Porn-obsessed boy, 12, raped four-year-old sister before bribing her with sweets

isn't it normal for kids to do that ?.
i'm sure every kid did that with a sister, cousin or neighbor.

The Shariah is much stricter in Allah's United Kingdom

Fuck the U.K

so was it an anglo, or was it a shitskin?

It was her half-brother who played with her, which does change the situation somewhat. The question I would be asking is, how did he regularly access pornography and who was enabling him to do so?

Where are you reading that he only rubbed his dick on her? I'm even more pissed now.

It's not uncommon at all but we pretend it's shocking and unheard of. Just like what Becky does with the family dog when her parents aren't home. Supervision and a talk should have been enough to handle this.

That's surprisingly progressive. UK BTFO.

Lazy parents can't be assed to monitor what their kids look at online.

this is b8, right?

Parents just give their kids smartphones. Literally all they have to do is google "nekkid baybes" and porn is theirs dood

No, it's not bait. What I'm asking is, in an investigation, it's important to find out how the pornography was accessed. Was it on his home computer? Was it on his father or mother's computer? Their tablet? Their phone? It's important to know this because it helps to build a profile of just how badly he was being raised.

It is porns fault. No one is responsible for their own actions. Parents are not responsible for raising their children properly.

You really think a 12 year old kid knows how to penetrate a vagina much less a prebuescent vagina which is very different in appearance and structure to the pornographic videos he was watching?

And you don't think the doctor would have examined for obvious vaginal bruising and tearing that would happen due to penetration? You don't think she would have mentioned the pain? Even a 12 year old dick is big enough to cause significant pain, do you think 12 year old kids have sex lube lying around?

Essentially.

Women are whores. All of them.

that's the only context in which it makes any sense. i'll give you a pass

Exactly. There's no way he could have just 'penetrated' her and she would have been able to keep quiet; she'd have been in absolute agony.

Checked.

The alternative would be me being a complete idiot and being oblivious to modern technology and the deviance of children; which I am not.

could also be the context of trying to blame porn like this user said

Yeah here's what happened.

Kid sees porn. Kid wants to know what bagina look like. Gets sister to show him bagina. Sister tells mother. Mother calls cops. Mother is hysterical screams that son raped daughter. Cops work off that assumption and create a narrative to fit it. Both kids now will have permanently ruined lives.

Seriously. MOTHERS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO RAISE CHILDREN BY THEMSELVES.

I've known plenty of people who were fugged by their older brother (both men and women). You know what I've noticed. The ones who didn't get the cops called on them led relatuvely functional lives. The ones who got the cops called ALL the kids ended up fucked up.

police are pieces of shit tbh

Right you are. Cops and the CPS are more destructive than so called perpetrators of these minor incidents.

It's only natural that kids in such a sexually repressed society are going to act out. When you don't tell your kids anything about sex and they find porn (they all find porn) what the fuck do people expect?

in my day, we called this "playing doctor"
and literally every kid did it

Have you ever seen a 12 year old's dick?

I assume you didn't judging by that atrocity you just wrote, so let me help you out: if you want to have some a perspective just raise your pinky and look at it. That's what a 12 year old's dick looks like. In some other cases it may look like a thumb, instead.

He should have given her an N64 game.

I can't fit my thumb into my nose if you catch my meaning.

Well, no. But I didn't expect them to go into detail because it involved two minors. I guess the definition of rape is looser in the UK.

I blame my degeneracy on discovering porn before getting "the talk"

He might have exaggerated, but there's no way it could have gone smoothly. She's four, he's in puberty and his only idea of how sex is supposed to be is from porn.

Shitty parents, shitty decisions, shitty punishment, shitty everything.

This shouldn't be fucking news, this is something that could've been fixed with a stern talk, a blacklist, and some therapy. But no, we need to make this headline news, we need to ruin this kids life, we need to conflate what happened, everything must grind to a fucking halt because responsibility couldn't be assed of the parents. Absolutely disgusting.

Gets me every time

Hyper-sexual / ultra-paranoid society. 'More sex education' calls are always trumpeted loudest by those shady organizations who piggyback on 'muh kid's health' to spread their ideology at schools.

Of course I have. The girl who was supposedly 'raped' was very young. Do you realize how tight and tender she'd be? Remember this isn't someone trying to tap young cunny on the sly, it's a "porn obsessed" 12 year old. Think of how they fap, now apply that to penetration.

In the UK anything that threatens the nobility and politicians' supply of fresh virgin pussy is dealt with severely.

