Solar Cycles Control Earth's Temperature

To be honest, it might be completely anecdotal and meaningless evidence but every summer kind of feels colder than the previous. Not by a lot, but there seem to be fewer days where I want to kill myself due to heat.

you might be onto something there user.
follow along this chain of thought.
solar magnetic activity influences the earths magnetic field.
solar output of charged particles including CMEs influence earths ionosphere
the earths magnetic field along with the ionosphere and input from the sun are the cause of the ever present resonances of the schumann cavity.
the schumann resonance frequencies correspond remarkably with human brainwave frequencies.

I thought this was common knowledge?

Common knowledge = Hurr Durr CO2 controls temperature.

interestingly, the solar cycle does fucking seem to correlate to the chinese zodiac ~240 year its 4 cycles of approximately 60 years but there is some overlap so the years does precisely translate to "240 of our years"\" cycle. And the 4th, last, firemonkey/firecock combo of the 4 cycles is very important for changes of power 240 years ago was 1776 :^)

so no ragnorak for us?

No, there will be violent civil wars in 2060.

By then solar activity will be picking up again, and that means stability will be ending.
This is the time where Good and evil will battle.
Prob be a rahowa between right wing whites and shitskins / race traitors.

It does though. Massive emissions of C02 are cooking our planet. Extreme weather is being made more dangerous and flooding will destroy huge parts of the land

Yeah but no.
The temperature of the Earth goes up and down for reasons we don't understand.
Your squiggly lines don't mean it's due to the Sun although that might be it.

Choke on a bag of dicks you ignoramus.

no it must happen before then.

I will be so pissed if it doesnt happen until im fucking 65

Our governments already know this, why co you think they started signing all the climate treaties in the past decade or so? When the temperature begins to fall they can say look our treaties are working.

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing when I saw this thread.

CO2 accounts for roughly 5% of the heating forces on Earth.
The bulk of the heating force, roughly 90%, comes from water vapor.

When I was in advanced chem, my teacher taught us that
CO2 is released from water when it heats up.
So something is heating the water and causing the CO2 to be released. Not the other way around.

CO2 is the tail mate. It doesn't wag the dog.

No it isnt. More third worlders die when there is a typhoon or what ever BECAUSE THERE ARE MORE THIRD WORLDERS TO DIE.

Florida just had its first hurricane hit land in 11 years. And guess what it was a babby storm.

Now THAT is a manmade climate disaster. Stupid fucking liberals pumped the aquifer of an historically extremely arid region dry so that they could have pretty lawns. Now that the area is seeing a cycle of less rainfall the aquifer isnt there so everything is drying out and dying. And it turns out that big forest fire was caused by one of your precious mexishits driving around on a flat tire.

AGW is not a thing, but the fatal stupidity of liberals is.

Alright I'm out. Enjoy, and let me know if you find anything cool in the comments section of that article.

archived link
archive.is/N6dip

So where does the 26 billion tons of CO2 humans release annually go then? Does it just disappear into the aether?

feeds the trees nigga

CO2 produces no net warming in Earth's atmosphere. The heat capacity of CO2 is slightly below the average heat capacity of the rest of the components of the rest of the atmosphere.

Water vapor, on the other hand, is a major GHG, and with our massive irrigation and paving efforts, we force much more of it into the atmosphere on a continuous basis. Thing is, WV is in a tight equilibrium. It will never lead to a runaway greenhouse effect.

The focus on CO2 is literally a communist plot to destroy the West. They needed to demonize some inevitable byproduct of industrial growth, and CO2 met almost all the criteria. The only problem was that it wasn't actually harmful. But propaganda would deal with that.

You know that isn't what happens right? Only a tiny fraction actually 'feeds trees'. Most of it gets absorbed by oceans.

But surely more CO2 → more water vapour is a decent theory. If the planet is hotter more water will evaporate leading to even more warming

When Holla Forums accepts anti-intellectuals among it's ranks, Holla Forums dies.

if it gets absorbed by the oceans then it isnt a 'greenhouse gas' now is it?

It builds up, but the only actual damage it does is ocean acidification, and that is a minor effect.

Paving and irrigation have far, far, far greater effects.

well which is it, libshits?

We don't want to acidify our oceans either, that's just another negative externality people don't consider. If we increase CO2 emission AND reduce carbon sinks (via deforestation) then we are obviously creating an environment where less CO2 will be taken care of and thus a higher atmosphere CO2.

I assume you've never took care of a salt water fish tank. Acidity is very, very sensitive. Take a look at the GBR if you think that the ocean isn't acutely sensitive to acidification.

Dips in 1700 (well into the renaissance), around 1830's-40's (industrial revolution really gets going) and interwar period (partly war-driven, of course, but it's when the television was invented, radar and jets were theorised and Communism, Fascism and National Socialism were all experimented with).
Lets just hope the experiment sticks on the latter, next time.

I saw a global map of the theoretical animation of CO2 being released by cities. It showed the CO2 being moved by the Jet stream and sheeeit, man.
Over the Winter, the CO2 kept building up, and the global map started turning red (showing all the CO2)
& then, when may / june rolled around, all the CO2 disappeared.

& this was a video promoting the Global Warming Hoax. So I imagine that during the Summer months, CO2 really is sucked up by trees.

Stop being stupid. One fish worth of CO2 would shift the pH of a tiny little fish tank by an entire log, or more. The ocean is HUGE. Not to mention that much of the carbon that is absorbed doesn't go into solution, but falls out in the form of organic matter.

I seriously hope you have better logic skills than that. Trees aren't CO2 vacuums, though they do provide a sink over time. It's highly likely that deforestation + increased emissions > the amount of CO2 plants can sink though. CO2 doesn't just hover around plants waiting to be absorbed after all.

Um, what?

You are right. When oceans heat up, they release CO2.
But TREES NIGGA. they do A LOT.

Small fraction being 40% according to climate change propaganda.
skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-intermediate.htm

That small fraction would be much higher if we exterminated brown people from the planet.
They create more co2 than white people do.
example: scitechdaily.com/deforestation-adds-more-atmospheric-co2-than-the-sum-total-of-cars-trucks-on-the-worlds-roads/

If we were serious about global warming we would have to start removing taco and rice from our planet.
But of course, Global warming is horse shit and liberals want more shitskins to exist which means they believe it is horse shit, too.

Is literally fucking nothing.
Comparing it to a drop in the ocean would be an insult to drops.

