A little while ago, my wife found a set of Wells' Outline of History (1956 publication). She was reading it tonight and brought pic related to my attention. So I thought I would share with Holla Forums.
Download:
archive.org/details/OutlineOfHistory
I haven't seen any topics regarding this in particular. The full section regarding Germany itself starts at p. 917.
Other urls found in this thread:
theamericanconservative.com
ihr.org
en.wikipedia.org
archive.is
theguardian.com
twitter.com
BUT IT WILL SOON
Not soon enough for my tastes.
They deserve for it to happen, but we're going to have to change the setup a bit.
Zyklon B is horribly inefficient for the job, and even the kikes claim it took over 20 minutes to clean out the room. If we're going to reach 6 million, that'll take the better part of a century.
The whole "holocaust" story hadn't been made up then, Night wasn't published in English until 1960
Exactly the point. It's another source stating there was no holocaust.
H.G. Wells: socialist, pacifist, all round an unlikeable cuck - and thanks to this, nobody ever mentions his ignorance of muh shoah. Given his CV, it's no real surprise!
when the next nazis come to power they will gas every single jew because they will know that if they dont, the kikes will come up with a shoah anyway.
Lurk more nigger. No Jews were gassed during the Holohoax. Starvation and disease is what killed the kikes in captivity, along with everyone else who was imprisoned. There was no targeted Jewish extermination during WWII.
Didn't Skorzeny say something to that effect at Nuremberg?
>unlike those of the first World War, the stories of German crimes and savagery had been much below the truth
Typical anglokike.
Feels good man.
And the term Holocaust was coined in 1972 IIRC.
Oy vey, never forget the six million Belgian babies who had their hands chopped off and eaten!
Why did Roosevelt side with jews then?
Did jews control the media and government in USA pre WW2?
Was there no ethnic alliance of Europeans?
Either I can't into english or Wells is actually saying
Yes. Look at all the kike, commie, and kike commie filth in the State Department back then, that McCarthyism made an attempt to clean out.
The Time Machine was a pretty good book
Am I reading this right? It sounds like he is saying German crimes were much more serious than had been rumored.
He was at Dachau, not Nürnberg
That's what I was thinking
Well, that's disappointing.
I remember reading that book in school and there was nothing like that in that passage. Wells wrote in that passage specifically about gas chambers, killing Jews with diesel engines and masturbation machines. I was okay with Sally Fields' name, Chick-fil-a and Kennedy's 6-seater limo changing but this is just too much.
That's the way I read it, too, but the irony is that he says "unlike those of the first World War". So he's aware that it was those exact same stories. In WWI Germans were accused by the allies of chopping the hands of Belgians (what the Belgians did in Africa), gasing Serbians, and turning their own dead into soap bars. In WWII the objects of the same crimes became Jews, but it's exactly the same stories that were admitted to be false in WWI. HG Wells is a real asshole. He is aware of the lies, and of the fact that the allegations have no credibility but he insists that it is true.
Source on those claims?
Read up on the so-called "Rape of Belgium" (as it was called). Funny thing is, after the war they couldn't find even one example of this alleged hand chopping, despite there having been "eyewitness accounts" before.
Really, all atrocity propaganda is just the same shit. The same stories of babies being smashed and people being fed into torture machines have been recycled over and over ever since the 70 Years War against Spain.
They even managed to drag them out for the Iraq War to use against Saddam.
Does HG Wells even acknowledge the starvation of germans in WW1 caused by the british blockade?
theamericanconservative.com
Britain in 1914 imposed a hunger blockade against Germany, illegally seeking to interdict food from the civilian population. (…) The British hunger blockade continued after the armistice of November 11, 1918; not until Germany acceded to the hash settlement of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 was the blockade fully lifted.
Fuck, I mean the 80 Years War.
Here, the alleged gassings of the Serbs in WWI. Gasing of Jews in WWII announced in almost identical article.
On the Germans allegedly turning their own dead into soap bars in WWI. The wikipedia article has this.
masturbation machines? huh? what's that?
First, I don't believe there was any "holocaust" & the death toll at the work camps was roughly 270,000 toward the end of the war, mostly due to typhus & malnutrition.
But I fail to see how this passage denies the "holocaust."
Could someone elucidate for me?
What I'm reading is that, "…the Allies realized that, unlike the [stories of German atrocities in WW1], the stories of German crimes and savagery had been much below the truth [more savage & criminal than reported] [in WW2]"
Am I reading this wrong?
