and even approved of the Aladin depiction except adding the qualifier that they were typically bad unlike the benevolent Robin Williams version.

Then there were the Hindu kids who believed in Hanuman and Ganesh…sage because religious thread

...

Jinn are originally from pre-Islamic times actually. They were originally gods of another religion but like Christianity they demonized them into something else. I never asked around to confirm this but I heard there actually exists a certain prayer some Muslims do to avert the gaze of jinn when they taking a shit or undressing so they can't see them.

i totally agree

A lot of Muslims have contradicting views wanting both democracy and sharia even though they know they can contradict eachother. So I dont think it's necisarily bait.