Plankton converts it into organic matter, dies, and sinks to the bottom where it decays very, very slowly.

Yes it does, but the argument is that trees aren't able to absorb all of the CO2 released either because there is too much or it isn't making itself available by just flying around like gas is wont to do. In the video he himself admits that not all of it is being absorbed so I don't know that we really disagree.

Small fraction was an exaggeration. It's obviously significant. I know shitskins emit more, but that doesn't make it a good thing.

tl;dr I'm not convinced it's not all bullshit. Yes the Jews are pushing for all sorts of hyper-Jewish shit through global warming, but maybe that's because they realized it's inevitable and are trying to position themselves as the saviors of mankind by being the only ones coming up with solutions.

The solution is to kill brown people.
assuming anyone actually believes this shit
not even libs believe it

youtube.com/watch?v=7sh_nlz43Pc

archive.is/7kKh7 (UN's Climate 2020 website)

archive.is/xSfUx (EU Climate Action website)

Exactly, see links above. They're going to really ramp up the "man-made climate change" bullshit to try to get all kinds of "green" laws & taxes passed and ultimately global governance by 2020 so that when the significant cooling starts they can say "See, we were right and our measures are stopping global warming! Now bow before your masters and thank us daily for saving your pathetic lives. You belong to us now!"

For more proof that "man-made climate change" is a hoax watch this video by John Coleman, meteorologist and founder of The Weather Channel.

Indeed. Very Interesting.

Maybe you're right, but I don't think the conspiracy is so vast. I worked in a lab and we observed changes due to global warming. That plus everything I've come to know about the situation leads me to believe it's true to some extent, even if not as extreme as the alarmists would have you believe.

Feeds the global warming business.

No, you observed changes and then ascribed them to global warming.

You have no control sample. Just a very, very biased model.

Or let's maybe take the occam razor pill and assume that people under stress start using their brains to ensure their survival?
And in the times of plenty they get lazy and progress stagnates? And "evil/decadence/hedonism" prospers?
Don't go into fringe teritory for no reason. That comes later.

You're right, I can't believe I forgot to consult my planet farm for a control group. Step it up fampai.

Oh yes because growing agriculture in that arid environment is so much better. In fact that's where farms should be, arid environments growing alfalfa.

You mean it builds up when most people are burning stuff for warmth, then vanishes when the most they need is an air conditioner?

Autism, you have it.

Embrace it and tell me what you see
earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/orthographic=-80.71,35.09,410

is she saying it doesn't matter how much carbon is dumped into the atmosphere?

Wait, can you help me understand how you derived those numbers? I am trying to properly understand your graph above.

if the temperature is controlled by solar cycles and we keep dumping carbon into the atmosphere, will it be hotter next time the sun gets quiet?

who pays for her work?

I can't understand how people go

Then proceed to make 500 year predictions

...

fuck off

Watch the video in the 1st comment.

Carbon14 Levels Seem to indicate that they Peak everyone 1000 years, and have a major Dip roughly in between the peaks.
The last C14 peak was around 1000 AD, and the Last C14 Trough was around 15-1600 AD

It should be noted that C14 levels are about 100 years delayed, b/c C14 has to be absorbed by plants and then go into the earth.

I used to have a 2000 year chart of C14, but I erased harddrive. Maybe I will find it later.
I was hoping to go to my local college and ask geologists / physicists if they have any good charts on this stuff. Google is very limited.

Checked.

But that's been the opposite of my experience not living in the US for what it's worth. In my part of Europe, summer just keeps getting fucking hotter. Winters are warmer too, there used to be so much fluffy snow when I was a child, I remember them clearly. These days, we're lucky to have some smattering of snow in December.

Check the current map i gave, the Mid Atlantic is shortening and pulling south.
This means you have the warm equatorial waters sitting closer and longer to you

Temperature is controlled by solar radiation bombarding the ionosphere. Carbon dioxide has little to nothing to do with temperature increases.

It doesn't matter if the earth is hotter or colder.
The temperature is just an effect of the bombardment.

Its the magnetic field of Sun which causes these cycles. There is no stopping them.

The north notices first.

Theres a big difference between

and

I guess even redpilled people have scientific blindspots too. These arguments feel a lot like trying to talk to a leftist about race.

I'm going to listen to scientists such as the botonist, ecologist & environmentalist Dr David Bellamy OBE who was banned by the BBC and blacklisted by TV in general after a 30-year MSM career (along with some other celebrities) for not believing the "man-made climate change" hoax, over a random & anonymous poster.

When the establishment cracks down on scientists' freedom of speech, persecutes them and tries to destroy their careers, especially when those scientists present what appears to be solid evidence backing up their views, I tend to believe those scientists over the establishment.

...

Do liberals actually believe this?

m80, you're talking about some isotope of Beryllium I guess - there's no discernible trend in C14 that I'm aware of.

Most of that atmosphere is like the conservative base, transparently useless in the matter.
You want to check the non nitrogen and argon components.

Also the real fun is the methane deposits are cooking off, it is now immaterial on the debate of the past, the future for 56 years plus the time it takes for them to pass half of the stores will be warming.

I don't really buy the 'blacklisted' thing because they do the same for the creation science or free energy nutters and that doesn't mean they're suddenly onto something big.

Atmospheric CO2 is only 720 billion tons, so unless we sink the 26 then it's going to have some effect more than likely.

I first noticed there was something odd about the stock market cycles, and the solar cycle. The two lined up very closely.

Later I read about the theory of "Mass Human Excitability" by some Russian guy who started by studying the correlation between battles and Sunspots.

Humans are electro magnetic creatures. & they become stimulated by solar flares. These magnetic field from the sun are likely causing people to become euphoric, and irrational.

Just study the Original Chart. Notice where the dips in sunspot cycles are. Those are usually lead to periods of great stability.
Notice that when the cycles are high, the jews are in total control.

Do you really think your waking up was by accident? You really think that's air you are breathing?

TFW no Bix Nood Matrix .jpg :(
Time to get my pol meme cds

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1536

240 years earlier was 1536, the peak of the English Dissolution of the Monastaries and tons of other shit in Europe.

Gotta see the 2000 year chart.
Peak in 0 AD. Trough in 5-600.
Peak in 1000 AD. Trough in 15-1600
Peak in 2000 AD.

Plus the physics bitches research claims the Solar Field follows a 1000 year cycle.
See Original Chart.
I'm looking for her research later today. Movie time now.

