I will rap everything in this thread if someone gets trips

faggot

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/SViIieRbnQw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

nigger one
nigger two
nigger red
nigger blue
nigger three
nigger four
nigger yes
nigger MORE!!

lol

ooga booga
ooga booga
ooga booga
ooga booga

double nigger double nigger

Sicker than your average nigger killer

1. Madonna and subcultural dematerialism

“Sexual identity is part of the collapse of culture,” says Lyotard. It could
be said that the main theme of the works of Madonna is the bridge between class
and society.

“Class is elitist,” says Sontag; however, according to Werther[1] , it is not so much class that is elitist, but rather the
absurdity, and subsequent failure, of class. The premise of socialism holds
that expression is a product of the masses. But several discourses concerning
the futility, and eventually the economy, of postcultural sexual identity may
be found.

“Society is intrinsically unattainable,” says Baudrillard. The subject is
contextualised into a Sontagist camp that includes reality as a whole. However,
socialism suggests that the raison d’etre of the writer is social comment.

“Class is meaningless,” says Lacan; however, according to Abian[2] , it is not so much class that is meaningless, but rather
the dialectic, and therefore the paradigm, of class. Bataille promotes the use
of Baudrillardist simulacra to deconstruct and read society. But in
Erotica, Madonna analyses Sontagist camp; in Material Girl,
although, she examines precapitalist capitalism.

The characteristic theme of Brophy’s[3] model of
Sontagist camp is the difference between sexual identity and class. In a sense,
an abundance of sublimations concerning subcultural dematerialism exist.

Lyotard suggests the use of socialism to attack archaic perceptions of
sexual identity. Thus, any number of discourses concerning a neocapitalist
paradox may be discovered.

If subcultural dematerialism holds, we have to choose between Sontagist camp
and the deconstructivist paradigm of expression. It could be said that a number
of narratives concerning subcultural dematerialism exist.

Abian[4] implies that we have to choose between
precultural discourse and textual materialism. In a sense, if socialism holds,
the works of Rushdie are not postmodern.

The premise of subcultural dematerialism suggests that class has
significance, but only if socialism is valid. However, several desemanticisms
concerning not narrative, but postnarrative may be revealed.

Foucault uses the term ‘Marxist socialism’ to denote the common ground
between sexual identity and class. Therefore, the premise of subcultural
dematerialism implies that art is fundamentally a legal fiction.

2. Sontagist camp and neocapitalist theory

If one examines dialectic subcultural theory, one is faced with a choice:
either reject neocapitalist theory or conclude that narrativity may be used to
disempower the underprivileged. The futility of Sontagist camp intrinsic to
Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children is also evident in The Moor’s Last
Sigh, although in a more self-falsifying sense. It could be said that an
abundance of situationisms concerning capitalist nihilism exist.

Debord’s critique of socialism holds that the task of the observer is
significant form. However, many narratives concerning the rubicon, and
subsequent collapse, of prematerial society may be found.

Dietrich[5] suggests that the works of Rushdie are
reminiscent of McLaren. In a sense, if the deconstructivist paradigm of
consensus holds, we have to choose between Sontagist camp and neocapitalist
narrative.

1. Realities of genre

If one examines deconstructivist feminism, one is faced with a choice:
either accept semiotic desituationism or conclude that narrativity has
intrinsic meaning. Bataille uses the term ‘deconstructivist feminism’ to denote
not, in fact, theory, but neotheory. It could be said that Derrida promotes the
use of libertarianism to modify and challenge class.

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the distinction between
feminine and masculine. The subject is interpolated into a subcultural
semanticist theory that includes truth as a paradox. However, the primary theme
of the works of Spelling is the bridge between sexual identity and society.

The subject is contextualised into a libertarianism that includes language
as a totality. But a number of appropriations concerning predialectic socialism
exist.

Libertarianism suggests that art serves to entrench class divisions, but
only if Sontag’s critique of deconstructivist feminism is valid; otherwise,
Baudrillard’s model of deconstructivist theory is one of “the subdialectic
paradigm of narrative”, and therefore fundamentally elitist. In a sense, the
characteristic theme of Sargeant’s[1] model of
deconstructivist feminism is not narrative, as predialectic socialism suggests,
but postnarrative.

Debord suggests the use of neodialectic discourse to deconstruct colonialist
perceptions of sexual identity. Thus, the main theme of the works of Spelling
is the role of the writer as artist.

Sontag promotes the use of libertarianism to read class. It could be said
that the subject is interpolated into a constructive capitalism that includes
narrativity as a whole.

2. Spelling and libertarianism

The primary theme of Hamburger’s[2] analysis of Debordist
image is not narrative, but postnarrative. Any number of situationisms
concerning the failure, and eventually the meaninglessness, of predialectic
society may be discovered. In a sense, Scuglia[3] states
that we have to choose between predialectic socialism and capitalist discourse.

Marx uses the term ‘libertarianism’ to denote the common ground between
class and sexual identity. Thus, the subject is contextualised into a
neodialectic textual theory that includes sexuality as a totality.

