So I felt compelled to make this thread after a lengthy discussion with my father and a friend in relation to the U.S...

(checked)
I'm projecting on you both here, but consider this for a second. I think you're both using the knowledge you have today to judge a situation that was many, many years in the making - a decision made long before the political landscape was as it stands now.

We know that there was massive collusion in the DNC to get Hillary elected. You have the fact she did decently well in 2008 but not good enough to top Obama, and essentially was handed the State Dept position as a consolation prize in exchange for her concession of the primary, and potential other future promises. That last part is not well established by hard evidence. She royally fucked that job up, but at the time nobody knew about it. Nobody knew about her server, nobody knew about the e-mails and mishandling of information, etc. If I recall correctly, Benghazi was the first time the Republicans had any real ammo against her, and even then, the whole investigation was a clusterfuck and basically went nowhere, other than starting people looking at the private server / e-mail situation. I'd even argue that because of the Benghazi hearing, most Democrats think she did nothing wrong and those Republican meanies were hurting poor poor Hillary. On top of that, you have the collusion between Hillary, DWS, and Tim Kaine with respect to the DNC, which is well established.

Further, I would maintain that the Democrats either did not anticipate that Bernie would run, or figured their contingency plans were good enough to stop any potential non-Hillary candidates from winning the primaries. Keep in mind they had a multi-pronged attack against Bernie, and in all honesty he did a remarkable job given how stacked the odds were against him, as we found out later. He also helped us, I think, because he revealed just how big and dangerous the socialist / marxist / communist contingent will be in the future. Consider it a small favor from a filthy kike.

In any case, the DNC was appropriating funds from their 50 state campaigns and effectively giving it all to Hillary's campaign. In other words, they took money from funds that are supposed to help Democrat candidates for the House and Senate in each of the 50 states, and basically pooled it up and "donated" it to Hillary's campaign. This is documented in the DNC leaks. They also had the massive imbalance of superdelegates as an extra buffer for Hillary against any other primary contender, which they used to good effect. It wouldn't be too surprising if most of those superdelegates were bought and paid for by the DNC, but that's just speculation on my part. It's likely, but as of yet unsubstantiated, that there were a few other plans in the works that forced Bernie to fold and concede the race to Hillary. It's also possible he was controlled opposition the entire time, and was simply in it to take people's money and convert a sizable block of non-voters into Hillary voters that she couldn't otherwise reach.

Now look at the Republican party by contrast. If Trump had not run, it would have been a complete clusterfuck. Jeb was clearly their candidate of choice, and it's very likely the RNC helped Jeb raise a large part of his massive funding pool. And I do agree to an extent the RNC figured he'd be a shoe in because of the last name, the fact he was governor of Florida, and people didn't really know how big of a fuckup he was. That said, I don't think any amount of money spent by Jeb's campaign would have made him less autistic. He was not a great speaker in any of the debates, he constantly fucked up in interviews and press conferences without any outside influence from Trump, and although he was leading the very very early polls in the buildup to the primary race, nobody knew how fucking retarded he was at the time. So until the media started really covering the Republican candidates and we started seeing them speak in public, Jeb was the obvious choice.

(more…)

(continued)
However, the RNC's plan was a total disaster the entire time. Trump literally saved the RNC's ass by doing as well as he did. I think Rubio and Cruz both had great chances of beating Jeb to the nomination, again assuming Trump wasn't running. Outside of a few fuckups in their own campaigns and at the debates, they both did quite well overall. Rubio was very popular until his robot short circuit at one of the last debates, and Cruz did well given the creepy vibes he threw off and the fact he's a booger eater. Again, it's not unreasonable to consider that both of them received more scrutiny over those gaffes because Trump was running, and because people like us are fans of Trump. I also don't think you'd see Holla Forums very active in this election cycle if Trump had not been involved in the race to the presidency, because we're sure as hell not going to support the left, and without Trump the right had good candidates, but not great ones. Mostly just the same neo-cohen bullshit that the right props up every year, little to none of which aligns with the common views on here.

