Again mod abuse

xski is a shit mod tbh

Other urls found in this thread:

justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

based xski pedro BTFO

Whats dost?

13 weeks a bit harsh

read the rules

i was banned on my first post without warning and it wasnt even a dost violation.

...

Whew lad

...

Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.
>justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography

...

Naked child where?
There was no naked child posted, at least not by me and now I highly doubt anyone else posted naked children either.

i don't know what posts are being talked about. i just found it to be relevant information and decided to contribute it to the thread. even if it's not kiddie porn, 8 has that bullshit dost rule that lets them delet whatever they don't like

They deleted my bread where I tried to get some senior citizens to come to Holla Forums. Deleted it before I could kick off the campaign with my nice ad /sadpepe
I think I need to talk to Jim about all this

deleting the tread wasn't good enough tbh. you should have been b&

this board is dead. Why do you care? I shitpost on half chan and quality post here.

context please, what are you trying to tell us with these red lines

GUYS MODS ARE CENSORING LEFTYPOL BO THREADS THIS IS CENSORSHIP

not possible

Now remedy bumplocked a legit thread he doesn't like with 71 replies.
There are some other threads copy-spammed but this is one was clearly the original and original content shouldn't be locked. Mods are out of control again.


go back
>>>/4chan/


13 weeks ban is too much. This is ridiculous. Additionally the ban was unjust because the posted content wasn't dost and 100% legal by US law.

Dysnomia made that a rule
Appeal it then

Thread was dead

Dys doesn't care

He made this rule for real dost spammers. Condition: real dost was posted.

dost see:

see

So the red underlining doesn't make any sense since your only point is that it wasn't dost
I think he will care if your images were perfectly legal, and he will lift the ban.

That doesn't describe dost.. the children don't have to be naked to violate dost.

user, my post here:
was only intended to quote federal law. as you may or may not know, the rules governing this website, including that which is known as DOST, are MORE restrictive than federal law. most things that are legal can be posted here, but not everything that is legal can be posted here.

fucking based! Totally not the name that a faggot out come up with!

...

ok ok you won. if you want to ban each other to death, do it.

what should i care, i can just change my ip with a few clicks anyway. its just if people with good intentions get banned for no reason its not nice but perhaps thats what Holla Forums has tuned into. i from now will keep myself out of it.


i think dysnomia got tired of all of this too.

this is true, and it should be a concern