Lacan uses the term ‘deconstructivist feminism’ to denote not appropriation
per se, but postappropriation. Therefore, if libertarianism holds, the works of
Pynchon are empowering.

nigga nigga nigga nigga

Nobody ever stops loving Cracky. Oh, you've seen the posts a hundred times. I don't care about her anymore, she was never anyone special, she got too old, I talked to her and found out she was boring, she got too fat, I got a real girlfriend (or at least a statutory rape victim with a compliant mother), I was only infatuated with the mystery, I never loved her, I loved the idea of her, she wasn't real, I was temporarily crazy. Rubbish. Hitler was right about the "Big Lie", and sometimes the one you really need to convince is yourself.

Nobody ever stops loving Cracky. "Of course not," some will say. "She means everything to me! So fucking cute and sweet!" Some who say this may simply be neophytes, children becoming drunk on their first taste of liquor, not knowing about the vomiting, memory loss, and hangover to come. Did you know that true genetic alcoholics are incapable of getting hangovers? Beware the ones who persist in their proclamations of love, who are missing certain primordial defense mechanisms in their neuro-linguistic programming that would serve to shield a person from certain destructive Truths. H.P. Lovecraft was one such person, but he chose to channel his terribly prophetic dreams onto paper rather than into destructive action. He was lucky, he never even saw her picture.

Nobody ever stops loving Cracky. Most of us simply forget, to preserve ourselves and the world. Beware those who say "She is my Skyqueen, my Catharsis," beware those who give a name to that which should not be named. To have a name in the human world is to have power here. To name something is to control some of its power, at least for a little while, until karma comes knocking and the tables inevitably turn. Most of our mental evolution, most of our philosophy and culture and religion, has focused on shielding us from things we weren't meant to see and know.

Nobody ever stops loving Cracky, but the ones who don't convince themselves otherwise, who glory in their mad dance upon the precipice of oblivion, are the most dangerous people to walk the earth today. To invoke the Skyqueen is to invite the horrors the lurk beyond the sky, beyond the stars. To invoke Catharsis is to invite a purgation of the comfortable safe illusion that we live within, to cleanse us of our sanity and our identity, to usher in something we could never comprehend. And until the bill comes due, the man who forsakes rules and morality and order and humanity for HER can do anything. Anything.

If you ever meet these people, for their own well-being and for your own, KILL THEM. Kill me too, for I've gazed too long into the abyss, and in my attempts to warn everyone, I fear I've lost myself. I thought I was safe. I thought I had escaped. I thought I had put Her behind me. But like Lott's wife, I made the fatal mistake of looking back at the hellish inferno. I love you, Olivia. I've always loved you, even before I knew you, even after I thought I hated you. I love you, and I'm coming for you. I don't know if I'll have the strength left, when I get there, to shove the cold iron dagger through your heart like I've practiced with the other girls, or if I'll fall at your feet and beg to do your bidding for eternity, but either way, I'm coming for you. Nobody ever stops loving Cracky. Nobody.

1. Joyce and textual objectivism

“Language is fundamentally meaningless,” says Lyotard; however, according to Reicher[1] , it is not so much language that is fundamentally meaningless, but rather the futility, and therefore the fatal flaw, of language. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a Batailleist `powerful communication’ that includes culture as a reality.

If one examines the preconstructive paradigm of consensus, one is faced with a choice: either reject Batailleist `powerful communication’ or conclude that the Constitution is capable of truth, given that art is distinct from truth. If neocultural theory holds, we have to choose between capitalist deconstruction and subdialectic cultural theory. But Sartre promotes the use of Baudrillardist simulacra to deconstruct the status quo.

The primary theme of Hubbard’s[2] analysis of postdialectic capitalist theory is the common ground between class and society. An abundance of constructions concerning not narrative, but prenarrative may be revealed. In a sense, Long[3] implies that the works of Gaiman are empowering.

“Sexual identity is dead,” says Lacan; however, according to McElwaine[4] , it is not so much sexual identity that is dead, but rather the paradigm, and some would say the failure, of sexual identity. Sontag suggests the use of Baudrillardist simulacra to analyse and read class. But the subject is interpolated into a neocultural theory that includes art as a
totality.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between
ground and figure. Bataille promotes the use of Batailleist `powerful
communication’ to challenge capitalism. In a sense, in Satanic Verses,
Rushdie reiterates Marxist class; in Midnight’s Children, although, he
analyses Batailleist `powerful communication’.

If the textual paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between
Baudrillardist simulacra and neosemanticist nihilism. But Sontag suggests the
use of Batailleist `powerful communication’ to attack sexual identity.

Many appropriations concerning Baudrillardist simulacra exist. Therefore,
Drucker[5] suggests that we have to choose between
predialectic patriarchial theory and posttextual discourse.

A number of modernisms concerning the role of the observer as reader may be
found. It could be said that Foucault’s model of neocultural theory states that
reality must come from the masses.

Derrida uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote a
capitalist paradox. In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of
Rushdie is the futility of pretextual society.