Continued:
Notice how the Sunspots dipped in 1890, and stayed low until 1930.
Guess who came to power afterwards?

These patterns just keep repeating, like clockwork. With the stability coming at the end of the dip in sunspot cycles, and the chaos coming at the end of the Peak.

So you're comparing well-respected scientists with hard facts to creation scientists just because they refuse to fully embrace cultural marxism? Like those who refuse to say race that race is a social construct or refuse to say that men who have the delusion that they're women are actually women?

Do you really trust the government-backed psychopaths who made this disgusting propaganda for a TV ad that basically threatens people to "listen & believe" or be executed??!

Global warming is cultural marxism? There's plenty of well-respected scientists in the pro-AGW camp. In fact most are there. There might be a few on the other side but they are definitely a minority. Being a minority doesn't make you right, I'm sure you're aware.

b-but global warming

...

:D

Wait, that's an ad against the climate change rubbish, not for it, it's all sarcasm to point out the insanity right? I mean they killed children, they killed people with the same state as you would switch up a light, an rapist–like man killed a woman on screen.

Watch this Stefan Molyneux video. It doesn't matter what you think of him, I don't care about him either way, but he makes a VERY good point in this video. Well, it's an obvious point but there are retards like you that need it spelled out for them.

Why don't you just reiterate the point if its so poignant? Could you be a retard? I like Moly for the record.

No it's not, they think (or at least want others to think) that "man-made climate change" is real.

1010uk.org/about/

If you think "man-made climate change" is real and trust the governments and the lysenkoist scientists who say what the governments want said either out of fear for their jobs or because of big financial incentives then you are a retard.

Yes, but since you can't into nuance, the video you posted was satirizing what anti-AGW people think goes on in classrooms for people that disagree. It's sad that you completely missed the point of the video, but if I can be honest it's not surprising.

when you burn oil you don't get the same carbon you get when wood leaves decay or burn
this is not talked about
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678675/
this article talks about pharmaceuticals but isomerism are not always stable in plants. so this kind of carbon is pollution if it can't be used by nature

You miss the crux. This is the situation as it currently stands:

Do you see how this is flawed? Couldn't there be an option where you acknowledge there is some verity to the AGW question but that doesn't mean you have to give the UN your country's butthole for ravaging. Afforestation could accomplish a lot of what we are looking for without giving any Jews more power.

After watching the ad, I have a strong emotional negative bias toward climate change since they associated it with humans making other humans explode in the most casual way, which in turn made it more vile.

Ignoring the actual climate change debate
HOW CAN THIS BE AN AD FOR IT AND NOT AGAINST IT
HOLY FUCK WE'VE REACHED 1984, WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, EVERYTHING IS TURNED UPSIDE DOWN, THIS WAS AN AD AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVISTS, THEY SHOWED THEM PSYCHOPATHIC ALLY BLOWING UP PEOPLE AND CHILDREN, IT CANNOT BE FOR IT

Calm your sperging retard. Look at my earlier post:

what kind of moron are you?
carbon is carbon there are two major isotopes c-14 & c-12 and there are NO isomers of CO² so I don't know where you're getting your chemistry information at but you need to get an education if you want to talk intelligently about it.

Fuck off PoMo cunt.

theconversation.com/the-mini-ice-age-hoopla-is-a-giant-failure-of-science-communication-45037

Heh
Number of sunspots =/= solar activity numbnuts
Temperature is going UP UP UP

Be honest, how old are you?

I used to be a farmer so I read about it
I remember a couple pages in a book that talked about a big agricultural university in the states tried dragging big blocks of dry ice into corn fields back in the 30s to see if the extra carbon would help the plants grow bigger

it had no effect
extra carbon is not like a fertilizer

...

Why do these schizophrenic economy threads keep showing up. i keep hiding them, and they keep coming back. How do I stop this.

That's the point, you retard. You can't call AGW "science". It's modelling. And alarmist models happen to be very, very bad at predicting the future. This is clearly because they don't understand that the forcing capacity of CO2 is practically saturated, while that of H2O is completely unsaturated, and far, far broader.

Except you're now claiming statistics isn't science. A black person is more likely to commit a crime, but if a black person doesn't commit a crime that doesn't mean he isn't statistically more likely to do that crime, you get it? The anti-AGW science is very thin at this point so I'm unconvinced. I understand about the funding mafia and governments using this to their advantage, but that doesn't mean that AGW isn't real by principle.

...

...

Carbon Dioxide does affect temperature in a logarithmic fashion

i.e its affect is significant at first but then levels off so that each incremental increase in temperature requires exponentially larger amounts of CO2

why is it always the conservatives, the ppl that don't believe in science, that are so reckless?
30-40 years ago it was cfcs won't damage the ozone. turns out they were very wrong

muh free market

No this proves global warming is a function of a larger environmental structure.
It means our weather has sun seasons too.

millions maybe billions are gonna get skin cancers now, and this could go on for 2,000 years.
where are the personal responsibility crew now?

inb4 nwo manipulates this to get us scared into action

youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g

not these ppl

Maybe this is the real reason for the chem trails, to stop the people from waking up.

Statistics isn't a science, moron. It's math. It is a tool that can be used to make predictions, just like a climate model. But your climate models consistently fail to predict the future, so they are wrong. A SCIENTIST would recognize that and move on to find a better model (one that doesn't revolve around CO2). But you don't. Climate "scientists" don't. Why? Because they are paid not to.

As for the "science being thin", CO2 doesn't even work as a major GHG even in theory.

Specific heat of water vapor is 1.86
Specific heat of CO2 is 0.85

The IR transmittance spectrum integration (area over the curve) is proportional to the amount of heat a given gas will hold per unit of gas with the caveat that a tall spike is saturated, and thus additional gas will not hold in additional photons. All the photons of the energy that it can block from radiating into space are already held in. Others largely pass straight though.

Compare CO2 to H2O:

webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?Spec=C124389&Index=1&Type=IR
senseair.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/IRspectrum_water.gif

Note how broad and low the spectrum is for water vapor, and how thin and sharp it is for CO2. It is already absorbing all the heat it can at low levels. Add more water vapor, however, and you can jack up the heat retention like crazy.

Water makes up about 2.5% of the atmosphere on average. CO2 is 0.04%.

Any observed warming can be explained by increased average humidity from human activity (from irrigation, paving, damming, combustion, and cooling towers). CO2 is an insignificant source of heat forcing. QED.

