Sovereign Citizens

So I discovered the Sovereign Citizen movement very recently. At first I thought it was some kind of staged publicity or trolling shenanigans, until I dug deeper and deeper, discovering the movement and that it's very much real.

If you've never heard of them, they're a loose collection of North Americans, Europeans, and Australians who think that they don't have to follow the laws of the countries they live in. They cite obscure legislation or outdated acts to support everything from driving unlicensed to stealing peoples' property, with reasons ranging from "the government's corrupt" to "I'm a citizen of the world and am above all laws." There are plenty of videos about them out there, and in many cases they will go to court and take up large chunks of time explaining their ideas, filing suits against everyone they can, and even murdering cops outright.

I realized it was less of a troll movement and more of a movement of retards, until I realized that Sovereign Citizens are apparently associated with Right-wing politics, particularly anti-Judaism and the idea that corporations run government politics. There are even some videos of outright self-professed Holla Forums users speaking in favor of sovereign citizens.

This has left me confused. They seem like a radical lefty hippie bullshit group, but they're associated with the Right of politics and even National Socialism?

I don't know what to think myself. What are your thoughts on this movement?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Schiff
youtube.com/watch?v=MTqvJ7t3j5c
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_law
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chart_of_a_trust.jpg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Learn about admiralty law before trying this shit.

Also, look into natural personhood in the former French states.

Really they are just full-retard libertarians. As you know libertarian is often a step along the path to alt-right.

is correct

They're just really fucking dumb lolbergs, user.

In theory its a movement of people saying you shouldn't expect everyone to abide by the social contract of a socity because any true contract is voluntary.

In reality, its just a way to get beat up by cops while yealling "COME SEE THE VIOLENCE INHERENT IN THE SYSTEM !"

These are the kind of retards that will attempt to justify horseshit like Anarcho-capitalism with a straight face and will not understand why its retarded no matter how you argue. They do not have any belief more sophisticated than MUH FREEDUMS (completely missing the point of freedoms the whole time) and being selfish unabashed cunts, the fact these assholes could be possibly associated with ANY sort of Traditionalist belief is laughable.
Do not engage these people at all unless it's with a bullet to the face

Sounds like paradise to me.

They are just retards, complete wastes of space.

There is only one source on this movement and it is Kate of Gaia. There you will find the means to disable any gubmint entity with ease. I'll not post link to the infamous court hearing or documents for such power is only available to the seeker. Be grateful I even graced your troll forum, stupid slaves.

LOL YOUR SOUL IS OWNED BY THE CROWN

That will be 10 shekels Big Goy.

Actually, I will post some because it's just too grand and will likely blow your inferior minds anyway. Besides, you guys like trannies I've heard.


All it takes is certain keys.

You goys should make Kate your new waifu, the way she so eloquently dissects legalese makes me fall in love all over again. What, you don't know anything about presumption and assumption or the little thing called legal joinder that instantly incriminates you whenever dealing with an agent of THE CROWN?

...

I don't see the problem here.

More like pedophile warlords are the future, well, and transcendent trannies

OK, I can't keep the juicy bits from you like this and Kate rambles too much sometimes like in the above video. If you can get into resonance with this tranny I can guarantee your freedom…

Lose The Name Win The Game

Well, lads, looks like we're off the hook about having to do anything about the jews, because these people discovered that kikes have gold fringes on their yarmulkes and have filed the sekrit court documents that will convince them to pack it all up.

And yes, I'm aware of all the arguments about our names being in capitals and the US is a corporation, blah blah, but I'm not going to start driving around with a license plate made with cardboard and a magic marker anytime soon.

Wake me up when the next 6 million Palestinian kids have been murdered.
Or when we've arrested the Rothschilds, like Uncle Adolf did.

That's because you are a pussy.

The funniest thing is, they're sovereign citizen as long as they like it. They want to have all the rights without following any of the rules. Either constitution doesnt apply to you or it does dummy.

Yeah well you file your documents and I'll eat my hat when the jews start leaving Israel.

Sage

wew

Here's a good example of how this shit doesn't work in the real world:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Schiff
Irwin Allen Schiff (February 24, 1928 – October 16, 2015) was an American tax protester.[1] Schiff was known for writing and promoting literature in which he claimed the income tax in the United States is applied incorrectly. He lost several civil cases against the federal government and had a record of multiple convictions for various federal tax crimes. Schiff was serving a sentence of at least 13 years for tax crimes at the time of his death. The Federal Bureau of Prisons reported that Schiff died on October 16, 2015.

