Not true, h.265 cuts bitrates by 1/3 to 3/4, even at SD sizes .
It's a shame nobody's doing anything with fractal codecs, or even wavelets. Still, I guess H.264/VP9 isn't so bad, compared to audio being stuck with '90s-era MP3 or images with '80s-era JPEG.
Not true, h.265 cuts bitrates by 1/3 to 3/4, even at SD sizes .
It's a shame nobody's doing anything with fractal codecs, or even wavelets. Still, I guess H.264/VP9 isn't so bad, compared to audio being stuck with '90s-era MP3 or images with '80s-era JPEG.
It also cuts gain/detail. If you want transparency without UHD, x264 is still the same or equal.
With a clusterfuck of big media companies behind it, they're probably too busy quarrelling about how to encumber the standard with DRM to actually finish the it.
We heard you the first time
x265 > VP9 > x264 > VP8
But that's only for relatively low bitrates. And both VP9 and x265 have a shit compression:complexity ratio compared to x264.
x264 > x265 > everything else
.t retard
So does 10bit x264.