You really need to stop pretending that you know what you are talking about.

the results of CO2 isomers

So the Kali Yuga is the reverse Superman-effect, turning us into idiots?
i like it

30.

Are you done with your deconstruction?

Cobalt is an element, not a fucking molecule, you imbecile.

made my day

Better climate means better food production which means more niggers. Simple equation.

fuck off cock breath

WEW.

What the hell is going on with OP's graph? Anyone know what the y-axis is measuring? Or what any of the lines represent? I might just be really out of the loop.

OP stop writing like a schizophrenic faggot.

Why does the temperature anomaly curve in your graph stop in ~1970? Why isn't the y-axis labelled?

No, not really.
nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n2/full/ngeo2040.html

Not an argument.

please explain the mechanism whereby the soil gets warm then.

I 'm not a chemist. all Im saying is this problem shows up in pharmaceuticals. years ago I read about a company making vitamin d. if they used one particular source for a carbon, they got isomers that made the vitamin useless. how can that be if it's all the same ?

Here's another interesting video as to what is about to happen.

Thank you OP for bringing this to my attention. If the predictions come true, Europa is about to rise again.

Death and famine will arrive in the third world for God is on the side of the righteous.

"Denial isn't just a river in Egypt that evaporated due to global warming." – Paris Hilton III c. 2104

spaceweather.com/

Blue on top is temperature.

Not exactly sure what red is…
I'm pretty sure its just a theoretical model.
I don't know, I'll read about it later.
I wish it were a frequency coming from the sun.
I'm sure there are emissions from the sun we don't know about. Ones that would actually show the 1000 year cycle.

The black line shows the Number of the Sun's Sunspots. Each wave is 11 years.
The small waves have less solar activity.
The big waves, have more solar activity.
(solar activity being CMEs, radio frequencies, Solar Flares, Filament eruptions, etc etc)

Protip: Earths climate fluctuates in a sinusoidal pattern every 200 or so years, with a ~100 year maximum and a ~100 year minimum. Despite AGW scam artists claiming otherwise, you can't extrapolate a 200 year fluctuation cycle into runaway global warming. Also "summers seem hotter" is not really solid evidence, especially on a human timescale.

Of course you were, nigger.

Yes, climate changes. But there is absolutely no evidence that humans are having any impact on the climate whatsoever. In order to establish an actual human impact in a statistically significant way, you must show a modern trend that deviates from a baseline of appropriate duration. Because geologic processes spanning millions of years are responsible for tremendous amounts of variation in global temperatures, an appropriate baseline must necessarily include millions of years of data to account for this variation. Not only are we not in a period of “record high temperatures,” we are in one of the coldest periods in the past 65 million years.

ONE

There is absolutely no evidence that current temperatures are outside the trend of totally natural variation, and all attempts to make it appear that way are misleading you by truncating the data to a sample of statistically insignificant size. And then they apply their misleading, exponential curve-fits and smoothing effects for dramatic purposes.
The earth had had ice caps for maybe about half of the time over the past 500 million years. The picture shows rapid periods of melting and re-glaciation over periods of a few thousand years. There is nothing abnormal about current melting rates.

TWO

The sea level has been rising at a very steady and predictable rate over the past 8-10,000 years since the emergence from the last major glacial period with no deviation at all from this trend even as humans began industrializing. When environmentalists show you graphs going back 50-100 years of rising sea level data, they omit the fact that this is both on-trend and completely expected.

THREE

We have no actual data that indicates that climate is in any way behaving abnormally, much less due to human impact. The only thing we have is a hypothesis that CO2 affects climate in a meaningful way, which is what climatologists attempt to model. But those models make terrible predictions.

FOUR

If your hypothesis consistently churns out inaccurate predictions–no matter how many times you tweak the knobs and change little fudge-factors here and there–then your hypothesis is shit and must be discarded. Morons who believe in this garbage have no understanding of basic epistemology, let alone science–and that goes for the so-called “scientists” peddling this mystical bullshit.
CO2 is only hypothesized to have the impact on global climate that the alarmists claim. But this has failed to be demonstrated in two major (but related) ways. First, carbon dioxide levels are currently being measured at several hundred ppm higher than measured from ice core samples. Now, it must also be cautioned that you can’t necessarily compare these two sets of data because they represent two different methods of measurement, and have other potential biases. However, even assuming that its true that CO2 levels are much higher–and that they’re caused by human activity–current temperatures are not deviating from the normal historical trends in line with CO2.
A doubling of preindustrial CO2, absent any feedbacks, would result in a maximum forcing of +1.2 ºC. Everyone agrees on this point because it’s a simple computation given the physical characteristics of CO2 which is well mixed in the atmosphere.
Actual warming, again absent feedbacks, would likely be much less due to bandwidth overlap between CO2 and H2O, something that we understand but find difficult to model (H2O levels vary dramatically day to day and even hour to hour with regional weather).

FIVE

The General Circulation Models, and the IPCC, predict 2-8 ºC of warming because AGW theory assumes a positive H2O feedback. They assume that if CO2 causes a little warming, the atmosphere will hold more water vapor which will lead to a lot of warming until a new equilibrium point is reached.
The warming predictions cover such a large range because everyone assumes a different average feedback rate. Again, modeling H2O in the atmosphere is extremely difficult because it varies so much with weather.
Every GCM based on this assumption has failed to model temperatures for the past 15 years. They are all trending too high. In the late 1990s, the modelers themselves stated that if they missed their predictions for more then a decade that would falsify AGW theory.
There is no data to suggest a positive H2O feedback either now or in Earth’s past. Indeed, we cannot model some periods in Earth’s history with an assumed positive H2O feedback. It would appear that Earth’s atmosphere is remarkably adept at dampening forcings from either direction and does not amplify them.
If there is no positive H2O feedback, we literally have nothing to worry about. The average climate change believer knows none of this. Politicians, citizens, activists, and surprisingly even a lot of scientists are literally ignorant of the theory and the math. In their mind, it’s simply “CO2 = bad” and “experts say we’re warming faster then ever.” The more you know.

