Can anyone give me an easy definition of fascism? It seems too complicated when i read it on kikeopedia...

found your meme video

Fascism isn't simple to define because it isn't meant for people with simple minds. Also it can be adapted to different cultures and societies to fit them better, within limits. Niggers for example aren't capable.

My personal ideal is an elected Ruler. Citizens are the only ones who can vote, they must have served in the military (ie all non-cucked white males). The Ruler controls everything but his laws can be veto-ed by the Citizens if enough veto. We won't have fucking representatives able to be corrupted by moneyed powers either, the veto process will be direct, like you will receive a text on your fashphone or go online and decide.

See this post which gives features of a fascist state;

The reason you can't really define fascism is he same reason why it was always so successful:

The doctrine followed the deed, not the other way around

Natural laws applied to man.

Also

More Mosley.

youtube.com/watch?v=kTWLP4paazk

IDK why the wiki confused you. Here are the tenets of Fascism from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism with explanation.

Nationalism - the natural unifying force of people is a shared ancestry which creates a Nation, and the purpose of the State i.e. the governing polity is to further the interests of said Nation. There's some healthy debate and rigorous bantz about exactly what that shared ancestry means in practical terms, but there's not any debate about the need for that shared ancestry.

Authoritarianism - the State must have the power to achieve its goals, and the interests of any individual must be subsumed under those of the Nation, and if necessary, overruled by those of the Nation.

The twin pillars of Nationalism and Authoritarianism lead naturally to a form of “social safety net” or “welfare State” as the poor of the Nation are cared for if needed, protected from abuse by wealthy members of the Nation (often through institutions such as Labor Unions), and this is paid for by those wealthy members, through coercive measures if needed, so naturally these twin pillars lead to a restriction on unrestrained "capitalist" exchange. Nobody will be allowed to enrich themselves by selling their people out and all of our people need to be cared for (remember our concept of Nation, above).

Autarky - in order to protect the Nation, the State’s economy must be as self-sufficient as possible, and this expresses itself through protectionist trade policies internationally and subsidies for those industries which are viewed as essential for the State’s survival. Our Nation comes first and this is reflected in the State's economic policies.

Realpolitik - if, as Clausewitz said, “war is politics by other means,” then it follows that “politics is war by other means.” Since the State is force used to impose the will of those who rule, politics is merely a “gentlemen’s agreement” on the method used to determine who is the ruler. This is different from war only in the methods used to determine who the ruler is, because both are, in essence, about one party using force to rule the other. The view of politics as an “ivory tower” experience is a particular disease of the post-Enlightenment West. We reject "representative democracy" and the universal franchise as goods in and of themselves, and we put no particular polity or form of government or founding document ("MUH constitution") above the interests of our Nation.

Morality - the Nation is more than a biological entity, it is also a *spiritual* entity, and the spirit and morality of the people must be preserved, or if it is degenerate, it must be restored. This applies on both an individual level, i.e. those of high character should be encouraged to rise in society, and on a societal level, i.e. those of degenerate character should be rehabilitated or rooted out.

For those who can sign onto the above tenets, but still want to signal against Nazis or NatSoc, basically FUCK YOU. National Socialism is simply the name of one German expression of Fascism, it is a subset of ideas contained wholly within the general superset of Fascist ideas. Different expressions of modern Fascism had different names but it really takes a scorecard to tell the players apart unless you want to spend many hours debating and studying the (minute but many) differences between National Socialism, Socialist Nationalism, Strasserism, Syndicalism, National Bolshevism, Italian Fascism, Falangism, etc.

Contrary to popular belief, the ideas of Fascism are not new, their principles were the organizing ideas for most States throughout most of human history, it's only the name which is new. Most national states shared these same ideas prior to the "enlightenment," it's only a few prominent historical empirical examples that seem to color our perception. There may be those among you who prefer terminology related to the rollback of the so-called "enlightenment" but since there's a convenient word - FASCIST - which encapsulates the above, I personally prefer to simply wear it.

Besides, it's the first time in forever that the marxists in the USA got it right when they used the term to describe an enemy, so enjoy it.

Fool's house. Even the digits think Op is a faggot for needing such spoon feeding.

That is why our founding fathers said we'd need a revolution every once in awhile.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."