Cucking is worse fetish

Mason Carter
Mason Carter

I just read the "don't worry he knows" pasta and I'm so disgusted.
Not because of the content themselves, i just know in my heart that somewhere, sometimes something very similar happened.
Any beta male who enables this to happen should be made into a sissy and castrated.

All urls found in this thread:

cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm
public.wsu.edu/~taflinge/socsex.html
books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=V-n71mc10B4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA105&dq=polygamy in primates&ots=zy1v9m8Dxt&sig=EVN2i6kfAv82Uhcil01YmsbkXYw#v=onepage&q=polygamy in primates&f=false
homeadvisor.com/cost/outdoor-living/install-asphalt-paving/

Samuel Brooks
Samuel Brooks

They'd probably like getting castrated. They should instead be pitted against eachother over something like food or water so they understand the importance of competing with other people.

Easton Johnson
Easton Johnson

Study some evolutionary biology. Nature is very conservative; the cuckolding fetish is an evolved expression of sexual relations. Monogomy/monoamory is a social construct, in nature humans have a drive to fuck and therefore increase the likelihood to reproduce, by watching another person fucking *your* partner (your tribe all swaps partners so they all are shared and they don't "belong" solely to you like in marriage or having a gf) you increase the ability to reproduce and have more kids. More kids = tribe stronger = tribe survives. Watching someone get fucked increases the sexual and aggressive responses of the amygdala (remember: sex and aggression are both tied to the same area of the brain) so by watching others gets fucked, you start wanting to fuck as well. This made tribesman more aggressive and once someone starts fucking, they all start fucking. In short, watching people fuck is natural, just like we even have pornography now. However, what's wrong is that beta males aren't working the way they should, their amygdalas aren't up to par with normality: when they see women getting fucked it activates their sexual reception but not their aggression. That's how they derive pleasure from watching their girl getting fucked yet they do not join in as they are supposed to. In short, "cuckolding" AKA partner-swapping is not the problem, it's the timid beta males who aren't acting out the proper response, which is to join in on the fucking.

Nathan Richardson
Nathan Richardson

Social construct argument
Cucking is good but only when the cucks are aggressive

Ethan Jones
Ethan Jones

social morals mean science doesn't real

Evan Mitchell
Evan Mitchell

your tribe all swaps partners so they all are shared and they don't "belong" solely to you like in marriage or having a gf
males have always wanted to defend their mates from other males
you are talking out of your ass

Aaron Myers
Aaron Myers

This.
If i know one thing of the human nature is that we are greedy, and we don't wanna share our women.
My blood boils just knowing other males breathe the same air as my gf.
If you don't feel the same, you have a testosterone lack most likely.

Jeremiah Smith
Jeremiah Smith

My blood boils just knowing other males breathe the same air as my gf..

dude ..

Ryan Taylor
Ryan Taylor

You know, some day a group patriots are going to track you down on the day of the rope and ask you why you posted that image…

Jordan Thompson
Jordan Thompson

tfw I am going to get killed for shitposting and jacking off to cute boys, even though I never even got to act on the latter

Kevin Scott
Kevin Scott

Good post.
In your opinion are there any modern drugs such as alcohol, weed, mdma, fluoride, trans fats, xeno oestrogens that may account for a deficit in the amygdala specifically? I don't think simple population variance can account for this behavioral response.

Justin Lewis
Justin Lewis

SHUT THE FUCK UP BITCH

I SWEAR TO FUCKING GOD, YOU THINK THIS IS A GAME?

THAT'S A GREAT FLAG AND YOU DISGRACED IT.

Connor Scott
Connor Scott

But I am a different user, user-kun.

Camden Johnson
Camden Johnson

Anyone with a modicum of intuition knows this is absolute bullshit

Xavier Russell
Xavier Russell

CUCKING IN THE NAME OF

Evan Powell
Evan Powell

Some of those who fuck horses

Xavier Bennett
Xavier Bennett

You kids will never understand true bravery.

Jayden Russell
Jayden Russell

Yeah, true bravery is opening up your borders and privatizing roads so travel is next to impossible without violating the NAP.