From that perspective, I'd argue it looks like the DNC pretty much had the election in the bag. Hillary has a ton of die hard fans on the left, Jeb could not have carried the RNC into victory and was constantly bleeding money and support throughout the primary process, and it would have likely been Cruz or Rubio that took the nomination. They might have tried to hit Hillary hard over Benghazi and her e-mails, but neither of them has the fire that Trump does, and I'd argue they would have kept things very civilized and politically correct because they're good goys. On top of that, neither of them has much political experience, something that Hillary's campaign would have absolutely hammered back with over and over. Furthermore, the fact that Jeb received so much money and was such a non-viable candidate means the coffers would have been close to dry for any other Republican nominee. Most donors had given all they could to Jeb very early on on the premise that he was a natural, which he certainly proved he wasn't.

What ultimately happened was something that I don't think anybody could have expected. There were three main points that changed the tone of the entire election. First and most obvious was Trump's entry into the Republican primary, and his immense success despite the establishment being heavily stacked against him. Remember, they naively believed they could get Jeb to win and had sunk a ton of money into him so far, so to see Trump come along and fire up the Republican party was extremely distressing for the establishment right. A lot of anti-Trump sentiments were borne out of the Republican party during the time before Trump really started to lock down the nomination. On top of that, I don't think any strategist could have fully appreciated how much popularity Trump would have achieved, in large part to his very politically incorrect stances and behaviors. Look at how wrong the media has been about Trump for the entire election process for evidence on this one.

Second, the Benghazi and e-mail scandals started to garner a bit more attention than the DNC predicted, possibly because of Trump's influence and rousing the Republican voters. I think people felt like it was more acceptable to keep asking those tough questions because Trump was standing up to everybody in his way, but that's just my opinion. I posit that Benghazi is effectively what lead to the e-mail scandals and the leaks of her e-mails, and that the gross mishandling of both of those investigations is what lead to the DNC leaks, further Hillary leaks, Soros leaks, and so forth. I think this because I have a personal theory that all of the leaks so far are from disgruntled US intelligence agents that are smart enough to not want her dead but are doing whatever else they can to fuck up her campaign. I think this because all of these people are meticulously careful about handling secure information, and some of them may even have co-workers that are named or implicated in the classified documents that were on Hillary's server. I would be fucking pissed too. Hillary was extremely lucky to have Lynch as AG and Comey as FBI director - and if you look in to both of their relationships with the Clintons, it's obvious why the investigation was intentionally thrown by both of them.

(continued)

Third, Hillary's health has taken a big turn for the worst and I don't think it was well anticipated. A year ago, other than her medical history, she looked fine and seemed pretty healthy. She was pretty cogent at the debates and aside from some extended bathroom break time PANTS OF SHIT there was nothing too odd going on as far as the general public was concerned. It was known ahead of time Hillary had experienced blood clots and some kind of fall, but I don't think there was even serious discussion back then that she might have had a serious cerebral hemorrhage, people weren't really noticing her Fresnel lensed glasses, and so forth.

As an aside, consider also that Holla Forums has a gigantic edge over the general population as we're in an environment that permits any question to be asked and considered without judgment. In other words, we're free to wonder about all sorts of potential future consequences, things which the public would never dream of thinking, and so we have an inherent edge in seeing potential future outcomes. So we may really get the gears turning over the extended bathroom breaks, the weird glasses, the occasional strange behavior, because we're always looking for anything even slightly out of the ordinary. Never forget this by the way - but also never forget how (little) the general public thinks.

