What does /pol think about direct democracy and liquid democracy?

i think it was only towers on mosques

There. Even communism would work if all jews were eternally genocided from the face of the earth.

The jews are low in numbers and gain power by bribing etc. Wouldn't it be favourable for hwites if we had direct democracy? As long as we are the majority that will say. Currently we only have real power once every fourth year to actually show what we want. Then some corrupted politician takes control.
The refugee storm could be stopped much earlier if we could vote.

...

It is not the aim of our modern democratic parliamentary system to bring together an assembly of intelligent and well-informed deputies. Not at all. The aim is rather to bring together a group of nonentities who are dependent on others for their point of view and who can be the more easily led, the narrower their individual mental outlook. That is the only way in which a party policy, according to the evil meaning it has to-day, can be put into effect, and by this method alone is it possible for the wire-puller, who exercises the real control, to remain in the dark, so that he personally can never be brought to account for his actions. For, in such circumstances none of the decisions taken, no matter how disastrous they may turn out for the nation as a whole, can be laid at the door of the individual whom everybody knows to be the evil genius responsible for the whole affair, all responsibility is shifted to the shoulders of the faction (party caucus). In practice, no actual responsibility remains, for responsibility arises only from personal duty and not from the obligations that rest with a parliamentary assembly of empty talkers. The parliamentary institution attracts people of the badger type, who shun the light. Any upright man, who is ready to accept personal responsibility for his actions, will despise such an institution. That is the reason why this brand of democracy has become a tool in the hands of that race which, because of its secret aims, must shun the light, as it always has done and always will do. Only a Jew can praise an institution which is as corrupt and as false as himself. As a contrast to this kind of democracy we have the Germanic democracy, which is a true democracy, for here the leader is freely chosen and is obliged to accept full responsibility for all his actions and omissions. The problems to be dealt with are not put to the vote of the majority, but are decided by the individual and as a guarantee of the sincerity of his decisions, he pledges all he has in the world and even his life. The objection may be raised here, that under such conditions, it would be very difficult to find a man who would be ready to devote himself to so fateful a task. The answer to that objection is as follows: We thank God that the inner spirit of our German democracy will of itself prevent the chance careerist, who may be intellectually worthless and a moral twister, from coming by devious ways to a position in which he may govern his fellow-citizens. The fear of assuming such far-reaching responsibilities, under Germanic democracy, will scare off the ignorant and the weak. Should it happen that such a person tried to creep in surreptitiously, it will be easy enough to identify him and apostrophize him ruthlessly, somewhat thus, “Be off, you scoundrel. Do not soil these steps with your feet; because these are the steps that lead to the portals of the Pantheon of History, and they are not meant for sneaks but for heroes.”

...

Why go through all that trouble of constantly fending off attempts be the jew to infest and ruining our societies instead of just removing the problem?

We never will be. The majority of people are morons who love reality shows and ball games. If you want to have any kind of high civilisation you need to have people with actual intellect and morals leading the masses.

Yes, but why would you want to settle for "not just as bad"? Shouldn't we be aiming for divine glory?

stalin tried that. still didn't work

...

Wew. Go back to Reddit, faggot

a (((party))) is representing big money

money right now is owned and controlled by the jew.

kill the jew and you will have deocracy

The fuck is liquid democracy?

Bolsheviks were 90% jews at the time. They genocided 50 million orthodox christians in russia. Showing the same empathy as with the palestinians.

Switzerland has a small WHITE population free of EU cuckery, whatever system they use would work

Switzerland has one of the largest foreigner rates in yurop. Around 30% of the people who live there are foreigners. The foreigners who took swiss citizenship (mostly balkans people and turks) are counted as swiss. If you would correct it by that offset, you could easily get to 35% foreigners.
However, to be fair it must be said that many Germans, Italians and Iberians make up those foreigner rates.
The sandpeople just started flooding in after Syria.

Direct democracy is shit. The commies will still gang up and sabotage anything the right wing parties would do. Also demographics are a weak spot in the democracy chain. The leftists will always import shitskins because they know that only them will vote for the leftist parties.