Leo Sanchez
Leo Sanchez

"All those past sex partners don't matter. You're the one for me."
Two weeks before moving on to the next one.
Afterwords she hooked up with some other dude.
cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm

My blood boils just knowing other males breathe the same air as my gf.
You should to get yourself checked for asperger's syndrome.

Landon Scott
Landon Scott

I am a libertarian too though, bro.

Cooper Brooks
Cooper Brooks

If I may derail this thread for a minute, he seems to be falling sway to a fairly common fallacy I see among the "muh social construct" crowd in that he assumes ancient peoples were somehow completely removed from the ideas we have floating around today. In his case, though, he's doing it in the opposite direction.

In his case, he's making the assertion that an idea we hold must not have existed in ancient times so the opposite must have been commonplace back then. He assumes monogamy is a somewhat recent invention and so concludes that polyamory was the norm. What I see a bit more often, though, is people taking tangible examples of historical behaviors and assuming these to be the natural state of things.

One good example of this which I hear come up every now and again goes something like this: "sexually egalitarian and even matriarchal societies have existed in ancient history so that must mean there is no natural inclination for men to take a leadership role or women to take a submissive one." You can probably recall similar examples of arguments like these involving societies where transgenderism was practiced, or homosexuality, or literally anything involving social issues today. These people have their head almost as far up their ass as the user you replied to.
They are completely ignorant to the intellectual capacities of our ancestors:
Feminism is, by no means, a new idea. Nor is communism. Nor are people who decided they'd like to fuck members of their own gender. Nor are people who decided they'd prefer to be the other gender. Polygamy/polyamory is even older than any of them. And the arguments against these ideas have persisted just as long as the ideas themselves.

There's a reason why one side consistently won the argument throughout history with few exceptions.

David Hall
David Hall

I just want to interject with something. Maybe people don't know or realize this, but marriage is older than christianity. It's older than religion.
Almost every single culture has a concept of marriage. It is secular in nature.

IIRC even Catholic doctrine today says as much, because it's only a Union in life and it doesn't matter in heaven.

You can also look at Christian Spain. The Church wanted to involve itself more into the lives of people and over the years you could see how first the priests wanted to bless couples, untill it turned into a religious affair and you could only marry through the church.

Hudson Allen
Hudson Allen

Haha I never pay tolls. At some point I just started driving through them. If you look at the law books, every man has the right to travel on the highways and byways of this great nation. Only if you submit to their corporate agenda are you a traitor. The United States is a corporation but The United States of America is not.

I don't like your .jpg, it is too empowering to women.

David Perez
David Perez

he didn't make an appeal to tradition argument though
he made a biological one

Jack Wright
Jack Wright

If you look at the law books, every man has the right to travel on the highways and byways of this great nation
Bullshit. Where do the laws state that you can just drive through a toll booth? You can't and it's against the law. You will get pulled the fuck over or sent a ticket in the mail after they review the security cam footage exposing your license plate.

Charles Davis
Charles Davis

That's my point. Assuming polyamory was commonplace in some ancient societies, that does not imply a natural inclination towards it.

Logan Reyes
Logan Reyes

Haha I never pay tolls
It's not about paying tolls, dipshit. If a country was 100% libertarian, there wouldn't be a department of transportation or public roads. Everything would be owned by individual people. So if you're driving along a "highway", you run the risk of getting shot at because you are trespassing on private property. You wouldn't be able to travel as free as we can today because everything would be privatized. Libertarianism is retarded mainly because of this.

Cooper Clark
Cooper Clark

public.wsu.edu/~taflinge/socsex.html

Ryan Reed
Ryan Reed

Oh… You must be a drivers license cuck. LOL did you pay for that privilege, cuck? If you use a fake plate, where are they going to send the bill to?

CASE #1: "The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.

CASE #2: "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

It could not be stated more directly or conclusively that citizens of the states have a common law right to travel, without approval or restriction (license), and that this right is protected under the U.S Constitution.

CASE #3: "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.

CASE #4: "The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.

Welcome to common law and The Constitution, bitch.

That's entirely a meme.