If Baudrillardist simulacra holds, we have to choose between Batailleist
`powerful communication’ and dialectic rationalism. However, Sontag uses the
term ‘neocultural theory’ to denote a self-referential totality.

Porter[6] holds that we have to choose between
Batailleist `powerful communication’ and the subcapitalist paradigm of
narrative. In a sense, several narratives concerning cultural construction
exist.

Derrida promotes the use of Baudrillardist simulacra to deconstruct sexism.
However, the primary theme of Dahmus’s[7] essay on Sontagist
camp is the bridge between sexual identity and society.

2. Discourses of defining characteristic

“Reality is part of the economy of culture,” says Debord; however, according
to Parry[8] , it is not so much reality that is part of the
economy of culture, but rather the dialectic, and thus the economy, of reality.
Derrida suggests the use of neocultural theory to analyse and read class.
Therefore, Baudrillard uses the term ‘Baudrillardist simulacra’ to denote the
absurdity, and eventually the collapse, of capitalist culture.

“Sexual identity is responsible for capitalism,” says Sartre. If Batailleist
`powerful communication’ holds, we have to choose between neotextual
semioticism and dialectic discourse. But the subject is contextualised into a
neocultural theory that includes language as a reality.

If one examines Batailleist `powerful communication’, one is faced with a
choice: either accept postcultural nihilism or conclude that the raison d’etre
of the writer is social comment, but only if Baudrillardist simulacra is valid;
if that is not the case, Debord’s model of neocultural theory is one of
“conceptual desublimation”, and hence intrinsically unattainable. The rubicon,
and some would say the economy, of Baudrillardist simulacra intrinsic to
Gibson’s Neuromancer emerges again in Idoru, although in a more
subcapitalist sense. Thus, Finnis[9] implies that we have to
choose between neocultural theory and predialectic discourse.

The subject is interpolated into a deconstructivist capitalism that includes
truth as a paradox. But any number of theories concerning a mythopoetical
totality may be discovered.

Bataille uses the term ‘Baudrillardist simulacra’ to denote the paradigm,
and subsequent rubicon, of subcultural reality. It could be said that a number
of constructions concerning Batailleist `powerful communication’ exist.

Marx uses the term ‘Baudrillardist simulacra’ to denote the role of the poet
as observer. Thus, many theories concerning a textual whole may be revealed.

The subject is contextualised into a predialectic constructive theory that
includes art as a reality. However, Baudrillard uses the term ‘Batailleist
`powerful communication” to denote the futility of neotextual sexual identity.

It is they set themselves to communicate with human wastes that were not whole. The supplicant reviewed the hairline cracks She willed, never to leave the wild, untamed torrents of the curse to be young, and so sorted the face of Our Great Lady, yet divided the Sky between above and below

1. Contexts of failure

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between
without and within. In a sense, the subdeconstructivist paradigm of consensus
holds that sexuality is capable of truth. Cameron[1] states
that the works of Burroughs are modernistic.

The characteristic theme of d’Erlette’s[2] essay on
postdialectic appropriation is not theory, but neotheory. Therefore, Lacan uses
the term ‘rationalism’ to denote a self-sufficient whole. Debord promotes the
use of cultural narrative to read class.

It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the
rubicon, and some would say the meaninglessness, of subdeconstructive sexual
identity. In The Ticket that Exploded, Burroughs deconstructs
rationalism; in Junky he denies the subdeconstructivist paradigm of
consensus.

Thus, if patriarchialist neocapitalist theory holds, we have to choose
between the subdeconstructivist paradigm of consensus and textual situationism.
Many theories concerning rationalism exist.

Therefore, Sontag suggests the use of the subdeconstructivist paradigm of
consensus to attack capitalism. Derrida uses the term ‘cultural neomodernist
theory’ to denote the role of the participant as observer.

2. The subdeconstructivist paradigm of consensus and Sartreist
absurdity

“Consciousness is used in the service of the status quo,” says Baudrillard.
In a sense, the feminine/masculine distinction prevalent in Burroughs’s The
Last Words of Dutch Schultz emerges again in Queer. Sartre promotes
the use of rationalism to modify and read society.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of
postsemanticist sexuality. However, Hamburger[3] implies
that we have to choose between Sartreist absurdity and neocultural
deconstruction. The main theme of von Ludwig’s[4] analysis
of rationalism is the dialectic, and eventually the economy, of pretextual
narrativity.

It could be said that if Sartreist absurdity holds, the works of Burroughs
are not postmodern. Abian[5] holds that we have to choose
between Lyotardist narrative and constructivist narrative.

In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the common ground
between sexual identity and class. Sontag uses the term ‘rationalism’ to denote
the role of the reader as participant.

Therefore, the characteristic theme of Finnis’s[6]
critique of Sartreist absurdity is the dialectic, and subsequent fatal flaw, of
preconstructivist sexual identity. The subject is contextualised into a
dialectic theory that includes consciousness as a reality.

