Hillary Vows to Speak ‘Directly to White People’ to Stop Racial Police Shootings

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton vows she’ll tackle the racism in the nation’s law enforcement system.

Clinton told Harvey that if the African-American community came out and voted for her, she would work to stop racial shootings by police officers.


Clinton was careful to specify that there many “good honorable cool-headed” police officers, citing the ones that successfully apprehended the New York City terrorist suspect in New Jersey on Monday.

But she restated her belief that something had to be done to fix police departments around the country.


archive.is/db6Dx

Other urls found in this thread:

imdb.com/title/tt4866982/
archive.is/in6I3
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

Hillary vows to cough directly on white people.

I have never seen a political campaign go down in such a flaming mess.
This is the Hindenburg of politics.

I have no idea which way is up anymore, the world has been turned on it's head.
What a glorious time to be alive.

She's trying to get the black vote back.
It won't hurt the white people vote, since the whites who vote for her are already cucks who think white people are the worst

this will only force more frustrated white indie voters to lean towards Trump.

Blacks have already abandoned her.

Her campaign slogan is godawful. It's even a chore to pronounce. Did anyone else notice that a couple of days after Trump made that excellent comment about the old slogan that they changed it?

Shame for her that a large chunk of blacks already despise BLM and Trump is taking them, this is only going to worsen things for her.

Exactly.

Perfect. She loses both sides she's trying to appeal to here.

Nigs/BLM/SJWs see this as completely unacceptable pandering to the enemy
White people see this as completely unacceptable and pandering to the enemy

I'm sure I will get called a shill for this but it looks like she is purposefully torpedoing her own campaign.

What is her campaign slogan ?

...

Yes, ever since that photo with a phantom pepe behind her things have been going downhill pretty fast…

...

So many of them are completely oblivious to it too.

Spread 'Color of Crime', it's a very small PDF dealing with the demographic aspects of crime and police handling said crime. It completely BTFOs the 'da poh-leese r riciss' narrative.


It's not pandering, it's telling White people they got privilege and that they suck for being racist. Or that's what I understood at least.

From "I`m with her" to "Stronger together" I believe?

It's groupthink, it's the same thing that lost the Axis the second World War.
The Clinton camp is full of political operatives who are used to working a certain way, leaving room for innovation within their structure but still remaining within it. The triad of state-media-industry has been very sturdy for most of the modern era, and now we have actors in all three entities who effectively openly collaborate on the dissemination of particular narratives.
When the people, who in American society have always had a place to voice their dissent and express their beliefs thanks to 1st amendment rights, begin to take the aggregation of data relating to world events into their own hands, this doesn't threaten the triad (since imageboards and social media are still part of 'the media' conceived broadly, though they resemble something else at times), but it does threaten the positions of these actors.
As we all know, there are reasons for shills to post here. This site is a threat to the power of our elected officials to remain elected, to the power of media moguls to remain relevant in the eyes of their consumer base, and to the ability of oligarchs to hide the fact that they pull strings in our society. Not to mention the Jews.

What
The Axis lost because they ended up fighting every major power in the world

Yes, because those major powers were involved in groupthink.

Yes, and why do you think they did that?
Specifically I mean the Japanese, who lost because nobody in their high command was willing to object to stupid ideas, and when they did they were ignored by the majority, who went ahead with attacking the US and dragging them into the war.
National Socialism involves an element of groupthink, and it was this groupthink that allowed Hitler to be in a position where he could do something stupid like invade Russia when he had victory within his grasp. The entire concept of the Fuhrer involves a man who embodies and acts on the will of his volk, which is hard to separate from groupthink as far as I'm concerned.
Are you implying that groupthink didn't contribute to the loss at all?

You are aware that the USSR would have invaded otherwise and that if it was`t for the early winter they would have claimed Moscow?
Hitler did nothing wrong is more than a meme, it is the absolute truth to which reality must conform to.
KKK
KEK
KKK

So why did he lose the war? Serious question. Was he not trying to win?

What victory? When the invasion started, Russia herself was within weeks of invading the "west". It was a preemptive strike that was delayed by the greece campaign started by italy.

Besides, in german military doctrine, there has for a long time been the focus on "Mission-type tactics", which as I understand it, is telling your officers and leaders what needs to be done while leaving the how and when up to their own judgement.

(checked)
Sabotage as well as fighting the largest powers in the world at the time (which were aiming for war with germany for a long time)

Sick trips, but what this user says

Uncle Adolf was perfect in every way imaginable.

Because there is only so much one country can do against the British commonwealth, endless hordes of Ivans, and a galavanting United States.

Probably the right thread to ask, what is this:

imdb.com/title/tt4866982/
archive.is/in6I3

Exactly, what victory? How was Hitler going to win the war? There's a reason the Axis lost, and it involved the trust the Germans put in Hitler and the Japanese generals who were more concerned with honor than with strategies that would bring them victory. Arguably the Japanese used effective psychological warfare tactics and weren't just committing pointless suicides and wasting airplanes with things like kamikaze attacks, but IIRC they didn't actually do that much damage to the American navy's fighting power and ability to subdue the Empire's Pacific forces.

It had nothing to do with Soviet and American productive capacity being superior and ideological obsession on the part of the Japanese leadership who brought the US into the war.
Which wouldn't have been drawn into the war as easily of not for groupthink.
Hitler was divisive pre-war, Roosevelt couldn't just declare war on Germany willy nilly. The Japs gave him a perfectly good reason to go to war, and Hitler brought them into the European theater.

I just don't believe that any politician or statesman has ever been perfect.

Right, so why bring the US and the Russians in earlier than necessary?

That was an act of desperation, The US was already at war in all but name before Pearl Harbor
The Japs knew if they went after the UK or the Netherlands to secure more oil, it was war with the US, so they hit Pearl Harbor in hopes of buying more time, meanwhile the US knew this and gave them a fat juicy target of non-important ships

Russia who was preparing to declare war on Germany in the near future?

Not at all, Britain was no where near surrendering, especially once US aid picked up and American ships started hunting down u-boats prior to a war declaration

The fuck you talking about? Russia was poised to attack Germany, the assault was much like what happened to France. They assaulted standing armies not built for defence.
U.S. on the other hand, along with U.K., every olive branch was offered that could be. Those two wanted to destroy Germany from the start. The Lusitania was an excuse. One torpedo hit a supposed medical ship, blew up the ammunition it was hauling and sank it.

from the grave???

hillary clinton is -dead-!!!

she's fucking dead, lying in her private crematorium while they clone her sorry ass!

they will soon "revive" her, fresh, and vital as the morning dew, as if nothing ever happened!

and -then- people will know that (((they))) indeed, cloned the last potus!

if that happens, then someone needs to pull that slimy lizard out of her shitskin. i want to hear it squeal…. squuueeeeeaaallll!!!!

Which begs the question, why did they even need to expand after a certain point? What was the end game, and did they seriously think they could achieve it, and did they have good reason to think that, and if the answer to either of those questions is "no" then why did they go through with what they did? Not just in attacking Pearl Harbor but in declaring war on everyone in the Pacific in the first place.
Russia who moved all of its industry eastward as the Germans advanced on its most productive areas, rendering German efforts to cripple the Soviet military ineffective?
Why not try diplomacy with the US? Because of Jews? Surely, a case could have been made to divide the Americans and British.

Funny.

A white woman, not unlike Hillary, very recently shot that poor black boy who dindu nuffin.

Surely she will attempt to throw white women in front a steamroller like other leftists have done recently in favour of their savage rapist wolf whistling nigger pets? I suppose this means Hillary, as a white woman, should just drop the fuck out and let some transnigger abomination who raped a thousand white women and got away due to the cucked courts before one day deciding to put on a dress should be running for president in Hillary's place. No more white people. and that includes you, Hillary.

Didn't they shoot him when he reached into the car? How can he have "his hands in the air" at the same time?

I'm suggesting that the Germans could have defended against a Russian invasion if they'd focused on it. If not, then the claim I'm taking issue with ("Hitler was right is absolutely true") is just not true. He was wrong to think that the German people could achieve their aims. He was wrong to do what he did in the first place.

Not who you're arguing to, but do some more research with regards to the jewish population of the US during the war and what exactly they were doing.

As for Hitler, I think he was right to attack Russia, but he should have simply laid mines and withdrew once he'd crippled their ability to actually strike back… but it wouldn't have meant anything in the long run given that the Manhattan project would have finished anyway.

He used his prehensile foot

Right, so he wasn't a perfect leader who did everything right.

They were already stuck in a war with China, the US embargo was fatal to Japan's ability to wage a war, not to mention the transfers of heavy weaponry to the Chinese

To get a better bargaining positioning, they thought if they could secure a better pacific position then approach the peace table

And? how does that relate to point that the Soviets were adopting forward positions and constructing airfields on a mass level


FDR and his advisers were hellbent on war with the Axis, the only way to really prevent that would be to replace FDR in '36

Hillary is going to lose the woman vote once we meme the female officer and women find out the one who shot that nigger is a strong white woman who made it in the patriarchal police.

You look at the polls, women hate niggers.

Please state in a clear manner, in the context of the evolving situations of the time and without foreknowledge of the future, what the fuhrer of a country that the juden as a race declared war on was supposed to do at the major turning points of these events.
Bear in mind that Hollywood, all of the banks and banking families, the elite of the U.S. and the likes pulled every string ever to gain support in destroying him.

In my eyes he was right in every decision he made, given what was known to him.

I never said he was - he lost, after all, and made a few boneheaded decisions. He was still an excellent leader and incredibly charismatic, and if it wasn't for the failure of whites in the US/UK to see what was happening he'd be universally regarded as a hero in the various white ethnostates.

How does it not? The Germans failed to effectively reduce the Soviets' ability to build planes, tanks, and guns. Less of those, fewer forward positions.

Hillary starts the morning with some more politically-correct race-baiting served up on a platter ignorance about the facts.


Race-baiting.

Even normal black people are tired of it.

By those standards Hillary has done nothing wrong with her emails.

Then I'm not really sure why you're taking issue with my core argument, which is that one of the reasons the Axis lost the war was failures among leadership. I'm specifically responding to a turboautist NatSoc shitposter who said that Hitler did nothing wrong and is absolute truth. Charismatic, sure, his policies did good things for the German economy, but he failed. If he hadn't, there wouldn't be a refugee influx in Europe today.

The German aims were to regain German land and people from Poland and reduce Poland back to a non-power, then presumably to invade the USSR and deal with Communism. These were entirely attainable goals but for the meddling of certain countries doing the bidding of Jews.

No, Hillary knowingly broke the law for personal gain.

uwotm8?

Nice dubs.
Still does not change the fact that uncle Adolf never did anything wrong. Everyone of his actions was divine.

Like halting the army at Dunkirk?
Or bombing London?

sage for off-topic

You have to go back.

Or the Holocaust not happening.

Hillary, and the entire Democratic party at that, have openly declared themselves the party of niggers, illegal beaners, Muslims, kikes, communists and America-hating smug fucks.

I have no interest whatsoever in anything she has to say to White people. She turned her back on us a long fucking time ago.

there's definitely a mole in the dem operation.

who knew?

...

Holy shit. Is she seriously implying that cops shoot dindus because white people want them to? I mean, I do, but only if they're criminals.

Why.

It sounds like the DNC might be doing this on purpose to forcibly remove her (she’ll pitch a fucking fit) and put up Biden as the “at least he’s not the sickly, insane, campaign destroying bitch, right?” candidate.

But they're all criminals.

Watching the Democratic National Convention is what convinced me they had no real plan to fight Trump.

Did we ever hear anything else about the nigger who was forced to say he had HIV? Were they effective in silencing him or did he ever leak that he was told to say it?

So they are going to berate whites because nigs chimp out when a dindu does nuffin? Hillary's campaign is so out of touch it is hilarious. Trump's popularity shows that whites are finally getting tired of being held at fault for all the failings of the lesser races.

No idea.

There are several nuances to this, but yeah niggers either won't care or just get mad at it because its not catering enough to them.

The USA was already in the war. They just had not formally declared it yet.

Or without aid to Soviets from Brits and Americans. Something like 40% of Soviet tanks came from Britain iirc.

Once again, I have failed.

This simply isn't the case. Germany had a very limited time frame to achieve autarky, since the other powers were at the time working to isolate and encircle Germany while increasing productive capacity (which was higher than Germany could hope to achieve). They would have ended up like North Korea at best.

The only time White people exist are when they want to scold us. Otherwise it's a social construct and didn't you know the Irish weren't considered white at one time :^)?

At best.

It's more likely the Russians would have simply expended more lives in the war and still won.

Even the normies will smell the bullshit. Christ she just keeps dropping voters lately.

...

...

You are probably Dutch, living in the Hague and I might be in the same class as you.
Long live Bas van Gool. You know who I am, i'll unmask you later.

l think Jeb's was the Twin Towers of politics if Clinton's is the Hindenburg

Jebs campaign was literally this:

Heinz Guderian informed Hitler that the USSR should have a maximum of 10'000 tanks and that the war would be over before Christmas. In reality they were facing double that amount in heavily armored vehicles such as KV's and T34's which counterattacked in the first winter and fucked everything up from then on. Hitler later said that if he had better Intel from his Generals that he would have reconsidered the operation. Normies nowadays parrot the same shit such as "Durrr if only he listened to his generalls :DDDD" and guess what it's all bullshit. He did nothing wrong.

#I'mWithHer is the most narcissistic shit ever and I don't know how the Democrats could even think it was good to begin with.

The Demoshits are going to lose hard this election because they took it for granted. Hillary hasn't done any campaigning or rallies and the majority of their propaganda for her just boils down to "She's a woman so vote for her".

Is this bitch stupid?

No seriously, is she stupid?

Blacks are what, 10% of the population? at best?

And she's going to talk shit about the majority?

Seriously?

>BREAKING: Speaking to gullible blacks, Clinton vows to confront the shadowy cabal of White People with whom she is in no way associated with irrefutable evidence of their thought crimes!

Can slick willy slip through a noose?