I remember listening to this guy on SHORTWAVE RADIO.
t. oldfag

They're just white people acting like niggers. They want the benefits and rights of society without having to pay taxes or follow the rules.

...

how many bitcoins would it cost to purchase a recoiless rifle so I could shoot dogs shitting on my lawn with sabots?

I guess not much more than a conglomerate of kikes funding millions of armed shitskins shitting on your lawn and shooting at your house.

Based Judge Hurley

youtube.com/watch?v=MTqvJ7t3j5c

Whereas you, are a full fledged, nigger. You don't know what anyone wants, dummy. I've never heard what you said from any of them. You're going by some fucking Jewtube and kikery on reddit and faggot shit like because again, you're a fucking nigger.

If you actually read any legal texts, you'd know the arguments are not only sounded, by correct. Some deadbeat douche bag like you who preverts those facts doesn't change them.

Anyway you go back to being as lave like your idiot old man and the cuck loser before him.

you want to know the only law that is real and matters? greater force conquers smaller force. wow you discovered you are born into a fucked up system, you must be free now. no. you dont have superior force, you have nothing.

They're a bunch of retards that think they know the system better than anyone by citing obsolete and voided laws or trying to scoot by on technicalities while making complete asses of themselves and blowing insignificant interactions with authorities into a shitstorm because they think they're above the law. It just pisses cops off more and makes life harder for everyone.

I wanted to embed this video, but apparently some kraut stole it

I loathe talking about this subject, because people with fairly harsh social engineering tactics always seem to show up with insults and lies. Then you have communists like BLM who poison the well, using one or two legitimate legal grievances to try and start a race/cop/civil war.

Then you have the ignorant and the Safety Sallys with their chaos/anarchy/disaster scenarios that seem to be thought up by hysterical school girls…


meh.

"The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.

"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

"The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.

"The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938,
at 941.

Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105
No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach
a fee to it.

You have a right to drive on the roads for non-commercial purposes. It's not a privilege that requires you to get permission from the government. And, yes, these days you will most likely get into trouble with the police/government, but that is because of corruption.

I see your post with 2 replies within 5 minutes and then I see you have made no other posts in the thread.
I see you associating government obedience with the far right and it is illogical.
I don't need to quote hitler to tell you that if a government is against its own people then it is the peoples' duty to rebel.

Well to you wouldn't be quoting Hitler in that case, you would be quoting The Declaration of Independence

you dont even know what a right is. a right is simply a truth incarnated. sovereigns claim to not be under the authority of the government but will then quote bureaucratic laws created by the same government (all the things you quoted). you dont have some divine "right" to the use of roads. the truth is, those who conceived the construction of those roads and those with power have granted you permission to use them. this comes down to being able to benefit from the fruits of your own labor. the people (government workers and their bosses) who constructed those roads have more authority of what happens on those roads than you simply because they built them. you dont have any "right" whatsoever to their use. you cant believe in private property and having the government not infringe on YOUR life and work, then simultaneously believe that you have some inherent "right" to infringe on the labor of others by taking advantage of what they built. the only right you have is only what you can defend is what you can own. now their are societally beneficial dogmatic principles that you should live by to be able to function as a society but quit acting like privileges are somehow birth "rights".

*there

these ideas are global ideas, much like 'breathing is good to keep you alive'

anyone can have them

I know what rights are (I'm Catholic, and know they are God given), and they do not stem from governments, and I'm also aware of the divine right to rule, which, btw, does not apply to America. The king of England dissolved the Charter for the colonies after we won the war.

Those are not bureaucratic laws I quoted, but rather what's called legal precedent. They point out the relevant and correct interpretation (legally/lawfully speaking) for the traveling subject we're talking about…

Who are you to say I don't have a right to travel on public roads? Awfully arrogant and presumptuous of you to restrict my freedom like that. Are you the king of america exercising your divine right to rule? They're public roads, paid for by the people, built by the government who are paid by, and work for, the people.

I don't think you have a clue as to what you're talking about.

How many successful, role model men who are pillars of their communities are part of the sovereign citizen movement?
How many policemen, firefighters, and rescue workers are part of the sovereign citizen movement?
How many men with quality marriages and well-raised, sons and daughters are part of the sovereign citizen movement?
….

