In your perfect world, all women

In your perfect world, all women…

Other urls found in this thread:

instagram.com/ohgeelizzyp/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Are 2D.

die

How?

Have penises.

Have a soul. Also, they're all petite, mousey black girls like pic related.

Are smart enough to not welcome any refugees.
Are smart enough to not be feminists.
Are smart enough so you can have conversation with them without having to bash your head against the wall.
Look like this +10lbs, where as 3lbs go directly into the tits.

Have invented a machine to make me 10 years old again, and are all pedophiles

...

This one has to be fed properly.

Are 16 y olds with armpit hair and high libidos.

I always enjoy it when a 15-16year old looks at my funny or winks while being next to mommy or daddy, esp. daddy

…are beautiful, intelligent, and submissive.

fpbp

Right?

Huh?

Are systematically eaten once they reach ten years of age, unless they give birth before then.

Maybe when they have 15-20? You know muscle mass and these things.

Have puffy innie pussies.

example?

...

Are smug 2D Lolis.


Patrician tastes, user.

would be gassed

kys


perfect

This bitch isn't that attractive something is off probably that she is a soulless narcissist


I think you should kys you lame ass motherfucker

...

kys

No, they get far too stringy by then, and I want to make love to them while they're 5-8 years old. by the time they're 15-16, they turn evil.

Yes she isnt attractive, she only has perfectly shaped natural tripple D tits on a perfect body.

Would love to suck/get sucked by women. Just imagine how get it would be to hear her moans while her cock cums.

-5'4 is considered tall for women with 5'1 being considered average (average height for men is still like 6'1, I just find tall lanky girls unattractive and am aroused by gender dimorphism and dramatic height differences.)
-Their skin is much more elastic and resilient, allowing women to undergo physical transformations like men do without ruining their breasts or getting covered in stretch marks.
-All extremely horny but unwilling to participate in any sexual activity at all before marriage. They're all good girls.
-Polygamy is culturally and socially acceptable, and instead wives express opinions on who they want or do not want to join the family as an additional wife.
-No mind games.
-A wide variety of body types, from petite to curvy, but predominantly busty with light skin.
-Unflinchingly loyal to their mates and family, never play mind games, always say exactly what they're thinking and feeling.
-Every single one loves to cook, be shown off like a trophy and suck dick.

/thread

This, 3DPD where a mistake by mankind.

Actually mens skin is less elastic than female skin.

Really? Then how come I know so many dudes who went from like 300 pounds to 195 and buff without a stretch mark, but I meet a girl with awesome tits who loses five pounds and suddenly she's covered head to toe in stretch marks and her tits look like deflated balloons?

weigh less than 100 lbs

lack of collagen, user.

Is this a retard question or a serious one?
Most dudes that go from skinny to buff are covered in stretchmarks whereas a boobanimal can get pregnant and have little strechmarks while the increase in size of a belly due to pregnancy is much greater than the increase in size of your biceps or your shoulder.

I'm not even talking about pregnancy, of course that would have the most dramatic effect.

I'm talking about like, for example I knew a girl through middle school, she was fairly overweight. When she came back during high school she'd lost some weight and looked skinny and as a result got more confident. One thing lead to another, and I saw her naked, and I mean she was a sweet girl so I didn't insult her or whatever, but it was probably all over my face that I was like "16 year old girls can have stretch marks and floppy little tits?!" and this isn't an isolated incident.

I know tons and tons of girls who lose a tiny bit of weight and suddenly their tits are destroyed and they're covered in stretch marks, and tons of dudes who went from flabby to buff and don't have any stretch marks. I'm talking about the dramatic nature by comparison of the changes in body size.

better avoid Murica

The stretch marks were there before, but once the tits get deflated they stick out more, that would be my explanation for your observation.
Teengirls shouldnt go through radical diets, they should lose weight slowly. I would even argue that chubby girls in their puberty will develop bigger boobs and then if they are in their twenties once the hormone levels are more stable they can lose it slowly, which would result in bigger tits than their peers.

This really, just transplant real female consciousness into a computer with a 2D avatar. once you cut out the hormones and can satisfy their wildest greed with the click of a button, then they are probably good enough until we can make an AI that is better.

well that is just speculation, but maybe some of them.

Yes i assume the nerdy girls imagine that a nerdy boy plays vidya with them on a console. While he is in boxers and she also wears really skimpy but casual dress suddenly a wild boner appears. While the game emerges she would then slightly punch his shoulder and while she is doing that she will notice the boner. He will then get a little red in his face, acting like nothing happened. Suddenly filled with female lust aswell, she would then try to punch his thights, a little bit closer to the boner to gap the distance. He would just laugh about it, a couple of minutes later she would again punch his thights, he will also then react to it with a slight punch an her shoulder. They go back playing the vidya game, but she then would suddenly slap his still errect dick with the tip of her fingers signaling that she didnt ignore the boner and wants it inside her…

this

Would be pretty and suck my dick.

what in the fuck are you talking about m8?

thread is about a perfect world. i am a burger, so it's hard finding an attractive girl

and what are you? A huge loser that sucks so hard at everything he can't even love himself?

Want to have sex with me and I would rejecet them every day until the mosts attractive ones ask me out.

Oi, in my corner of burgerstan, we have plenty of attractive women. Problem is they get impregnated by 15 y/o chads before I can even legally have a go at 'em.

… would be dependent on diapers, and would wear them openly at all times. And would perhaps require assistance for diaper changes.

Live in Liechtenstein.

Would have no rights at all, akin to being perpetually children. Giving women any of the rights that men have has be more than disastrous.

Women should not be allowed to:
Vote, own property, own any assets, open bank or credit accounts, sign contracts, consent to medical procedures for themselves or anyone else, hold power of attorney, inherit, have a job, posess a degree, any education beyond high school.

In this perfect world, women would be the property of thier fathers, or in the absence of a father (which wouldn't really happen in this world), eldest brother, until such time as she is of age (first period) or marriage.

Marriage should be polygamist in nature, a man posessing as many wives as he can support. "Rape", which isn't actually a crime, would disappear. So would a great number of other "crimes", too many to go into right now.

kek

and have a dick

A fatal flaw there: if powerful men monopolized this resource, you'd have a ton of disgruntled lone young men, vulnerable to destructive ideologies. Just look at the Middle East.

The attraction to awkward, floppy cocks is just beyond my comprehension

It's a patrician fetish for the most intelligent of us, much like how Rick and Morty requires immense intellect to fully appreciate.

well played.

Instead of a polygamy, woman as they reach the age of marriage, would be auctioned. Those that are not sold will be thrown out (killed). A man could have one at time. If he has already one, he must throw her away. Auctions would be local.

have no rights.

Are Asians

would have common sense.

All women are objects and hold no power.

You expect too much

...

…would be required to suck my dick on their 18th birthay.

Who are out in public without a man are fair game for rape.

Or at least know how to read maps.
What the fuck.

Hardly fatal. Mankind has operated for 10's of thousands of years exactly this way. We're still here. And who gaf about the mudshits tbh?