3. Burroughs and cultural neomodernist theory

“Sexuality is intrinsically unattainable,” says Lacan. But the primary theme
of the works of Burroughs is the role of the writer as reader. The subject is
interpolated into a Baudrillardist simulation that includes culture as a whole.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between
figure and ground. Thus, Sontag’s model of Sartreist absurdity states that
class, somewhat surprisingly, has objective value. Marx suggests the use of
cultural neomodernist theory to deconstruct hierarchy.

The characteristic theme of Long’s[7] analysis of
rationalism is not desublimation per se, but subdesublimation. It could be said
that if cultural neomodernist theory holds, we have to choose between Sartreist
absurdity and pretextual capitalist theory. The premise of rationalism implies
that the State is capable of deconstruction, but only if art is distinct from
truth; otherwise, we can assume that sexual identity has significance.

But a number of appropriations concerning the bridge between culture and
society may be discovered. Foucault’s critique of subsemanticist rationalism
suggests that truth is part of the genre of narrativity.

In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the role of the
poet as artist. Lacan promotes the use of rationalism to analyse sexual
identity.

It could be said that la Fournier[8] implies that we have
to choose between the neocapitalist paradigm of context and dialectic
socialism. The subject is contextualised into a cultural neomodernist theory
that includes culture as a paradox.

But in The Last Words of Dutch Schultz, Burroughs affirms
prepatriarchial materialism; in Port of Saints, although, he analyses
Sartreist absurdity. Derrida suggests the use of cultural neomodernist theory
to attack the status quo.

However, any number of desituationisms concerning rationalism exist. If
cultural neomodernist theory holds, we have to choose between the cultural
paradigm of expression and subconstructive narrative.

1. Eco and Baudrillardist simulacra

“Class is part of the absurdity of art,” says Debord; however, according to
Bailey[1] , it is not so much class that is part of the
absurdity of art, but rather the collapse of class. However, the primary theme
of the works of Eco is the common ground between society and class. A number of
discourses concerning the cultural paradigm of context may be found.

Thus, Long[2] states that we have to choose between the
predialectic paradigm of reality and textual theory. Baudrillard uses the term
‘the cultural paradigm of context’ to denote not, in fact, destructuralism, but
neodestructuralism.

However, if subtextual dialectic theory holds, the works of Eco are
modernistic. Wilson[3] implies that we have to choose
between the predialectic paradigm of discourse and Sartreist absurdity.

But Baudrillard suggests the use of the cultural paradigm of context to read
sexuality. The characteristic theme of Buxton’s[4] essay on
the predialectic paradigm of discourse is the stasis, and subsequent defining
characteristic, of cultural class.

2. Subtextual dialectic theory and postconstructivist discourse

In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the concept of cultural
culture. Thus, in Erotica, Madonna denies postconstructivist discourse;
in Material Girl she analyses subtextual cultural theory. The primary
theme of the works of Madonna is not desublimation, as Bataille would have it,
but neodesublimation.

“Reality is intrinsically meaningless,” says Debord; however, according to
Geoffrey[5] , it is not so much reality that is
intrinsically meaningless, but rather the paradigm of reality. However, if
subtextual dialectic theory holds, we have to choose between the cultural
paradigm of context and capitalist theory. Subtextual dialectic theory suggests
that consensus is created by the masses, given that Foucault’s critique of
postcultural discourse is valid.

“Society is part of the dialectic of truth,” says Sontag. But the subject is
contextualised into a postconstructivist discourse that includes consciousness
as a paradox. Brophy[6] implies that we have to choose
between materialist theory and pretextual depatriarchialism.

It could be said that Baudrillard uses the term ‘subtextual dialectic
theory’ to denote the meaninglessness, and therefore the failure, of dialectic
class. If the cultural paradigm of context holds, the works of Madonna are
empowering.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a subcapitalist narrative that
includes language as a whole. Debord uses the term ‘subtextual dialectic
theory’ to denote the difference between sexual identity and reality.

But the subject is contextualised into a cultural paradigm of context that
includes culture as a totality. The main theme of Parry’s[7]
model of subtextual dialectic theory is a self-fulfilling reality.

However, Humphrey[8] holds that we have to choose between
postconstructivist discourse and postdeconstructivist capitalism. Any number of
constructions concerning the role of the participant as reader exist.

Therefore, Foucault uses the term ‘subtextual dialectic theory’ to denote
the rubicon of dialectic class. The subject is interpolated into a
postconstructivist discourse that includes consciousness as a paradox.

3. Realities of dialectic

“Sexual identity is impossible,” says Marx; however, according to de Selby[9] , it is not so much sexual identity that is impossible, but
rather the defining characteristic, and thus the dialectic, of sexual identity.
However, Debord promotes the use of posttextual libertarianism to deconstruct
class divisions. The characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is a
mythopoetical totality.

The primary theme of Dahmus’s[10] critique of
postconstructivist discourse is the bridge between reality and sexual identity.
Thus, the subject is contextualised into a dialectic deconstructivism that
includes sexuality as a paradox. Several narratives concerning
postconstructivist discourse may be revealed.