No. America and UK are sexually repressed and hyper sexual at the same time. Kids shows have twerking tweens humping black men but lawdy lawdy not a tit can be seen on tv.

Sexually repressed? Nigga what the fuck are you talking about, its the golden fucking age of porn, anything and everything is a google search away, everyone kid and their dog can watch it, now without stigma or shame. The stats are pulling out huge fucking numbers, porn watchers are the majority among kids and teens, it's a fucking disease at this point because we don't fucking set limits on these kids when it comes to how open sex is these days. 10 fucking minutes is all it takes to talk to these kids and let them know whats up. 10 fucking minutes. We don't need a fucking teacher to tell us this, but with how shitty parents have become these past two generations, shitting out these literal subhumans that can't hold a conversation with their peers and stare at screens all day, what should I know.

Children shouldn't be watching niggers on TV anyway.

that's how i know you aren't living in the real world.

You don't get it man. We live in a culture of hypocrisy. We live in a place and time where a 13 year old girl dates a 20 year old nigger and after him and his 20 friends gangbang her she asks JEEBUS for forgiveness. Just fucking wipe the slate clean. Everybody needs to die. Not just jews or whatever the fuck Holla Forums thinks. We need a clean slate. WIPE THE SLATE.

Yeah good fucking luck. I've seen how Americans raise their kids. There is no hope for this country. None.

And yet at the same time, vaginas and penises (but especially vaginas) are pretty much the only things you can't show on tv. And male sexuality, at least, is demonized, as seen in OP's example. Boys grow up being told that they're oppressive animalistic rapists for wanting to see titties. And god forbid they see a girl and would like to put their wee wees in her hoo has. He might as well be raping her right now. And we all know that's worse than murder. He'd better get sent to a therapist, and if he puts up a fight, they'll just send him to jail and put him on the sex offender registry forever.

It's a fucking disaster and its ruining us. At this point I'm at a loss on what the fuck we do, I just wanted to play video games and maybe have a wife and kids in some small town. Now that plan's fucked and I'm stuck here with a useless degree and a job I hate and enough bitterness to kill any semblance of relationships I have with anyone.

It's not like any of this is sustainable. It'll all burn soon enough.

The guy deserves to go straight to adult prison.

this

We should execute any kid who looks at another kid naked. Withoit trial. Hile Hirtler.

>>>Holla Forums

Hile Hortler 8841 kill any child who touches their bum

s-shs-shit i'm cumming

"Porn-obsessed boy, 12, raped four-year-old sister before bribing her with sweets"

"The porn-obsessed boy was 12 when he repeatedly sexually assaulted his sister during a game of hide-and-seek, a court heard.

The little girl’s shocking ordeal came to light during a bath time when she told her mother what had happened.

At a hearing at Brighton Youth Court, the girl’s tearful mother said: "She said to me 'Mummy I want to tell you something'. She didn't normally say things with such an introductory manner.

"It was something important to her. She said it happened while they were playing hide and seek.”

The mother said the girl told her of at least two occasions when she was raped and another time when she was sexually assaulted by her half-brother.

Her mother said: "She said he offered her sweeties to do this. She said she didn't like it but she liked the sweeties.

"I said to her liking sweeties was perfectly all right but he should never have offered her sweets to do something like that.

"She said 'he made me like Skittles'. She was clearly cross about that. I said to her 'why didn't you tell Mummy?' and she said 'he told me not to'."

Yesterday the boy, who is now 13, admitted raping and sexually touching his own sister.

He was found guilty of a second count of rape.

The court heard investigators found a significant amount of porn on the boy’s mobile phone.

District Judge Teresa Szagun warned the boy that he faces a severe custodial sentence.

A decision on whether he will be locked up will be made following assessments by youth offending experts on whether he poses a risk to the public.

The court was told boy has already been subjected to psychological assessments to see whether he can tell the difference between right and wrong.

He had changed his pleas from not guilty on two of the charges midway through his trial.

The judge said of the ordeal of the girl, now aged five: "I'm sure what she described is accurately what happened to her. The way she spoke was very factual and articulate.

"She was able to tell me about those experiences very well. What she describes was you making her take off her skirt and pants, telling her not to tell, it was a secret, giving her sweets."

there you go now you don't have to visit that shitty article that it wont let me archive (thanks cuckflare!)

fantasy ruined

Thank you, user.

there is no evidence of his "porn obsession" in the article just a claim in the press, but fucking hell whatever just any excuse to put a scare story out like "PORNHUB 3D NOW CAUSES RAPIST KIDS!!!!" welcome to the united shitstain fake news machine.

seriously fuck this country.

oh fuck off you easily offended cunt,this website really isn't for your small minded kind.

oh how disgusting little timothy saw porn and this corrupted him lets ban every site on the internet with a single naked anime character on it.

