I agree man, I just dislike how anti-science the right can be. We don't have to give the UN our asshole if we admit that AGW is happening, we could do things like afforestation like you're saying. It's ridiculous to me to hear how many tons of CO2 we are dumping into the atmosphere and then pretend like there is no impact at all.
True, but that doesn't mean the current rise in temperature isn't being helped along by our actions however.
That's a rather sophistic way of looking at it. CO2 makes things warmer and destabilizes what would otherwise be a natural temperature fluctuation into something more serious.
This is part of AGW. Removing forest from the globe means there aren't as many carbon sinks as there were in the past which means there will be more atmospheric / oceanic CO2 which means more of the bad things. That, coupled with ever increasing emissions from the turd world equals what is known as AGW. It's demonstrably happening and the degree to which the temperature is fluctuating is our fault.
Luke Allen
No, it doesn't, hence made up terms like "global warming hiatus". What happened to global cooling?
Alexander Morales
Global warming hiatus could be other factors acting as counters to the greenhouse gases. Maybe decreased solar activity cancels out the increase in atmospheric carbon temporarily. Lots we don't know, but ice sheet thickness of many glaciers is decreasing which is no bueno.
Joshua Campbell
This. Vid related includes a whistleblower who details an R+D team "scientist" manipulating data on pharmaceuticals and trying to keep his interns silent about it. This is the tip of the iceberg, a scientist was willing to falsify data just to get ahead and make money, imagine how low the threshold for science corruption is when there are not any lives at stake directly, which there usually are not in most non-medical science fields. Don't ever let a status as a "scientist" or a "PhD" fool you into thinking they are beyond scrutiny or even legitimate, trust absolutely no kind of so called "expert", always verify independently when possible.
Michael Gray
The etiquette is lurking 2 YEARS before posting, newfag. No exceptions. Anyone who doesn't will always be obvious as an outsider and should be called out, not ignored.
The worst shit is a newfag making a thread, not just shitposting his cancerous opinions. The solution is sagebombing, but you still get other newfags and shills who bump it. Mods need to be ban them, i.e.:
Anyone who admits to being new deserves nothing less than a year long ban, just like anyone who would admit to being underage.
There is never 100% agreement on anything: see the creation science or deepak chopra wackjobs. AGW is supported by research coming out from every single country in the world. Is literally everyone in on it? Doubtful.
That doesn't mean we need to pay carbon taxes however, that's clearly jewish in nature. That doesn't mean that the underlying cause is false.
Hunter Stewart
Global warming hiatus could be other factors acting as counters to the greenhouse gases. So you admit that there are other factors, so we can't predict what will happen? You have to go back. Seriously though, this is another "oh no, something bad will happen" crap. What empirical data do you have showing what its consequences will be?
Jordan Smith
You know the climate change cucks say that the entire ocean will soon turn into an acidic wasteland? destroying all the poor corral reefs! seriously nigger. this shit is easy.