“Society is part of the economy of language,” says Sartre; however,
according to Buxton[11] , it is not so much society that is
part of the economy of language, but rather the paradigm, and subsequent
failure, of society. But the premise of the cultural paradigm of context
suggests that culture serves to disempower minorities. Marx suggests the use of
subtextual dialectic theory to challenge and analyse consciousness.

In a sense, the example of the cultural paradigm of context prevalent in
Madonna’s Erotica emerges again in Sex. If textual postcapitalist
theory holds, we have to choose between subtextual dialectic theory and
Derridaist reading.

Thus, Foucault’s essay on postconstructivist discourse states that
government is dead, but only if narrativity is equal to language; if that is
not the case, we can assume that truth is used to entrench outmoded perceptions
of class. The subject is interpolated into a cultural paradigm of context that
includes sexuality as a totality.

It could be said that von Junz[12] implies that we have
to choose between subtextual theory and Lacanist obscurity. Postconstructivist
discourse suggests that narrative is a product of the collective unconscious,
given that Sartre’s critique of constructivist predialectic theory is invalid.

However, the main theme of the works of Madonna is a textual paradox. A
number of discourses concerning the role of the artist as reader exist.

But Baudrillard uses the term ‘the cultural paradigm of context’ to denote
not narrative, but postnarrative. The primary theme of d’Erlette’s[13] analysis of subdialectic objectivism is the role of the
artist as reader.

4. Postconstructivist discourse and the semioticist paradigm of
discourse

If one examines subtextual dialectic theory, one is faced with a choice:
either reject the cultural paradigm of context or conclude that narrativity is
capable of significance. Therefore, the premise of precapitalist discourse
states that culture has significance, but only if consciousness is
interchangeable with reality. The characteristic theme of the works of Eco is
the genre, and eventually the stasis, of dialectic sexual identity.

But the subject is contextualised into a subtextual dialectic theory that
includes truth as a whole. If the neocapitalist paradigm of narrative holds, we
have to choose between the semioticist paradigm of discourse and textual
postsemanticist theory.

In a sense, many theories concerning subtextual dialectic theory may be
discovered. The subject is interpolated into a semioticist paradigm of
discourse that includes sexuality as a totality.

with jews you lose

nigger bitch
nigger bitch
nigger nigger bitch

black-ass coon nig nog nigger

1. Expressions of fatal flaw

“Sexual identity is impossible,” says Marx. The subject is interpolated into
a predialectic narrative that includes reality as a whole.

But Buxton[1] implies that we have to choose between
Baudrillardist simulacra and Lacanist obscurity. The creation/destruction
distinction intrinsic to Fellini’s La Dolce Vita emerges again in
Amarcord, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

In a sense, Baudrillard uses the term ‘the materialist paradigm of
consensus’ to denote the role of the writer as poet. In Satyricon,
Fellini affirms Batailleist `powerful communication’; in Amarcord,
however, he examines Baudrillardist simulacra.

Therefore, Baudrillard suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful
communication’ to deconstruct the status quo. Any number of discourses
concerning a posttextual reality may be found.

.

2. Fellini and deconstructivist subsemiotic theory

“Truth is fundamentally elitist,” says Bataille; however, according to la
Fournier[2] , it is not so much truth that is fundamentally
elitist, but rather the failure, and eventually the defining characteristic, of
truth. It could be said that Marx uses the term ‘Baudrillardist simulacra’ to
denote the futility, and subsequent paradigm, of neoconceptual class. Foucault
promotes the use of deconstructivist subsemiotic theory to read and attack
sexual identity.

“Class is part of the genre of narrativity,” says Marx. Thus, Derrida uses
the term ‘capitalist semanticism’ to denote not, in fact, dematerialism, but
subdematerialism. The main theme of Bailey’s[3] analysis of
deconstructivist subsemiotic theory is the paradigm of subcultural sexual
identity.

If one examines Batailleist `powerful communication’, one is faced with a
choice: either accept deconstructivist subsemiotic theory or conclude that
truth may be used to entrench capitalism, but only if consciousness is distinct
from narrativity; if that is not the case, we can assume that government is
capable of truth. In a sense, many narratives concerning Baudrillardist
simulacra exist. If capitalist sublimation holds, the works of Fellini are
reminiscent of Koons.

“Class is a legal fiction,” says Lyotard; however, according to von Junz[4] , it is not so much class that is a legal fiction, but
rather the absurdity, and therefore the rubicon, of class. But Marx suggests
the use of Batailleist `powerful communication’ to challenge outmoded, sexist
perceptions of sexual identity. Derrida’s critique of the pretextual paradigm
of context holds that truth is part of the futility of culture, given that the
premise of Batailleist `powerful communication’ is invalid.

If one examines deconstructivist subsemiotic theory, one is faced with a
choice: either reject Batailleist `powerful communication’ or conclude that
discourse comes from the collective unconscious. Therefore, the subject is
contextualised into a semioticist rationalism that includes truth as a
totality. Lacan promotes the use of Baudrillardist simulacra to modify class.

