Ask me anything tbh

ask me anything tbh

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3062612/Man-drowns-faeces-falling-Russian-cesspit-left-12-hours-friend-assumed-d-able-climb-himself.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Why is shit brown? I mean, why brown, and not, say, green?

i dont know, but i misspelled "brown" in the google query "why is poop brown" and found this rad article
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3062612/Man-drowns-faeces-falling-Russian-cesspit-left-12-hours-friend-assumed-d-able-climb-himself.html

Didn't you say just the other day that you wouldn't be posting?

Is AJposter closet gay?

i lied

yeah, and he's a super cute feminine underaged boy

Figured you would, the attention is too nice huh?

yeah đź‘» (this only makes sense if u look at the anroid emoji)

what the fuck it changed my emoji

I can't tell what that is aha
Still going to try for BO?

Is Miku your waifu? (not like she's my waifu or something ;) )
And if yes…how do you feel about jerking off to a voice synthesizer?

Favorite animal?
Favorite anime?

Why?
That's the question.

its a ghost
& yup


no, & i'll pass tbh


little dogs
yuri on ice


because

Post your tits.

that's not a question.

Please?

You think, realistically, that you'll ever get the postition?

nah


eventually, yes. i'd need to become mod first though. stepping stones.

Everyone's gotta have dreams i suppose, best of luck to you.
also
will you marry me?

didn't dysnosia offer you mod at some point? could have sworn he did.

Why do you want to be a mod in this place? Is it for attention? Maybe you want to feel needed in life. Is it just because you think you can do better? Or maybe you think it will develop into a full time paying job where you can be almost like a camwhore but do less work.

yeah, then i posted where he was from and he demodded & permad me and pretended to be someone else for a month.


i'll think about it

yup. i can run this place better than dysnomia.

That's more generous than others have been, i'll be waiting for your response
unrequited feelings hurt

try asking bill wurtz then, p sure he says the same thing. unless youre only looking for girls.

How long have you been on chans? If you think you can do better, what are the problems you see now? Don't tell me how you want to correct them but the problems you see at this moment and how dysnomia is not correcting them.

since late 2006. and the problems are that certain things (almost everything, really) aren't being handled as well as they hypothetically could be- the problems are inherently tied to the fact that there are corrections, or better alternatives, so i can't really explain one without mentioning the other. handling criticism or meta threads, or choosing new mods/deciding which mods to axe, or keeping relevant information stickied (which he doesnt do at all, really), for example, are things that I've talked about how i could change.
i've posted pretty in depth explanations on what i'd do, and dysnomia has read them and i'd imagine theyre somewhere in archives, so you can just seek them out or just ask me on individual issues if the answer doesnt take too long to sufficiently explain.

anything? ok, what are your fetishes?, have you put anything up your butt? whats the most perverted think you've jilled off to?

buddy, i just report these posts whenever i see them, u arent really doing anything to affect me tbh.


i'm pretty boring. gay guys? i guess?? maybe shota?
what kind of question is this? does anybody of any gender get off to non-pornographic not "perverted" shit? the guy who was into floor tiles from 4chan maybe?

Hmm, I'll give my two cents on what I've seen over the years on how a chan go's to shit and the one's I have seen stay OK… Then later go to shit because of influx of "clubhouse" fags. As it seems now, you want to attempt to fix something but no one can know if your ideas will really work until they are implemented. The risk or problem is if they do not work, how much drama are you willing to raise because something failed in your life? You seem to care a lot about wanting to moderate and have a deep passion for it. That can become a big risk because your over emotionalizing a simple job. People who say "you should be passionate about your work" tend to say that because they want that passion in theirs. But in reality, passion can destroy that job log term. How to maintain something for a long time is to allow it little wear and tare and have the least internal fighting or drama. So here is a question, what qualities do you have that would make you a low risk factor?

i'd be more willing than most moderators on this site, or perhaps of any imageboard or forum, to hand ownership to someone else quickly if i'm not really successful or what i do gets old. contrast w/ dysnomia. if i am successful i'm keeping the board though.

Giving up easily isn't a very good quality to have. What if you give up and just easily hand the board over to someone absolutely horrible like a Jew, shill/fed?

yeah, dude, the jewish race, professional shills and the fbi are all obviously super concerned with this board. i'd put it to a poll like every other decision concerning thr moderation staff.
stubbornness nets you mods like dysnomia

Only some one who truly dose not give two fucks about foreign and domestic shills trying to buy them out would be able to maintain such a site. I remember back in the old days when chan sites where basically playgrounds for the mods and what ever temperament they had that day. Yes, it would piss off anyone who took chans seriously but those are the people who destroy them anyways.

the fun kind.
Sounds like you are kind of an Ara.

I don't mind Dysnomia but I hope you achieve your dreams at some point, its good that you're a passionate about it, have you ever thought about making your own board?

i have. what would be the point? sure, i tell people to post in it to see what my moderation is like, but it most likely only gets a dozen threads at max no matter how good i manage it (i couldn't even work put my many of my own policies on such a small scale) and then it stagnates and dies and i'm told to just use that board whenever i request board ownership. costs outweigh the benefits tbh

If the board was only made to suit your ideas and not a common interest then of course it's going to get low traffic. What was the board btw?