McCarthy wasn't jew wise, in fact, one of his top guys was jewish, likely to divert his attention elsewhere
Thanks, that's pretty interesting. Knew about some propaganda from WW1 but not those
No, you're correct. Wells is insisting that the atrocities poised against the Germans are worse than WWI. He isn't denying the Holocaust at all.
The evil goymans created machines that would jack off innocent jews until they died from exhaustion.
Never forget the holocauster
ITT: OP and his retarded wife cannot read
I read it as much below the standard of truth. Truth representing the proverbial "high road."
...
OP can't into English
Kill yourself
McCarthy fell for the virtue signalling meme, he surrounded himself with jews to show he wasn't an antisemite (as the jews accused him of, since he was rooting out a lot of commie jews).
I always liked HG Wells
AND a fag.
The term holocaust was already used in early 1900s media to describe the Jews' suffering in Eastern Europe. I think the term was both "Holocaust" and "holocaust" already then.
You're right though that the word has only later been used to describe the holohoax.
No. He is implying that the "atrocities" were much less than what happened in WWI.
This implies that he thought they were true for World War I, and false for World War II. In other words he heard the holocaust lies, and did not believe them.
19.0 The Hebrew Scriptures and the Prophets
19.1 The Place of the Israelites in History
19.2 Saul, David, and Solomon
19.3 The Jews a People of Mixed Origin
19.4 The Importance of the Hebrew Prophets
20.0 The Aryan-speaking Peoples in Prehistoric Times
20.1 The Spreading of the Aryan Speakers
20.2 Primitive Aryan Life
20.3 Early Daily Aryan Life
...
Patton certainly seemed to have come to the conclusion that Communist Jews had already taken over the Federal Government when he was denied the authority to go push Stalin's shit in after siezing western Germany.
Read the post you're replying to again, it's dripping with sarcasm that went over your head.
wha?
Yes. Are you new?
Yeah, I am not seeing what op is seeing here.
Me either, I'm starting to think OP is a Jew.
It seems pretty clear that Wells believes in WW2 German war crimes. But without the rest of the book for context, maybe it's a pic-related situation.
Generated some interesting conversation about WWI soap, anyway.
Don't be an idiot. Who gasses a single room of people at a time and then goes through all that cleanup when you have tanks, planes, and firearms to kill or literally obliterate large amounts of people.
Thats some of the best evidence of the holocaust being fake. Germans are too efficient a people to waste their time on that shit, and they couldn't have made the number so high with such a method.
Yearly reminder it's slightly blue tinted white with mustard yellowish gold
2000 people gassed at the same time, behind a wooden door, underground, and then dragged upstairs, with canes, to the ovens, where they were burned 4 at a time, in 15 minutes.
It was real in their minds.
I do think we should use Zyklon B to gas them just to make the point come across.
You are a lucky Holla Forumsack, user. Sounds like you found a good one.
.
Reminder that you are describing the photograph and not the dress.
jewgle it.
...
Look, I am convinced this whole question is a troll to begin with. That dress is obviously white and gold.
I agree with these people OP. I haven't read that book yet, but the quotation you posted is clearly saying that the stories of German crimes and savagery didn't do justice to the truth. In other words, saying the holocaust happened.
Are you illiterate, or did you post the wrong quotation?
for OP
You're right. Wells is saying that the stories of German atrocities were greatly exaggerated during the first war, but were greatly understating the realities of the second. OP is illiterate.
well for it to be a holocaust it has to be death by fire.
White Phosphorous would do the job very well
Today’s concept of war crime, with genocide its ultimate horror, flows from the sheer scale of Nazi mass murder and the need to ensure nothing like it ever happens again.
It would have been monstrous to classify the cultural destruction of the second world war, the worst of which was often caused by British and American bombs, in a similar moral sphere to Nazi crimes against humanity.t would have been equally misplaced for the court at Nuremberg to treat the destruction of Jewish culture in eastern Europe as equal to the mass extermination of millions of Jewish lives.
The Degenerate Art exhibition in Munich in 1937, at which the Nazis mocked and vilified modern works, was an insight into their ideology, but a footnote compared with the horror of Auschwitz.
Culture can be renewed, remade, reinvented. Human life cannot. The organised torture and murder of human beings is what war crime should always, and unmistakably, mean. So while we mourn the loss of art or cultural artefacts, we need to keep a moral perspective in which the true crimes of war can be seen for what they are, and eradicated from the world.
Of course not.