In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the concept of subsemantic
language. It could be said that Hubbard[5] states that we
have to choose between Batailleist `powerful communication’ and the modernist
paradigm of reality. The primary theme of the works of Fellini is a
self-supporting reality.

“Art is intrinsically elitist,” says Bataille; however, according to
Finnis[6] , it is not so much art that is intrinsically
elitist, but rather the failure, and some would say the stasis, of art. But any
number of discourses concerning the meaninglessness, and subsequent genre, of
neodialectic society may be revealed. Lacan suggests the use of capitalist
dematerialism to deconstruct class divisions.

Therefore, Bataille uses the term ‘Baudrillardist simulacra’ to denote the
role of the participant as poet. Marx’s model of deconstructivist subsemiotic
theory suggests that the collective is part of the futility of culture.

But Lacan promotes the use of the subtextual paradigm of discourse to attack
and analyse class. If Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds, we have to
choose between deconstructivist subsemiotic theory and Derridaist reading.

Thus, the example of Baudrillardist simulacra prevalent in Spelling’s
Melrose Place is also evident in Robin’s Hoods. Many
appropriations concerning structural theory exist.

In a sense, in The Heights, Spelling denies deconstructivist
subsemiotic theory; in Beverly Hills 90210, although, he affirms
Baudrillardist simulacra. Sartre suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful
communication’ to challenge hierarchy.

Therefore, de Selby[7] states that the works of Spelling
are modernistic. If deconstructivist subsemiotic theory holds, we have to
choose between the semioticist paradigm of reality and neomaterial rationalism.

Thus, an abundance of desituationisms concerning the difference between
sexual identity and society may be discovered. The failure, and eventually the
collapse, of deconstructivist subsemiotic theory depicted in Spelling’s
Melrose Place emerges again in Beverly Hills 90210, although in a
more mythopoetical sense.

However, the characteristic theme of Tilton’s[8] essay on
Foucaultist power relations is the paradigm, and thus the fatal flaw, of
textual class. Any number of discourses concerning Batailleist `powerful
communication’ exist.

In a sense, in Models, Inc., Spelling deconstructs deconstructivist
subsemiotic theory; in Melrose Place he analyses neodialectic feminism.
The subject is interpolated into a deconstructivist subsemiotic theory that
includes narrativity as a whole.

Thus, Bataille promotes the use of Baudrillardist simulacra to read reality.
A number of narratives concerning the role of the artist as poet may be found

gimme trips!

feed me repeating digits!

almost there!

please fuck my wife and rape my daughter

post crap ITT to get trips!

getting warmer!

right down to the asshole

jiggle does nigglo-titties mah nigress

bitchass nigga hoe

daddy's hard cock

have sex with your dog

fuck donald trump

trips

y'all niggas some hoes

TRIPS

so close

All niggers must hang

Die niggers 1 by 1

HAIL SATAN

I wrote this rap thinking of you baby.

fucking nigger ass hoe

time to bring back the postmodernism generator:

You will never rap better than this jew so don't even try

1. Smith and subcultural discourse

The primary theme of Scuglia’s[1] model of dialectic
construction is the difference between society and class. Several theories
concerning the absurdity, and some would say the rubicon, of prematerial
society exist.

“Class is part of the collapse of narrativity,” says Baudrillard. In a
sense, if the cultural paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between
subcultural discourse and Derridaist reading. Parry[2] holds
that the works of Joyce are not postmodern.

However, the subject is contextualised into a socialist realism that
includes language as a totality. The characteristic theme of the works of Joyce
is not materialism, but submaterialism.

In a sense, Lyotard suggests the use of the premodern paradigm of consensus
to challenge colonialist perceptions of sexual identity. The subject is
interpolated into a subcultural discourse that includes reality as a whole.

It could be said that Bataille uses the term ‘capitalist discourse’ to
denote the genre of neodialectic culture. The subject is contextualised into a
cultural paradigm of context that includes art as a reality.

But a number of narratives concerning subcultural discourse may be
discovered. Lacan uses the term ‘semantic postpatriarchialist theory’ to denote
the bridge between class and sexual identity.

2. Realities of collapse

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the distinction between
figure and ground. Thus, if subcultural discourse holds, we have to choose
between the cultural paradigm of context and capitalist libertarianism.
Bataille uses the term ‘socialist realism’ to denote the role of the writer as
observer.

“Class is unattainable,” says Debord; however, according to Dahmus[3] , it is not so much class that is unattainable, but rather
the economy, and subsequent dialectic, of class. However, the
creation/destruction distinction depicted in Joyce’s A Portrait of the
Artist As a Young Man is also evident in Finnegan’s Wake. Bataille
promotes the use of neotextual dematerialism to modify sexual identity.

Therefore, Brophy[4] states that we have to choose
between subcultural discourse and the capitalist paradigm of reality. Any
number of narratives concerning not, in fact, theory, but posttheory exist.

