Thought crime

Surely based mods here won't ban me for merely criticizing their ban policies?

Other urls found in this thread:

domain.co
youtube.com/watch?v=X3ihcfJdAMs
youtube.com/watch?v=0QbjELF-8kY
justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Not sure, but whatever you do, do NOT post pictures of little girls' faces. They HATE that.

Why did you get banned? Tell us before you ask for our support.

I wouldn't even say the words "l*ttle g*rls". Mods are as insane as 4chan here.

If I tell you they will just ban me again.

Fuck it, they will just ban me anyways.
Compared them to 4chan and posted a little girls' face.
Bye.

Holla Forums is now 4chan

lol

Was it a naked face? Or was it appropriately covered by a sheet or garment of some sort?

See you in 20 minutes.

Enjoy your ban, you degenerate SCUM.

Also, be s-sure not to s-s-stutter…
O woops. Bye all.

You can criticize all you want, post pedoshit and I'll ban you. And tell the truth faggot, you posted a pedo thread and I banned you. Then you got assfractured and decided to start spamming pedo threads, and posting pedo shit in other threads. Keep your tantrum to this thread, don't post pedo shit, and I won't ban you. Thanks

t.reddit user who became mod

Thank you for banning this piece of shit

FTFY

We've jumped the shark.

Not at all lad, it's open to discussion.

Do keep it in 1 thread though.

You mean like how you guys JUST deleted my post ITT?
R-r-r-right…

Again, I ask: what is "pedoshit"? We can't discuss pedophilia here now? We can't post a perfectly clean picture of a little girl without triggering you? Get a fucking grip you guys.

Pic related is "pedoshit"??
WTF!!

...

LOL. You mods are true heroes. GL to the remaining 3 ppl in this hell hole.

Why doesn't wget -r -P /save/location -A jpeg,jpg,bmp,gif,png domain.co work for a imageboard with /g/scr directories?

I told you to quit posting pedoshit. You posted another child model pic

Why lock the Christian thread?

I didn't lock that one, you will have to talk to dysnomia

Answer the question ass-tard: wtf is "pedoshit" and why are you so assblasted about it? Child model pics are not illegal. If the child is not a "model" then is it ok to post?
Fuck
Your
Bullshit

Anything that indices a pedophile, such as yourself, to post risque pictures.

Pam Pam :^)

If you want to fantasize about molesting children, and have threads circlejerking to children with other pedos do it somewhere else. Pretty simple

...

Oh, now I understand. If any user other than myself is tempted to post "risque" pictures then it is my fault and my thread is automatically deleted. GOT IT. THANKS.

Ah, OK. Legitimate discussion about anything even mildly pedo-related is fundamentally and unequivocally a circlejerk about fantasizing about molesting children. GREAT.
Nice board you got here, fellas.

Fuck you antipedo-kike.

What are you talking about nigger? Your threads got deleted because every single 1 had child model pics on them. Notice this tantrum thread didn't get deleted because you didn't include your child molester shit with your tantrum.

The new mod is an absolute faggot. Is this your plan? Mod an insufferable redditor who will lock/delete threads in a whim so we stop calling you a faggot and focus on him instead?
SHAME!

SHAME!

SHAME!

ah, so this is a pedo butthurt thread, nice. So how mad are you guise right now, exactly?

You are projecting your shit about child molestation onto others and it's not right. In what world do you want to live in where it is against the rules to post a perfectly clean picture of a CHILD MODEL???
Ya, I'm throwing a fucking tantrum. God damn RIGHT I am!
I'm not even pedo and I'm being persecuted for merely discussing it and posting super-clean photos.
You guys have your heads way up your ass this time.

wew

I know, right? It is truly unthinkable that anyone could appreciate the beauty of a child without wanting to fuck them up the ass every minute of the day. How can it be?
I guess my mom is pedo for saving all those pictures of me when I was a child. Google must be the biggest pedo of all, huh?

...

Why did you bumplock this thread, niggerfaggot??? Also, "shitposting" is subjective and even if you somehow could objectively call out a shitpost, the fact remains Holla Forums is random and shitposting belongs here.

