discuss
Discuss
It's shit
this.
Historically inaccurate Saracen propaganda
yeh, it's kinda shit
starts so and so, gets progressively worse, last hour is fucking unwatchable
also yes, shitty secularist propaganda
any good actual crusade kino btw?
Its redpilled and based
one of my fav historical movies
Enemy at the Gates-tier bad
seen abut 1 min of this, idk what cut. its probably shit blood and green suck
seems its shit>>734854
Eva Green still had a working human costume and so looked like a moderately attractive human
Edward Norton was okay the sets and costumes were cool
Directors cut is worth a single watch at the least
8/10
Killed Orlando Bloom's career. He hasn't been in anything noteworthy unless he already had an established character, and was secondary even then.
Edward Norton was in it?
How do you explain his work in the Pirates movies?
dude he was under a mask the whole film
...
They somehow managed to make medieval warfare boring.
This was the movie that cemented my belief that Scott is a hack.
No. The Crusades are too useful politically to too many groups. Protestants shit on the Crusades because muh papists. Kikes and Muslims hate the Crusades because they got their asses kicked. Faggots in the Church like Francis hate the Crusades because they are peacenik queers who want the Church to be weak. Fedoras use the Crusades as their go-to example of how religion is bad.
Only a very small group of people report or care about the truth when it comes to the Crusades: that it was a defensive war, the Muslims were savages who only had success because of camel archers, and the European kingdoms fell apart due to infighting and lack of support.
Oh boy, here comes the Christcuck defending the shitshow the Crusades were.
The Muslims had lost all momentum by the 8th century and were on the defensive ever since. But do you know what the Crusades did manage to achieve?
They gave all the warring mudshit factions, that were perfectly content to keep killing each other, a common enemy to rally against.
Yeah, if only a certain Jewish sect hadn't ushered in the fall of the Roman empire, the one European power that had managed to win time and again against Easter horse/camel archers.
Because they were a wasted effort, holding some shitty patch in the desert with little resources or strategic value. But I guess gutting Byzantium and leaving it ripe for the turkroaches was worth it, right?
Listen up you Jewish puppet, leave waging war to competent people, you've already wasted enough white lives defending Jewish interests.
...
lel
I liked it.
...
Pagan Europeans were little more than niggers.
He's just assmad because I neglected to mention his stupid group of LARPers.
...
He is right though. The 2nd Edition of the crusades and onwards was the kikes trying to kill 2 birds with one stone: destabilize and weaken Europe by sending off its warriors to muzzie shitholes while at the same time expecting to gain whatever can be stolen from the conquered shitholes. Plus the formerly fractured sandniggers became united and thus they made sure the conflict would be prolonged for as long as possible, allowing them to be their usual merchant self who place their cards on both sides. Much like today to be honest
Wow, that almost sounds like another popular movie of his which I can't remember the name of for some reason…
yes fucking wanna be greek larpers got what they deserved
please
You mean the kikes who were routinely slaughtered every time Whites made an excursion to the middle east? Jews didn't have power back then. Populaces regularly rose up and killed them, and kings expelled them from their borders at the drop of a hat. You may as well tell me that Hitler was working on behalf of the kikes too; it's a ridiculous claim.