… would be different, because a utopia with identical people is boring.

Would have rights just like men.

Would have sheathable teeth or claws in their vaginas, so rape didn't happen. Involuntary response, so there isn't any debate about whether it was rape or not.

There'd be no SJW, no Holla Forumstards, no consumerist bimbos and chads, and no authoritarian "conservatives". But a nice array of different lifestyles and preferences.

Would have alternate modes, and so would men. Women would turn into bikes, planes or birds.

Sex would be simple. People wear armbands which signal if they're taken, available, polyamorous or asexual. There'd also be an armband for "available but not now". Poly would be the norm. And no fucking around. Yes means yes and no means no. It's not taken as creepy to ask someone if they wanna fuck (even if you ask a few times with delay), but men don't pester or pressure or attack women who say no.So you just ask someone if they fancy a fuck, or a relationship. Or get a computer to hook you up for one-night stands. People would just post on their Facebook, "I'm horny, who wants to fuck today". Except there wouldn't be Facebook, there'd be something that's just peer-to-peer and open source instead.

Poly would be normal.

Public nudity would be normal.

Jerking off in public would be normal.

Sex in public would be normal.

Every building would have a "sex room".

Some women would have wings, like angels. Some would have three tits. Some would have natural red or blue skin. Some would have head tentacles like Twi'leks. Some would have natural hair in all colours - pink, blue, purple, green, etc.

Making porn (pics at least) would be voluntary but seen as a public service, and most women would do it.

Nobody would get slut-shamed. Because that discourages women from fucking.

People can choose their appearance with self genetic surgery or prosthetics or self-liposuction. Either women would stay young-looking forever, or men would become attracted to women whatever they look like - so there isn't sexual competition/scarcity.

Sex would be disconnected from emotional security and material support, like with the Nayar. People would have relatives, commune-mates or affines who would provide emotional support and who you'd provide support to, but who you wouldn't necessarily be fucking. Hence no Overly Attached Girlfriends and no creepy stalker guys.

Neither men nor women have 'rights'. It's a fallacy that has been abused simply to further the interests of the wealthy. What God Himself gave you is yours everything else is a lie.
gtfo.

Maps to nearest work camps

Good Lord, you are degenerate.
Do everyone a favor and do NOT reproduce.

LMAO triggered

Enjoy dating your hand, Holla Forumstard

inb4 you get banned for saying that

oh my fucking god! I was really banned just for saying something. Where the fuck are we? North Korea? I demand talking with Dysnomia right now

...

…want to serve me

That's a jewess.

If you were to fuck or kill her, what gas would you choose?

nice try, schlomo

...

First mentally but second physcially.

GTFO, cuck. Also, you may want to consider suicide.

…would be dead.

Same, tbh

How would they be killed?

your point?

Basically muslim rules without the muslims. Fuck muslims, but they know how to treat women i.e like cattle.

The one that makes people skin melt off then they are alive and slowly die. Is that mustard gas?

burqas?

I'm not against it.

You'd end up with a shitty kebab-like society.

It would be called chairisity, it means your fat mother that was sitting on a chair for too long.

Should get diability checks for having extremely large tits.

instagram.com/ohgeelizzyp/

user, are you insane? Squashing all of the women of the world into an area as small as Liechtenstein would allow their screeching to physically move the earth due to the amplified sound waves. Do you want to kill us all???

I pray for death every single day.

OK
I'd allow it if they're a business owner or inherited it.
Well that's bullshit
Why not? Let 'em earn their money if they want it
You should ban pretty much 2/3rds of the population from being able to do this, tbh fam. Fuck the US government and its popularization of quick loans.
Contracts already require a third party present, just make that requirement more stringent.
You're just asking for mass deaths of women, aren't you, faggot?
Sure they should if granted to them initially
Fuck you
Fuck you again, just get rid of discrimination laws/affirmative action
Fuck you a third time, there are good female scientists/engineers and you're a fucking idiot
Why stop there when you're already a massive fucking faggot?

Weak willed faggots like you are why we are in suck a mess now. Off with your fuckin head.

Women shouldn't have any right. Everything went to shit as soon as they got the vote. Fuck you.

...

...

Have sex with me

You are shit

opps because of race and special girlfriends

Pick one

ITT:


Variety is the spice of life lads

Goes on beach naked

In my perfect world, all women stop aging mentally at 10-12 years old and physically at around 15.

Women stop aging mentally at 5, user.

…go to a vet instead of a human doctor.

this user gets it.

This but they are also gently dominant :3

are sexy BBWs or average girls, or full package futanari

…produce our mikl instead of cows

can't deny that's a good body, but jew women don't age well at all (typically)

...

cleaners for woman

Robot Whores

The only thing I'm not sure of is if perhaps, since we have artificial wombs, we can simply breed an excess of women, and thus allow men to claim more than one throughout their lives. This would be better in many ways, especially since excess women can be used for work, but taking care of little girls costs money, even though these little girls would be trained to work from quite an early age.

That first pic really makes me think. All of those lines represent my gf perfectly. Except the pic isn't of a fat slob that I can't convince myself to be attracted to, despite the fact that it's the only vagina-haver I've ever met that doesn't actively hate me.

would be younger than 12

...

Does that mean that would apply to that scenario?

Then she should be killed quickly

You really think the the reason why the Middle East is so fucked up is because men aren't getting any pussy, not because they're inbred shitskins anyway?

It certainly doesn't help. Hence they'll blow themselves up for the promise of virgins, because they're all virgins themselves. Their repression is also why they come here and then become rape machines, because they're so overstimulated by seeing an ankle or whatever that they go berserk.

Genetically inferior spotted

gay

…can wear only black or white tops, black leggings, black bras, white panties, black or white skirts or dresses, silver jewelry. Everything else is forbidden.

Define slut wear

...

I'm this guy.


I don't understand you misogynist jerks who want to fuck women but obviously hate them. Why do you still want to fuck them then? Wanting women to be slaves, cattle, or a lot stupider than you - there wouldn't be a relationship there, you wouldn't be getting any feedback from them, you might as well just be fapping.

And what's with wanting to fuck women, wanting them sexually available, but also wanting them to be prudes and virgins?

To the people who want to kill women instead - who do you plan to fuck then? Men? Kids? Sheep?

I wanna fuck women. I wanna fuck women who wanna fuck me. I wanna enjoy it, and I want them to enjoy it. I wanna lose myself in the moment of shared intense explosive ecstasy. Is that too scary for you guys? You too pussy to let your armor down for a moment, in case it makes you vulnerable?

too old

weeb shit

stinky nigger

too old

too old

too old

too old

too old

too old

no face

too ugly and too old

too old

nigger and trash

sick fetish

sick fetish

too old, no face, too old, no face

fake tits, weeb shit and trash

people in this thread have no idea of perfect woman

Suck a dick ;-)

go back to reddit

It's instinct. It feels good.