Are you, by any chance, female?
Do you have sexual attraction to children or a personal story related to pedophilia?
Was this "pedoshit" thing the the reason you became a volunteer?
What harm is made by sharing "model" images that don't break the law or Holla Forums global rule?
Do you actually believe you are protecting any children with your moderation?

Good. Gas the pedos.

anti-pedo logic

go back to reddit

no
no
no
I lurked the ban list, and board logs, and determined what should be moderated based on what other mods of this board moderate. Today I've actually done more moderation than probably all my other days combined because an assfractured pedo decided to spam pedo threads
no

Nah they dox people CNN dislikes. Besides, you serve the role of a scapegoat on an argument where deanonymization of the internet users is advocated.

Cut the crap. You know deep down you're a pedo. The old excuse of "muh admire beauty" is pathetic. Also you must be new here if you think we'll fall for that.

...

Waterfalls is my fetish

Model pics are illegal, that neofag fella got nabbed for seeding them.

For having a serious discussion go to >>>/younglove/
For viewing and sharing legal images go to brchan/lg/
This place is worse than halfchan

The cuck got what he deserved

Pedos need to fuck off.

Does anybody have any pics of children that are not models?
Cos I now know we aren't allowed to post pictures of child models, so I guess I'll have to settle for child not-models if I want to post children here…
Where is a good place to find pics of child not-models? Google seems to be mostly full of child models.
What makes them "models" anyway? Is it exceptional beauty? Or perhaps really good framing and lighting? Shutter timing? Maybe it's just the old-fashioned act of being paid.
Hrrmm…maybe Hex can clear this one up for me? That is, if he doesn't ban me. Gosh, I sure hope no one is tempted to post "risque" photos from this post. That would definitely be my fault if they were…..right, Hex?

lol butthurt

Man look I think he's a cunt but this is a pretty shitty way to go out.

You gotta keep the scene healthy, I seed 24 hours a day but nothing in this capacity because I like adults.

the post on is not mine.
Yes.
I like pictures from >>>/bl/ but that's completely diffetent because boys are agressive and really want that sexual stuff. I was molest at 9 from my stepfather.
Was this "pedoshit" thing the the reason you became a volunteer?
Yes. That and spam.
What harm is made by sharing "model" images that don't break the law or Holla Forums global rule?
It's CP and it's illegal. It doesn't matter that they are clothed because those professional studios also maked very harmful and illegal images.
Do you actually believe you are protecting any children with your moderation?
Yes. By forcing you scum to stop posting those pictures, your shameful ideology will not spread and make even more children be molested

Maybe the criteria is posing? Somewhat related to shutter timing, I suppose… like if they are expecting to be photographed, then it is illegal. So smiling, focusing on the camera would be illegal…
Yep. That makes sense.

Just consult professionals help, spare some bucks.

mods are butthurt that they can't have a loli wife.

the moderation here is getting way too authoritarian. this board probably hasn't been crippled so much as it has been in the past week. what the hell

Not sure if trolling, but think about what you are saying:
Images of clothed children posing non-sexually are CHILD PORN and ILLEGAL?? Need I say more???
If anyone is molesting children, it is the fine folks such as yourself that think it is a shameful ideology to believe they are beautiful and worth admiring.

What are some examples of threads you think were unfairly moderated?

Just remember that you're wasting your time seeding for asshats like me who set their torrent clients to stop seeding at 0.00.

But yeah, that could be bad for people seeding illegal non-pedoshit.


Shotadom is one of my top 3 fetishes but that's some pretty impressive mental gymnastics right there.

Hopefully you'll treat Danny Dream the same as you treat Laura B and Pam Pam, whoever the fuck that is.

...

I could give you countless examples but they were all deleted almost instantly.

...

Not sure if I can spare it. Prostitutes that young are usually expensive outside a third would country.

Is this real life?