In the end, the DNC is struggling with a candidate that is constantly manifesting huge differences between the constructed public image of herself and what the public actually sees. The various layers of PR armor that have been built up over years are breaking apart, and rather quickly at that. The problem is, as much as they might want to replace Hillary, they're stuck with her. She won the primary (fair and square!) and has had their backing the entire time. No matter what happens, they can't back out now. They're also dealing with the fact that Trump is proving to be very successful even though the DNC is colluding with the media against him, arguably rigging poll results in Hillary's favor to discourage Trump's support base, and trying to dig up every bit of his past for the world to see. You have CTR and its network of related media companies (see David Brock) going all over the internet shilling for Hillary and trying to sway public opinion, spending quite a lot of money in the process.

And yet here we are, starting to take the lead in rigged polls.

She's electable because:
Current year, we need woman president.
"Experience"
Confident they can rig the game, just look at the media.
Extension of Bush/Clinton dynasty.

But most importantly:
Easily controlled due to such a shady past.
AND
Replaceable when she dies, because she WILL die.

I'm pretty sure this is them waving their dicks in our faces saying that they control the world and that they can put whoever they damn well please into office, even a known criminal.

However, it's going to backfire in their fucking faces.

Please list off all the female democratic politicians whose existence you were aware of prior to the start of campaigning in 2015, i'll wait.

Done? I have no doubt that Hilldabeast is the only one name you had on you list. Now given that everyone on /ppol/ is significantly more politically aware of than the general population, it's simple to assume that almost everyone in the united states is unaware of any other female democrats.

You see, I live outside of the United states and the way the media is trying to portray the election is part of a larger story against America's "right wing intolerant past". Barrack Obama's election was portrayed here as niggers overcoming racism and defeating the white supremacists. So the media wanted to use Hilary to continue that narrative, "sexists join the ranks of racists as defeated political outcasts", which is why so much focus was put on her being the first female president the same way King Kong was the first animal president.

Without the constant narrative of "progress towards higher egalitarian ideals", the goyim will start to question what the hell is the point of this politicking. Trump was the wildcard they didn't expect, who asked and answered the question for every goy.

White Democrats are either full on corrupt insane SJWs or Jews. The pool of candidates is slim. The Democrat party isn't the party of functional white men anymore. They've been drove out of the party.

The base had a chance to vote for O'Malley and he only got like 1% of the vote from the coalition of minorities and single moms. They don't want a white male.

The Democrat party is the affirmative action party. As more and more white men get forced out the whole operation is going to become even more incompetent. Democrats relied on the media in the past to sugar coat Hillary's corruption. Like with Benghazi they treated it like it was a conspiracy theory. They thought they could get away with it and laugh at anyone that calls Hillary out.

Treating the election like it's some deep state psyop is overestimating them. Minorities are the majority of government employees and even more so in the Democrat party. These people don't have a clue about what they're doing. If some deep state actor gave a briefing about immigration will have a destabilising effect he'd certainly be fired for being racist.

A-grade analysis. Definitely worth the read.

Bumping again for this.

1) 90% of people are not capable of forming independent intelligent opinions. This is the reason that the kikes have so successfully subverted our race.

2) People only listen to the kikes because they are the ones in control. The only way a majority of people will reject the modern world and progress is if those in control reject these things and propagandize against them.

Do you think fixing either of these things will be resolved by clever memes and youtube videos of Hitler with inspiring music? No. The jews in power have never controlled a population so thoroughly and completely as they do now. They would rather see it burn than relinquish control.

Winning hearts and minds, and in the greater sense reawakening the soul of the white man can only happen after the war is won.

Do you think muslims will go back because we asked them nicely?
Do you think nigs will stop nogging unless there is a brutal crackdown so they learn their place? And whats to stop them from chimping out in the next 100 years unless we get rid of them.
Do you think mexishits will stop leeching off our country because they realize we're serious all of a sudden?

No.

This war is not for our countries. It is for the world. Only one race will come out on top.

It wont be glorious, it wont be easy. It wont happen like we would like to think it would. But it will happen. If you dont see the inevitably of the coming race war you are a fool.