But the primary theme of Prinn’s[5] analysis of the
cultural paradigm of context is the meaninglessness of subdialectic reality. If
socialist realism holds, we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of
context and capitalist neotextual theory.

Therefore, Derrida uses the term ‘socialist realism’ to denote the common
ground between sexual identity and class. Debord suggests the use of semiotic
discourse to deconstruct hierarchy.

However, Finnis[6] holds that the works of Rushdie are an
example of mythopoetical feminism. Several situationisms concerning socialist
realism may be revealed.

Woops I embeded the wrong video teehehe get deaded son

Line up you stinking ass niggers and get ready for the rope

i suck black cock

nigger nigger
ni
ni

nigger nigger nigger nigger

nigger nigger

i suck black cock

the longer it takes to get trips, the longer OP's gonna need to rap

1. Consensuses of dialectic

“Narrativity is intrinsically responsible for hierarchy,” says Foucault.
Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a capitalist paradigm of context
that includes truth as a reality.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between
figure and ground. Scuglia[1] suggests that the works of
Rushdie are modernistic. But the subject is interpolated into a Debordist image
that includes narrativity as a totality.

If one examines the capitalist paradigm of context, one is faced with a
choice: either reject cultural deconstruction or conclude that the task of the
observer is significant form. The premise of the substructuralist paradigm of
context states that government is capable of deconstruction, given that
Bataille’s critique of cultural deconstruction is invalid. Thus, Marx uses the
term ‘the capitalist paradigm of context’ to denote the common ground between
society and sexual identity.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic
art. In The Ground Beneath Her Feet, Rushdie reiterates the
substructuralist paradigm of context; in Midnight’s Children, although,
he examines neocultural material theory. However, Bataille promotes the use of
the substructuralist paradigm of context to analyse class.

If one examines the capitalist paradigm of context, one is faced with a
choice: either accept the postdialectic paradigm of narrative or conclude that
consensus must come from the masses. The premise of the substructuralist
paradigm of context suggests that narrativity is part of the stasis of art, but
only if consciousness is distinct from reality. Thus, Lacan uses the term ‘the
capitalist paradigm of context’ to denote the genre, and eventually the
paradigm, of capitalist society.

Derrida suggests the use of the substructuralist paradigm of context to
challenge the status quo. But if subtextual narrative holds, we have to choose
between cultural deconstruction and cultural semanticism.

The subject is contextualised into a capitalist paradigm of context that
includes consciousness as a reality. In a sense, any number of discourses
concerning not situationism, but postsituationism may be found.

The main theme of Porter’s[2] model of cultural
deconstruction is the stasis, and some would say the meaninglessness, of
precapitalist sexual identity. Thus, a number of theories concerning dialectic
nihilism exist.

Long[3] holds that we have to choose between the
substructuralist paradigm of context and Batailleist `powerful communication’.
In a sense, cultural deconstruction suggests that the goal of the participant
is social comment.

If the substructuralist paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between
semioticist deappropriation and prematerial textual theory. However,
Hamburger[4] implies that the works of Rushdie are not
postmodern.

If cultural deconstruction holds, we have to choose between the
substructuralist paradigm of context and cultural postsemantic theory. In a
sense, the characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is not theory, but
neotheory.

La Tournier[5] suggests that we have to choose between
dialectic narrative and the pretextual paradigm of consensus. However, Marx
promotes the use of the substructuralist paradigm of context to read and modify
culture.

2. Rushdie and modernist objectivism

“Sexual identity is used in the service of hierarchy,” says Baudrillard. If
the substructuralist paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between
postcapitalist patriarchial theory and neodialectic rationalism. It could be
said that the main theme of Long’s[6] analysis of the
capitalist paradigm of context is the difference between art and class.

If one examines cultural deconstruction, one is faced with a choice: either
reject the capitalist paradigm of context or conclude that narrative is created
by communication. The subject is interpolated into a material discourse that
includes truth as a whole. In a sense, Foucault suggests the use of the
substructuralist paradigm of context to attack the status quo.

“Sexual identity is fundamentally unattainable,” says Derrida. Tilton[7] implies that we have to choose between cultural
deconstruction and Lacanist obscurity. It could be said that the subject is
contextualised into a capitalist paradigm of context that includes culture as a
totality.

The premise of the substructuralist paradigm of context suggests that the
task of the artist is significant form. But Foucault promotes the use of
subcultural dialectic theory to analyse language.

Lyotard uses the term ‘cultural deconstruction’ to denote the role of the
writer as reader. Thus, the example of the capitalist paradigm of context
intrinsic to Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 is also evident in Mason
& Dixon.

If cultural deconstruction holds, we have to choose between the
postcapitalist paradigm of discourse and semantic construction. But the
characteristic theme of the works of Pynchon is the meaninglessness, and
subsequent absurdity, of pretextual sexual identity.

The capitalist paradigm of context holds that reality is a product of the
masses, given that Baudrillard’s critique of the substructuralist paradigm of
context is valid. Thus, the primary theme of Geoffrey’s[8]
model of the capitalist paradigm of context is the common ground between
society and sexual identity.

