It does rather, it's just not explicitly an accelerationist manifesto (given he's already written one). The point of Left Accelerationism is that you harness technological change rather than just letting it occur on it's own (Right Accelerationism).
Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work
Kayden Harris
Tyler Campbell
Who do you think possibily has control of the superstructure, but does not have control of the base?
To have influence in the superstructure IS having influence at the base
Chase Nelson
Read some Althusser mate.
Carson Smith
I have, not much though. What in particular should I read? Where does he somehow demonstrate that it's possible to remove yourself from material reality and have hegemonic influence of ideas without having any economic or political power? How can this entirely ahistorical unprecedented event possibly happen?
Carter Torres
Reading Capital & On the Materialist Dialectic.
He explains it far better than I could.
Samuel Gutierrez
cont.
But insofar as I'm aware, there's a dialectical relationship between the base and superstructure, rather than a purely determinist one.
Joshua Fisher
Well that there is two way causal influence (absolute butchery of Hegel and Marx both to use the word dialectic to just mean circularly-causal) between base and superstructure is nothing new from Althusser, and doesn't contradict the point made in
Caleb Ward
That's not what I mean here. There was a course on it I took several years ago where the prof made this point, but again I'm not going to be able to express it particularly eloquently if you don't read the book.
Connor Cook
read gramsci
Samuel Perry
Because "Communism" means advancing to Communism. It's a process, not a state.