We would like a world where women aren't horrible and thus would give us incentive to fuck them beyond mere physical pleasure. Ideally, they'd be good people who we would want to give pleasure to. Unfortunately, we do not live in that world. We live in a world where women are encouraged to be selfish, unempathetic succubi. And this results in some people here not even being able to imagine women being good people, and thus simply wishing death upon them instead.

You answered this yourself.
This requires that women actually wanna fuck you and not cuck you. But in modern society, telling a woman that it's not nice to be fucking more than one dude at a time, or to ride the cock carousel until they need money and decide to finally "settle down" with some loser whose youth they ruined by ignoring him at best, scorning him at worst, well that's just being a "prude."

you are right

...

...

Lots of women are cunts. Lots of men are cunts. Modern society makes everyone selfish, unempathetic cunts. You realise women on SJW sites are saying just the same shit about men? "I just want men to be good people I'd want to give pleasure to, but instead they're selfish, unempathetic abusers who cheat on you and won't do the housework and this means #killallmen" It's an exact fucking mirror image, and nobody's getting any sex from it.


Why shouldn't women fuck more than one dude? Men want to fuck more than one chick. Separate sex from relationships and both get a lot easier.

Girls are fit with a lie detector chip inside their brains at birth. These chips will classify these lies in Green, Blue, Orange, and Red and will send small, medium, large or deadly shocks to their bodies. Green are white lies like did you brush your teeth before bed or did you eat that cookie and a very small jolt will follow. Blue is a bit of a step up from Green and is relative to minute lies such as did you steal my jeans or did you use my lip gloss and a bigger jolt will follow. Orange is quite a ways away from Blue and the lies usually consists of did you fuck my boyfriend or did you fuck another guy that isn't your boyfriend and a large shock will follow. Red is the absolute worst one you can commit and those lies center around absolutely foul shit such as is that baby your boyfriend's/husband's and does he know it isn't but you are still milking him financially or did that guy actually rape you with some form of genital penetration (or unwanted fingers/hands) or did he just verbally disagree with you and a shock so large that it will kill you will follow; there are no second chances for this offence.

All women have their rights stripped and are banned from owning businesses that they or their kin haven't created themselves and even then aren't allowed to run the business by themselves. They are also socially considered less than human and will only be permitted to have sex with whatever ONE man she chooses (if he accepts) and however many men her owner chooses. They will be dismissed in all forms of government and judiciary positions and will have their right to vote revoked (as previously stated). They will only be permitted to have jobs that their owners allow and will not earn money for their "services". All fourth born daughters and beyond are to be detained until the parents conceive a son and one daughter will be returned upon each birthed son. If the mother or father are incapable of producing another offspring, the detained daughter(s) will be killed. All women's education will be comparable to that of inner-city minorities and all men's education will be of the highest quality. Women who are of university age will have to have an IQ of at least 115 to enter and must retake an IQ test every year, if her IQ does not rise by at least 8 points in 4 years she will be killed. A woman cannot enjoy anything man-made that she doesn't absolutely need (comic books, television, video games, movies etc.) unless she takes a "true feelings" test that determines whether or not she is a genuine "geek girl" or just adores the medium. Women must also ask permission of the oldest or most influential male present at the time to leave the house and must be accompanied by said male. If said male tries to "liberate" said female, he will be killed on the spot via his "nut tracker" embedded in his scrotum at birth as will she. If a woman gets married, she is not allowed to refuse sex unless she is pregnant and is in her second trimester (if she is lying it falls under blue, the man will notice and is permitted to have his way with her). Incest will not be tolerated if the husband or boyfriend is still around, the boy in question is under 15, if the woman gets pregnant or if there is another girl involved with the woman alone. All fatties will be put into a program that helps them lose weight and develop better habits; for women the optimal weight is below 175 and for men the optimal BMI is below 15.

Blond Asians…

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

have vaginas

They are both degenerate. Sex is for babies. However, even considering this, men should be able to have more than one mate because they can have more than one baby at a time. Go back to school you degenerate autist

...

HAHAHAHAHAHA

What fucking century are you from?!

Fuck off to Saudi Arabia with that shit.

wew lad

...

It's not, because they can't point to actual legislation and policies. The fact of the matter is that men have always been and continue to be treated as disposable. Nobody, women or men, is encouraged to feel empathy for men, but of course women are double discouraged to feel empathy for men because grrl power and men are pigs and oppressors.

I only want to be treated like an equal, but there are actual laws on the books, not to mention policies from every major institution, from schools to workplaces to charities, that actively treat men as second class citizens. Of course this is related to unlegislated treatment as well, with studies showing that even babies suffer from this, with the cries of male babies being ignored for significantly longer than the cries of female babies. I could cite many more examples, and you know I can. I'm not only saying women are cunts, I'm saying women are actively encouraged, by actual on the books laws and policies, to be cunts, and to disregard the lives, let alone the feelings, of men.

I can sympathise with this, but I personally do not want to fuck more than one chick, if only I could find one. But then I guess you could say part of this comes down to how sexual relationships between men and women work, with men having to do all the work and take all the risk and be rejected over and over, while women just sit there and reject people until they feel like saying yes. Why would I want to play that game? If I could find one woman to have an actual relationship with, then I'd be done. I'd never want to return to the shit I'd have to do before. And yes, I'd want the woman to be a virgin partially because I'd be jealous of how easy she had it. If I was chad thundercock getting all the chicks, maybe I'd feel differently. But even mean, dumb, fat, ugly girls can get laid easier than chad thundercock. Even they still have men asking them out so much that they have the nerve to complain about it. Maybe if things worked more equitably I'd care less about the promiscuity of my partner, but even then, I don't think I wouldn't care at all. Call me a sucker for romance I guess.

Do you know what makes you valuable, despite being chad or a beta or an omega. It is a certain value other people give to you, a certain non jewed expertise or knowlege.
Shit on this empathy for men thing, it carries some water but yet is merely a coping mechanism for this fucked up society in essence, to the bottom. They advocate that so they can shape you into "refugees welcome" (and i hate those people and once the times comes i flip the switch).

The value you have is through skill not through idiotic ideology. And if you just want a GF she will know when other guys ask you for something and that will gives you value not feminsm or the new age shit. Remember that.

Men have to work for their value. Their value extends only to how well they can serve women. Women are given automatic value just for existing. This is reflected in actual on the books legislation that openly discriminates against males. Your post is what is only ideology. I am pointing out legislated fact.

Well legislation is mostly pragmatic these days, that is why the state until recent years choose so that you pay alimoney for kids that were verifiablely not yours.
Why? Because 1. men today are fucking idiots (that is why they let jamal in), speaking in memetic terms.
2. Society as a vector sees that as a benefit until the secondary effects get a grip on it, but to put it blunt, they dont see it until well what you see today.

It has nothing to do with "these days." This is how things have always been.

You have to imagine it this way:
Imagine the bongalows with that hanging pearls that seperate the kitchen from the living room, in my case the pearls are cards, and in this image i m hannibal lecter and they are the happy little nodding horses that bring me my breastfast through that semipermeabel door of cards.

Oh well if you put it that way. How could I not understand it earlier?

Well you should have listened.

