Hiring a poor hooker = Rape

Hiring a poor hooker = Rape
Why are film analysis such cucks?

Fuck that.

...

What does that even means.
Jesus Christ, even that libtard of Renegade Cut left the sexual symbology as an aside comment.

It's called leftism and liberal arts. Part of destabilizing the arts was forcing everything to be viewed through a lens of critique aka critical theory. Leftist indoctrination stems from the method of instructing students to constantly read into everything and view everything as part of regressive thought. Therefore in the mind of the delusional leftist who has been indoctrinated; prostitution and rape are now "themes" of the movie even if those elements played a very minor role in the movie.

It's why you cannot have certain things in movies anymore, even amongst the latest wave of leftists. Like when the feminists bitched out Cuck Whedon when he had Black Widow wish she wanted to be a mother, because motherhood and maternal role are not "progressive" for stronk ind'pendant womyn. The bottom line is that all things in a movie are now forced to be indicative of something worthy critiquing and the purpose is to find signs of regressive thought in movies. The reward for the leftist is that they're there to partake in the act of pointing out wrongthink and pretending they're smart.

What happened to this guy? I thought he made good videos.

This.
Sage cause not webm, not webm because not on PC.

Everything he says in the video is on point, though. And war time prostitution is basically rape. The German women after WW1 and WW2 would not have whored themselves if they had any other choice. The same can be said for the Vietnamese women.

...

What people don't like to acknowledge is that without this "rape" industry these women would be left to starve and die with no other action to take.

It is the dirty & negative side of "fixing" child prostitution in 3rd world countries. Sure - you "can" save the children and put them into schools and foster homes so they can get a slight education which will mean nothing for them and be able to get bullied by the other kids and gruel for dinner. Or you can let nature take its course and have them suck a dick or two and pay for real food and medicine and a house for their whole family. Some of these girls even get "adopted" by rich men who will basically have them not wanting for anything for the first 15 or so years in their lives. Just lay there when he says and look pretty while doing it. I'm sure many of us would want to live a life akin to that.

Same with these girls. Sure, there is no other option. You know why? Because the other option is starving and death!! But that is too realistic for cinema and the leftist agenda so they would rather gloss over that fact. They would have a woman starve and die in the streets and applaud her for doing so rather than taking a few dicks a day to fend for herself. And isn't that true feminism? To be an independent woman making your own money? Not to leftist women. They would shame these women

t. Pedo

Wait, wouldn't all that degeneracy that you wrote be part of the leftist agenda?

I'm gonna mirror the other videos here as well. Give me a few minutes.

...

...

Thanks user.

The child angle you introduced is transparent as all fuck, and nobody is going to sympathize with you for extolling the benefits of child prostitution, at least with adults there is some discussion to be had

That said, leftists are generally split on the issue. Prostitution is wrong and degrading and forces women into bad situations, but it's also a woman's right to use her body for money etc. etc. It's the kind of doublethink that would drive any sane person mad

it's very common for leftists to think that any trade between people of different economic means is oppressive to the poorer one, even though both parties benefit from the trade

...

So was The Shining about whitey's exploitation of Native Americans? The answer I'm looking for is "yes"

Are brown ""people"" actually people?