Anyone here like OpenBSD? I really like their manpages and using FVWM as a desktop...

LOL look at the cuck! Look at the cuck!!!! He did it for free!!!!!!

Don't you see how ridiculous this sounds? And it's a good thing if a big company starts using it, they're likely going to run into problems and contribute fixes. Even if they do not, they'll hire others with experience in that system which increases the overall mindshare.

Yay! This post comes to you through my new isolating proxy running OpenBSD. No more uncontrolled internet access for Mr. Windowsbox.

Now I just have to implement about a dozen more features, besides http and dns, to get a full featured internet access back.

So again, how? The bootloaders on flash generally don't support encryption. That's why using Coreboot/Libreboot is an exception, because GRUB2 does.

christ why do these faggots even try


every time. You gonna buy trash, stick to your trash chips, trash drivers and trash OS.

Except that's not what happens. The company closes the source and contributes nothing because it becomes their intellectual property as the license allows.

That's the price of actually controlling your network, regardless of your OS choice.

The OpenBSD bootloader can handle FDE with like a 5mb boot partition for the loader itself.

speaking of which, fvwm.org gives me an error, is fvwm kill? I mean I always felt that UDE did things better, but it would be disappointing to see fvwm go

Then no. Basically, it's down to someone to attack my OS while it's running (pretty possible) or while it's powered off to alter the decryption, and it's far easier to change what's on the HDD than to write to my laptop's flash. Mind, it is possible that someone will do a proper BSD payload for Coreboot, but there's a few other reason I'm not running OpenBSD. sndio is awful for a start, and so is its Unicode support.

You're an actual full fledged moron.

The bootloader is actually 512 bytes that loads the boot program. and no, nobody is going to replace the actual 512 byte bootloader on OpenBSD. If you'd know anything about the system, kern.securelevel makes it so you cant write the boot program.

Stay with gnu.