Agreed. I think those militant 3rd wave feminists are disgusting, abhorrent cunts so I sure as fuck am not going to join the male counterpart to that shitshow. There are some amazing fucking ladies out there.

Where are the males who legislate open discrimination against women? I don't see them. Only in shitposting threads here does anyone even fantasize about it, and half of those posts still fantasize about worlds where women are NEETs who don't have to work, which is how it's been for most of history.

Good luck finding one. Society openly, with actual on the books legislation, encourages them to be selfish and hate men. So you've got quite a quest for yourself trying to find one that isn't ruined.

The boobanimals will come like the little ranch horses nodding with boobs bopping.

I agree they have far more power than any man does


I also agree with that, but there are more of them than you'd think.

All I'm saying is the "All women are evil!" horseshit is the same thing they pull about us and I will not lower myself to their standards, I use reason and logic.

I haven't been arguing "All women are evil!" and the amount of people who do, even among MGTOW, is vastly exaggerated so that feminists of all stripes can use them as strawmen and avoid addressing the actual literally institutionalized discrimination that men face. Women complain about "institutionalized discrimination" and it's all vague bogeymen and conspiracy theories like "patriarchy." Meanwhile, every major institution openly and proudly writes rules that openly and proudly discriminate against men, but men who point this out are just the same as feminists? Yeah right.

Like I said, totally agree. We are disposable and it pisses me off. I was referring specifically to the ones who shun all women.

We wait ten years and see how much of a non issue this will become, and we will be the first to experience the pleasure not giving a fuck. This shit will disolve, hopefully sooner than later.

THIS. ALL OF THIS. I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said.

It doesn't have to be because you think "All women are evil!" If you recognize the game is rigged, to keep playing is stupid. Your only hope is that you can find someone to play with you that happens to play by a set of house rules that actually try to un-rig things, but this is going to be rare when the rigging is in their favor, and they have plenty of people begging to play the rigged version with them, and if they ever change their mind and decide to drop their house rules, they can, and there's nothing you can do about it.

Like I said, I'm on your side. It's the government I hate. I will admit to women being batshit insane though. That is fact.

Well they wouldnt let us talk freely now they die, the next decade or two the shlomos will get killed, no mercy since they have been warned half a dozend times.

The government is the symptom, not the cause. It's these more concrete symptoms that I can point to because they're on the books, but things become laws because they are already popular sentiment. You couldn't openly discriminate against men like this unless the population agreed with you. And the population has historically always thought this way, because every society throughout history sends men to die in war and hard labor all for the stated purpose of serving women, who have historically been socially accepted and even praised NEETs, whose only job is to make sure their kids don't die, using resources given to them for free by men. Meanwhile, the men never got to see their kids because they were too busy being worked to death, but it's okay, because historically over half of men never passed on their genes at all, because if they didn't just straight up die as virgins (again doing service in the hopes that girls will accept them), then their wife simply cucked them with the milkman known as Chad Thundercock. And this is all provable with genetic evidence, showing we have twice as many female ancestors as male ones. Because historically women have been happy to send men to die so much that this trend can be seen in your genes. So again, any non-prehistoric institution, like government, is only a symptom, not a cause.

Just wanted to say that I like the MEMEME!~ slut, best background ever.

I guess I like sluts after-all, except as a wife.

We wont be the milkmen.

Good point. Fine, you win.

this guy gets it

If you read the bible you will know of the holy sanctity that is marriage

user, in the "perfect world" you just described, you'd be an incel. You're not going to be one of the few powerful men who get to have a poligamous marriage. That role will be taken by the chads of today.

How can you be that naive?

…would have hair on their head only and be unable to grow it elsewhere

user just what do you think life is?

have dicks

When they get asked a question, they wont nod their heads to confirm or shake them to negate.
They will use their boobs to do that.

This thread

They can point to a whole bunch of shit - violence rates, rape rates, wage differentials, glass ceiling, distribution of childcare and housework, representation in government and top professions. Also, there's legislation and policy favoring "male traits" which are either biologically or socially caused to be more common in men - strength, courage, aggression, self-promotion, competitiveness, linear thinking. If you're putting in funding bids or loan applications, men will do better because they're more confident, competitive, and better at self-promotion. Whether or not they're the better candidate. Yeah there's other stuff that discriminates against men, but it's not all one-way.

Neoliberal capitalism treats everyone as disposable. There's more people than jobs, there's few permanent jobs or workers' rights, and there's no right to an income without working (if there is then it can also be cut off arbitrarily). So, anyone (man, woman or tumblrkin) can be fired, evicted and either starve, or get jailed for stealing to survive. This is not accidental, it's a necessary feature of the system which is used for social control. Women are also dealing with this feeling of being rightsless and disposable, but for some reason they mainly express it through these over-broad ideas of "abuse" and "harassment". But often what we're dealing with is: women can't leave a job with a sexually demanding boss, or a relationship with a man they depend on financially, and (behind all the Tumblr shit) that's what the "abuse" scare is.

Yeah, but that's socially caused, it's part of what the feminists call "patriarchy". Women also have to put in a lot of effort in terms of looking attractive, promoting a profile, watching their weight, rebutting advances, not seeming like a slut or a prude or a failure (pressure coming from other women more than men I suspect), and trying to filter out rapists and batterers from the pool of people they date. Women have to be a lot more careful about certain things - for instance, accepting a drink from a stranger, getting absolutely drunk or taking drugs, sleeping in strange places. A lot of women find the whole thing too stressful, and stop dating. Others feel totally worthless because they aren't getting any interest from men, or the only men they pull are assholes.

It's more common historically that marriages are arranged, the choice (on both sides) is made by parents or heads of family.

We need to make people not-disposable whatever their gender. The keys to this are: universal basic income and/or right to a job with a living wage and/or free access to necessities of life (which you can't be banned from). Getting rid of the constant social role performance and the penalties for not doing it, and strengthening civil and human rights protections in general. And, changing the rules of sex and relationships, so that people can "just do it" without all the judgement and pressure attached. Lately we've seen all of this overridden by fights over which side you're on, state authoritarian shit which entrenches disposability (beginning with zero tolerance and Guantanamo), and anger coming from the frustration at being disposable which is expressed as fights over *who* is disposable or disposed-of: kill all men, kill all women, kill all cis, kill all terfs, kill all Muslims, kill all Jews, kill all niggers, kill all whites, kill all Nazis, kill all criminals, kill all retards, kill all commies, kill all homophobes, kill all infidels, kill all pedos… up to the spree-killer's "kill everyone". And if it's not "kill" then it's rape them in prison, jail them for nothing, beat them up at demos, take away their free speech or their citizenship or their welfare or their internet access. Not caring about anyone's rights, suffering or survival because they're part of an out-group category in relation to one's own. No empathy among people in general - just a battle for validation, for survival at the cost of others. All these positions are basically the same, they accept the neoliberal world of disposability, they just seek to reshuffle who gets disposed of. And this benefits the corporations and the state, who get to keep treating *everyone* (or everyone but a favored minority) as disposable while we fight over the scraps.