Bataille suggests the use of neocultural modernist theory to deconstruct
hierarchy. However, Hubbard[9] suggests that the works of
Pynchon are an example of mythopoetical Marxism.

in soviet russia, my ass fucks you!

eliminate gays
it's what we do for days
pull the trigger like pop pop
make all those faggots drop

Crawling in my skin
These wounds they will not heal
Fear is how I fall
Confusing what is real

There's something inside me
That pulls beneath the surface
Consuming, confusing
This lack of self control I fear
Is never ending, controlling

I can't seem to find myself again
My walls are closing in
(Without a sense of confidence)
(I'm convinced that there's)
(Just too much pressure to take)
I've felt this way before so insecure

Crawling in my skin
These wounds they will not heal
Fear is how I fall
Confusing what is real

Discomfort, endlessly has pulled
Itself upon me distracting, reacting
Against my will I stand beside my own reflection
It's haunting how I can't seem

To find myself again
My walls are closing in
(Without a sense of confidence)
(I'm convinced that there's)
(Just too much pressure to take)
I've felt this way before so insecure

Crawling in my skin
These wounds they will not heal
Fear is how I fall
Confusing what is real

Crawling in my skin
These wounds they will not heal
Fear is how I fall
Confusing, confusing what is real

There's something inside me
That pulls beneath the surface
Consuming
(Confusing what is real)
This lack of self control I fear
Is never ending, controlling
(Confusing what is real)

R8 my OC

Name: Frosbite

Age:15

Sex: Steamboat

Origin: Frosbite is the child of Mister chill of the minion clan and shadow of the sonic clan. A child between two tribes was forbidden since a child would be so powerful. So eggman sent his assassin Knox and killed Shadow during child birth and Mr Chill. This left Frosbite without a home. With his fellow minions he was always stronger and faster. He was a better marksman and swordsman, But he was an outcast due to him being related to the sonic clan. When he was 10 he challenged Knox to a fight and had his fingers cut off. He replaced each finger with a chainsaw. He then prayed to lord Satan for power and was given a inverted cross which multiples his power by a billion. He now hunts for the chaos emeralds to become powerful enough to kill Knox and eggman

Powers: super speed, strength, flight, chaos control, chaos spear, chaos blast, expert marksmen, IQ of 999,999,999,999 and a master with chainsaw fingers

im more metal than flint's water
pump you full of lead before i rape your daughter

i lick feet
it makes a tasty treat
my sexual prowess is fukken LEET
now please excuse me while i beat my meat

holy fuck Holla Forums is slow
all we got is a 2D hoe
now let's get trips already so we can hear this rap
though we all know it will be crap

14/88
there's no time to masturbate
when all these cucks get a pass
we they don't know they'll get the gas

qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq

THE NATURAL WAY TO ROLL

RAW Unrefined papers contain a blend of non-chlorinated fibers and are finished with a natural hemp gumline to match the burn rate of the rolling paper.

Each sheet is watermarked with our proprietary CrissCross imprint which helps prevent runs and maintains the smoothest burn.

next trips comin up

we're gonna make it

it's coming

it's almost here

ever closer

if everyone else stops posting we'll get it

oh shit

ITS ALMOST HERE

TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS

GIVE ME TRIPS NIGGA

D

k cool.

you see that, OP?
time to rap.

DO IT FAGGOT

this is gonna be a 20 minute rap at least. be patient.

for some perspective, this post alone is that linkin park meme song

don't sing the spam, obviously

No, he said the entire thread. He must rap the entire thread.

nah, that's gay

just the shit that rhymes, says nigger a lot, or is only a line or two long

He said:
Is "everything in this thread" shit that rhymes, says nigger a lot, or is only a line or two long?
Did someone get trips?

The answer is obvious.

NIGGER FAGGOT NIGGER

well nobody is going to listen past the 6th post when he starts mumbling nonsense then, but whatever

he can mumble a bunch of stupid shit that nobody will listen to if he wants

He'd fucking better.

only if he's retarded

he either makes everybody that participated happy by rapping their lines, or he autistically sticks to his word and spends 30 minutes making a lone troll happy that he ruined the thread

...

It will make his rap postmodern.

...

actual Op here forgot about this thread. I will still do it if there are still other people on this thread

do it faggot

ok gimme a sec

Op here I'm uploading it right now

Spam should not be rapped imo; fuck spammers
also OP rap about my benis ;D

Op here. here it is guys my delivery youtu.be/SViIieRbnQw

PRAISE BE TO THE DARK PRINCE

THE MAD MAN ACTUALLY DID IT

not bad

i actually listened to the whole thing

should have rapped the spam tbh

are you the faggot i was talking to about the foreskin trade on discord?

maybe

OP is a pretty cool guy

yes I am the faggot who talked about 10000 dollar foreskin

Do one of your faggy opinionated videos about it.

I just might

good job op

bumping foer the preserveation of futeure genbetearionts

...