Maybe you could convince Dysnomia to give you BO temporarily for like a week, he seems to like stirring the pot every once and a while so maybe he'd be up for it.

there wasnt any board, i'm just prognosticating.
and my ideas are the common interest– literally, a lot of them involve democratization and polls.


maybe i could, however that would work.

People are stupid and don't understand what they want or need, democracy is tyranny by the majority.

sure, Hoppe. but for the purpose of the moderation of this board a democracy is generally applicable to solcong most problems, and i'm flexible in the case that make a nearly objectively bad decision.

Sometimes voting breaks the community apart.
Sometimes you have to become someone everyone hates to get a job done.
This is why sometimes you just have to say fuck it and drive the agenda you want your way for the fun of it. If you take it to seriously then you have already doomed the board.

i'd listen to the people who make good posts and participate more than the random children stopping by. in fact, after first getting BO i'd probably just ban a ton of the repeat offenders who are obviously underaged or otherwise not intent on ever contributing, like rin (unless, i mean, people are actually fond of his posts) or the "DERP" guy, for example, so we can get them out of the way for future affairs. i guess that's kind of what you're talking about.

Unless they spam or break the rules then why ban them? So what if they piss people off, only kids get upset. Shitposting helped chans stay alive.

Post your tits?

Hey, have you ever shaved the back of a girl's head while having doggy style sex before???

Well, that's not a red flag, or anything.

nobody likes their posts except themeselves. the reason for banning them is that it just doesn't matter if they post; the net value of the quality of the board is lowered and anything against them is pretty much justified considering only they are defending their content. and there's a different from good shitposting, like that which is funny (like [s4s], although all things considered theyre pretty unfunny nowadays) or serves to prove a point (the hotpocket meme was born out of anti-mod /sp/ shitposting), and shitposting in it's literal definition, being posts that are shit. the former makes imageboards run, the latter kills them.


nah


no. want to share a story with us, user?


it isn't, i'm literally only talking about the people whose posts are absolute shit. like people asking you to raid a discord channel or some girl on facebook, or a weird autistic all-redtext post about how angry they are that's obviously been written by a child, or posts from people saying they just got banned from 4/b/ and want us to explain to them why posting here is worth it. it'd be catharsis for everyone, including you, to see these people shoo'd and i defintely wouldnt censor any opposition.

that came off as sarcastic. i actually wouldn't censor any opposition, i am strongly against that.

as long as i'm saging i might as well say sorry for all the typos, i'm typing quickly b/c i have somewhere to be. bye

And just like, my dreams of her being a qt reeking hikki who has no life beyond attentionposting here all day 'are shattered.

You're not good

...

...

Only NEET's can become the best moderators. The only place they will ever have to be is here…with us.

r u a cute girl?

This, and even if they did someone is going to VPN rig the poll.

She wants to run an imageboard, probably ugg or gawker?

The only thing that would cause is a catalog full of people bitching about "muh freez peech" and how "fugthelgu is delettting all the postts"

t. dysnomia

i doubt it. you've deleted threads that people were actually participating in, and at least to some degree in the past stifled or at least tried to stifle opposition against certain things you did. people gave that response. but nobody even participates in these threads except for the op bumping it over and over ad nauseum, people telling them that they're nypa/they should lurk more, and arguments in which the posters, who i'd assume generally care if the board is shit or not, are (frustrating ly) unable to deal with someone who will clearly never understand because they can't just shut him up. i did this on a small scale when i was mod and no one really complained, because people don't want to spend their time defending autists & children. 8/b/ isnt supposed to be a playgound for kids. no one that matters will care, and if you think that's exclusionary, considering everyone equal will lead to the death of the board because some posters will just always contribute more than others. we could use absolute free speech and no censorship for those with the merit to use it for good, or at least those who've shown that they can contribute in the past. for example, & not to stroke my own ego, if i was some rando you probably wouldnt have let me make a thread everyday, but a good mod is discriminatory on whether people's posts are fucking good or not. if theres a massive opposition there'd ways to channel that that there aren't under your moderation. if the board plainly gets better, and you can vote or participate actively, people would get tired of making complaining meta thread over and over. but people enjoy doing it now because it's responsive- either you lock/delete the thread, showing that they've done 'damage' or at least attacked you, or you or a mod responds within the thread. they have no other venue.

making the board more democratic will allow me to make more undemocratic decision for the greater good & in the interest of board quality, because the posters will be more heard otherwise.

whooops

You come off giving a vibe of failchan 2.0 moderation. Everyone knows that most of the time moderation can be done by shitposters. So in a seance, we can moderate ourselves when of course we are not being raided by an unfair spam advantage. This is where moderation chimes in, in order to regulate the spam. Dictating what you yourself like and do not like makes the board into your own little hugbox and is basically what your upset at dysnomia of doing it seems. You can't make a "Perfect" environment without heavy moderation to the point that it becomes stagnant. If everyone agrees on everything written then no discussions will be started.

How about this?
Meanwhile, the bo/mods will just delete spam/cp.

I like this idea. The thread owner will delete everything he dose not like and stagnate the discussion thus killing his thread. Only the smart ones will have successful thread that do not allow a hubox environment. Only problem is you can have new threads pop up complaining about the thread they where kicked out of. So could make the catalog be flooded by butthert threads.

Make a cyclical butthurt thread then.