So, yeah. Make love not death-camps. Or something.

Continued
Fair enough, I'd be pretty happy with monogamy too, even though I fantasise about everyone fucking everyone (without all the dating games).

This is quite a new phenomenon, though. Historically, women wanted monogamy and men wanted to play around. Men feared that women were trying to "tie them down". Men were the ones pushing for "free love" in the 60s.

You turn the pyramid upside down, the ones that you should be asking to uphold the highest levels of responsibilities are the ones in power not the other way round.
I hope i do not interpret too much into it but they way you write and what you advocate is that "total savety net" in every aspect of your life. You ask for cops not to "stroke" your head with utmost certainty or when you are out you worry about someone putting shit into your drink and the you want certain measures to prevent that, which in reality far exceeds the benefit of that.
You want the lack of distance because muh empathy, but once it comes to close combat and the following mechanisms well then you realize you created a monster.
The utopia you seek in realistic terms will by a dystopia, because just like in poker you can increase the odds of a society and your own social standing but there is no guarantee.

Have integrity, a true sense of selflessness, and know the differences and utilities of both sexes and works with them rather than against them.

"selflessness"
You will see us get what we asked for, and if you do not obey you will see a different face. Mark my words nigger.

And who gives them that power? Men. Modern women are the equivalent of society's collective children - they are coddled, spoiled brats who have no reason to change their behavior.

Men are more likely than women to be victims of violence, including homicide and suicide.

The greatest underreported epidemic of rape is among men in U.S. prisons.

The wage gap is a myth. There is an earnings gap, for well-understood and perfectly good reasons. The fact that you even bring up this old saw makes you easy to dismiss.

Doesn't exist. A woman almost became president. She won the popular vote, and only lost the election because of America's archaic Electoral College system (which has nothing to do with her sex).

No role in government or "top professions" is barred to women. If they're underrepresented, it's because they've made different choices in life.

Also the result of women's choices. They often choose less lucrative careers, so when a couple has to decide who is going to stay home with the child(ren), the smarter choice financially is often for the woman to stay home. This also results in her doing more housework. Boo hoo.

Bullshit.

Mostly they do not want to shit their offspring into a hostile environment and they want a certain clairity because they care for that, this holds true if you correct for intelligence.
You should advocate for more jamals because that makes things better.

Do you want California and the northeastern states to run the whole country? Hillary only "won" the popular vote because of the lack of ID laws in progressive states and ballot stuffing.
If anything this showed how necessary the electoral college is and how much the political parties need to be reformed. It was practically confirmed that the democratic party election was rigged

All women are chastised until marriage. If they really get horny I have a key.

Are like Nicole.

are beautiful white females (everything else is aborted or prevented from being conceived in line with an eugenics program that ensures nobody has to be born ugly, defective, and miserable).

Holy fuck fuck the mind games. That is the one thing I hate most about women.

That's all of us here tbh.

Solution: Do whatever the fuck they did to that tribe in Sarnia, Ontario that keeps producing a disproportionate amount of females and apply that everywhere. Use some kind of technique to cause there to be like 5 women for every 1 man.

I hope you get deported to Asia and your passport burned so you can never return to a white country.

…but user, you are the SJW

Nothing about that "implausible GF" image is implausible.

How about a GF that is into philosophy, that DOESN'T want to travel (all the fucking bitches on dating sites all just want to travel the world incessantly until their uterus dries up), has far-right ideology and actually understands it, and is able to actually converse intelligently on metaphysics and politics.

My perfect world wouldn't have voting because voting gives the illusion of choice and creates pacification / contentment and I'd rather have a world where due to one party system people entertain no delusions and actually set about revolting when it's necessary.

Of all the big mistakes we made letting women work was the biggest of them all. Because of them bloating the labour market now instead of one man's income supporting an entire family the man and woman both work and can't support a family.

[citation badly needed]

Voting doesn't matter as much as working. Women shouldn't be allowed to work. They shouldn't be allowed to vote either but work is what took them away from the home, turned them into childless career women, made them independent of men, destroy the incentives behind marriage, and fucked up everything.

That's the world we already live in though.


That would be nice.

I like the scenario you describe a lot. Would like that world.

Go into nice comfy stables.

Are cute and get free bunny ears and ice cream

I know the feel fam
I'm not even attracted to kids (which is what people assume when I say I'm totally cool with lowering the aoc), I just like the idea of deflowering and dominating an adult woman while still being underage. I was a really horny kid even before puberty, and puberty just sent me into overdrive.

Is that post even in English? Learn the language before you start bullshitting.

Social safety net is a good thing. Makes less misery, less crime.


*By other men*.

*By other men* who don't have access to women or children.

You need to include things like part-time work paying less, and professions with lots of women (such as nurses) paying less.

You believe outcomes stem from life choices? Then you're a puppet of the NWO. You might "make the choices", but the system decides what they mean, what the consequences are.


Nope, SJW is reverse discrimination. Crapping on "privileged" groups to help "oppressed" groups. I'm into social equality, social and moral liberalism, and everyone living their own way. Kinda like libertarian but minus free markets and with fewer guns.

The SJW vs alt-right shitfest is a stupid game about which race or gender gets to be teacher's pet to the NWO overlords in the new totalitarian order, when the real struggle is the struggle to destroy this order.

why comfy?

are mechanically deflorated when they have 14 yo.

Where is that first gif from?

Go to church

and?

Suck my big fat dick

In a perfect world, women do not actively seeking to be manipulative cunts just because they don't feel like doing their part. Whether it's emotionally or physically. Fuck mind games

Violence by women is ignored, laughed at, or seen as justified by the fact that it is done by a woman. Men are not allowed to report it or they're pussies, or just lying abusers.

Many western jurisdictions literally define rape so that men cannot be victims and women cannot be perpetrators. When using a definition that is simply "forced sex," the numbers come out nearly equal, even going by Department of Justice numbers. See feminists are probably right about many rapes being unreported, they're just wrong about which group doesn't get reported. Protip: It's not women being raped by men who aren't believed and discouraged at every turn from reporting. It's not men who are encouraged by every facet of society to see every interaction with the opposite sex as sexual assault.
You mean how when all other factors are adjusted for, women actually get paid more for the same behaviors? Yeah, this is a serious issue, but feminists get very angry if you bring it up.
Bogeyman, related to previous point of wage gap
You mean how women take the kids and the house in the divorce and then won't let the father actually participate in parenting or go anywhere near the house, then complain that the father isn't a good parent and is never around? Again, good point. Not really fair, but not something feminists care about.

You mean how since men actually have to work to survive and don't have the option of getting a spouse or the government to pay for them, they are more motivated to work more and seek more promotions? Yeah, I agree. It's a shame that these poor workhorses never get to spend time with their families, and are only seen as a free source of income for their wives.

Oh wait, you're probably one of those people who thinks that everyone is rich and uses the rich as an example to compare to the lives of every day people. But even then, the same scenario of men needing to work and not getting the opportunity to be lazy NEETs like women applies. Of course they get more jobs, they need them. Women don't so they opt out once they realize it's not fun or they get enough money from another source (their husband) to not be worth working for more.

All those things you said make them the better candidate. It's not sexism to select based on how somebody acts. What is sexism is how every major institution openly says they would rather hire women than men, and admit up front that if they have two people that are otherwise similarly qualified, they will pick the woman every time.

Agreed, but you do not comprehend the degree of disposability I speak of. A worker's position in a company is disposable, but a man's very life is disposable. Women and children first, after all. And this is how it has always been across nearly every society ever. An unnamed man's death does not cause the same grief as an unnamed woman's. Men are sent off to war always in the name of protecting the women. They are sent to the mines to provide for the women. They get their arms cut off in factories and now they're failures because they can't provide for the women. And women turn around and say that they're victims because while all this was going on, they were at home being NEETs, whose only job was taking the resources their husbands broke their back for and cooking some food for their own kids. They should be thankful for getting to see their own kids, because the husband doesn't get to, he's too busy working. But it's probably not his kid anyway because we have genetic evidence that we have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors, because a significant amount of men simply died as virgins (doing the aforementioned dangerous stuff in the hopes of being seen as valuable to women), but also the women also just cucked a significant portion of the remainder with Chad Thundercock while the husband was at work.

Might as well call the KKK a black power organization.

Not true. Even the fattest, ugliest, and more importantly meanest and dumbest women still get asked out. Usually enough that they have the nerve to get angry about it. "Stop giving me compliments, silly boys!" Men are smart enough to know the "conventionally attractive" women are getting too much competition, so they go for the ones that seem like easier targets, not realizing that plenty of others thought of the same thing. But to think of it in less cynical terms, many have also been conditioned to think that these women will be nicer than the supermodels, because tv says so, but also because they must not be as stuck up because they don't get as much attention right? They're losers, just like me! But no, they're not, because they still actually do get guys asking them out, while those same guys can't even get a girl to not reject them. The biggest loser of a girl is still the social equivalent to a chad.

Nothing is more enraging than women complaining about people liking them. It is the ultimate example of how spoiled a person can get, and how oblivious and unempathetic one can be. "But he might get mad if I reject him!" Yeah of course someone will feel negative emotions if they get rejected. Be glad you don't have to feel that, you stupid bitch. This line of thinking also means that men know they are thought of as evil predators beforehand, but still have to risk not just their self esteem, but risk being called an evil predator, or else simply be alone forever.

Well you're right that it's more pressure from women, but again, at least this doesn't affect their actual material lives. Because women have to actively try to be failures. All they have to do to not be failures is just say yes to some guy who has a little bit of money or simply seems like not a drug addict, and then she can take all his stuff and his paycheck forever, with police enforcing this for her. But if that's too hard, she can just ask the government, because there are tons and tons of programs exclusively for women.

Which again men have to do to, but nobody cares when a man's girlfriend or wife beats the shit out of him. They laugh at him and call him a pussy. And many western jurisdictions won't even call it rape if she forces him to have sex. And then if she chooses to not use birth control and gets pregnant after raping him, and chooses to not abort, and chooses not to give the kid for adoption, the rape victim has to pay for the kid forever, no choice involved.

Also, men are discouraged by every facet of society from hitting women or being too aggressive sexually (even though they're also responsible for all initiation and risk in escalating relationships, they don't get the privilege of being passive and not having to work for it). Women are encouraged to think of men as evil beasts who are lucky to be tolerated, and hitting or raping them is usually seen as funny at worst, or simply heroic in many cases.

Fucking spoiled cunts, I swear to god.

Because of fear of violence? Even though men are much more likely to be victims of violence? A woman is much more likely to be helped if she's in such a situation, and not be seen as a stupid drunk like she is, unlike a man who does the same thing and is seen as a stupid drunk and is assumed to be criminal. Oh no you mean because they might have sex and then not remember it later or regret it. Oh yeah, such a danger. Those poor things, getting to be incredibly irresponsible, and then get laid, and then if they want they can send the person the fucked to jail on a whim.

And instead start riding the cock carousel. Again, you're just going back to "it's so hard to be so popular!" Fucking stacies. You really are like a goddamn cartoon. Your observation also doesn't note that far more men are too stressed out by their situation and stop dating, hence MGTOW and Herbivore Men. Japan is falling apart because they refuse to treat men like human beings, and now men are waking up and refusing to play a rigged game in such high numbers that it's fucking up their tax base.

And again, it comes back to the central point. When a man says he can't get a woman, he means he can't find a single woman that won't reject him, despite his trying. When a woman says she can't find a man, she means that she sits there and has guys come up to her, but she rejects them because they aren't good enough for her. But hey, it's okay, because a modern woman don't need no man! So no, she's not useless. However, a man that can't get women simply isn't good enough for them and thus isn't a "real man," and is useless.

This actually is happening all over the world, but before you get a large enough dose to simply produce girls, it just produces boys with micropenises, homosexuality, and hermaphrodites. Also I'm no doctor but I bet it also causes things like cancer.

Sure is great getting to be a man ain't it, friend? The privileges are endless.

...

MODS this is a child abuse victim

Are made obsolete by men

Wears only bikini or nothing (even in winter)

my gf is the one on the left
been with her for 5+ years and we're living together currently
pretty great.

But does she let you fuck her butt?

Get an imagination, faggot. There are a thousand designs that are better than a bikini in every way including exposure, class, attractiveness, and strategic qualities.

Some examples? What would you like to see on girls

Faggot.

females are hugely based

Aside from the insanity, they're pretty awesome

Human females are reduced in status to the level of literal objects, specifically objects intended for reproduction, but able to be used by their owner in any manner he wishes.
Females are the property of their father whem they are born, uses for females vary widely, but some common uses are for manual or domestic labour, for sex or torture, for food or milk, for entertainment or bloodsport, for running errands or couriership, and finally, for breeding and sale.
To ensure females remain under control, various means are taken, from high tech to low, but usually whatever method used will also indicate her owner.
Females are hated, due to their crimes throughout history, due to their neccesity in the continuation of the species, they were allowed to survive, but in the worst level of existence possible.
The Females of all lesser races were all captured as well, the Males were captured and used to produce more of the females, who fetch a higher price due to the desirability produced by their exotic natures, any male half-breeds are usually destroyed at birth, while exotic women are worth more, they are also lower in status and rank than the Females of a master race, and can expect to be subjected to the worst possible treatment, the master race females kniw that the lesser races were also responsible for the apocalypse, and so hate exotic females more than they hate themselves.

...

What are you, gay?

wll look at the ppr women that have to row rhe boat there why aren't there any men doing it, they get a free pass. We clearly have a rowgap there

They've been trying to make me hate myself for being born male since I was born. In my utopia, I'd make them feel the same thing.

…signal their undesireability by colouring their hair or self-mutilating with tattoos and piercings, leaving us an easy system of identifying decent mating material.

I assume the hair colouring, and by that i mean the
sjw colours (blue, red, green) is a more extreme form to switch things up in an easy way to achieve different results in getting a suitable mate.

This thread is still going? Wow, you guys really like your slavery and cannibalism fantasies.

Not really sure as I should be feeding MRA trolls, but here goes…

Unless the woman's a lot bigger than you, or uses a weapon, then men will do a lot more damage.

Again I'm not quite sure how you imagine huge numbers of women are raping men. Not only would they be taking a huge risk, but usually it's men pestering women for sex.

The real question is, why are some "behaviors" paid more than others. The ones which are paid more are usually the ones which either male bodies or minds are better suited to, or men are socialised to prefer and to be good at. Fact: cops, bankers, lawyers, paper-pushers, politicians, skilled manual workers, and some types of computer workers are overpaid; nurses, teachers, retail, childcare, anything defined as "women's work" is underpaid. Also, women are expected to do housework for free.

In an average hetero marriage/cohabitation, the woman does far more hours per week of childcare and housework. This is the underlying reason women are favoured in custody cases.

First off, most women work. How many women do you know, who are funded solely by their husband? How many jobs do you know, that pay a man enough to support himself AND a woman AND children off of his wage? Second off, most civilised countries have welfare benefits, and more men claim than women (because usually, women in households with male earners can't claim).

You have a very strange view of human motivation.


Yes it is, if "how somebody acts" is partly an effect of gender. Especially if the people deciding which traits are best is also male.

OK smart-alec, explain why families under the one-child policy regime in China wanted to have sons, and hid or killed daughters. Explain why boys are more likely to reach adulthood than girls in North Africa, leading to gender disparities of more men than women. Explain why most cultures have a norm that mothers should self-sacrifice for their families.

So why is there evidence that 50% of teenage girls have body image issues and have considered starving themselves?

Yeah, courtship norms are fucked-up today. That's why I say, in an ideal society, it's all more direct.

No, women have to be careful because a predator might spike their drink. How many times have you heard of this happening to men? Is it something you worry about when out drinking?

A man who falls asleep drunk at a party will maybe wake up and find someone's drawn a dick on his face or stolen his trousers.

No, not riding the cock carousel instead. A lot of women just don't have sex. And the pattern is very similar to MGTOW, except the discourse around it is feminist.

Hahahahaha I can't believe you actually blame women for micropenises and hermaphrodites!

Seriously tho… I'm not saying men have it easy, I'm saying everyone is fucked by the way things are organised. It's not "all men oppress all women" like SJWs imagine, but it's not "all women oppress all men" either.

Guess it is OK then - women shouldn't be put in jail anyway.
Go fuck yourself

And duh. Severity of injuries has a big effect on whether assault can be proven, and what the sentence is.

It's not trolling to insist that men should be treated as human beings with the same rights and respect as women, instead of hated beasts of burden that are openly discriminated against at every level of society.

That doesn't matter. It is not okay to be the first one to become violent in a situation. The lack of damage dealt also vastly exaggerated. Plus, not only do they use weapons, but they get way more hits in because the man isn't allowed to fight back.

Then there should be no reason to defend female rapists by defining rape in a way that makes them impossible to prosecute.

I'm not imagining anything, I'm saying that women shouldn't be immune from certain prosecutions. Of course, now they're immune to practically all, but they're literally immune to being prosecuted for rape in many jurisdictions.

Women raping men are not taking as huge a risk as men raping women. Both take the risk of getting injured in a fight (inb4 women are helpless quadriplegics that can't fight back), but men take the risk of being prosecuted and otherwise punished for it, while women know they can get away with it.

Also, it's not men pestering women for sex, it's men doing all the work and risking rejection in order to give women offers for sex, allowing them to take their pick of the litter and never have to actually put any work or risk into a relationship.

Actually, that's all purely subjective opinion. As a teacher who previously worked in retail and childcare, the reason these positions don't get paid more is supply and demand. There is always a surplus of people trying to get these jobs. I obviously think my current job is valuable, and I get paid okay for it, but there are too many people trying to get these jobs because universities pump out useless degrees and the graduates then realize the best chance they have for getting a career is to go back for another year or two and become a teacher.

Banks and politicians are overpaid because they make tons of money and are filled with corruption. Cops and manual workers deserve every penny they get for risking life and limb. What you define as paper pushers and computer workers probably work for successful companies that determine they are worth that much. Supply and demand. The only thing you remarked on I don't have enough knowledge of is nurses. I do think they're an important job, but I also wouldn't be surprised if it was like teaching, with way too many people in the field, just driving down the value of each worker.

Every woman I've ever been related to or dated was messier and did less housework than her spouse, including myself. If the spouse ever complained, the woman just spouted "muh patriarchy" and continued being a slob. Plus, the fact that men are almost universally doing the actual hard housework, like repairs and anything that requires manual labor, is never brought up when you people say that women are expected to cook and clean, which are much easier jobs, even if women were still actually doing them.

And this is determined how? Likely a small number of self reported surveys, which are a less than reliable method of determining stats anyway. Given the incredibly high divorce rates, I'm sure plenty of people on this board have seen their fathers, their friends, or themselves, lose custody despite the fact that they were better parents than the woman in the relationship. And again, stats show this, with children of single fathers having far better living conditions than children of single mothers. And not just economically, but facing fewer instances of child abuse, and that's only the child abuse that is prosecuted. Of course we know already that women get away with crimes and men are prosecuted for crimes that never happened, especially when divorce and custody is involved.

But it's a choice. They have other options that men do not.

Which has resulted in men being kicked out of the house and being left homeless so that the woman can claim benefits that are denied to any family with a man in it. You know full well there are many benefits, charities, scholarships, and other opportunities offered solely to women, and practically none for men. Not that I'd want there to be. I'd want people to just be given the same opportunities.

That need motivates people? How is that strange?

No, it's not sexist to say that in order to do a job that involves lifting things you have to be able to lift things, even if men are statistically better at lifting things.
Also, people act differently, people are individuals. Some men have these so called feminine traits and are thus not as valuable in those industries you complain about. What are you going to do for them? Nothing, because they don't have vaginas.

Those males are motivated by profit and will try to get the people who make them the most money. Ironically, where this fails is the exact opposite of patriarchy, because men are largely white knights and women all claim oppression, so women get treated better even when less qualified. There is no conspiracy of men conspiring to oppress women. We all know it's the opposite. Men conspire to serve women, and the males you talk about that are at the tops of these companies probably all have wives at home who don't work at all.

Because women are essentially socially respected NEETs, who are never expected and therefore never raised to work, while even young boys have been expected and raised to work throughout most of history. In most societies it has been common practice to essentially have more children to use as free labor once they reach an age we would consider relatively young, and even in America and Britain this was relatively common until just over a century ago. But since women aren't expected or raised to work, or at least not as hard, in times of poverty, they simply cannot be afforded. It is expensive to keep a NEET. However, they were at least socially respected NEETs, and male NEETs would be killed much earlier. But they'd also just be forced to work easier. Likewise, if the west were to fall, I assure you that the users of Holla Forums would be purged (kicked out of their parents' basements) before the users of tumblr, despite the fact that both of these populations are largely NEETs.

