Which one is better for hackery fuzzing stuff and why?

Basically dead.
Ada is still semi-used as PL part of PL/SQL, but this language has no community.

C and C++ are run by ANSI (i.e by corporations using ANSI as proxy).

>luaconf.com/#coc
Remainder: Lua was made by a Brazillian Jew.

For now there's no other options but HolyC and Urbit.

Ruby and Haskell still have no CoC, but they are heavily infiltrated with fags and they will eventually push their faggotory.

Source?

Tim Toady is a KOS believer, it's a well known fact. The name of Perl itself and also the names of some language concepts (like 'blessing') come from Bible.

Regarding the shilling
youtube.com/watch?v=zmNInkzaYLc (around 00:57)
Here he talks about lack of women in Perl community and that "we should do something about it".
Another such session was hosted by a tranny (it was YAPC NA I believe)

There's his another talk where he goes about how "minorities should be included/welcomed" or some word-play like that.

The first implementation of Perl 6 was lead by a tranny as well (though this code was thrown away for being a pure crap).

Also Larry Wall works for Craigslist, which says enough

freetards are the same way

/thread

Well who cares if there is tranny or woman coding? As long as the code works it is OK for me

...

Ada and Fortran are not dead
also what's about python?

That's what I've been saying for a while. Either the software works or it doesn't work. That's all I care about.

If the only reason why people still learn a language is to maintain legacy software from the 60s, its dead.