For 200 thousand years, the males our species have been fucking females as soon as they are fertile(11~12) so that other males won't empregnate females before they do. As it is an evolutionary advange such trait got passed on for thousands of generations.
In less than 200 years sex with early teens became a taboo. Definitevely not enough to undo the effects of evolution.
No amounts of therapy will undo 200 thousand years of evolution that defines my attraction.
If you mean the "acting on it" part, let me ask you a question: Do you constatly feel a nearly uncontrolable urge to rape all adult women arround you?

Go to Russia before the sanctions get lifted. Who knows, you may run into Donald at a piss party.

every thread that's been bumplocked or locked. why not let a thread survive on its own volition rather than intervene like the imageboard equivalent of a market regulation? sometimes multiple threads to discuss a similar topic are necessary. if people want those threads they'll participate on them, and if not they'll go away. a bumping & pruning system is literally the most democratic you can get, and any "thread eugenics" at the hands of moderators is always going to be inferior at removing unwanted threads because a smaller sample size of posters with more power will always less accurately represent the interests of the whole of the userbase than everybody with the power of self-moderation and choosing which threads to bump. that's fucking basic lmao

We have containment boards for that shit here.

so basically: spam = free speech

Dumb nigger.

>>>/reddit/

...

Dude, for fucks sake he didn't even read what she said. He probably just fucking skimmed it in a huge hurry. Notice how his post
came 40 seconds later than hers.

If it takes you more than 30 seconds to read that small paragraph, you may be retarded.

Dare I mention 32Chan?
Anyone know what their ban policies are like?

You want to know the reason clothed pictures of children that are perfectly legal are verboten here? CONTEXT. If you really want to ogle kids you can go to a nudism website and do it all you want, perfectly legal. Post that shit here? Illegal, because of context, and if you had a bunch of it saved it probably would be counted by the feds as pizza and get you put away.

Same shit. Different number.
They will probably be more tolerant for now because they are trying to increase their numbers and are also under less scrutiny due to low numbers.
General social intolerance is the real issue. That being said, I have no fucking clue.

how the fuck are you retarded niggers getting yourselves banned from Holla Forums i've been fucking AIDSposting ever since the gamergate exodus and i've never gotten banned (unless this post gets me banned in which case 🤣🤣👌)

in fact i've posted extremely cancerous shit all across halfchan for years before i discovered Holla Forums and the one time i finally got banned on halfchan was for posting a picture of barbara streisand in a gamergate exodus thread in 4/v/ (topkek)

This context you allude to is completely arbitrary and therefore unknown to anyone other than the individual interacting with the material. It doesn't matter how much I shitpost about "muh dick" in such a thread, nobody else can know how sexual my thoughts may or may not be about a particular piece of media.
Either way, this now becomes an issue of "thought crime" because the media is no longer the matter of subject, but rather the REACTION of the person interacting with it.
How fucking scary is that? Suddenly the thoughts I'm having are illegal instead of the picture I may or may not be jacking off to.
1984, bitches.

...

but that's how the law works. want to dispute that? vote libertarian or call your senators or whatever.

...

Post a picture of a pretty little girl's face and literal gibberish. See what happens and report back to us.
protip: have a spare ip

oh i finally read some of the thread

pedos belong in gas chambers tbh fam

argue about semantics all you want you're a fucking idiot

i played on a private wow server. I got banned, cuz i complained about mods and i appealed it, but the same nigger was responding to that.

that wont work, statist jews control the world

quality contribution

I'm sure you can do better than that.

i thought da joos were the ones pushing for the sexualization in the first place

Yep, completely arbitrary double standard, I totally agree. But it can still get the site shut down hard. Any chan that isn't watching out for shit like this is still so small that it's flying under the radar. This one isn't.

...

there is no reason to give a reasoned debated with someone who has a diseased mind; it was for my fellow normal, functioning adults to see :-)

fugg

I agree. However, the administration has proven they are only interested in protecting the rights to call a Jew a kike and praise Hitler. A chan unwilling to fight for the rights of the most oppressed is not a chan worth having imo.

Jews are responsible for everything bad that has ever happened to anyone anywhere.

joos hate freedom

...

Calling a Jew a kike and praising Hitler won't get you arrested or sites shut down in the country the site is hosted.

