Anarcho-democracy

...

...

...

I'm not talking about socialism retard, I'm talking about democracy, which can lead to whatever economic politics

I'm not trying to decipher you reddit, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy to everyone else

...

I wouldn't trust the average person with a nerf gun.

Poodle fisting ✊ commie cucks

wew

That's just classic anarcho-communism, isn't it? Everyone holds resources and means of production in common and has consensus meetings on decisions, instantly recallable delegates sometimes included.

Ur paranoid

Everyone has POWER in common, but not the rest, they can decide capitalist laws or whatever if it is'nt against democracy

Oh, so direct democracy without imposing common property everywhere? You can vote for capitalism in your individual commune if you want?

Honestly, if it works that way maybe that would be a better way of settling the ancom vs ancap debate.

That's not how it work!

You spelled national socialism wrong.

Hilarious, doesn't change the fact that all you want is power by any method, at any cost

All the people want power, this is why direct democracy is fair retard

awesome

This has nothing to do with natsocialism, clearly…

Also, think you're confusing your original assessment with what is now known today in the U.S. as "representative democracy"

What with todays retard population for of muslims?
Are you bloody insane?

You and "non-muslim" majority can still vote for getting them out

You mean the neo-marxist cucks?
The last thing this generation of snowflakes needs is more power.

The only legitimate decisions are people decisions, not decisions decided by a minority treading on us.

I remember when I was 14. Don't worry, once you read some actual books and get your first job the world will start to make more sense.

Yes I get that logic but the population right now are brainwashed and ignorant as shit.

What we need to do is redpill the shit out of everybody. I mean actually redpill not spout Holla Forums memes that just make you seem like a dickhead that isn't worth listening too.

...

t. someone who's never read a thing on the subject

no ty nigger loving faggot

...

Please end this meme. You either have anarchy, or you dont.

Time for your vacation

you couldn't be more obviously uneducated on what anarchism if you say something like
anarchism isn't a 12 year old hot topic kid with a circled A wristbrant on thinks of when they say "anarchy xDDD"

Nothing you typed had anything to do with what i typed.

I pointed out that anarchy is anarchy. Anarcho-snowflake doesn't work. How can you have anarchy, and have a form of government at the same time?

self-governance among decentralized communities in a horizontal power structure is not the same thing as a hierarchical federalist system
it is not the dissemination of governance, it is the dissemination of the state
i mean i don't want to steer you all the way back to Plato's republic but his ideas of "indirect democracy" vs "direct democracy" are entirely applicable me

the different flavors of anarchism are the exact same thing as different flavors of socialism, libertarian socialism being the obvious choice for an anarchist

replace dissemination with dismantlement

who here /anarchostatism/?

Well yes, if anarchy comes, and stays, people will just break off into a bunch of communities. But again, if it's actual anarchy, your anarcho-whatever will be meaningless. These communities are going to do whatever the fuck they want. Some might be democracies, some might be theocracies, some communists, etc. etc..

How? If you have democracy, you don't have anarchy. What is there to vote on during anarchy?

you have officially been noted as a lost cause at this point

Do you mean direct democracy without the government.

I was seriously asking, what is there to vote on in anarchy? tell me.

And i'll add on to it, explain to me how the vote is enforced.

Communities vote democratically on issues whether it be social, economic, or judicial in a DIRECT DEMOCRATIC fashion. This is a horizontal approach. You can think of it akin to how different states have different laws in the U.S. This is because these different communities all have different values and different problems that plague them.

The people, do. Democratic assemblies form and deal with issues accordingly. If there is dissidents or people who are sabotaging the going on's of the community and pose a threat, then the people of that community deal with it themselves. Different people have different jobs, and those whose job it is to enforce the vote of the people (whether it be to exile a community member or what have you), will do so but only after it is democratically decided to do so

Wow, OP is edgy

This just goes back to what i said. Some might do this, some might end up being religious cults that worship the sun god. There's no figure to actually ensure that anyone follows your anarcho-democracy.

Or, the more likely scenario, everyone is drinking at the pub, and the topic of dave comes up, and a conclusion is made that he's being a massive faggot and needs to go.

Basically, what im gathering is, your plan is to topple the government and then you and your town become a direct democracy.

The problem being that it, like most other ideologies, only works in your head, where everyone thinks like you.

First is the massive uphill battle of the anarchy bit. You have to overthrow the current government, then ensure a new one doesn't take it's place. 0.0000001% possible amigo. When the dust settles, either a new government is going to arise, or an already existing country is going to sweep in. Have fun ending up as Canada's newest province.

But even if you do get the 0.0000001%, there's still the issue of it even working in your community. Your town (i'm seriously hoping you aren't actually having this wet dream while living in a city or even a town of more than a couple thousand) may very well decide to just turn into a republic.

And then, this is of course assuming your town doesn't just end up being culturally enriched by a wandering warband of the We Wuzian tribe from the nearest city.

You mean by the mob? 100% democracy is fucking gay and doesn't represent an entire country, it only represents the most popular cities. If the USA went 100% democratic, the the east and west coasts would be able to make decisions for the entire country. You'd effectively be allowing liberals to run the country. This is why the USA is a republic, not a democracy.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_in_Spain
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapatista_Army_of_National_Liberation

You're still completely misunderstanding or not even investigating the fundamental principles of this, and are strawmanning a caricature of anarchism that doesn't even exist.

...

...

...

The kurds seem pretty successful to me

Quads of truth

no thanks I'm already in a democrat shithole

welp, you tackled the weakest point in my post. congrats.

digits dont lie user

Anarcho democracy is obviously anarchy, there's no government

We can impose anarcho democracy faggot

Anarcho democracy is abolition of the republic or any form of power given to a minority, than that would be forbitten. But a city could still vote its independance, if they remain anarcho democratic

yeah pal, that's the point

So anarcho-domocracy, minus the anarcho part.

Then there's no democracy. What are you going to vote on? Who enforces your vote in the town 10 miles over?

Democracy is retarded, but anarchy is even more retarded, and your plan is to combine these two?

Democracy only works as a way to find out what people care about, not as a means to decide things, because the vast vast VAST majority of people are drooling fucking retards who can't tell the difference between freedom and communism and will believe and vote for what ever the fuck the TV or their favorite jewlywood celebrity on twitter tells them to.

Anarchy doesn't work as anything, it's a fairytale fantasy based on the idea that everyone is selfless inside and would never have major disagreements with other people, and people who advocate for it seem to think that all their political opponents would somehow just disappear if anarchy was achieved.

That's anarchic, there is no chief

Well you're not going to vote on people but on laws and decisions, how is that complicate?

You're so selfish you think that majority of people is more retarded than you little nazifag, pathethic…