They have to realize we can only have a country like that if it's 100% white.

sovereigns dont pay taxes you fucking faggot. legal precedent is totally subjective and at the whim of bureaucrats. you originally quoted "legal precedent" as the justification for why "you have a right to drive on roads". none of that was god given, it was decided by people in the government. the same government who contracted out the labor to build the roads. the same government responsible for the construction of the roads. implying somebody who has no stake in that (by paying taxes or laboring themselves) has a "right" to use public roads based on legal precedent, it just goes to show that you are the one with no clue.

Lol fuck these retards. I always love how they threaten legal action or to sue if a cop rightfully does their job. If you are do above the system, you should lose the right to use the legal system.

Lolbergs. They're anarcho cuckservatives. So tough until they have angry nogs staring them in the face. Oops. Well hey you own your property right? Get to defending it because there is no help coming in a libertarian society.
I will go enjoy myself with some vids of these morons getting ZimZammed though

God dammit, fuck off with that alt-right shit.

If they buy gasoline or diesel, they do and pay for the roads. Or did you not know there was a tax on fuel?


Not true at all.


I never said that American legal precedent was justification.

So far, you have got nothing right, and have offered nothing to back up your position.

wew

read some Schmitt lad

Apparently they chimp out just like niggers when you gainsay them too.

some of it isnt bullshit

like there is law, there is trust law, equities and religious law

and there is also the difference between the criminal code and incorporated law

government employees are also public servants which has an affect

its also true the birth certificate registers a company of the persons name which represents their share of the common wealth

i dont even know half of the shit because basically you have to pretty much be a lawyer to put any of it into practice effectively, hence all the retards that try to pull the shit and get shut down

the real brutal sovereign types dont even go to court, they just send letters and bills to anyone who fucks with them

the other problem is the bar association, a lot of lawyers are like dumb goyim for the other higher up lawyers but free sovereign shit is par the course for a lot of lawyers they know all about it

they know all that shit and they keep it to themselves on purpose so only they are qualified to legally represent, when you join the bar you have to pledge to put the interests of the bar association first or some shit… which means no giving away lawyer secrets

if i understand it correctly all bar lawyers are technically criminals via conflict of interest as after pledging to represent the bar they cannot pledge to represent a person and to act entirely in their interest as that conflicts with representing the bars interest solely

the mechanics of courts is probably the most interesting and valuable to your average person, non criminal courts mostly use trust law and the judge assumes a role as the chief of your corporation in court, and you can essentially deny that and take that role, as that corporation that is your name is yours and you are the principle stakeholder

i forget the exact words, it matters very much exactly what you say and how you say it and often when you trap a judge or lawyer they will stop responding or repeat shit hoping for you to just crack

part of it is know when you have won and can essentially walk out of court

its all easily as much of a mess as the media or lobbying industry and it goes back to before roman and biblical times as if i remember one other crazy thing is when you swear on the bible you can use bible law to trump all other laws, i think trust and equities is in precedence after that

so the bible and trust law are pretty much the final say on anything

so yeah the shit is all too real

it also explains the excessive ingrained hate for lawyers society has that seems quite far beyond just for representing a few crooks and making lots of money

source: hundreds of hours of youtube videos and a few law books i used to check shit its been a while

These are the same people who have tried to quote the Confederate States of America's constitution as legal law in the US.

Many of these people are mentally ill drug addicts

What the hell are they implying as the difference between a person and individual?

It's some kind of nonsense that your "person" is a corporate construct and the "individual" is the person you're born as. I don't think they even understand the difference. This video sums up best the ridiculous BS they pull acting as representatives of themselves.

someone else here with a few brain cells to rub together

those ancap idiots acting like irresponsible fools do not represent the law or the free sovereign movement, they are of course just ancap idiots playing as lawyer

the people who are by far the best qualified on the laws that actually relate to the free sovereign movement are people that live in mansions and wear suits that cost more than the contents in your house

a lot of these laws are embedded in the financial system….. equities, trusts and corporate law is business 101 for (((anyone))) with a few shekels to rub together

...

i forget on on person and individual
it also depends what country and what laws

i know that if you dont admit to being a citizen or individual (i forget the words) you cant prevent the judge from chairing the court meeting for your corporation, essentially giving up a lot of rights


CAN WE PUT ASIDE THE ANCAP IDIOTS FOR FIVE MINUTES

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_law

this shit goes back to roman times and jesus and we all know what kinda shit went down around those times

That's a kike lie. Just look at the name SOVEREIGN citizens. SOVEREIGN nation….
They constantly trigger kikes enough to make it to SLPC's Hatewatch at least once a week. Like always there are some larping individuals that take the thing too far.

Many of their legal arguments are logically sound and should in fact be lawful. But they mean nothing without superior physical violent force to back them up.