Hunter Turner
Hunter Turner

OK. Instead of just posting a link, provide what you believe to be the important bits of information so that I can address the parts you find important to your argument.

Ayden Wilson
Ayden Wilson

That's entirely a meme.
Tell me exactly how a public road can exist in a libertarian society.

How would the infrastructure be funded and maintained?

Who would own these public roads? It certainly can't be the government. And whoever owned them would have complete control over them and could make any kooky laws he wanted to.

inb4 well we would have taxes to provide some NGO to do it for us
You can't have taxes in a libertarian society, it violates the NAP.

Jackson Bell
Jackson Bell

You think too much, little man. Now fuck off.

Ryder Ortiz
Ryder Ortiz

guys building a road
They are building roads for the state, idiot. That's my entire point. The guys who build roads are paid by taxpayer money. They don't just do it privately.

Josiah Ramirez
Josiah Ramirez

Simple answer:
my business is located at point A
population centers are located at point B
i hire people to build and maintain road from point A to point B
I might own the road. But it would be retarded for me to put toll booths on it because then no one would go to my business.

Kevin Lopez
Kevin Lopez

What's wrong with going after other women? Males are predators by nature.

Xavier Nguyen
Xavier Nguyen

Do you know how much that would cost? Even if point B was just a couple of miles away, it would cost a ridiculous amount of money. All in the name of being a libertarian.

Also, what if you want to travel across the country? Protip: you can't unless you are willing to violate the NAP

Christopher Nelson
Christopher Nelson

people can build roads
therefore roads will exist
And who owns these roads? That's the main question.

Jackson Wood
Jackson Wood

it would cost a ridiculous amount of money.
a libertarian society would find cheaper ways of doing it.
what if you want to travel across the country? Protip: you can't unless you are willing to violate the NAP
how so? The entire road system would consist of segments of roads commissioned by the individuals who need them. If someone's at point C, right next to point A, they could connect their road to A's road so that those wanting to travel to A or C from B could follow what is essentially the same road.

Samuel Robinson
Samuel Robinson

books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=V-n71mc10B4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA105&dq=polygamy in primates&ots=zy1v9m8Dxt&sig=EVN2i6kfAv82Uhcil01YmsbkXYw#v=onepage&q=polygamy in primates&f=false

intuition
Your opinions have been disregarded.

Whoever owns the land?
also checked

Connor Johnson
Connor Johnson

It matters not who owns an empire of dust.

Matthew 6:26-34New King James Version (NKJV)

26 Look at the birds of the air, for they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? 27 Which of you by worrying can add one cubit to his stature?

28 “So why do you worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin; 29 and yet I say to you that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30 Now if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will He not much more clothe you, O you of little faith?

31 “Therefore do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ 32 For after all these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. 33 But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you. 34 Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.

Jose Hernandez
Jose Hernandez

Whoever owns the land?
Who comes up with the price to use these roads? What potential manipulation will take place as far as location of building, and what possible strategies might they implement for economic control/manipulation whether it be zoning or tolls? Why do you think putting travel in the hands of the private sector would be a good idea? Could it maybe be that anarcho-capitalism is just a meme and that maybe small government is needed for some things?

Dominic Watson
Dominic Watson

a libertarian society would find cheaper ways of doing it.
How? You're just making an assertion here. Do natural resources become more abundant just because you are libertarian? I mean, they may become a little cheaper because of the lack of sales tax but it would still be a shitload of money.

The entire road system would consist of segments of roads commissioned by the individuals who need them.
You're implying that everyone would be compliant with this system. What if some schizo redneck owned a segment of road within this system and decided to shut it the fuck down. He is in his own right to do so and there is no one who could stop him, unless you violated the NAP. That's why libertarians are so fucking retarded, they just assume everyone will go along with the program when they fucking wont. That's why we have cops and a prison system.

Whoever owns the land?
see above

Isaac Fisher
Isaac Fisher

How?
because the government does everything in the most inefficient way possible.
What if some schizo redneck owned a segment of road within this system and decided to shut it the fuck down.
someone else would commission a bypass, retard.

By the way, the system you're describing is AnCap. Libertarians do believe in a limited government.

