The trojan origin of vikingr peoples

No no fam he be sayin we be da lost tribes of israel an sheeit.

sheeeeeeeeet fam that be fuckin bonkers

was shakespear hwhite too?!?

this

nice archive OP
reported

I was interested in lawfulpath.com/ref/whchflag.shtml the reason we no longer use the vertical striped flag .

...

The Vikings weren't the Vikings when they arrived in Scandinavia from Central Asia, they were the Aesir and companion tribes the Vanir and the Erul. Viking was an Old Norse word meaning sea-expedition, and a vikingr was someone who partook in these expeditions. The word became affixed to the Norse invaders, probably by the Franks, and the name stuck.

Before migrating north to Scandinavia the Aesir had lived for countless centuries on and around the shores of the Sea of Azov on the north side of the Black Sea. Central Asian origins of the Vikings of Scandinavia are confirmed by a mountain of evidence. Many archeological finds in Scandinavia belie Scythian/Central Asian influences, and these begin to appear fairly abruptly in the archeological record around the 5th century AD. Bracelets, bronze plaques, highly decorated armor and horse trappings, all consistent with Scythian influence date from this period, as does evidence of the introduction of horses in Scandinavia. Some graves have in fact been found in which horses have been buried along with their owners, notably in Bornholm, Sweden. This was a tradition practiced by Central Asian nomadic tribes like the Huns. Also, genetic research has uncovered DNA (Y-chromosome) markers which show up in both Scandinavian and Central Asian populations.

I know the village my family is from in sweden it has my last name. I have a through history on my mothers side as well. Origin storys are important. I dont have an opinion ether way about this blog post but its my opinion that our heritage has been rewrittin even before this modern era. We had no written language for a reason because it was too easy to lie on paper.

Just the more desperate Christfags, honestly. Christian Identity and Positive Christianity and the like are crocks of shit that were conceived as a "we wuz biblical and sheeeit" buffer to ease stubborn Christians into de-Christianization.

Literally nobody in the christian faith identifies as jewish other than brother nathaneal, who is literally an ethnic jew convert who shit talks jewish culture, zionist politics and religion.

youtube.com/user/zionget

Nice strawman though.

This.

red and white sails were used because it was a disruptive pattern that would be able to easily identify ships at sea.

It was the Romans who had Trojan origins. What the fuck are these people smoking.

WE

Yeah, nah. There are plenty of people around here that go in for quibbling about the identity of ancient peoples of the near east, usually to the tune of "Israelites and especially Jesus weren't Jews but h'white Aryans and Jews were actually smelly Edomites so Christianity isn't a semetic religion okay" or something similar.

WUZ

Get out, and take your wewuz back to Sweden, Sven.

I've never once heard anyone say jesus wasn't jewish or that the israelites weren't jewish.

Literally nobody says this, except retarded nordicists who think everything from mesopotamia to sweden was filled with glorbious 8 foot tall blonde eye and blue haired nordz to compensate for the reality that nords really weren't accomplishing much until introduction to romance culture.

Sure jesus was a jew, but I don't have anything against people for just being ethnicially jewish - especially one that hated the cultish aspects of judaism.

Fuck the zionists and active leftist shills who are trying to break western civilization, though.

Is that why is was universally rejected by the semetic people mr D&C shekelberg?

What makes christianity unique compared to judaism is that it's not ethnically based and there is no "chosen tribe" to inherit the kingdom of heaven. Ergo that's a moronic argument.

Aryans inhabited and settled india. This may be hard for you to grasp but no modern whites are "aryan".

You're obviously fairly new then."Muh synagogue of satan" and "Muh Khazar theory" were going strong nearly every day for months on end when the Christian/Pagan shit was at it's peak. It only died down about two or three months ago.

Ah shit. Yeah, only one person on Holla Forums that uses that term. Stand the fuck by lads, thread is about to get real fucking stupid.

But the Vikings waz kangz.

No, I've been here longer than the vast majority of people on this board. I can guarantee you that.

Sorry. I don't recall any khazars posting, and their children today certaintly aren't christian.

Oh so you really do believe "you wuz kangz"?

I think I found you

In all seriousness I have no issue with nordic nationalism in of itself. Nordicism though, is the equivalent of white niggers larping as pyramid builders and hannibal.

Yeah, going about as I figured with you. If that went over your head that bad, you've certainly been here less than three months, or you'd know that that isn't even close to what I was talking about.

So why did you post a picture of Caligula with coloration common in Northern Europe? You referring so heavily to a (1) poster when there's only one guy that pushes that viewpoint doesn't do any favors to point out that you're likely switching IPs, too. I wouldn't accuse you of that if there weren't only ever two posters in any given thread that use the term "Nordicist" and push this viewpoint. The odds that there would only be two of you and you always show up in the same threads is pretty low, m8, and the more you do it the more obvious it is.