Jews Fear Aryan Women

nothing could be further from the truth you mong. women follow where civilization goes. women are born followers. the more fertile and beautiful they are, the more dependant they are on the protection and inclusion of the tribe (a beautiful woman outcast from a tribe would be raped 24/7). women do not go anywhere on their own. they follow the herd.

gas urself tbqh

Women are the carriers of tradition. They raise our children and thus are the ones to pass tradition on to our children. Each woman they can't get to that has a white child is a white child who is aware of his tradition and is less likely to adopt degenerate non-white traditions.

Furthermore, women keep the tribe alive. They are life. A tribe cannot continue to exist without its women. 50 men and one woman can only have so many children, and the tribe will quickly die. But 50 women and one man can easily repopulate and keep the tribe alive for generations.

women create life
men create the cradle of life

smashed civilizations have been rebuilt again and again
but if you control, pervert and destroy women, you have destroyed life

it is as warlords have known and practiced; to create a slave state, destroy the teachers.

Well, this "cultural movement" needs to broken up into waves. Pioneering men go first, then once established women want in, women then want to change all of it so then everyone else accommodates them. This third phase where everyone accommodates them would be what the user you're replying to is talking about.

No they dont where women go men follow

Danish?

...

That's not what this is about… Maybe read it again

implying that the relationship is entirely linear in either direction is grossly over simplistic. Men always start the movement, attracting more men and when there are enough men, women who then attract more men, ect.

sage for shitty pointless thread.

saved

Your thread is shit, OP. mods have been banning MGTOW jew threads for YEARS now.

That's true. In one generation of female Holla Forumslacks we could create 5 times the user base for an additional 70yrs of redpilled offspring who are even more prepared for the race war than we are (as demoralized products of the Baby Boomers).

That's a tribe.

Jews don't fear women because women are easily corruptible or burned at the stake when they aren't.

Because their argument was a Leftist scam and easy to spot thanks to the users who DEMANDED IT from mods who refused to do anything for years. MGTOW threads were around a year ago anyway… And now they are just

Then why do they freak out when they see redpilled females speaking openly while they laugh at the men?

I TOLD YOU

KIKE MODS ANCHORED THREAD

Aryan Beauty and Jewish Conflict

Occidental Observer: theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/03/rhonda-garelick-despises-aryan-beauty/

- This is a fairly routine exercise emanating from the highest reaches of the mainstream media expressing Jewish hatred and revenge seeking against Whites and especially Nordic-looking Whites. One is tempted not to make too much of it except that the issue of physical beauty and health goes to the heart of the long conflict between Jews and non-Jews over the construction of culture.

- There is a long history of Jewish hostility to Western concepts of physical beauty, going back to the war of the Macabees against the Greeks commemorated at Hanukkah. The standard Jewish interpretation is that it was a rebellion against the Greek concept of physical beauty as a value in itself, as opposed to Jewish “holiness” as the ultimate virtue (which, being a bit cynical, I would parse as group commitment). Especially abhorrent to the Jews was the Greek practice of honing their bodies in gymnasia.

- In “The Artful Race” Sunic mentions the Frankfurt School as dedicated to subverting Western images of physical beauty–a theme also of Elizabeth Whitcombe. (My chapter on the Frankfurt School discusses a different kind of subversion of the healthy: family life. Children with strong ties to their parents and a sense of pride in their families are said to be forerunners of fascism and anti-Semitism.)

- Garelick’s little article is in the tradition of Jewish antipathy toward the physical beauty of Europeans and for the value that Europeans place on physical beauty. I suspect that these traits of Europeans are an aspect of European individualism. Peter Frost has argued convincingly that there was sexual selection for traits like blond hair and blue eyes (Peter Frost, “European hair and eye color: A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection?” Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006) 85–103). This means that traits like blond hair and blue eyes were seen as sexually attractive—like the peacock’s tail, so the became more common in the population because they were sought after in mates. Frost associates sexual selection among Europeans with monogamy as a marriage system, selected for in the northern areas where Whites evolved because of the need for fathers to provision children. Rather than marry on the basis of known kinship relations and family dictates, marriage is based on individual choice. And one criterion of importance (among others) is physical beauty.

- Such selection pressures would also lead Europeans to value love as the basis of marriage–analysed as a trait that makes close relationships between spouses mutually rewarding. John Murray Cuddihy remarked on how love was seen as foreign by Jews emerging from the ghetto, resulting in theories like Sigmund Freud’s where love was analyzed as repressed sexuality—little more than a neurosis.* Nor was physical beauty in marriage partners valued among Jews. A passage in the Talmud says that physical appearance was not to be a critical resource for a woman: “For ‘false is grace and beauty is vain.’ Pay regard to good breeding, for the object of marriage is to have children.” Instead of personal attraction, arranged marriages were common into the modern era.

- Hence the culture clash exemplified by Garelick, abetted by Jewish historical grudges against the West.

Just taking a guess but it's probably because women have 100s of men they can pick from while it's harder for men to pick a woman and they don't want the women choosing the wrong men