Sebastian Walker
Sebastian Walker

because the government does everything in the most inefficient way possible
And private citizens are more efficient somehow? Please give me an example of this. I'm not even an authoritarian but I completely disagree. If we gave a bunch of random citizens power of the transportation system it would be chaos. The better option would be to have a taxpayer funded government organization that was highly regulated to take control of it. Do you want DIY hipsters building your roads, or do you want professionals building them?

Cameron Miller
Cameron Miller

I want a bridge to be holding on to it's structural integrity by a thread every time I cross it and only get fixed when it's most profitable to do so

Daniel Young
Daniel Young

The women will build the roads.

Woman in the west, especially "the lady," finds herself in a false position. For woman, rightly termed by the ancients the sexus sequior, is in no wise suited to be the object of our honour and veneration, to carry her head higher than the man or even to have equal rights with him. The consequences of this false position we sufficiently see. It would be very desirable therefore that even in Europe this number two of the human race should be again referred to her natural place, and that a term should be put to the lady-nonsense, at which not only all Asia laughs, but at which Greece and Rome would also have laughed. The consequence of this in a social, civil, and political connection, would be inconceivably advantageous. The Salic Law as a superfluous truism, ought not to at all necessary. The essentially European "lady" is a being which ought not to exist at all; but there ought to housewives, and girls who hope to become so, and who are therefore educated, not to arrogance, but to domesticity and subordination. Precisely because there are ladies in Europe, the women of the lower classes, that is, the great majority of the sex, are much more unhappy than in the East. Even Lord Byron says: "Thought of the state of women under the ancient Greeks - convenient enough. Present state, a remnant of the barbarism of the chivalry of the feudal ages - artificial and unnatural. They ought to mind home, and be well fed and clothed, but not mixed in society. Well educated, too, in religion, but to read neither poetry nor politics, nothing but books of piety and cookery. Music, drawing, dancing, also a little gardening and ploughing now and
111
then. I have seen them mending the roads in Epirus with good success. Why not, as well as haymaking and milking?"

I've grown tired of watching cucked minds attempt to outwit one another. Goodbye.

Hunter Martinez
Hunter Martinez

And private citizens are more efficient somehow?
yes, actually, yes they are.
Please give me an example of this
literally any time anything has been privatized ever.

btw. the reason roads cost so much isn't the raw materials. Pic related is why they cost so much. They'd be cheaper than dirt if we didn't insist on all this spaghetti being buried under them. But "muh health regulations" mean you can't just have your sewer pipes running above ground.

Luis Sanders
Luis Sanders

literally any time anything has been privatized ever.
So can you give me an example of a private company that builds roads more efficiently. Hell, give me an example of a private company doing a public service that is more efficient than the government. You can't because private companies don't service public land, the state does, so shut the fuck up about that.

They'd be cheaper than dirt if we didn't insist on all this spaghetti being buried under them
The same spaghetti that provides you with clean tap water and gas to power your utilities. It also allows you to flush your toilet and watch your toxic waste go down a drain and never have to deal with it again. You should just move to India if you think this shit doesn't matter.

Also, you are moving the goalposts, the things under the road aren't part of the road itself. I'm talking about labor and the asphalt it takes to build an actual road. Not all of the other things underneath. If you want to lay a thick coat of asphalt on a road for a mile or so, you are looking at shitloads of money. Not to mention all of the labor.

Jacob Bennett
Jacob Bennett

a

Owen Perez
Owen Perez

The same spaghetti that provides you with clean tap water and gas to power your utilities
the same spaghetti which could be build above ground for much cheaper.

you are moving the goalposts, the things under the road aren't part of the road itself. I'm talking about labor and the asphalt it takes to build an actual road.
and all of that is dirt cheap.
If you want to lay a thick coat of asphalt on a road for a mile or so, you are looking at shitloads of money. Not to mention all of the labor.
lol. bullshit.

Julian Mitchell
Julian Mitchell

what do ancaps think about flammable tap water?

