How do you deal with the inherit genetic differences between individuals that will always inevitably lead to a...

How do you deal with the inherit genetic differences between individuals that will always inevitably lead to a hierarchy of some sort? Is a truly classless society even possible? Some groups of people will always be better than others and will always prefer to associate with one another.

Other urls found in this thread:

theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

People looking better than you is not a hierarchy in the political sense.

Irrelevant if you grant everybody an AK-47 and Revolver.

Better by what degree? Everybody has their specialisation and talents that can be utilized by society.

One of the problems with this way of thinking is that it first classifies humans by genetic differences rather than their developed abilities; for example, if you're looking for someone to do a job like translate one language to another, you'll look for someone who has those skills first; you won't select someone with "better" genes if they can't do the job as well.

Associating with people because of their genetics is the same principle; in this case, one selects his associations by qualities that are ultimately irrelevant to what humans do. It is not genetics which produce classes, or most abilities.

The solution is effectively to inform people that the associations they make are nothing more than remnants of tribal feelings of closeness with those who look similar, and have no intellectual or effective bearing on ability, and only ends in the rejection of useful people and the acceptance of useless people.

Genetic differences do not lead to hierarchy, the weight that people give to genetic differences helps to create hierarchy, as does presenting these weights as fact and truth.

...

...

Correlation does not imply causation. There is no evidence that Ashkenazi Jews have an inherent increase in intelligence compared to specific cultural differences.

In fact, doing some research I came across this


Source: theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/

I don't care if you're smarter, better looking, have more skills, better educated, stronger than me [&c.] as long as you don't try to tell me what to do. If you try to force me to do something I will resist.

Also, OP, you don't understand what 'hierarchy' means. Results of a 100m sprint aren't a hierarchy.

Do you know what an Ashkenazi Jew is?

So when the commissar representing the local workers council tells you that you it's your turm to perform your monthly allotted labor, you will resist?

Yes, and what I just sent clearly shows that studies have shown that Ashkenazi Jews that lived in Isreal had a LOWER than average IQ which seems to imply that IQ is based more on culture than genetics.

"No"

Yes, Mahkno did nothing wrong! Kronstadt sailor sqaud forever!

Great argument, you really showed me.

Biological differences don't necessarily lead to political or economic hierarchy. There will be social hierarchy (more charismatic people will have more social influence of ideas) but so long as that doesn't manifest itself in political or economic structures that's fine. Not a lot we can do about that. Communism isn't a utopia.

Genetic engineering.

Why is this inevitable? Point to one hierarchy that is the result of superior genetics

How would genetic differences create an exploiting class in a classless society if everything is already collectivized? OP pls, you can do better than this.

sageing cause I'm sure this is bait

Iq is bullshit.

IQ does correlate well with success in most economic spheres, though as usual there will always be those who arrive at their wealth by birth or advantage of birth in a Capitalist system. The great majority of people don't fit into that category, you don't see a whole lot of 80 IQ doctors, and the simple fact of the matter is that some races score as much as a full standard deviation lower on IQ tests than others. In some cases, two.

That said, particularly when you introduce low-IQ races to high-IQ societies, you end up with people who simply cannot collectively contribute the same amount to society outside of manual labor as their racial superiors. In a market system these people end up disenfranchised, but even in an ideal Communist state, as society moves ever more towards the hi-tech, they would end up essentially as leeches on the back of society proper.

Logically the solution to this would be a soft eugenics program, which should frankly be a part of any Socialist ideology. There is literally no reason not to encourage high-performance people to breed and discourage low-performance people from breeding. The idea that everyone ought to reproduce like locusts only advantages a society that is built on constant exponential growth. You need enough offspring to provide for the aging generations before and the youth of tomorrow, and there is no reason why those should not be the product of the best and brightest.

The Israeli Jewish population does consist primarily of Ashkenazi Jews, but it also consists largely of native Palestinian Jews who occupied the region beforehand, and crossbreeds between the two, since they share cultural and social equality, and thus do not discriminate when choosing mates.

Palestinian Jews have staggeringly low IQs, sometimes tested in the 80s. And there is more–inbreeding, particularly first-cousin marriages, can cause a drop of up to 10 points in a population over a few generations. Jews have a notorious problem with genetic diversity because of their cultural taboos of marrying outside of the tribe, and particularly in Shepardic Jews this has manifested in some serious cancer-related genetic problems that they now screen for. In America there are far fewer taboos regarding banging goys, so that may have something to do with it.
Regardless, what data on IQ actually shows, between 50% to 75% of it is inheritable genetically, with the rest being cultural/material. That's still enough that a strong educational system can produce functional people out of anyone from Aborigines to Zulus. That wasn't a nigger joke either it's just A to Z.

That said, Israel's educational system isn't exactly third world, they're perfectly competitive with Western states, if not near the top. I'm dubious as to what this study actually means in the larger scheme of things, because it does seem to clash to a degree with other data I've seen.