Jew Doctors Get Paid to Endorse Sugar

Big Sugar Paid Harvard to Say that Sugar is Healthful
by Dr. Gabe Mirkin

drmirkin.com/nutrition/big-sugar-paid-harvard-to-say-that-sugar-is-healthful.html

My faith in several of my Harvard mentors during the 1950s and 1960s has been shattered by an article that appeared this week in JAMA Internal Medicine (September 12, 2016). Cristin E. Kearns, a postdoctoral fellow at UCSF, discovered letters in the archives at Harvard, the University of Illinois and other libraries showing that from the 1960s onward, the sugar industry paid respected researchers at Harvard to write that sugar is not harmful. This incredibly-well-documented research took many hours of sorting through old letters and memos to prove that the sugar industry paid for Harvard's support. To this day, North Americans are fatter and at increased risk for diabetes, heart attacks and some cancers, in part due to recommendations paid for by the sugar industry through research grants to Harvard and other universities.

The Bombshell Showing Collusion between Big Sugar and Harvard
In the 1940s, Fred Stare, chairman of nutrition at Harvard's School of Public Health, began soliciting food companies to donate unrestricted funds for research and education.

In the early 1950s a noted researcher at the University of Minnesota, Ancel Keys blamed saturated fat and dietary cholesterol for the ever increasing rate of heart attacks, obesity and diabetes in North America, while John Yudkin at Cambridge University in England published extensively that sugar, not saturated fats and cholesterol, was responsible for this epidemic. Researchers from other universities, including Harvard, took up the debate and the war between the two factions continued for decades. Now we learn that the debate was fueled with payments to researchers by the sugar industry to prove that Yudkin was wrong. Yudkin died in 1995, still considered by many people to be a quack. The JAMA article, which was reported on the front page of the New York Times (September 12, 2016), shows that Yudkin was on the right side all along.

Dr. Kearns discovered that in 1965, John Hickson of the Sugar Research Foundation (now the Sugar Association) wrote to Harvard researchers asking them to write an article showing that sugar was safe and healthful. He paid them $6500 and asked them to review only the research papers favorable to the sugar industry. Harvard's Dr. Mark Hegsted wrote to Hickson, "We are well aware of your particular interest . . . and will cover this as well as we can." As the Harvard researchers wrote their review of the causes of diabetes and heart attacks, they sent each draft to Hickson, who responded, "Let me assure you this is quite what we had in mind, and we look forward to its appearance in print." Dr. Hegsted and Dr. Stare submitted their paper to one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world, stating that the data implicating sugar as a cause of heart attacks was extremely weak and that saturated fat and cholesterol were the actual causes (N Engl J Med, 1967 Jul 27;277(4):186-92). They wrote, "Sugar does not have a unique role in heart disease," even though they had previously published articles associating both fat and sugar with increased risk for heart attacks. Nowhere in the article did they reveal that they were paid by the Sugar Research Foundation. The New England Journal of Medicine did not begin to require financial disclosures until 1984.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/bQ8fY
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

This paper and others, produced by these prestigious and respected Harvard scientists under the influence and funding of the sugar industry, had an incredible influence on the entire academic community and the general public. Dr. Hegstead was appointed head of nutrition at the United States Department of Agriculture and in 1977, he and Fred Stare helped to draft the forerunner of the federal government's dietary guidelines, which blamed saturated fat and cholesterol, but not sugar, for the increasing epidemic of overweight, diabetes and heart attacks. Popular books touting low-fat diets became best sellers and thousands of low-fat food products flooded the supermarkets, often with sugar and white flour as their primary ingredients.

I Was Suckered In Too
In 1976, I asked Dr. Stare, who was a personal friend, to write the introduction to my Sportsmedicine Book. It had a section specifically stating that eating too much sugar in foods and drinks is harmful and a probable cause of obesity and heart attacks. Dr. Stare sent me a note telling me that, as an academic, he could not endorse popular books. Now I can see that his real reason was that I disagreed with Harvard's well-funded position on sugar.

I remember being a guest on Elizabeth Whelan's radio show while I was promoting my book. When I told her that sugar is harmful, she excoriated me for not knowing that sugar is harmless because it is a natural fuel for all cells in our bodies. (Whelan was a member of Harvard's Department of Nutrition and a cofounder, with Dr. Stare, of the American Council of Science and Health (ACSH). In 1980, ACSH sought major funding from Philip Morris Cigarettes and Dr. Stare assured them that "it would be to Phillip Morris's benefit").

Worse, like most doctors in the United States, I came to believe that fat was the primary culprit in the obesity epidemic and told my patients to follow a low-fat diet. In 1993, my wife, Diana, and I wrote Fat Free, Flavor Full, our first of several popular books based on restricting fat. At least we did advocate limiting sugar and other refined carbohydrates too. Now I cringe when I remember that I encouraged people to restrict the healthful fats found in plants such as avocados, nuts, olives and coconuts. Today I tell everyone that they should include these fats even if they are trying to lose weight.

The Food Industry is Still Trying to Influence Research
In an editorial accompanying Dr. Kearns' article (JAMA Internal Medicine, September 12, 2016), Marion Nestle wrote that even today, food companies continue to manipulate public opinion about foods. Dr. Nestle is professor of nutrition at New York University and Cornell who has written widely on the subject. She says, "It is almost impossible to keep up with the range of food companies sponsoring research." Last year, an article in The New York Times revealed that Coca-Cola, the world’s largest producer of sugary beverages, has provided millions of dollars in funding to researchers who sought to downplay the link between sugary drinks and obesity. Respected researchers were paid to say that lack of exercise, rather than sugar, is the main cause of obesity, diabetes and heart attacks. Most research shows otherwise. See my article on Industry Sponsored Research.