SIX

Not only are current temperatures not outside the normal trend, we are in one of the coldest periods in the past 65 million years. Also, current temperatures (at the peak of the current 100ky cycle) are actually lower than past 100ky cycles, meaning that we are expected to either warm further just by way of natural variation or we are in an unusually cold peak period.
Second, climate models that use CO2 as a major driver for global temperatures are not producing accurate predictions for global temperatures. This is at least good initial evidence that the alarmist stance on the CO2/climate hypothesis is false. Notice that current temperatures are in no way deviating from normal trends. and that the two “scary red dots” are not observed data, but “predictions.” But, as we already know, the observed data is wildly lower than the predictions. These people are completely full of shit.

The biggest alarm for me that global climate change was a hoax was when the number 1 tactic leftists came up with to solve it was increase taxes and two to spray water into the upper atmosphere to "reflect the heat away"(despite the fact that water in the atmosphere is the biggest 'greenhouse' molecule)

Order and chaos are both neutral polarities. They aren't defined by human morality, the concept of good and evil is a purely human idea that is thrown and labeled on almost everything.

But I do catch your drift in the ying-yang thing with chaos and order balancing each other out. Almost everything in the universe is a polarity.

Wow mate.

You wrote a lot about nothing, without reading any of what I wrote, or watching the video, or what was said in the discussion.

I don't think I ever even mentioned global warming once, except to say, that is was obv bs.
You could have made your point in 1 paragraph, as I did in this post:

Pretty sure you are a shill, matey. Or filled with a whole shitload of fail.

Holla Forums should embrace for what is coming. Death and famine will reach the third world. Only the strong will survive. Evolution will once again proceed. Those who can cope with the coldness best (i.e. Europeans) will thrive the most. Shit-skins will get wiped out by the millions. African population will plummet.

The free ride is over.

Are you fucking kidding me? That's fucking insane…

Can you find any MAJOR (Trusted) Websites that were pushing the Idea? I can only find rinky dink retard websites.

I have no scientific source for this, its just what I hear from the bluepilled normalfags that I associate with.

I'm not sure why they got that idea.

Winter-chan on a global Scale?

Okay, sage and reported then.

seems like global cooling would actually help africa, make the desert fertile again.

Global food supply and aid to Africa would cease if the predictions come true (i.e. 5 degree drop globally). That alone would fuck Africa up severely.

Also, shit-skins hate the cold. The Syrian refugees were bitching about not being able to stand the winter in Europe and many of them had to leave because of it. If there is a 5 avg degree global drop, they will flee by the millions as far south as possible.

You cannot escape nature. Not even the Globalists would be able to stop this as much as they think of themselves as gods…..nature is beyond their reach.

Did you play a lot of football growing up?

I dunno if this is the guy or not, but this guy used to get vids off spaceweather.com/
and talk over them. it appears his site is gone but he also used to rant about obama and democrats in general.
he got schooled a few times by ppl with an actual education in the science

I tried; you wouldn’t listen. Sage.

youtube.com/watch?v=sYq5da6MN_M

and you're a fucking imbecile if you don't believe him

He’s great; always pulls up things that I don’t see anywhere else. He shills for the electric universe bullshit, though, so that really detracts from his message.

isn't he a college drop out?

conspiracy kook , comes from a wealthy home but blames the left for his failure in life

wonder why he doesn't use his real name anymore
you could google it and see what ppl say

bump

This is why surfers and beach babes are so dense.
This is why us shut-ins can see so clearly.
This is why monks in monasteries strove to understand the human condition.
This is why farmers are accepting, simple folk.
This is why white reflective skinned people are more intelligent than blacks.

Is this also why the Lightbringer leads humanity to destruction all through mythology?

Lucifer is the bringer of light.

So was Prometheus and he fucked everything up too.

Depends on your mythology or perspective but "destruction" is destruction of the physical and passing the threshold to the transcendent.

Key is the come back with the boon, and then seize the power of creation.

You might be on to something, there is definitely something wrong with your brain.

But muh computational models (made by chink grad students).

But seriously though

...

I'm with you there mein bruder, but if that doesn't pan out maybe we should replant some forests.

No….we are not going to have another "elightenment" age.

No…this will be different if the avg drop is by 5 degrees around 2030. This will be much worse. It will be about SURVIVAL and nothing else. Under such extreme conditions Liberalism would cease to exist. Red-pilled and right-wing ideas would become prominent since tribalism and survival come above all else. The family will become the primary unit of civilization once more.

Based on history, Europe may suffer temporarily….but will thrive in the long run. Such conditions favor the Europeans above all else.

Never thought that the phrase "Winter is Coming" may become relevant in the real world.

bump

Personally I think that the Ice Age / Warming cycle is the result of Earth's magnetic inversions. Ice Ages occur after a magnetic field inversion when the magnetic field is the strongest. The warming period happens as the magnetic fields weaken and move across the surface (this creates variable pockets of temperature variation like the medieval warm period.

You guys are making a mistake. Yes, there are solar cycles, but green house gases and pollution are another factor on top of it. Maybe we will enter a cooling phase because of the sun, but it won't be as cool as previous phases because the Earth will retain heat better thanks to greenhouse gases. And then when the next warm phase of the sun comes, it'll be even hotter.

I personally don't care, I'll be dead by then. But the solar cycles isn't going to change pollution or greenhouse gases. I'm just tired as fuck of pollution being some sort of issue that gets dragged into solar cycles or climate change. We're polluting, we're fucking up our own countries and planet. I'm not saying go full hippy, buy a Prius, and go solar, but at least make some efforts toward the biggest contributors to gases.

CO2 is irrelevant though. Increasing CO2 doesn't yield a linear increase in temperature absorption, it's a logarithmic function, so controlling for CO2 doesn't mean jack shit.

lrn2science

No shit
I don't understand how this can even be a great revelation to anyone

We have had Global Ice Ages with higher levels of CO2 than we are experiencing at the present day.

And so to combat this effect, one needs only to acquire headwear of reflective quality. One made of foil of tin would suffice.

never change Holla Forums I love you faggots

wow, you put up a graph so it must be true.
we worship your elite math skills user you clueless fucking faggot

I love you faggots.
The Sun's magnetic radiation does not hit us.
It warp's the Earth's magnetic field, and this warping impacts us.

You can't go indoors and escape the earth's magnetic field. I don't think you can escape Earth's field.
Also, trying to block the Earth's magnetic field would be disastrous for your health.

Lastly, covering your own magnetic field, with anything metallic (ie a tinfoil hat), would also be fucking moronic.
You are electromagnetic, so a metal hat, would block the magnetic toroid produced by your brain / spinal cord.

