So, Marxists, why do you reject Anarchism?

So, Marxists, why do you reject Anarchism?

Pic unrelated

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=yUOBXdLfu0g
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Infantile disorder something something…

But for real, my biggest gripe with Anarchists is that they are all moralists. An Stirner's subjectivist solipsism isn't very helpful either (everything is spooks, we get it).

I grew out of Anarchism when I realized that Marxism is cold and reptilian interpreting the evolution of the human race, and not an emotional that just thinks that Capitalism is "bad for poor people".

No, you don't get it apparently.

Some may be, but it's certainly not a 1:1 ratio. In fact, my support of Anarchism has nothing to do with morals, nor does my disdain for capitalism. It's a matter of functionality.

Aren't you just disregarding an entire ideological faction of leftism based on suppositions you've made out of bias, because you assume anarchists are just making the mistakes you yourself made when you were younger?

This is, uhh… supposed to be good, you say?

I don't want to leave the working class defenseless just for the sake of some higher ideal. Rejecting party politics is a senseless handicap that simply cedes all action to those who don't.

And what do you mean by "rejecting party politics"?

But wouldn't relying on parties leave you defenseless if they become corrupt with power?

Because the rest of the world exists.

Because idealism is incapable of adapting.

Because I know how a military works.

Because I recognize the need for a clear strategy for the revolution against capitalism.

Are marxists completely incapable of explaining their viewpoints without resorting to repeating such empty platitudes as these?

It's all I ever see on this topic. You say "I know how a military works" the same way ancaps say "I know how economics work". From my perspective, it's marxism that is idealism.

...