Because the feminist lie that they are oppressed and don't have the huge upper hand in relationships has fucked them up. Also because boys have the same issues but nobody gives a shit. These same girls are all still getting laid, while the boys are not. Yet the girls complain that they have problems with romance. It's because they are raised with a false sense of entitlement, which is ironically the charge against men by feminists. But when feminists say men are "entitled" (actually they mean that "they have a false sense of entitlement," which means the exact opposite), what they mean is that men are bad for feeling bad about the fact that they're treated like subhuman filth by women.

In an ideal society women don't just get to sit there and have the offers roll in yet complain that they are victims. The system now essentially operates on a price fixing scheme to artificially inflate the value of vagina. In actuality women like penis and men like vagina, so it should be about equal, but men are encouraged to feel like demons for having sexual urges, and feel like lesser beings in general (women are perfect, angelic creatures who are oppressed by evil men after all), so they settle for women who are less attractive than them, not just physically, but mentally, emotionally, and socially. Yet at the same time, they are encouraged to be hyper sexual and always be trying to get chicks, otherwise it means they're a loser failure faggot. So this artificially decreases the value of dick by creating a sense of flooding the market. The flip side of this is slut shaming, which is essentially women scolding other women for breaking the price fixing scheme and lowering the value of vagina. Of course they're also constantly told they're better than men resulting in them rejecting most men and only going with chads. Studies show that women on average rate 70% of men as "below average," while men rate women as about 50% above and 50% below. The end result of all this is a system where the value of vagina is artificially inflated so that men have to serve women in order to get it, rather than making an equal trade of penis for vagina.

Actually quite a few, but nobody gives a shit. A lot of the time they just call the guy a dumbass and say he got blackout drunk. In fact, I'd bet a lot of the time the guy just assumes that he got blackout drunk and doesn't even realize what happened. On the other hand, there are tons of cases of women claiming men spiked their drink because they got blackout drunk, while many witnesses attest to the woman just getting drunk and deciding to fuck. Of course the man is prosecuted anyway.

Yes, in fact, I just don't go out drinking, partially because of this. I know that as a male I face a higher chance of violence and a lesser chance of getting laid if I go out drinking, so why would I?

If a woman finds her trousers stolen you would assume rape. If a man finds his trousers stolen, you find it funny, like drawing a dick on his face. A woman getting a dick drawn on her face would also get that classified as sexual assault.

Statistically, far more women have sex than men, and this has been the case throughout all of history. So no, what you speak of is statistically insignificant, even compared to minorities like MGTOW.

I didn't, I blamed pollution, which is well known to cause things like that. You've never heard of xenoestrogens? The guy I was replying to even cited a community where it is a very prominent public health issue.

It's more like "almost all women and nearly as many men oppress almost all men."


Many western jurisdictions automatically arrest the male no matter what in cases of domestic disputes, even if the male was the sole victim and the female the sole perpetrator. Feminists only in the last 50 years pushed to make this law and have since fought tooth and nail to protect this law.

I made a mistake, what I meant to say is the desirability came from their scarcity.

>this thread

No, it comes from ass and tits just like everywhere else, the "exotic" factor is just a secondary social effect.

would be the subject of a datamining thread

The boobanimals will still come like horses that i want to feed with dry bread.

great writeup but I have a small disagreement on this point:
that's like saying "ferrari dealerships like money and people like Ferraris so it should be about equal." You're ignoring the fact that demand for ferraris far outstrips supply.

When it comes to human sexuality, despite what feminists claim, there is a huge imbalance in libido between men and women. That's what elevates the price of vagina.

Imagine you were creating a "rat utopia" but for humans. If you put one male and one female in a cage (and assuming you selected them to be attracted to each other and willing to fuck), the male would burn up the female in a couple of days. What I mean by that is, a woman willing to fuck a man whenever he wants will reach her limit, despite her best intentions, after a few days. She'll just need to take a break. But the man will still be ready, willing, and able to fuck.

So okay, you put another female in the cage. I think the male will probably burn her up too before the first one is recharged, in terms of libido. I think you'd probably have to have five or six females per male in order to keep everyone satisfied.

Natural selection designed humans this way because, in our natural habitat, among our ancestors, many males died off. You really only have to break one bone and you die - lots of boys used to die just from playing. The male:female sex ratio was thus naturally pretty far, by the time you reached puberty, from 1:1.

But with modern medicine, it's very close to 1:1. And that's what elevates the price of pussy. This ratio is actually a very recent development. As recently as WWII, we were still killing off enough men in war to keep the demand for pussy low.

Ironically, the one thing that feminists have proposed that would actually improve the situation (well, improve it if we weren't importing millions of low-IQ males) - is to abort most male children. Feminists think they're trolling us when they suggest that, but it would actually help things if they'd do it.

you kinda are

I argue that much of this is at the least exaggerated, and thus inflates the price of vagina. I understand that this is the most radical point I propose, however.

But this is also largely because men died doing things to serve and impress women, because the price of vagina was considered higher than the price of penis. Things such as working dangerous and backbreaking jobs, and going to war. It's a little bit of a chicken and egg scenario.

Now some of the perfect world scenarios do have female majorities, but of course they still need to be very tightly controlled, and this would be logistically difficult. But in a perfect world, I guess we could do this, and it would have benefits. But to make it anything close to practical, they would have to actually work and become useful, which they currently aren't, because their inflated value of vagina means they never have to work for a thing in their lives.

...

…at least by your definition of "overpaid" and "underpaid", which are 100% self-serving and based on nothing whatsoever.


Under 5,4

Would be reviewed yearly for acceptable attractiveness levels from 7 onwards and the consistent uggos and fatties culled past 20, would work as an incentive to get fit and pretty.

All sold off to degenerate granny fiddlers by the time they're 30 or culled lest they become tumblr.

Would be hardcoded with a phrase or a couple of words that's very unlikely to ever be uttered by anyone who didn't know it, something like 'Molecular whale bicycle' or something equally improbable, upon hearing this phrase the given female would fall into docile fugue state and be easily led for fugging purposes until you say the phrase again and then be left with no memory of what happened while under the influence.

...

all is women

...

You give me hope ITT.

I'm gonna need more of her

KimmyTeen

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:c109692d8d4d4dcb81b5b0e52d8ae4b707b2a8e5&dn=Kimmyteen.com%20100%%20siterip%20ALL%20pictures%20and%20Videos%20Kimmy%20teen&tr=http%3A%2F%2Ftracker.trackerfix.com:80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2F9.rarbg.com:2710%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2F9.rarbg.me:2710%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2F9.rarbg.to:2710%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fcoppersurfer.tk:6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Feddie4.nl:6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com:6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fglotorrents.pw:6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com:1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fp4p.arenabg.ch:1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fp4p.arenabg.com:1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftorrent.gresille.org:80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.aletorrenty.pl:2710%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.glotorrents.com:6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.internetwarriors.net:1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com:80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org:1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fzer0day.ch:1337%2Fannounce

Don't age past 20
It's that simple

...

...