L2 magneto hydrodynamics

There will be no age of enlightenment for another 500 years mate.
The higher the C14 levels, the worse off the world is.
& the most recent dating of C14, 100 years ago…
Says it was spiking super hard.
Which hardly means its descending.

This next 30 years, is like the eye of the hurricane.
The fun is just beginning.
———————————–

If you want a better explaination of the theory…
Here's the man who invented it
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Chizhevsky

He started by studying a War in Russia.
He went to the front lines, and observed the Sun.
When the Sun released a solar flare, about a day later, a massive battle would erupt.
He noticed this happen, over and over again.

He later developed the theory of Mass Human Excitability.

Read that wiki article, it will explain everything.
I'm sure the Jews know this and use this against us.

Yes. But governments approach to limiting pollution is what…more regulation, more government control which means more corruption, CO2 taxes that consumers would ultimately pay for, and CO2 credits Goldman Sachs can trade on the open market and speculate with.

Government doesn't have the right answer, but you are right, people are entitled to hold leaders and companies accountable for creating dirty air and water. I would make the case that the developed world is much cleaner now than 25 years ago and we didn't do much except advance the technology.

Interdasting.
French revolution, the 1848 revolutions, WW1, WW2 and 1989 all fall on the heights.

But the following years will be very low.
Winter-chan is coming with her icy grasp.

If this is true, we finally have the motive for HAARP and chemtrails - The kikes are trying to disrupt or stop annudah shoah.

Well, we know that dindus are fucking crazy from living in constant heat, and it didn't take many generations to turn Strayan women into hot-headed feminist harpies despite being European immigrants.

Perhaps this is why (((they))) are zergrushing us with muds, because they only have so much left of the hot period before cold sets in and the dindus go home on their own accord and white people enter a new renaissance.

the earth itself rings like a bell in ELF radio waves, and the frequencies line up with the human alpha, beta and delta brain waves. Variations in solar output will influence the size of the Schumann resonant cavity and thus slightly alter the these frequencies. It is quite probable that these changes in the Schumann cavity's resonant frequencies and it's influence on the corresponding human brain wave activity may be part of the answer you are looking for.

No CO2 isnt a threat to the planet.
No CO2 isn't going to turn the ocean into acid and kill off all the fish.

Any CO2 being produced today came from a plant that had previously fixed it into carbon.

Earth has a very real limit to the amount of life it can sustain, by NOT releasing carbon to the environment in the form of CO2 you are further limiting the amount it can sustain.

Fucking with the natural carbon cycle and actively trying to prevent CO2 from reaching the atmosphere is irresponsible and reckless, that "scientists" are doing it only proves how little people care about ethics.

Oh yeah, and just a quick tldr of OP;

The sun being a few billion degrees heats up planets that are nearby.

radiation nigger.
people need to quit being retarded

dude, you're a fucking loony…what next? flat earth?

Then why aren't they doing anything about it? All that talk and they don't do a damn thing to curb emissions.

Europe is heating up, North America is getting colder. Most europeans believe in global warming, most americans don't. Humans are pretty damn stupid.

Yes, it's all clear now.

We need to start putting tinfoil on our heads! They were right all along damnitt!

MOSHI MOSHI
WINTER-CHAN DESU

wake up white man

I guess Chinese will enjoy long and prosperous life.

Kill yourself, please.

Are you actually complaining about having fire?

Certainly not by going indoors or anything so simple as that, but if you were to build a room with ferrite walls, it would probably work as a faraday cage for magnetic fields. All the external magnetic fields would travel around through the walls, leaving the inside free of magnetic fields. If you put it on the inside of a faraday cage, the inside would be free of all outside electric and magnetic fields.

fucking why?

You're the one sounding tinfoil-y here, bruvna. The brain's electric signalling doesn't work like wires. It's not a circuit. it works by controlling the flow of ions, in a chemical chain-reaction. it doesn't produce any meaningful magnetic field.

Also soldiers wore metal hats all the fucking time, and it never caused any problems.

Tesla said he could "sense" magnetic fields. He also said Einstein was full of shit for his Relativity theory because it assumed the Universe is made up of empty space.
Tesla believed in an ether, a net like space that exists right in front of us but we can't see it, in which electricity travels. (there are magnetic experiments which can confirm this.)
The raw amount of shit posting we due on the U.S.'s copper lines would have affects on that ether spectrum. you could maybe call it meme magic
On a serious note, The Sun would definitely have a major effect on such an ether.

see

Yes it does.
I started getting deeply interested in magnetic fields, when I learned who Tesla was and what he said.
& yea, your spine does have an electromagnetic field, and it can be measured.
You can actually increase and decrease this field by flooding your body with adrenaline.
This happens every time you get goosebumps across your body.

People can detect magnetic fields. You can feel it when you walk up to an MRI machine.
Magnetic fields carry energy inside of them. They are not inert.
Simply being in a field means you are covered in kinetic and potential magnetic energy.

My intuition tells me that our (electro) MAGNETIC channels are influenced by the earth MAGNETIC field.
If we adapted to live harmoniously with this magnetic field…
Then we also likely depend on that field to live.

"Control".
No they don't.
They might influence, determine or cause Earth's temperature but "control" requires intent or purpose.

Pompey conquered Judea in 63 and Titus + Tiberius ended the jewish revolt against Roman rule in 70 and their temple was destroyed.

You were partly right. You didn't have to go full retard and try to link Good / Evil with solar cycles.

livius.org/pictures/a/roman-emperors/hadrian-killing-a-jew/

this

Both, you fuckwit. How are those mutually exclusive?

It's absorbed into the oceans and then released again when they evaporate.

op was no faggot. climate change identified as hoax by (((un))) to fix the economy in (((their))) favor.

it's all nice and good we know these things, but the majority of sheep keeps sleeping. we need to raise mass awareness with these things, they need to get pushed into their reality bubbles….

Don't forget the nearly trillion gallons of fresh water that are off limits because some environmentalist shitlibs convinced the California governor that the endangered species of fish that live in it are more valuable than the water needs of about 60 million people.

Literally no relativist or physicist claims this, even in an absolute vacuum there are quantum fluctuations and zero-point energy ans such."Empty space" means empty to the human eye, not a literal void of complete nothingness. That in fact is a paradox, since human conceptualizations of "nothing" are usually a black void or the like but a black void is still something, absolute nothingness is a paradox which cannot actually exist. I am curious about Tesla's arguments against relativity and that is something that should be investigated seriously but characterizing relativity as "a Universe of empty space" is bullshit.

