We can agree that
but then…
>The solution is to add more underprivileged people from the third world to the American population, so we can exploit them even more, and provide everyone with even less
I mean, unless you believe that adding to the population would in fact increase wealth, which is more in line with Reaganomics and slave labor economics.
Please explain how you can be a leftist AND in favor of immigration, while NOT exploiting people or causing greater suffering.
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
dubtrack.fm
twitter.com
To begin with, you could stop fucking up said "third world" countries.
Don't try to change the subject. Answer the question.
I am.
Problems have causes and effects.
Fighting the effect does nothing, unless you stop the cause.
The question is:
The question is not
America is a third world country already. It does the very least to protect the people already here. How can you support bringing more people into misery?
...
...
We can agree that
but then…
Please explain to me how you can be a Leftist and NOT in favor of the systematic genocide of the poor or anyone who stays unemployed after 30 for more than a year.
...
Well, bombing their homes is bringing misery to them in the first place which then causes them to want to leave.