Neither will posting perfectly legal pictures of "child models" and discussing pedo-related issues, regardless of whatever temptations fellow anons may experience as a result of this. Yet, here we are…

The "transgender children" stuff is propaganda to increase political power of the LGBT movement to have a bigger control of politics.
Jews multilate baby dicks with their mouths giving them herpes and will sell the forsekin and support child marriage under Islam but… they also want to heavily control the internet so they use fear of terrorism and cp to pass laws that restrict and control that content. The more the mainstream population is afraid of the "boogey man pedophile",the more power they have.

imjim

Yes it will. It will totally get the site shut down. This is not a battle that Holla Forums would win.

Explain?

why isnt instagram shut down?

See


It isn't fair or just, but the Feds have never cared about either of those things and nobody's going to defend the right of a chan to post pictures of other peoples' children.

Did a court ruling come down recently or something? Jim's owned the site for over two years now and until recently fully clothed models were okay outside of bo/bv discretion and funbans.

It's not like you'd listen anyway. You wouldn't be able to understand. I don't blame you, I blame the people (the government) for indoctrinating you with this nonsense. Bitch, we went through so many wars that are not of our own interest, that it is simply a ludicrous claim to deny that a very nefarious could be behind most of the worlds problems. But, whatever like I said you wouldn't understand and I highly doubt you'd ever listen anyway. I've already given up on humanity anyway.
and fyi I'm not even a natsoc
I just got really lucky over the internet a few years ago when someone shared me a link to The International Jew by Henry Ford. Tbh it did take a lot of convincing, but he eventually got me to read it. I am not racist neither was he (clearly stating it as much as he could). And as a matter of factly, the guy who gave me a link to it was in fact a black guy.

Tl;dr quit your close minded thinking and actually listen to people.

da joos support islamic law, obviously. what an epic MAGApede redpill for based shadilays, youre obviously not brainwashed by Holla Forums

Any pedophile related images, especially children models.

That shit is cancer.
It derails, encourages feds to lurk, starts circlejerks, starts pedo.vs.anti-pedo wars, and always leads to some fuck posting CP.

I don't want any of that shit here, and I've stated that very clearly since day 1

If you want pedoshit, make your own board. Holla Forums isn't an edgy teen pedophile hangout club.

Holla Forums will never realize that Muslims are the greatest ally they'll never have. Palestinians have the most legitimate gripe with Israel and they can say quite a bit and still get shielded from anti antisemitism claims by the left.


Is 2D pedoshit?

Shit dude. IM NOT A WEABOO AND I HATE ANIME BUT I WILL SPAM ANIME PICS XDDD

Look up "Kalergi plan". Refugee imigration to Europe is a jewish plan.
Removing governments on Iraq, Iran and Libya was a jewish plan to give power to terrorists and place a puppet state to control the entire Middle East and expand Israel's territory.

Did I miss something?

It's just fine.

...

Wow, so you're a faggot AND a pedo

You're never going to get your way, pedo.

It's just fine.

...

This.
youtube.com/watch?v=X3ihcfJdAMs
youtube.com/watch?v=0QbjELF-8kY

Did I miss something?

thats not me fyi im just lurking

I put it to you, then: what is the context that would be illegal?

justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography

Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age)… the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive.

According to this definition, in the US, a picture or video of a clothed child or even otherwise assuming a non-sexual pose (which we all know is implied because children are not sexual beings, right fam?) is not illegal.

How, then, could a picture of a clothed child simply standing there smiling, be an illegal image? If it is the context that MAKES it illegal then it is the context which IS illegal, NOT the image. Nowhere in the aforementioned definition does it mention CONTEXT whatsoever.

Therefore, let me upload my cute little girl pictures and post my threads about the funny things children do and fuck the hell off, you fucking pansies!


Photos of child models are not pedophile related images! You are projecting, Dysnomia, and we are all suffering as a result of it. Fucks sakes, I can't post a picture of my cute little niece or whatever without you deeming it "pedoshit"? Fuck the hell off.

You guys are just scared of a little heat and have no respect or tolerance for anything remotely child-related. It is honestly pathetic. You only have my temporary attention because the next exodus hasn't yet formed. It will though. No doubt, it will.

if it doesn't violate us law its fine retard

...