You literally just described the effects of gravity on the space-time continuum, according to relativity, what meaningful difference is there between Tesla's aether hypothesis and relativity if the both describe the same constants of space/time and gravity?

...

When relativity was first proposed, most physicists, including Einstein, would have believed the universe to be made up of empty space. Of course, that's sort of a nitpick, because now we think it's not.

There are important differences between mass-bent ether and the space-time continuum of relativity, though.

First, relativistic lightspeed is invariant, while ether-mediated light would travel at a speed dependent on the motion of the ether.

Second, under relativity, the rate at which time passes for an object is slowed when it undergoes acceleration. Nothing like this would happen under the ether model.

Experimental evidence strongly suggests relativity is correct over the ether theory. Notably, the failed Michaelson Morley attempt at detecting ether and the way muon decay times vary with speed.

's reasonable to assume that changes in the sun's energy output would cause the climate to change, since the sun is the fundamental source of energy that drives our climate system.

Indeed, studies show that solar variability has played a role in past climate changes. For example, a decrease in solar activity is thought to have triggered the Little Ice Age between approximately 1650 and 1850, when Greenland was largely cut off by ice from 1410 to the 1720s and glaciers advanced in the Alps.

But several lines of evidence show that current global warming cannot be explained by changes in energy from the sun:

Since 1750, the average amount of energy coming from the sun either remained constant or increased slightly.
If the warming were caused by a more active sun, then scientists would expect to see warmer temperatures in all layers of the atmosphere. Instead, they have observed a cooling in the upper atmosphere, and a warming at the surface and in the lower parts of the atmosphere. That's because greenhouse gases are trapping heat in the lower atmosphere.
Climate models that include solar irradiance changes can’t reproduce the observed temperature trend over the past century or more without including a rise in greenhouse gases.

I can't wait for an Ice Age. That's literally a fantastic reason for interstellar migration.

continued

Winter Wonderland, here we come.

continued

TL;DR; Race ware happens

I am gonna' call it, screen cap if you want.

An incoming Ice Age will lead to a true space age

Source?

Unfortunately the best part was spoiled.

Well not the best part but up there.

Gargantia on the Verdurous Planet

Bump

So… good time to retake Constantinople then, ay

And meanwhile, every summer is claimed to be the hottest on record yet, despite clearly being cooler than they used to be.

Bullshit.

bump

Damn right it's time! Let's fucking do this!

you have my bats

California has one of the highest concentrations of jews globablly and almost everyone ther eis a shitlib.

Fuck those guys, the endangered fish are more valuable than them.

...

The fuck are you talking about? In no way shape or form is Australia's feminist problem as bad as Europe.

Polite sage

Don't want to make you scared, but I guarantee you that when this global cooling happens they will say it's because of their anti-warming policies and they succeed

Ryan?

ID: 000000

A faggot every fucking time, filtered

...

archive .is

b-b-but this xkcd comic reddit showed me says something different :(

Actually ragnorak may have originally been a story about a volanic eruption. Not sure of the exact mechanism but I believe volanic activity is affected by magnetic fields and we may be due fpr a big eruption soon.

I think there might even be a connection between mini ice ages and volcanic eruptions

Wtf are you talking about? I live in aus cunt. We are pozzed to the max. Feminists have taken everything over and fucked it up

When those of the arctic pole are united together,
Great terror and fear in the East:
Newly elected, the great trembling supported,
Rhodes, Byzantium stained with Barbarian blood.

-Nostradamus, Century VI, Quatrain 21

Fucking pick one.

It explains why equatorial races like Africans didn't build any civilization for themselves. The winter wasn't cold so there's no need to build a nice warm house or stockpile food. If you acted like a tribe in Africa in a colder country then you'd be ruined in the first winter that rolled in.

Fuck off with your relativism, Chosen.

...

Can't we just be against pollution? Why does the temp of the earth matter, it's changed in the past and we adapted, and you cunts can't even tell me a definite cooling or warming. It's diverting the discussion. Pollution is the problem, dumping a bunch of carcinogenic fumes into the air we breathe and water we drink, destroying the environment directly and physically with development (IE sprawl when we should keep human civilization compact and let some wildlife have a spit of woods to live in), actual filth and dirt. Look at air pollution in china. Why is environmentalism ALWAYS subverted by heat-cool niggers? Reminder jews hate nature, reminder they would see the entire planet developed if only to turn it to a massive, sprawling slum, because they so hate nature. The cool/heat/not debate is a misdirection to keep the truth from us that POLLUTION IS BAD. Look at the frogs, they're the canary in the coalmine, and they're getting fucked up growing second heads, third genders, and fifth limbs. They're dying. And they're the canary and we're charging ahead. LOOK AT SHANGHAI. Look at beijing. Asthma and lung cancer rampant. Look at cancer rates of people who live near chemical waste sites or power stations.

It doesn't even need a debate. Pollution is bad, a child could tell you that, yet the environmentalist movement keeps being subverted to where they don't even mention the cunting pollution, it just gets derailed to this pointless climate change bullshit. You're on Holla Forums, you should know a kike shilling when you see one. The truth is where they don't want you to look. We need to take back environmentalism from the kikes and fucking shitlibs and make it about the ills of pollution and destruction of nature. We must preserve nature, we as aryans have this duty, all other races are anti-nature because they are spawn of the devil.

Fucking anti-science nigger normies. If genetic engineering was around when I was born, I would have wanted to be a superhuman able to fucking breath underwater and photosynthesise and whatever. That'd be awesome. Ooh, human experiments, so fucking what? Most of our scientific progress has been made like that, or on animals and then on humans. There's tons of worthless people in the world. If some 80 iq part time shelf stocker can contribute to humanity by being an experiment subject, he should be honored. Tired of our scientific progress being hindered by temporary morality. In the short run maybe you harm a few people, but in the long run you save or improve the lives of BILLIONS, generation after generation for all the generations to come will benefit. Utilitarianism, faggots. Artistotle was a shit. Let's into fucking SPACE and human photosynthesis already.

We can tell
You sure it wasn't an enantiomer of the vitamin they are talking about, m8? Because that seems way more likely than the autism you just described

you are closer than you realize user…

archive.fo/sJp2Q

dubito ergo cogito, ergo sum

some rare few can consciously sense magnetic fields, but all affected.
to doubt that our magnetosphere has influence on human behavior flies in the face of modern science.
check out some of the external magnetic field stimulation experiments that have been done in recent years.