My Recommendations
Almost all scientific journals now require authors to reveal their sources of funding, so you can check to see who may be influencing the authors' opinions. The bottom line for all businesses is profit, so be skeptical of claims that any one food is more healthful than others.

Even though the explanations have changed as new research came along, my healthful lifestyle recommendations still remain basically the same:
• Base your diet on plenty of vegetables, fruits, nuts, beans, whole grains and other seeds
• Restrict meat from mammals, processed meats, all sugared drinks including fruit juices, sugar-added foods and fried foods
• Try to exercise every day
• Avoid being overweight, particularly if you store extra fat primarily in your belly
• If you are overweight or have high blood sugar levels, severely restrict all refined carbohydrates such as most dry breakfast cereals, bread and other bakery products, pasta, pretzels, chips and so forth
• Avoid smoking and recreational drugs
• Restrict or avoid alcohol

Also, archive.is was not responding, so that's why there's no archive link.

They continue in promoting obesity.

If you want to dig deeper on how fucked and tampered the research was, read Gary Taubes' book "Good Calories, Bad Calories."

It's long, but it's shocking how government policy and academics all conspired to make America a nation of retarded fat fucks.

Dude was writing about this shit years ago.

I don't believe you so I did it for you: archive.is/bQ8fY

It's working for me now, but it wasn't before, bud.

Of course

:^)

Taubes is an idiot and a kike. Don't read his drivel.

Yep.

None of the the people in your image appear to be Jewish, don't spread misinformation OP.

& None of the them will serve any time in prison for this…

Thanks to Daily Stormer for writing about this

$0.25 has been deposited into your account.

It's a lot better than high fructose corn syrup.

Just like fluoride is better than cyanide, right?

Bump.

Bump.

Capitalism wins again.

s-surely scientists always tell the truth, and this is merely an outlier, I mean think of the climate ho… change

No evidence they're jews except maybe for one, this one:


That name sounds jewish – but it's OP's article denouncing the doctors who were paid by the Sugar industry.

OP is a retard. And there's already a thread about this news here

OP is a faggot who doesn't take the time to check the catalog and he doesn't provide evidence that the corrupt doctors were specifically jewish.

SAGE

There's already a thread here:

Can you explain how you discovered that John Hickson, Mark Hegsted and Fred Stare were jews?

Or did you just wanted to start a slide thread to try to spread disinformation?

>Ancel Keys blamed saturated fat and dietary cholesterol for the ever increasing rate of heart attacks, obesity and diabetes in North America, while John Yudkin at Cambridge University in England published extensively that sugar, not saturated fats and cholesterol, was responsible for this epidemic.

So in this case the 'aryan' guy – Keys – was wrong and the jewish one – Yudkin – was right?

OP bumping his own stupid thread.

Who benefits from Holla Forumsacks mistakenly calling goyim jews?

It's like how Hitler thought Charlie Chaplin was a jew, it just makes people who already didn't like him think he's some kind of idiot.


I thought Mirkin was Dutch or something but I looked it up and apparently it's slavic. None of the 3 people with that name are categorized as Jews on Wikipedia, one of them, David Mirkin, has this:
Also:


So… possibly a Jewish name but not definitively.

Just because someone doesn't have a Jewish name doesn't mean they're not Jewish. The pattern I was referring to was the frog lips (mostly). Does anyone here honestly not think that at the very least Hickson and Hegsted look Jewish?


I understand that Yudkin was Jewish, but Keys also looks somewhat Jewish (see pic related). The corrpution - not the individual doctor's findings - is what matters here.


I was only bumping the thread to tickle those who I replied to.

Perhaps if you want to show everyone how retarded I am, you could stop saging the thread so others see it.

...

wtf im glucose now

wow I support chemical sweeteners now thanks op

Yes, go-guys, vegetable oils and healthy whole grains, that's the answer to your health problem. Also, you should try one of the 10 new flavors of Oreos!

Hickson is too blurry and it could just be an underbite or something. Hegsted, no not really. Trying to figure out if someone is Jewish based solely on physical appearance is a crapshoot. Yes there are a lot obvious cases, but generally if someone doesn't admit they are a Jewish and there is otherwise no proof then it's better to err on the side of caution. Otherwise you'd end up with a lot of false positives (A lot of time, people are just ugly) and false negatives: race mixing and 100% genetically goy converts to judaism mess things up. I would never guess that Lenin for example was a Jew based on appearance alone, he was only 1/4 and likely didn't even realize it himself, so it really was (((coincidental))) in his case.

>Just because someone doesn't have a Jewish name doesn't mean they're not Jewish. The pattern I was referring to was the frog lips (mostly).


WEW that's some solid evidence you got there


No, I don't think they look jewish but what I think isn't important because we're just speculating. It was YOUR responsability to discover evidence that they were before you call them jews and start a stupid thread about it when there's already a thread about the same subject. You can't understand that? Is it too complicated for you?

>The corrpution - not the individual doctor's findings - is what matters here.

Then you should have posted your speculation in the other thread – with a "sage" in the Email field – instead of starting a new thread that puts the emphasis on your speculation based on your Expert analysis of lips instead of the real news story that people should focus on.

>Perhaps if you want to show everyone how retarded I am, you could stop saging the thread so others see it.

Why? You're anonymous, I'm anonymous, it doesn't matter. Just stop making stupid threads and stop thinking you're an expert at identifying jews just because you have an obsession about lips.