Babies are Sexist

Infants Prefer Toys Typed to Their Gender

Children as young as 9 months-old prefer to play with toys specific to their own gender, according to a new study from academics at City University London London and UCL.

“Biological differences give boys an aptitude for mental rotation and more interest and ability in spatial processing, while girls are more interested in looking at faces and better at fine motor skills and manipulating objects. When we studied toy preference in a familiar nursery setting with parents absent, the differences we saw were consistent with these aptitudes. Although there was variability between individual children, we found that, in general, boys played with male-typed toys more than female-typed toys and girls played with female-typed toys more than male-typed toys.

“Our results show that there are significant sex differences across all three age groups, with the finding that children in the youngest group, who were aged between 9–17months when infants are able to crawl or walk and therefore make independent selections, being particularly interesting; the ball was a favourite choice for the youngest boys and the youngest girls favoured the cooking pot.”

archive.is/X0uth

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE?t=22m25s
realclearscience.com/blog/2014/03/end_the_hype_over_epigenetics__lamarckian_evolution.html
youtu.be/w3310KWlDXg?t=19m21s
westhunt.wordpress.com/?s=Epigenetics
archive.fo/vWEpn
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Nature vs. Nurture.
Look it up.

Cooking is literally coded into a woman's genes.

Looks like nature was right again

B-b-but gender is a social construct goys!

...

We always knew this. I'm bookmarking this article.

Solid article for at least denting the "everything is a social construct" conditioning. Unfortunately most leftists will just try to claim that social conditioning managed to occur in less than 9 months, but at least it's evidence against them.

This just means children should be taken from their parents at or before birth. Only the state can break the chain of gendered oppression.

The Anatomy of Female Power made me realize that's not a benefit

I usually point out how every other animal has sex-based roles, so why shouldn't humans naturally have them?

I wonder though, if something like a "pot" is determined female, or a "toy car" is male, it's only after we apply a logic to it babies don't possess beyond the simple play functions needing spatial or social cognition, which are clearly differentiated in the sexes. Probably safe to say our caveman brains aren't set up to recognize modern objects, and then apply instinct to them.

Raises another question though, is it possible we've selectively bred new instincts about post-agricultural living into our children, so they naturally recognize gendered roles in otherwise abstract(to them) objects?

omg infants are being brainwashed by the patriarchy smh fam

The following video shows that differences between males and females can be seen in newborn babies.

youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE?t=22m25s

(checked)

This.

They're not YOUR children, they're OUR children.

WE HAVE TO STOP IN UTERO PATRIARCHY!

It's simple fact that only white semen is oppressive!

I know this is sarcasm, but there are commies who actually think this.

First post. Every god damned time

Its eppi genetics

Your ancestors memory is encoded in you DNA. Its why people are afraid of snakes and spiders.

Not trying to be some faggot, but society is trying to move away from "natural behavior", which is why you cant go around raping women.

and niggers

So why do "feminists" never preach to niggers about le patriarchy? Niggers are easily the most blatantly sexist race, even above Sharia law stoned-for-not-wearing-a-rag shitskins

...

Or at least was, until we started letting faggots show their disgusting face in public, the normalization of pedophilia, and the normalization of women being sluts. Its weird because this has happened in the 1920's, and the 1960's, society becomes cucked after having a good 20 year span of good morals after having major coflicts.

Do you mean "Epigenetics"? You do realize that stating "epigenetics" in response to claims of inherent characteristics in humans is a leftist meme, right? It's another way of dismissing the idea of inherent differences, favoring environmental only explanations instead.

Assertions of epigenetics within human beings should be examined very carefully as it's likely BS.


realclearscience.com/blog/2014/03/end_the_hype_over_epigenetics__lamarckian_evolution.html

youtu.be/w3310KWlDXg?t=19m21s

westhunt.wordpress.com/?s=Epigenetics

It's due to the concept of "Intersectionality". Feminists feel the same insitutions which oppress women also oppress blacks, and the negative behaviors of blacks towards women is excused as being the product of oppression.

It's basically an ideology which seeks to unite all so called oppressed groups against the oppressor (straight white males).

So in libshit candyland, niggers beating up, constantly cheating on, treating like auto-warming fleshlights and literally selling sometimes their women is alright because nogs are "oppressed"? Nevermind they aren't actually oppressed at all and the life of a nigger in America is extremely easy, this incredibly weak fallacy is the very crux of their whole ideology?
Liberalism really is a mental disease

Yes.


archive.fo/vWEpn

It's the fault of you and your ancestors. Feel guilty and send reparations.

I should clarify that feminists do not think mistreat of women by blacks is okay, it's just that they excuse the behavior, something which they would never accord to white men.