I guess that would explain why some people plaster old coins to their temple despite not knowing how or why that shit works.

Any of you ever heard of Harmonic Theory?
archive.is/pS7ry

pdf file of third pic:
archive.is/ZK3d1

Even if you try to bullshit your way into saying our climate is changing naturaly and humans are not contributing to it then at least recognize that the changing climate needs to be adapted to and that we're woefully unprepared to do so.

okay den

I don't know any personally but the astronauts in the ISS don't seem unhinged at all.

Depends on your age.
I'm old and saw it get hotter, then cooler.
NE Italy here, for reference.
early 90's nice
early 00's got hotter
early 10's plateau
mid 10's (now) cooling with a short hot peak (2-3 weeks max)

conversely, winters
early 90's fuckcold and humid (frigid fog)
early 00's fuckcold but drier (mid 00's got some freezing fog)
early 10's less cold and dry

so around here it's like the climate's been evening out. colder summers, tepid winters.

only longtime almanac devotees get the cycles. 80 year old bitch in my neighborhood insists it's all just standard cycling.
mid 10's tepid

So, the colder the climate, the saner people are? We should get the fuck to Mars as soon as possible then.

those are highly trained intelligent people in a structured environment… think subtle effects changing over long time periods working on the whole population at the same time,
if pink suddenly were perceived as green by everyone, would we notice? and if an oddball did notice, wouldn't we call them crazy?

OP [ee3d3e] is a dumb oil-ZOG shill for Royal Dutch Shell (Rothschilds) and BP
archive.is/zZgKR
nigger tier research

Ra is the ultimate god? Kek is already raising.

HEIL HITLER

I cannot possibly comment on their mental state, but be aware that most, if not all of the interviews, clips etc regarding the ISS are filmed on Earth, not in space. There are dozens of videos on YT where inconsistencies (gravity effects etc) and fumblings of supposed astronauts are shown.

I had a geology professor in fucking community college explain this to me, actually. All this fear over global warming, and how we're fucking it up…this is just Earth doing what it's done for millions and millions of years.

It doesn't explain why Australia is Smarter than Sweden

You and your ilk will be routed out and hanged until dead if you keep up your fucking bullshit kike.

I'll have to look into this, thanks user.

makes sense to me

Everyone who isn’t a climatologist knows that it’s all bullshit. Meteorologists are some of the most powerful people who fight against AGW.

great defense.
The fact is that anthropocentric global climate change is real and it's happening.

skepticalscience.com/evidence-for-global-warming.htm

Sure, keep waiting for a day when your delusions are validated like a Jehova's witness.Day of the rope, day of global cooling, etc. The rest of us are going to draw conclusions based on the facts available to us right now. I know it seems unfathomable that your previous oil companies would lie to you, but the evidence is as clear as the bleached coral in the ocean.

Let's say you're right.

How do you deal with it? Reduce CO2 emissions? Whoops, you just gave China/Russia all the cheap coal and oil they could ever use. They are unconcerned with climate change, or even see it as a good thing. How do you make sure they don't respond to the supply:demand curve of fossil fuels swinging in their favor? Without going full globalist?

How do you reduce CO2 emissions without handing you-know-who control of your entire energy economy so they can make Agenda 21: Global Poverty On-Purpose Edition happen?

Most important of all: Why is "science" so damned confident that they know anthropogenic CO2 release must be stopped, yet so timid about geoengineering? I never hear a peep about that. If we understand the Earth so well, install a damn thermostat already, however the hell you do that. Find a way to keep the gulf stream from shutting down (or stop it, depending on circumstances). Stuff like that.

Physicist here.

I actually confirmed this using linear regression lol.

>youtube.com/watch?v=U8NNHmV3QPw
No. Please. Not this stupid shit again.

ISS is still within the magnetic field.

Hell, every manned space mission we've ever done other than the moon missions has been within the magnetic field.

ISS altitude is ~250 miles. You don't even hit the van allen belts (which are cause by and very much within the magetosphere) until ~620 miles.

If dude's theory of people's thoughts being influenced by the magnetosphere is true, then no astronauts other than the one's who went to the moon would have ever felt the effects of no magnetosphere.

Real talk though: you're household electronics (not to mention infrastructure electronics, like power lines) are emitting magnetic fields that are a degree of magnitude more influential on you than the earth's field.

The fish are dying, jellyfish are swarming, and coral reefs are collapsing. It's a matter for concern, as is mercury building up in the ocean and all kinds of other shit.

Even though climate change, or at least its causes are greatly exaggerated and maybe just fabricated does not mean we shouldn't consider the environment. I know environmentalism is typically a left-wing hippie thing, but any nationalist state should consider the well being of their environment.

"Here is some pure water with a pH of 7"

First line of the video.
Your argument was destroyed by the first line of the video….

First of all, the ocean has a pH of 8.2-8.3.

But more importantly the ocean is not pure water (aka distilled water). It's filled with elements and compounds that bind with not only carbon, but even CO2 itself!

How do you think CaCO3 is made? I wonder how much CO2 a block of limetone locks away. Or even marble…

Fisheries are collapsing much more so due to overfishing. Ocean acidification adds just a bit more stress, and may be enough to push them over the edge.
We don't know the cause of that.
It happens. They regrow.

Mercury in fish isn't a big deal. It's all complexed into insoluble salts (mostly with selenium and arsenic, IIRC), which just fall out of solution, ie they pass right through your bowel. There are a couple of species of fish and whales where non-complexed mercury is at dangerous levels, but they aren't anything that humans eat, unless you are a jap.

nice

Actually now that I read it I regret it.

Physicist here. I wish I could live in this thread for a week and wreck some shit, but I'm way too busy right now :(

Daily reminder that climate change is a natural product of solar function and is about as easy or useful to try to stop as making the moon stop spinning.

You are either naive or blatantly in denial.

Science is a meme

Capacity is irrelevant.

Are you retarded? It is about radiative forces and the atmospheric windows, you idiot.

Omg…

Before some idiot writes any further, the oceans dwarf capacities in any measure or form.

Bump

I think he's just another clown who's never really examined what he thinks very carefully.

This third tier of postmodern "nuance" or "irony" I don't accept as mere Irony. I take it as a threat anyway. Kidding on the square.

BOOM

Mods, this shill has Schizophrenia.

...