Redox OS

Why do the porkies have to fuck everything up with their libtard licenses? If it's not GPLed, it's fucking bullshit. You're just inviting corporations to take your code, cuck you, and fuck your ass.

Who's going to steal your OS code if it's written in Rust?

What does that word even mean?

It means he's from Holla Forums and needs to go back there, or preferably back to Reddit where he came from

It's another failed Holla Forums meme. You never hearing about it until now is evidence that it hasn't caught on.

He's accusing everyone of begin a communist while promoting communism. True freedom means I can do whatever the fuck I want.

Kinda like how I take GPLed code all the time and re-release it without a license or credit.

wat

hope you get raped by niggers in prison

redox code quality is absolute dogshit. truly pajeet tier.

Why do you care in the first place?

It's the politically correct Happy Merchant. Holla Forums tested, normalfag approved!

Anarchy isn't true freedom smh

Pajeet detected

Another cringeworthy as fuck attempt at a meme by Holla Forums. Since all their memes are literally propaganda and not jokes like what they're supposed to be they end up being cringeworthy as fuck because they actually try not to offend anyone with them. Contrast with Holla Forumsshit like Happy Merchant and at least there's a joke in there because it doesn't give a fuck if it offends people.

Because that's the entire point of the project. It's also the reason it's doomed to never catch on anywhere because "yet another microkernel unix BUT WRITTEN IN $FLAVOR_OF_THE_MONTH LANGUAGE" won't convince anyone to switch.

Isn't the point of a permissive license to allow EVERYONE to use the code in any way they please?

What's your point?

The point is that people who use permissive licenses in free software are happy to let corporations fork that software into proprietary software. This is completely intentional.

I don't see any implication that it's unintentional.

Most FOTM languages aren't compiled, memory safe, and non-GCed (actually, are there even two other languages that meet these criteria?). Rust does have unique features that make it both viable and desirable as a kernel language. It also has Mozilla's backing, and other companies like Google are starting to adopt it as well. It will probably have staying power.

It's because of communist rulecucks like you that I license my stuff under WTFPL.

Since day 1, I've wanted to fork it and create a misogynist/nazi/pedophile-themed version.

Note how you still haven't given one reason for this project's existence beyond "BUT IT'S IN RUST".

Rust is still better than C.

Forget it, you won't understand what I'm getting at.

No, I get you, just making a new OS because of "better language" won't get anywhere (proof: it never did, and AFAIK you can't even switch Linux from GCC to CLANG yet?)

Still most bugs are because autists convinced normies that C can be written by non-autists. If Linux was suddenly magically in Rust you wouldn't see most bugs crop up. But of course it ain't happening.

HOW WILL RUST EVER RECOVER

Writing an OS in a managed language is a more interesting project than anything to do with RUST. Phantom OS is I think defunct but was more interesting than redoxed os.

Memory safety. Even Linux is constantly getting memory vulns because it is written in C. It's a very valuable feature.

wow talk about pajeet

Privilege escalation became dos attack. The cost is an ugly syntax. Big change.

Which is every modern language.

There's more than just OOP, user.

Can someone give a link for the source?

Not the one you're replying to but the OOP hate here is often retarded.

As a way to ease my understanding I view fucking everything as an object. An int, for me, is just an object of size(int) bytes in the memory with certain operators I can apply to it.

I even view C as an OO language. It's made of Nouns (Variables) and Verbs (Functions). It has Grouped Nouns (Structs) with Verbs (Operations) I can apply to them.

What does irk me is where some languages bloat this with "magic bytes" that make these objects unpredictable in their storage.

I don't really understand why C++ was necessary from a practical point of view. The OOP of C++ just seems to pack "objects" up into a more cohesive syntax (classes).

In short, fuck everyone.

Procedural with objects and composition > Procedural >>>> Object oriented with composition >>>>>>>> shit >>>>>>> Object oriented with inheritance

pajeet, please

Your ilk should definitely stay in reddit

Not even Java does this retarded assumption, I just want you to know that.

What language is procedural but doesn't allow composition? Brainfuck?

Holla Forums is so much more cancerous than Holla Forums, their memes are shit and you should feel bad

I was referring to the composition vs inheritance debate on objects. I don't know any languages that don't allow composition.