Not true
Highly suspect.

/thread.

I've seen a handful that actually do make some sense, even if I disagree with them, but 99% of them seem to be the types in these videos, raving morons like those who think that just because you say you're "traveling" and not "driving" means you can suddenly disobey all rules of the road.

Yeah, to the Confederate Constitution.

in a court under the jurisdiction of incorporated law (fines and taxes) not criminal court (murder etc), the sitting of the court is essentially a meeting for the corporation that is your name

the judge assumes the role as chief of your corporation, or whatever the role is called under the laws where you live

the judge is acting in the interest of your corporation in that meeting, the judge uses that power to do what they want to you

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chart_of_a_trust.jpg

this image here shows it but i dont know those specific terms, it must be US law and i think learned what i learned from english law

it says at the top that "The trustee may be either a individual, a company, or a public body"

so there is some implication it depends what you are doing, if you dont admit to being a citizen you cant use that power the judge wields

but if you are going to apply religious law or other laws with lower precedence than trust law it can be better to not be the role of citizen or individual at times as it doesnt tie you to any trust law

with all this shit its all about context, who are you at the time, what are you representing, what role are you full fulling and under what context is the meeting, discussion or court sitting that you are in

whenever they take breaks on judge judy you notice they get up go out of the room and come back in, they are changing the context of the sitting court

...

Holy shit

exactly this

a lot of it is completely true not the dumb shit the kiddy larpers try to pull but the real law shit is real

that however, is no guarantee whatsoever that any specific court is actually going to follow the law properly or even understand how to if they even wanted to

at this point anyone trying to drive without plates or a license is stupid, you pick your battles and that one isnt worth it

but as far as fixing the (((situation))) all this shit will have to come out for things to change

Their failures exactly destroy the argument of natural rights.

Without force of violence, there can't be no rights.

So be strong, user, that's the only way you can protect your rights.

They're debating cops on whether they're guilty or innocent. That's not the job of the cop, that's the job of the court. These people are fucking idiots.

I want to be this level of bad ass.

This is fucking hilarious

...

Which is it America?

There are people who believe in the magic dirt theory, and then there are Sovereign Citizens.

Sovereign Citizens believe in the magic typography theory.

V.K Clark, kill yourself.

Not only do you start a thread on Holla Forums as an outsider, presumably to shill your channel, but you clearly haven't done the most basic of cursory research into the subject of sovereign citizens.

Not a single sovereign citizen claims it is OK to steal property. Their central belief is that only common law is legitimate.

Now kill yourself VK Clark.

...

These words only make me harder

holy shit satanic trips… kek has spoken

Butthurt sovereign detected. Yes, you are being detained, faggot.

...

Probably second on the list for a gassing.

Now This is a sliding thread

...

that cunt is going in my list

The immediate confrontational attitude of SC faggots is what annoys me the most. You get friendly cops walking up to ask simple questions and you get

AM I BEING DETAINED???=

in a mix of anger, passive aggression, and smug selfrighteousness.

You mean common law that permits taxation and was invented by the Anglo-Normans to centralise legal power and take away the courts of the landowners?

...

Too bad for them it's not.

Your window has no authority over me you dumb nigger.

oh what the hell man…

...

the sovereign citizen is an oxymoron from the start, one cannot be both a sovereign and a citizen.
Sovereignty is understood in jurisprudence as the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies
a sovereign = a king ~ under no power but his own.
a sovereign without sovereign lands to reside in (a sovereign state ) is essentially a visitor

''Citizenship is the status of a person recognized under the custom or law as being a member of a sovereign state. A person may have multiple citizenships and a person who does not have citizenship of any state is said to be stateless.

So a sovereign citizen is a citizen of his own sovereignty but is a citizen of no other state or nation and if the sovereign citizen has no land…

Most of the fools who spout the standard gibberish are trying to have the best of both worlds.

Does a tased nigger smell like fried chicken?

...

This gets me every time I see it.

Fucking hate "Sovereign Citizens" Just look at any video of them arguing in OPs video.
Just pay the ticket and stop being a like you dumbfuck!

They're just lolbergs who are even higher on the spectrum than the rest of their ilk.

I've met two sovereign citizens in my time. Both were fucking retards if you got them to talk about any subject that wasn't their sovereign citizen bullshit. One thought if he hooked up a generator from a F4 Phantom to a home microwave it would create some super powerful microwave weapon. The other thought the earth was flat. I lost contact with them after they got arrested for dumb shit. Like the F4 Phantom guy got sick of being stopped for having made up plates so he refused to pull over one day starting a police chase. He drove the speed limit through three counties before they pit stopped him.

