...
BBC: White Countries Alone Responsible for Environmental Conservation
Once a 10 year old boy from England wrote to Tun Dr. Mahathir on logging in 1987. Tun Dr. Mahathir replied him.
It occurs to me that I no longer check to see if the author is Jewish, but rather which Jewish name they have.
He has a point there.
This is the reason Donald Trump is against conservationism, rather explicitly. Preserving air quality and natural forests is all well and good but that means fuck all if the Chinese are going to destroy anything they own and pump tons of smog into the air.
I remember as a boy in Canada I was a part of the junior forest wardens. One of the primary lessons we were taught is that if even one person decides to replant a forest he can, in effect, rebuild the whole forest alone. The trees will grow, the birds can come back, the deer will arrive, and eventually the government will come by and call this a stunning natural beauty and erase all of your credit because that's what the government does(a weird end to the story for ten year olds, but hey better rip off that band aid early on).
If you look at the woods in British Columbia whole miles of it was torn down for logging decades ago. But conservation efforts were rather rapidly able to replant the trees on a relative scale, and now the logging industry is more or less sustainable.
Environmental stability isn't hard. It really, REALLY fucking isn't. Trees obviously want to grow on their own and animals want to fuck and reproduce. They do a lot of good work in the Nordic countries tree planting and while it can be time consuming it's a paid regular job that contributes to the various countries natural resources as well as economics.
You want to save the rainforests? Get a fucking shovel. Get your machete and make cuttings of plants you need. It's not rocket science.
Hey, I'm from BC too
What the cucks like to leave out is that in terms of actual land covered in wilderness, its only been expanding these past decades. They just really hate it when you cut down big trees because they have some sort of weird religious attachment them.
archive.is
they cut it down at night and a group of women just showed up in the morning and balled their eyes out
They also really hate clearcutting but can only ever provide aesthetic reasons on why its bad.
Hahahaha the MSM always seem to be pushing that white people are the only race with any agency. Hopefully that idea will gain momentum and we can get back to the good ole days of empire.
So the National Parks movements in the US and UK, Allemansrett in Sweden, Norway and Finland, the German ecological movement from the Nazis onwards; all those things never happened. Good to know.
One word holes your non-argument and leaves it to sink: China.
Well just about every non-white country has been running off the fumes of colonialism-guilt for decades so whenever these worthless international economic/environmental forums are held across the world, they offer nothing and demand everything. It's like clockwork. Then they take this bitchy attitude and run this circular line of logic where they actually believe the should be destroying the environment because white man did for so long and we have to catch up. These forums are so useless that I didn't even bother remember their titles, but it's the same unproductive conversation, every fucking time. For instance; China and India, if they continue on this trend, are just going to start consuming coal on a massive level and seriously fuck shit up. The West was on the path to stabilization, but now we have this clusterfuck of nonwhites ruining any attempt as consumption is driven to harmful levels.