Hi Holla Forums, I have a little game that I thought my friends here would be interested in...

Hi Holla Forums, I have a little game that I thought my friends here would be interested in, I'm going to pretend to be a complete Holla Forumsack and other Anons try to counter a typical Holla Forumsack's arguments as best they can, I thought this would be a good way to try and develop our argument skills and will be a good laugh at the same time.
I'll start off by the usual…
Here's some typical Holla Forums views.

Oh yeah, forgot to mention, WEBM related is what a Holla Forumsack actually finds good music…

We don't need a devil's advocate when Holla Forumsyps are regularly hopping in here to say hi.

...

kek still no valid arguments

We go through this every day either way. It's a waste of time. I have enough of Holla Forumsacks as it is.

Hm, then enlighten me, what would be a valid argument against it? I see tons of retard Holla Forums users running amock here but I don't see any decent counterarguments, maybe if we show them that their arguments are retarded by showing that our arguments and reasoning are more strong then maybe they might fuck off or at the very least genuine lurkers may see our point of view.

I'm mainly more curious as to what the average user's arguments are here, I know that there's tons of stormweenies trolling here but I'm genuinely curious here, maybe my plan is a bit shit but how would one counter those guys? Maybe just ignoring them because they clearly aren't going to take our logic as fact are they?

Then you aren't reading the post. Why do you think people would be able to formulate better arguments or you are a Holla Forumsyp trying to make feel better about yourself by posting your rhetoric here and expecting the leftist to jump at the opportunity to debate with you alt-right retards.

There was just a thread about jews where one guy was posting fake talmud quotes and using pathos to argue. If you think these people are efficient arguers you should fuck off.

*trying to feel better about yourself

And I meant to say: Why do you think people are going to come up with a better argument in this particular thread than the arguments people use when they're actually engaged in a real argument, with a real Holla Forumstard and their infographs.

If you think the Holla Forumslyps might have a point you can go to Holla Forums.

This is a shit thread. We want to discuss stuff relevant to our leftist cause. Not come up with counter arguments to shit that gets spewed here daily. You can't show a Holla Forumstard his argument is retarded. You can't show him other academic studies that might conflict with his preconceived notions of race or jews etc, because they rely on unfalsifiable statements to prove their points.

Like "da j00s" infiltrated the academia so this study is already biased and false without first looking into it.

Why do we want to come up with counterarguments that when it boils down to it, they will have the last word on the matter because of some info graph proving the reptilian jewish monopoly game we're all playing

Fuck off.

No dude. It is true that people respond to them with memes and allegations but for a lot of the reasons its because they've gone through the same dialogues over and over and over and over and over again, so people are just tired of all of it.They just call you kikes, niggers, sjw's, betas and pretty much anything without really discussing seriously. They end up harshly derailing the thread and so much focus on their spasms makes discourages the serious anons trying to make descent, in-depth posts and drives them off. I'd much rather discuss and debate other leftists here than go through that obnoxious show with the pol people. That isn't to say that every non-leftist here is stupid, a waste of time or from pol though.