I'm spassing out. I gotta interject some truth here. The OP is a faggot, and his 'Daily reminder' is 100% wrong.
The most amazing thing about Hitler's econommic miracle is how is was proven in the worst of times. Germany was held under crushing debt, and yet because of Hitler's economic system, pulled itself out of the hole. But the theories that resulted in the Bundesbank didn't originate with Hitler.
for people who want to read what actually happened, not what bullshit is posted by some faggot OP, read Irving Fisher's Stamp Scrip.
You're a fucking idiot and people that think Germany needed a war to stay afloat are just as stupid as you
Joshua Parker
I'm not suggesting anything. I'm just pointing out that you can't make a fallacious argument that NatSoc works, because it hasn't been proven yet.
My jew gold? I'm not sure if you checked the archive link; I actually like NatSoc policies, I just think stepping the gas on it doesn't. But, as said there, today's world makes NatSoc something that nations could benefit, and maybe we DO need a NatSoc country, exactly to prove these theories.
I'm not spinning anything, just stating the hard truth you don't want to hear. Success of 6 years (with no wars) means nothing for a long-term government ideology.
Germany was winning during the first years of the war and conquered a lot of territory in Europe. They benefitted from the war because of that. There's no instance in the world where conquering territory means less economical prosperity for a nation.
Logan Ortiz
Name me a single socialist or commie country whose people enjoyed prosperity after enduring poverty to the point of exploitation, retard. Even with the whole old Anglosphere, France and its colonies, China and the USSR against them they still managed to fund their survival effort and expand through most of Europe, even if it wasn't their original plan.
They originally only wanted the territories which were still inhabited by Germans who were exploited (IE ex-Prussia), then Britkikes declared war and refused every single peace treaties because Churchill was a drunk piece of shit who did everyhting Judea told him and he absolutely did not want anything competing against the British might at the time (which kikes gave to America when they saw Brits were about to fail).
Charles Nguyen
/thread
OP stinks of Gefilte fish, this whole thread reeks of it too.
Levi Mitchell
Tried in smaller communities in Brazil, and in the US, before being adopted by Germany. Those were longer 'experiments' than six years. The system worked in every instance, and was just bought out by the greater banking systems.
The same theories can be extrapolated to the computer age and applied to today. I wrote a paper on how to do so a few years ago.
Evan Cox
There will be all the time in the world to have discussions about national socialism or what system should be used,It will be discussed once all non-whites are gone from white countries tho.
Side note why are there so many British people on here who continue to act like the traitorous kikes of the whites?
William Robinson
Socialism and left policies, regardless of race and competence of the people involved, does not work. After the money runs out, socialism/marxism fails hard.
Gas yourself.
Cooper Reed
I dont think Germany wanted a war with a much more wealthy/powerful British/French Empire as well as having a growing USSR to their back. Even if they gained territory they dont have enough soldiers to guard all of Europe against partisans and wage a war going as far north as Finland to Northern Africa.
Matthew Carter
Watching OP flail around in his thread is pretty fun.