>youtube.com/watch?v=0QbjELF-8kY
I love how the jews immediately play the victim card right from the start.

not everyone on this board is a pedo, faggot

Including me, faggot. Still, I suffer all the same, faggot.

Sure thing, pedo

who cares what they are?
if the post violates us law (naked children) ban
if it doesn't violate us law (non-naked children) dont ban
simple as that. no need to be a ban happy SJW. keep that shit on 4chan

...

I didn't spam the board with child models. I started a single new thread every time you banned me and deleted my threads. Yes, with a single picture of a fucking child model. A LEGAL picture in a LEGAL context.
You guys are going too far and ran into a stubborn motherfucker with a bottle of vodka and a vendetta.
Tell it like it is, and enjoy your little boy love. Something I would never try to take away from you.

ebin

Indeed! Well-played.

child models in seductive posses=/=images of children
you could say that about alot of things on Holla Forums
again, you could say that about alot of things on Holla Forums. best option would be to give it a circular thread so everyone can hide it
they don't really lurk. every now and then someone may report to them and they will ask Holla Forums to take it down. not a big deal.
which is why it should be kept contained in a circular thread
who cares? this is fucking Holla Forums. and besides a circular thread would keep that to a minimum
which is what mods are for, just give one or two of them mod status so they can keep their thread clean

...

They act as if being kicked out of every single country they tredded upon is over nothing but racism. THEY act as if there weren't legitimate reasons behind it. Like massive usury and fraud done through horrible business practices that bankrupts entire countries. WELL apparently the jews got kicked out of all those countries for no reason whatsoever. And that same no-reason-ness is just an entire coincidence according to most of the jews.

i do believe some of it. i've read a culture of critique, all the stuff Holla Forums shills for, etc.
but i don't believe all of it

The funnier thing is legal and legit links to youtube videos where underage girls are nude or twerking also get deleted

The post get deleted I mean
:( youtube is too controversial for Holla Forums even

Well, that's probably a good thing. You should only believe someone if they have sound reasoning/logic and actually have facts/evidence to support what they say/believe. Don't be a sheep.

tits or gtfo

meant 2 quote my bad

if they fuck up, by all means shut the thread down. but that was how it worked on here a few years ago and it went pretty smooth

so basically hire some pedo mods to police the pedo thread, then keep another non pedo mod in the pedo thread to make sure the pedos monitoring the pedo thread are doing a good job

all so some pedos can tripfag, namefag, avatarfag and circlejerk to children

hey why don't we bring back the cyclical pony thread too?

Photos of japanese cartoon characters are not anime related images.
Fuck off.

make me mod

Didn't you just get done saying that nothing should even be moderated earlier in this thread? Also tits or gtfo

nothing should be moderated in the manner it is right now. there are different types of moderation, and moderation with different end goals in mind that aren't necessarily reconcilable with keeping free speech as an ideal that needs to be preserved.
e.g, a moderation doesn't interfere with users posting but instead moderates it's users directly, either by setting the board to mod only and picking candidates for posting from another board or by handing out bans for posts not being high quality enough.
ideally i'd be BO and i could radically change this place but mod is a good start
and no.

You seem to be confused, the only thing worth looking at that you could possibly post is your tits. So quit writing long paragraphs that no one here is going to read and whip em out.

fucking based & epic #mtgow (learn more w the reddit pals 2 /r/incel)

nah

tits or gtfo cunt

Dont try to argue with the law you fucking faggot

post ur dick

...

women that go out of their way to attention whore on the internet by making it known they are a woman, and attempting to use their pussy pass to influence discussion dont get to make the demands until revealing their tits. you know the rules

Perfect analogy. Inexplicably accurate.
Some of us appreciate photographs of child models beyond the boundaries of pornography. Incomprehensible, huh?
Whew, thank God you are BO. All hail numb-nuts.

but people doxed me, i never made anything known. nor do i try to influence discussion ;__;

...

yeah. they had me at gunpoint user. they still do, they won't go away, send he

...

More like:

...