github.com
Need I say anymore?
>Certain internet communities
Ryan Rodriguez
Nathaniel Perry
This looks fun
Let's hope ((((certain internet communites)))) do something funny
Carter Barnes
I have a feeling it will be furry porn somehow
Jace Lopez
I think that we should raid it and patch bot so upvotes and downvotes that contain some politically incorrect string count as 10 votes or something like that.
File that we would need to edit is this one:
github.com
John Lee
first we need to change the vote system so it doesn't take into account the amount of followers someone has, that is absolute cancer
after that we can slowly take it over
Thomas Brown
That is already implemented, all votes are equal.
github.com
But it still has minimum account age requirement.
# voter controls below## how old do they have to be for their vote to count?MIN_VOTER_AGE = 1 * 30 * 24 * 60 * 60 # 1 month
Evan Gomez
gay
Justin Long
We should send in a trojan horse to implement some (((buggy))) code that for some reason changes that value... How about importing a date/time library but then replacing the function that gets the value of a month in seconds with an obscure lambda or something?
Justin Reed
I see some lines of interest
```
old_enough_to_vote = age >= settings.MIN_VOTER_AGE
weight = 1.0 if old_enough_to_vote else 0.0
```
We could shorten it to
```
weight = float(age >= settings.MIN_VOTER_AGE)
```
And use cause some floating point error on the conversion or something
Dylan Sanchez
Fork on some other git platform when?
Robert Miller
Order naturally forms out of chaos, you fucking pleb.
Austin Rivera
Let's do it guys.
Should we pull in deepmind?
Adam Johnson
get at work lads we have a raid goin
James Roberts
We need a few sacrificial GitHub accounts that have been around for longer than a month to get the first commit in which will aim to reduce the required account lifetime
Jordan Peterson
What if we instead targeted the things actually taking the weight and caused an fp error in there? It'd probably be easier to get in without people noticing
Owen Parker
You had to post this fake astroturf thread here and elsewhere to get eyes on your gay + boring project, though I imagine you will need to post quite a bit more to get your memer epic lul troll army to do what you want
Cameron Garcia
This is the only place I've posted this, and it's not my project, go back to Reddit borefag
Josiah Myers
Lads,
why not rewrite the entire thing in perl?
all the numales and women won't be able to understand anything because perl is 2hard4them
once we do that we have free reign
Samuel Jones
Pleb
Benjamin Roberts
For the love of god, somebody install a Tor exit node on this server.
Thomas Cox
Brayden Edwards
Julian Scott
View the content of the pull request first before setting vote
Samuel Reed
You dumb fuck
Caleb James
Hi EtherTyper.
Adrian Perez
Look. Somebody proposed the contributor covenant. It was rejected for good reasons, that can actually convince people. That's an unambiguous win against the contributor covenant.
If you then muddle it up with an inane non-argument like this you're associating opposition to the contributor covenant with people who can't even put together a real counter-argument and like to argue with rude gestures. That's only going to reinforce the opinions of people who like the contributor covenant.
Jonathan Anderson
that's probably what they tried to do
Jason Evans
That post is from two minutes after the pull request was submitted, so it's safe to assume that it was made by the person who made the pull request. Given that they're posting here they probably genuinely oppose the contributor covenant and for some reason think that this is the way to go for opposing it.
Jose Wood
really?
Jeremiah Wilson
I regularly see posts defending the general idea of codes of conduct (and I personally think there's nothing wrong with codes of conduct in general) but I don't think I've ever seen someone be really positive about the contributor covenant. I'm sure people who like it use this board too, but the typical response is so overwhelmingly "fucking sjws ruin everything" that I think it's more likely that they dislike the contributor covenant and think this is a good way to fight against it than that they like the contributor covenant and think this is a good way to promote it.
Bentley Evans
Fight, fight, fight
Fighting the World every single day
Fighting the World for the right to share
Free Software in my brain
I'm fighting for Stallman cause he's here to stay
Fighting, fighting, fighting the World
I been fighting the World
Fighting, fighting, fighting the World
I been figthing
Fight for a living-Fighting the World
Fight for a living-Fighting the World
Fight for a living-Fighting the World
Fight
Jayden Diaz
Free software or no software at all
whimps and posers leave the hall
Free software or no software at all
whimps and posers go on get out
Leave the hall
Daniel Torres
Michael Nguyen
Charles Fisher
We should be pounding it with all we've got right now
Camden Ross
Open source is mob rule.
Adam Bell
It (almost always) isn't.
At the most basic level, "open source" is just a category of copyright licenses. You can develop open source software in private, and you can develop proprietary software in public.
But in the common open source development model that does happen in public there's still typically no mob rule. A limited number of people have commit rights. Anyone can submit proposals for changes, but they have to go through a gatekeeper to actually get merged. That's not mob rule. There may or may not be a mob, but the mob doesn't rule.
This particular thing is mob rule, but it's an experiment and not an attempt at real software development. I can't think of any real software development with mob rule.
Adrian Robinson
that's some basic bitch level of understanding of open source. like that scene from that shitty movie nerve
you sure are fucking stupid. read a book nigger.
Bentley Wright
How did you you fags fuck up this badly!?
Lets add some subtle commits. And get enough anons in to vote our commits in.
Ideally inject malware into it.
Aiden Lee
I'll start working on a logo
Wyatt Thomas
This country is being ruined by "certain internet communities".
Hunter Johnson
Quick, down vote meritocracy pull request, because it's offensive.