Having only heard of it recently, distributism sounds very anacap.
Can Holla Forums fill me in on the finer details?
Having only heard of it recently, distributism sounds very anacap
Easton Barnes
Eli James
d&c purity spiral thread with a cucked logo
2/10
Charles Watson
If I remake the thread with the second image that came up on google images when searching this topic instead of the first
will I get a serious answer?
Nicholas Peterson
Wow, never thought i'd see distributism being discussed here.
Distributism is basically Catholic libertarianism. It teaches that property is a basic human right and that it should be distributed to everyone. In other words, everyone should be able to sustain themselves from their own property, and not from the property of others. It emphasizes on medieval guild system in terms of production and distribution of goods, and a wide network of small communities producing independently for themselves whilst trading and cooperating with other communities. All communities are essentially religious, and faith, tradition and family values are held in high regard.
There are no banks and usury is forbidden.
Lucas Rogers
Heres your answer you fucking retard
Ancap is for pretentious little edgelord teeny faggots that dont realize everyone in the world is not just like them
Go to Somalia, you cumstain
Bentley Hall
If tomorrow the whole capitalist world became Distributist, how would that work?
I'm trying to see how the modern world would facilitate something like this.
Evan Anderson
Don't be a cuck you goys!
Justin Perez
sounds comfy
Adrian Brown
all of these liberal economic policies sound great in a utopian model with no enemies. but we need a national socialist state/economy to defeat our enemies before considering embracing economically liberal policies. they only work in homogenous communities without external threats.
Anthony Stewart
Pretty tough since it demands a full societal restructure, and an honest return to religious view on the world as it existed in Medieval times.
IMO distributism heavily romanticizes Medieval commune system. Medieval Italian communes to which the distributists mostly look up to were indeed self-governing, self-sustaining bodies but their existence relied heavily on bigger players like the Pope or the Empire. Also the difference between various city-states was wide and huge. In some cities you usually had prominent/notable/influental citizens being appointed to power by the community and in other cities like Venice you had full oligarchy with most residents not even being worthy of citizenship because they lacked money to buy one.
It's an interesting concept nevertheless.