Listen this is Holla Forums not the commets section on mumsnet, lots of pedo threads get posted on here all the time full of jb and cp take your mary whitehouse censorship brigade shit elsewhere and stop shitting up our website.

it does not specify.

another "someone touched my privates" when i was little experts.

how did you even find Holla Forums?

okay now you are just sounding completely like some stuffy arsehole on a daily mail comments board.

like who give examples?

you dumb fucking cunt, 10 quid says someone was fucking him in the arse on the sly and that's why he acted out.

the sex education here is led by feminists and they don't even teach about the female orgasm and abortion or even homosexual sex.

i knew about bumming, but i didn't know about squirting until someone told me at 19 or that women use abortion as birth control and its sort of seen as okay for teenagers now thanks to this and overprotective parents i am a total robot.

had i lived somewhere with a more normal attitude to sex i would have fucked tons of prime cunt.

go eat a bag of dicks you puritanical faggot and stop posting tabloid shit like jeremy kyle.

Yeah, I know a girl in a situation like that who sent her dad to jail and went to counseling since he told her to "give him some lovin"

She went to counseling a couple years back and is in her mid teens now so I should probably wreck that pussy since it's beyond redemption; she is definitely going to hell

horseshit. pedoshit is alot rarer than these moral panic people make out.

a wet 14 year old cunt when i was 13 and a nice morning after pill afterward, a decent ecstacy tablet to make it better, a job when i left school at 16 was that so fucking hard to give me britain?

now im a boring fucking arsehole neet thanks alot for killing my fun.

Nah but she was raised by a rabid grandmother cuz single mom druggy mom

That grandma would always scold the other little girls when they would get too affectionate with me, so I now have a vendetta against that family which I grew up with

This is why you monitor what your kids are looking at.
If my parents didn't let me fuck around on the internet by myself when I was a kid I wouldn't be here now.

Send him to juvenile detention, what a fucking nonce. Let's see how he likes to be "played" with.

I didn't have internet access when I was a teenager, and I'm probably just as degenerate as you. I never even heard of vaginas until I was like 13. And certainly didn't know what they looked like until a few years later. I'm confident that this fucked me up more than if society took a casual and factual attitude about the subject.

SJWs please go. You imply actual rape by actual criminals is the same as playing doctor. You also imply that gay rape is the same as straight rape (which isn't even what happened here).

Yes, that's how modern prostitution works.

youtube.com/watch?v=Qu39ZLxH1y0

So the solution is to literally rape children who show any interest in sex?

BREDDY GUD

They get what they want then

I want to cut you open and pour fire ants into your sectioned ribcage but you can't always get what you want.

edgy

Thanks I try

wanna yiff?

What shows?

He's no child, he's already hit puberty and knows right from wrong.

He also has an inborn knowledge of property rights now, and should be executed for breaking the NAP.

Okay. Then make the AoC 12 if children can decide things.

All I know is if I was 12 again, knowing what I know now, I would get my side-hustle on by selling self-produced CP to pedos.

My version of the NAP says women and children are property.

AOC
BBC
PS3
AIRBNB
LAND OF THE FREE
SPICS AND NIGGERS SHOULD HANG FROM TREES

Stop moving the goalposts, he's going to juvenile detention(babbys gulag) for being a molesting degenerate. He's not innocent, he specifically targeted her because he thought she was too young to tattle and that he could bribe her.

...

Trump already made it 13.

Me and my sister fooled around too but I was 8 and didn't bribe her, she was exposed to things too and wanted to try them, I even saw her with a neighbor girl kissing. Am I as bad as this kid? 12 is pretty old to be doing something that bad, but I don't want his life ruined.

Leftists and rightists really are mentally ill. You hinestly don't even know how kids normally act do you? 8/10 kids do this kind of shit. Kill yourself.

Yes you should have been executed.

Moving the goalposts is ignoring that you successfully contradicted the point he was trying to make by pretending he was always trying to prove a different point, and thus you failed by providing evidence that contradicted the actual original point. He is not moving the goalposts. He's just pointing out that by your own logic, if a 12 year old is adult enough to commit a sex crime, then surely a 12 year old is old enough to have non-criminal sex. Either the child is old enough to understand or he isn't. Your logic is flawed, and thus does not disprove the original point, away from which he was very much not moving the goalposts.

Yeah but user over there was probably a 0/10 ugly kid.

shooped

Yes, it is and he needs fixing that only the justice system can give out.

He's not a child, he's damn near 13, an adult in some cultures… He knew right from wrong, he tried to cover up his misdeed but the little girl was brave. He fucked up and juvenile detention will fix him, he is not old enough to have sexual relations with a four year old. Keep playing neutral, all that matters is the judge's decision.

How old do you need to be?

:DDDDDD

So then the age of consent should be at least as low as his age, which is 12, because that is no longer a child, it is a person fully capable of understanding these things.

Gotcha. As long as we're consistent here. I'm glad we've come to an understanding.

...

"sexually repressed".

Sharia…

Listen, I grew up watching porn and doing my share of fondling, but those kids we're MY age. This 12-year-old "child" had a plan for his unsuspecting toddler sister and he's going to find out what "bad-touch" is soon enough. Juvenile detention is known for it's lack supervision towards its detainees. His innocence is gone, he tried to take hers, stop defending him.

Four years old.

i hate to post a nigger here, but it seems fitting

No you idiot. The AoC should be 20. The justice system doesn't exist to prevent criminal acts or deter them. It exists to subdue the civilian population through force and moral subversion.

Heiled

You said "not old enough" which means you have to be older than 12.

His crime indicated that he was done being an innocent child, he has sexual desires reminiscent of adult rapists. By any chance, do you protect him because you have the same desires and hope for leniency? Perhaps it's some sense of vicarious wish-fulfillment on your part, pedo.

I would legitimately be happy to see you die. Your suffering would feed me. I'm not even being edgy, eat shit and die.

puritans get out.

In your quest to "protect children," you literally advocate child rape. But I'm sure plenty of people on this board would agree with saying 12 year olds are adults and can make informed decisions about sex. I'm sure they'll be glad to see you agree with them.

Well if it's 20 then by the logic used to promote that law, this boy in question was incapable of making decisions in these matters and therefore cannot be found criminally responsible.

Who cares?

My dick that's who, bazingababwe.

Innocence is linked to punishment for a crime, if he unintentionally molested her and told her not to tell, then you'd have a point.

...

No, I defend him because I'm not a filthy pedophile who thinks 12 year olds have the ability to make informed decisions about sex. I just want you to at least admit you're a pedophile, like the rest of the pedos on this board have the decency to do.

It's the fact that he said "tried to take her innocence." That shit's retarded. But it's double retarded in this case where it's already dubious.

You are.

You heard it here folks. 12 year olds are adults who are capable of making adult descisions. I think you know what to do. *unzip*

No I'm completely serious. This isn't a joke. I actually legitimately want the idiot writing these posts to die a painful violent death.

You can be seriously edgy. It's the best kind of edgy.

Sorry kiddo, not a pedophile. Shocking right? Not everyone is like you and your fucked up friends here.
Because he's not getting away with being a degenerate? He's into sex and she's not, like, at all. She didn't like what he did, so she told on him, simple. He shouldn't have touched her and I would've beaten his ass 12 or not and I'm not the only one that feels that way. You do not touch someone that young.

Game over Holla Forums, game over.

Strawman.

Who fucking cares, you child-molesting faggot?

justice system is fucked, satan trips

Only Holla Forums is allowed to have an expanded vocabulary. Sorry, kid, I don't play into that larping shit these chans are so obsessed with, I don't give a shit who uses that word the most.

I'm not the one who claims 12 year olds have the ability to make informed decisions about sex, you are.

Because "tried to take her innocence" implies that she would somehow be guilty of something because someone, in this case another kid, saw her pussy. She would still be very much innocent. She did nothing immoral.

Literally not a strawman. A strawman is making up a new argument that is not being made, attacking that, and then claiming your point is correct because you defeated an argument that you yourself created to be easy to disprove on purpose. This is very different from pointing out the unfortunate implications of the opposing argument that show how ridiculous it is.

FTFY

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
O
G
N
I
T
I
V
E

D
I
S
S
O
N
A
N
C
E

I know you are but what am I?

He wanted to introduce her into sex, and taught her how to be dishonest. He wanted her to do a bad thing and keep it a secret, he wanted her to be his plaything and she was not fucking having that. He couldn't change her and she will lead a normal childhood while he finds some new friends in lockup.

Are you serious? The justice system doesn't get fucked with by corrupt politicians and judges and lawyers and lobbyists and special interests groups and basically any other sources that want to fuck with it? You seriously think the justice system is invincible?

Some people can't think for themselves, notice how it sticks to the judge's decision like it's gospel. That's because it only has a shallow social conscious and not a real conscious. When you out these lemmings you need to kill them where they stand or they shall continue to sow disharmony through petty (or edgy) antics. Abandon thread,

There are people, right now, calling me a closet pedo for defending a four-year-old girl from her 12 year old molester.

A fucking 4 year old though all these things? She must be the smartest little bitch in the world because I've never seen a little shit that age that could think past "me hungry, me thirsty, me tired".

A closeted pedo?

In this case, yes. He's gonna get that dick in his pooper whether faggots on 8ch cry about it or not. Fucking lame ass, don't defend him or change the focus.

Die you pedo scum.

You're pretty edgy man, the child molester isn't going to be seriously harmed, just taught a lesson.

So a child molesting a child is bad but that child being sodomized is good?

Sooo, when's Lena Dunham going to go to jail for this very exact same thing?

Kill yourself kike

When women are paid an equal wage.

Lena Dunham did nothing wrong. The justice system decided she was innocemt and that means she is.

Women have less power than men therefore it's not rape it's justice.

That isn't an appropriate way to address a four-year-old child, user. Do you hate children or something? Is she a "bitch" because her molester is getting in trouble. By the way, I've heard four year olds tattle about things in great detail, don't underestimate the memory of a child, especially girls because they're taught at a young age about bodily boundaries.

Rape is power + privilege

The boy isn't a child, he's nearly 13, a man in some cultures.

We aren't larping, user.

Suck my cock faggot. Bitch dog children go eat shit cock dick monkey nigger!

12 year old girls are not children. They are married already in some cultures.

She didn't know right from wrong at the time.

…sage for you

Sage my dick you nigger.

Be that as it may, they're not child molesters…

Not inherently immoral, especially on the part of the one who is learning. Learning is never immoral.

Kids that age already know how to lie. Kids lie from incredibly early ages. Just it's considered cute early on.

She wouldn't have been doing anything immoral. By saying so, you are saying that by having sex, she would thus be learning about it and would have moral culpability related to it. She would now be able to be held morally culpable for it. So you're now lowering your ideal age of consent from 12, to 4. You're not only a pedophile, you're into fucking toddlercon. You're a degenerate even among vietnamese cave painting imageboard wizards.

That's only bad if the thing she originally did is bad, which it wasn't, because she's four years old and can't be held morally responsible. Except, oh wait, you think four year olds, once introduced to sex, can then be held morally responsible to make decisions relating to it, because you're a fucking mega pedophile.

The rest of your post was irrelevant to the parts I was taking immediate issue with. Of course if you think a four year old is old enough to be held responsible for things like this, then it follows you'd think a 12 year old would be too. I'm at least relieved to see you're following consistent logic here, even if it's toddlerphile logic.

I'm calling you a pedophile right now for thinking a four year old would somehow no longer be innocent because a 12 year old saw her vagina. You are a pedophile because you think a four year old should be held morally accountable for decisions regarding sex. You've already argued that 12 year olds should, which already makes you a pedophile, or at the very least a pedophile enabler, but fucking four? That's fucked up even for Holla Forums.

Literally fantasizing about a 12 year old getting gay raped. So you're not just a pedophile enabler, you're explicitly a gay pedophile.

Once again, I'd tolerate you, I know I'm on Holla Forums after all, if only you were up front about it and not somehow pretending that fantasizing about a 12 year old getting gay raped and saying that 12 year olds and goddamn four year olds can make informed decisions about and be held morally accountable for sex.

I'm not the one saying 12 and four year olds can consent, or that it's morally righteous to gay rape 12 year olds.

So 12 year olds aren't children. The age of consent should be no higher than 12. You heard it from this brave, gay toddlercon user first, folks.

Some are. Like Lena Dunham.

And in some cultures he did nothing wrong. What's your point?

Keep the insults coming, your "underdog" is going to the gulag no matter what. I support the judge's decision and so would a jury.

Plenty of Holla Forumstards support your decision, and they'll be glad to join you at the next NAMBLA meeting, you gay child molester.

Please tell me you're not actually happy about a kid having his life destroyed over this.

I'm sure you'd love to "punish" this kid for his "sin". You'd love to rape his ass to "teach him a lesson". Kill yourself gaypedo.

This whole thread

Test IDs and flags gone?

Cry all you want losers. This kid is going to get the ass rape he deserved in juvie.

And hopefully you will too when your door gets kicked in and your hard drives are seized.

He could've taught her without touching her.
Mental gymnastics on your part, it's a real stretch, user.
It was bad, her mom doesn't want her to have sex yet, she wants to obey her mom, so she told on him. She didn't want the sex, even if you think she did.
Stretching for your mental gymnastics routine, I see…
I'm not, I don't find children attractive.
I merely shared my speculation on what could happen, rape is a very real thing in juvenile detention centers.
You're just defending a child molester, I guess that's normal for you.
This 12 year old isn't a child anymore, was my point, his crime has qualified him for strict punishment as an adult, which he has shown to capable of acting as. The legal system works, If you don't like it then you can call your fucking congressman/congresswoman.
She wasn't 12 and didn't know right from wrong.

Looks like you're the loser, because your gay pedophile fantasies are still illegal. In order to be happy about this, you must already be in the same detention center that he's getting sent to, probably for child molesting, and I guess you're pretty psyched about getting a new victim. What are they gonna do? Keep you in there longer? I suppose this is a good situation for you after all. Now I get it.

What in the fuck…

Cry more LOL

I'm only glad that the justice system is dealing with him, he'll do it again when he gets out and real prison will be waiting.

100$ says he doesn't

I know for a fact he will. He is a rapist and mentally ill.

I don't gamble

Either way, she would have been doing nothing immoral. He wouldn't have been either, since he's 12 and isn't old enough to make informed decisions about this subject. But let's just say he is, let's play your sick, gay pedophile game. Even if we accept that, how the fuck would the four year old be doing something immoral because a 12 year old is teaching her about something? Even if we accept the 12 year old is morally and intellectually responsible, it follows that the four year old wouldn't be. Unless of course you're a fucking toddlercon, which you apparently are.

You are literally arguing that four year olds, once exposed to sex, can be held intellectually and morally responsible for decisions regarding sex.

She wouldn't have been doing anything wrong because she's not old enough to make informed decisions on this topic either way. It is impossible for her to do anything wrong relating to this subject.

You're the one arguing that she can make informed decisions on the subject. I never argued she was into it, but you argued that if she didn't feel the right things regarding it, or even if she did, either way, she would have somehow "lost her innocence." No, she would still be perfectly innocent, because she's four years old and incapable of being held intellectually and therefore morally responsible for decisions on this subject.

You have, multiple times, shared with this thread your fantasies of a 12 year old boy getting gay raped. I suppose I've heard pedos on this site argue that not all child molesters are pedophiles. So okay, you're not a pedophile, just a child molester. I guess the kicks you get from molesting them doesn't come from their physical attractiveness, but just from some other, doubly fucked up part of your brain. If anything, that's even worse. You are truly even more sick than the fucking pedophiles that infest this board. At least they hide behind the mask of love, but you fantasize about gay raping 12 year old boys purely out of hate. They are in denial about the damage they do, but you revel in it. The damage is your motivation. You are one of the sickest individuals with whom I have ever conversed.

And you're happy about it. You didn't merely share your speculation, you reveled in it, you sick, gay, child molesting son of a bitch.

No, I'm condemning a child molester, that being you.

Yes, we've already established that you think the age of consent should be not only as low as 12, in in fact as low as 4. I accept the premise from which you are arguing, I just want you to admit to it.

Sorry for still referring to him as a boy. I'm trying to converse with you on your gay pedophile level, but it's pretty hard to put myself in the mind of someone as truly fucked up as you.

Well apparently people at least as young as four years old can be held morally responsible for decisions regarding sex once they are introduced to the subject. I don't recall the details but I'm sure she was older than four.

It's the organization the guy I'm arguing with is probably a part of.

Hope you're behind seven proxies, motherfucker. They're gonna take your internet privileges away for the things you've advocated in this thread, you know.

Be careful with your money, user. This guy probably knows because he himself is a recidivist gay child molester. But I guess the kid in question isn't a fucking faggot, so the cases aren't 100% similar.

What a shit article
So what? And what does "rape" even mean in this context?
What 12 year old boy with unfettered porn/phone access doesn't?
Skittles are ass. She should have held out for a snickers bar.
And why is this thread so large?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_infancy
crin.org/en/home/ages/Americas

Look, I already said that I'd accept your rules for the sake of this argument. I'm willing to overlook the fact that your logic implies the age of consent should be 12, because you've since started arguing that the age of consent should in fact be 4, and that's even sicker. I'll deal with the sickest parts of your mentality first.

What is so hard to understand? The age of consent should be 18 and if a boy has sex before then he should be charged with rape.

No, they can't. He tried to introduce her to a world of inappropriate behavior that she's not yet equip to deal with. She's four… He's 12… he's morally and legally responsible for his own action and he alone knows what he was doing. He tried to bribe her ffs…

You type like a redditor fam tbh kys

How the fuck do you even find out about weird shit like that unless you're a pedo. Never heard of NAMBLA, and I'm not clicking some wikipedo article about it either… Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you to even know about that shit?

You claimed that he tried to "take her innocence." As if she wouldn't be innocent, as if she could somehow be held intellectually and morally responsible. That's sick. Four year olds cannot be held intellectually or morally responsible for decisions regarding sex. They are not capable of being able to make informed decisions on the topic.

I can almost believe that happened

They're quite famous. There's a South Park episode about them from when that show was still good like 15 years ago.

Incorrect. Even newborns are completely responsible for their actions. If a newborn bumps into a gun and it misfires and shoots someone it's murder.

She wouldn't be innocent, in terms of knowledge, she still wouldn't know right from wrong. If she agreed to lie for him, then he would've corrupted her and eventually she would turn 12 and do the same to another little girl/boy, thus subjecting her to the same criminal responsibility at age 12… Pedophiles always make more pedophiles, luckily, she told on him and can now be protected.

Oh, then I'm ignorant, I used to watch South park before the political soapbox routine.

This is parody I refuse to believe anyone is this willfully stupid.

You type like an ESL spic

Kill this poster tbh

smdh (suck my dick head) fam tbqfh lol

Oh boy, I guess you better read the article before you sound even more retarded than the pedo sympathizers in this thread…

Pedophiles, such as yourself always welcome violence on innocent people. I guess it's your nature to senselessly ruin others…

SOMEONE WAS TASTING THE RAINBOW ALRIGHT
god dam now i find it fucking funny

Woah, now you're a nigger? Mind as well call yourself Brazilian…

...

Even in your fantasy where now a 12 year old girl also goes on to molest more four year olds (I guess you're not a gay child molester, you're a bi child molester), she would still be innocent until said actions happen. He would not have taken her innocence. By your logic, by the age of 12, she would be old enough to be held responsible for her decisions about sex, so any actions taken that make her immoral and no longer innocent would be her own responsibility.

Pretty sure there's only one pedo sympathizer in this thread. Everyone else is shocked that he's seriously arguing the age of consent should be 12, or maybe even 4.

You're the pedophile fantasizing about 12 year olds getting gay raped.

Don't defend him.

This thread 😂👌
😂😂😂😂😂😂

White people😂🤔👌

Yes.

Or what you fucking crazy pedophile? You'll jack off to more gay fantasies?

You're a nigger aren't you? That's why you added that condescending remark, you're a faggot don't forget that.

Okay tough guy, talk as much shit as you want.

lol niggers

No I added that comment to bait you into incriminating yourself as a Holla Forumstard again

Say it to my face not online, see what happens!

Okay, but you're a spic and only wish you were white

Pussy, I'd wreck you, you already sound like an uncultured faggot

Say it to my face not online, see what happens!

The nu-nazis final argument.
Most white people voted for shitbat Killary, why would you think white people agree with your insane talmudic views?

Then by your own logic, he was not "taking her innocence." She would still be innocent after the event in question, and would only stop being innocent after another sick fantasy of yours, in which she would be responsible for her own loss of innocence.

He wasn't making a threat, he was literally asking you what would happen. You're the one pretending to be an internet tough guy. Or maybe you really are already incarcerated for rape, and will follow through with your fantasies of gay raping a 12 year old. You probably think that would make you a tough guy. Nobody else would, though, because only sick pedophiles like you think 12 year olds aren't children. Raping children doesn't make you tough.

Who cares? Why did this retarded thread need so many responses just to get a point across? You people are so fucking difficult, you don't understand law or morality, underage sex is all you're about.

I'm tired of arguing.

You're the one defending a violent pedophile who raped his own sister without remorse and tried to bribe and threaten her. This guy was lucky he didn't get the death penalty.

🤔

i've always said that the board gets the most active when there's a discussion about pedo shit. Exhibit A dis tread

Well once again, you're the one who fantasizes about raping 12 year old boys, and says four year olds can make informed decisions about sex. So apparently you're the one who is all about underage sex.

You're the one threatening to rape 12 year old boys, and claiming that children as young as 12, no wait, as young as four, can make informed decisions about sex. I hope you get chemically castrated, you registry filling sicko.

For my opinions? Wow, so "progressive"

For your actual, written threats, of anally raping a 12 year old boy.

Show me where I said that? How can I threaten the kid if I don't know him? I get that we're trolling but you seem to have overused projecting, I never fell for it so I'm confused as to why you kept going.

You have many times in this thread fantasized about the anal rape of the 12 year old boy in question. Then acted like an internet tough guy and threatened people who "defended" him by pointing out that you're a pedophile for thinking a 12 year old, let alone a four year old, can make informed decisions about sex.

You say I'm projecting, but not once did I or anyone else in this thread non-sarcastically imply that 12 year olds can make informed decisions about sex. You aren't using the term "projecting" correctly.

Oh, but now you claim you were just trolling the entire time.

You use loaded words, you place emphasis on fantasizing as if I'm deriving sexual pleasure from the mere contemplation of his punishment. I'm not the monster you're trying to paint me as, I'm saying that this 12 year old is not innocent and what he did has consequences, me talking about those consequences will not somehow make them happen, nor do I seriously wish horrible things to happen.

Banter is the keyword for this thread and so many of the false-anger/concern-trolling posts intrigued me that I genuinely wanted to see if anyone would actually become angry at my mockery. Surely, no one bares their true feelings of rage on Holla Forums, of all places. This isn't a hug-box and anyone genuinely outraged by my statement are obviously out of their element and should leave.

Not once did I claim that I wanted to have any sexual relations and you know it, you came to those barbaric conclusions about me on your own. As far as calling me a pedo, well… okay if you say so. It's fun to know that you might be this ass-blasted, and you're not even the one going to juvenile detention!

This is why we shouldn't give the smartphone to the children.

this is true, i just recently went to court and my judge was female.

7313950
anti pedo kike, go back.

faggot

what's with all the kikes in this thread? its almost like we are being raided by 4cuck or deddit.

...

Don't you love it when a story has a happy ending?

=And then…

Of course.

I don't care what kind of pleasure you get from your fantasy of anally raping a 12 year old boy. It's sick.

12 year olds cannot make informed decisions about sex, and thus cannot be held intellectually and morally responsible for decisions about sex. 12 year olds cannot consent, you fucking child molesting scum.

But you do just just talk about them, you revel in them. That is what makes you sick.

You have multiple times posted gleeful fantasies of a 12 year old boy being anally raped. It's all in this thread for everyone to see.

You have repeatedly argued that 12 year olds can consent, based arguments on the notions that four year olds can consent, and gleefully fantasized about a 12 year old boy being anally raped. If you're not a pedophile, then you're something even sicker.

So by your standard there should be no repercussions for what he did to his sister?

ITT: pedos scramble for damage control on one more case where children simply are not mature enough to understand sexual intercourse

Well either the answer is no, or user is arguing that the age of consent should be lowered to at least 12. If that's what he's arguing, so be it, that's for another thread, I'll accept his premise here. But he won't admit that that's what he's arguing. At one point he argued that four year olds can be held intellectually and morally responsible for decisions about sex. This means that he is arguing that the age of consent should be no higher than four years old. Once again, I understand I'm on Holla Forums, and I accept that I'm surrounded by pedophiles here, but I want this guy to admit he's one of them. I want him to admit that his argument is arguing that the age of consent should be no higher than 12, or even no higher than four.

One could argue she still doesn't.

There's only one pedo in this thread, and he won't admit he's a pedophile despite arguing that 12 and even 4 year olds can consent.

They can consent with parental supervision.

I think I deserve to be be heard, too.

explain?

Wrong

The government owns your children. You may be allowed to take care of them but you fundamentally have NO rights in regard to your children. Parents are caretakers, the government are the owners of all children.

Lost me at the butter being nuked for eight minutes straight. After two minutes it would explode, so this story is fake and gay.

I bet she has a nice ass, so I can't blame him.

Plus - I hope it's his sister.

It is!

White Girls Fuck Dogs

Noice

Just another case of the double standards between males and females and consent. They should just go ahead and abolish the age of consent for males because clearly it means fuck all.
Teachers can fuck all the boys they want and get off with a slap on the wrist and all the boys that are fucking anyone younger are held accountable as rapists so lets just drop the fucking pretense already.

Where the guards and older boys can keep his sweet ass all to their selves.

If he has been watching a bunch of porn he probably does.

Trial and error.