But user, the alt-right can be a step along the path to fascism.

Listen to pol OP, you are a fucking piece of property. Get used to it or go do something about it.

guess whos money paid for the road?

Those peoples are insane

...

the colloquial use of a word often doesn't share the same meaning in it's legal use.

They're basically wannabe kikes.

The killing police is PSYOP bullshit, to demonize them.

They are just people who believe in the constitution.

The media attempts to label anyone who defends themselves against police aggression as a "Sovereign Citizen".

Be a good slave.

Yeah the media made you drive too fast and then act like you don't have to pay fines.

I think I'm saging this bullshit thread.

Admiralty law, you summertards.

...

...

I really wish somebody like Glenn Beck would disect this whole subject.

There are a few of them in my area. The police and courts have made a game out of slapping them down at every opportunity.

One guy spams everyone's mailbox with multi-page rants

No, they want to be able to live their lives without the government dictating it. That may be hard for you to understand, the desire to live as you see fit without a government telling you what's right and what's wrong.

A sovereign citizen would be someone living in the woods, growing/hunting their own food and minding their own business. And then the government comes in and guns down their family, burns down their property, and defames them on mainstream media. Because they didn't pay taxes.

Just like neo-nazi skinheads represent Holla Forums, right?

To be completely fair, prosecutors do the same thing.

For example, there are plenty of cases of police officers who have purposefully got right up into somebody's face, just to have the other person use their arm to put some distance between the officer and themselves. Of course, by a technicality, this can and will be construed as assaulting a police officer.

If someone tries to railroad you that way, and you find some weird loophole where you can fucking sign something in crayon and make it null and void or whatever, good for you.

Basically, if you are being prosecuted on a technicality, and can get off the hook by using a different technicality, I see no problem with this.

I don't agree with the whole concept of being a sovereign citizen. I think people need to follow laws and such, but especially in the US, we supposedly have laws that the government must follow as well. If they find a technicality to get around their constraints, then it's every citizen's duty to find technicalities to re-restrain them.

I haven't read much on them in years, but if they can do that by using crayons, or using lower case spellings of their names and refusing to recognize themselves in all capital spelling because of Admiralty law, or by filing the paper work to put a trillion dollar lien on them or whatever, good for them.

So long as all of that is being used in a way to "put the genie back in the bottle" so to speak. If you have broken a law that the government had authority to create, then go to trial or pay the ticket, or whatever you are suppose to do.

This guy explains it pretty well in my opinion and even though it's long he keeps it to facts and arguments, never unnecessarily dragging it out.

This paints An-cap in a positive light dammit.

Fucking degenerate.

From the few videos I've seen I'd say that most of them are weed smoking NEETs that think they are smarter than everyone else because. Well I don't know why they think they are smarter than anyone else, I guess the drugs just fuck their minds up.
They act tough but most of them are skinny nowts that appear to never lift etc. Once outside the safe zone of their car (which their mom bought them) they tend to cry like bitches.
It is, for the most part, just a phase some teenagers go through, the same way in that some make-believe they are vampires, dragons and other such bullshit. Most of them grow out of it after the summer holidays when their mom tells them to get a job.

lol

Most of the vocal ones are fucking faggots, no surprise there. But you're being intentionally blind if you deny their arguments.

The modern level of instinctual submission to police and other artificial authority figures is unhealthy.

From everything I've seen, SCs are basically man-children who don't want to work for anything and are most often heard shouting "AM I BEING DETAINED" at every cop who gets anywhere within 200 yards of them.

Most the cops are fine, if you just be polite and have not committed a crime than it's gonna be fine 99.9% of the time. Problem is that drunk and drugged up NEETs know they have committed an offence and are going to get in trouble so try to distract by kicking up a fuss. They've gone throughout their school years having childish tantrums to get their own way and honestly believe they can take that behaviour into the real world. It's great when they get a taste of reality, even better when they record their own delicious tears.

2nd Amendment prevents the Federal government from putting limits on your right to bear arms.

10th Amendment allows the individual states to put limits on your right to bear arms.

I'm not denying that most of the self-proclaimed sovereign citizens are total fags. But I am saying that most cops are fucking jokes. There are some that genuinely want to help their community, but they rarely last very long in that environment. Most cops are the same kids that were tattletales or bullies in school. They have no authority or strength of their own, so they wear a uniform and hide behind big papa government.

Based as fuck