Juan Stewart
Juan Stewart

the same spaghetti which could be build above ground for much cheaper
Yeah, why not build natural gas lines above ground next to roads. What could go wrong, right? It's not like a car might crash into it and cause a massive explosion.

and all of that is dirt cheap
It costs around 3K to 6K just to install an asphalt driveway. Imagine the cost when you pave a road for 5 miles.
homeadvisor.com/cost/outdoor-living/install-asphalt-paving/
You think private citizens are willingly going to pay for this shit on their own?

Brody Rivera
Brody Rivera

it's a good thing. Methane isn't water soluble so with some clever plumbing techniques they can harvest it for personal use.

Yeah, why not build natural gas lines above ground next to roads. What could go wrong, right? It's not like a car might crash into it and cause a massive explosion.
it's a given that safety basically goes out the window in ancapistan. you should know this.

It costs around 3K to 6K just to install an asphalt driveway.
because of lack of competition. Go ahead and do a search on the raw materials.

Adam Nelson
Adam Nelson

because of lack of competition
Libertarians support a free market, that's a 100% competitive market. There is no regulation, therefore there is a lot of competition. I think you are confusing libertarianism with socialism.

Daniel Anderson
Daniel Anderson

Libertarians support a free market, that's a 100% competitive market.
THAT'S MY POINT RETARD

Jonathan Stewart
Jonathan Stewart

I never said we were a pair bonding species, I did say males don't want their mates to fuck other males while in the relationship, because they don't want to get stuck with taking care of another dude's kids
the statistics you provided prove nothing but that people sleep around. Wo-fucking-ho that doesn't prove that the cuck fetish is normal
btw you seem to think swinging is the samething as cucking, it isn't and I don't like swinging either, it is better then cucking

Kayden Russell
Kayden Russell

reminder this whole cuckolding thing is a (((merchant))) meme

Michael Martin
Michael Martin

Dunno, I'm no doc. We don't have any statistics to tell us just what percentage of people are cucks or have anything to compare it to to my knowledge. I'd say it's just a consequence of the internet making things more apparent. Vocal minority and all that.
Sorry if the truth triggers you. By the way, this may be a bad time to mention, but a woman moaning during sex is a sort-of "mating call" that's designed to attract nearby males to join in on fucking her. You're welcome.
How could I forget, when we crawled out of the ocean one of the first things we did was establish marriage. Thanks for letting me know.
And polyamory was around longer than that. Just how long do you think humans have existed?
that does not imply a natural inclination towards it.
genetics don't real
You can cloud your mind with all the soial mores you want but you cannot escape yourself nor your genetics. Unless you want to be a tranny any time soon?

Robert Cooper
Robert Cooper

And polyamory was around longer than that. Just how long do you think humans have existed?

everything that is not monogamous =/= polyamory

Some beta cucks like to tell themselves that they are living polyamorous, but just because you let your gf sleep around, doesn't mean that you are in a polyamorous relationship. baka

Parker Hughes
Parker Hughes

There's no other way about it; you're either celibate, monogamous or polyamorous. What fucking reality do you live in? What other options are there?

Colton Gomez
Colton Gomez

I think there are 2 ways to look at polyamory. Either you see it as a sort of "organized relationship". Like for example Muslims who have multiple wives. They wives typcially aren't expected to fuck each other, their only bond is with the husband. It's not an equal fuck party.

Or it actually is an equal fuck party and you are only fucking each other.

Then there are unorganized relationships. Like a husband who cheats on his wife. Technically still monogamy. The wife doesn't even know. Or you are single and have multiple fuckbuddies. Or you are a beta male and you and your couple decided """together""" (only she did) that you are now polyamorous, which means she gets to fuck other guys.

If you think this is polyamorous, then fine, call it that, but then you just robbed me of a way to define "organized" polyamorous relationships. And you probably have an agenda. Either you want to show how humans are naturally polyamorous or you want to go on about muh degeneracy.

Jeremiah Fisher
Jeremiah Fisher

there's a fuckton more evidence suggesting early humans were monogamous, retard.
polygamy is the newcomer, not monogamy.

Bentley Walker
Bentley Walker

THIS ENTIRE THREAD

Leo Gray
Leo Gray

How did a thread about cucking being a shit fetish become a thread about libertarianism

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit