New uk police cars

A good use of tax payer cash

Other urls found in this thread:

thesun.co.uk/news/3873209/cash-strapped-police-blow-750-giving-just-two-cop-cars-special-paint-job-for-gay-pride-events-to-prove-theyre-open-minded/
nhs.uk/Livewell/vagina-health/Pages/keep-vagina-clean.aspx
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia#Homosexuality_and_non-heterosexuality
medium.com/pedophiles-about-pedophilia/pedophilia-as-a-sexual-orientation-d414e0780f6d
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

ok

[[

...

moar

thesun.co.uk/news/3873209/cash-strapped-police-blow-750-giving-just-two-cop-cars-special-paint-job-for-gay-pride-events-to-prove-theyre-open-minded/

The UK is rapidly becoming Sweden. Anybody who doesn't want to be raped and murdered by sandniggers will be disappeared for 're-education'.

I moved to Sweden for the rape

this is wrong on so many levels

for one, its emergency vehicle, its supposed to be its normal colours for a reason, to cover it with some interest groups logos is ridiculous, does that mean its okay to have a pokemon cop car? inb4 it exists in japan slipper slope is not a fallacy, next there will be fury cop cars

another, what gets me a about this gay pride shit is that homosexuality is a fetish, anything other than consensual sex for the sole purpose of procreation is degenerate. all these fags marching up and down the street waving rainbow flags is about advertising the world that they like fucking men in the ass and stabbing their shit with their dicks. to put this on a cop car is a fucking obscenity put on public property by the people who should be taking responsibility for that property

i love how the article focuses on the cost, as if thats the biggest issue here

As long as your brown they'll never take you down.
Meanwhile, in the uk jihadis can appear on tv documentaries about jihadis with 'jihadi' in the title and left alone to murder white people. Any white who questions this gets v&.

Lolno.

I'm a homosexual because I'm exclusively attracted to men. It's not my identity as a person, but it does form the core of my sexual identity.

With the male requirement being met, next in order of importance is top/bottom. I'm a total bottom because topping feels awkward and unnatural to me.

After that, fetishes come into play. I have a fetish for the male back, but it doesn't rank as close in importance as 1. being the sex I'm attracted to, and 2. being a top. Why? Because it's a fucking fetish.

shoulda gone with this style instead

what a faggot, when are you planning on killing yourself, xir?

you like being fucked in the ass

last time i checked, you dont get babaies from being fucked in the ass

get the fuck out you contradicting fuck

oh and kill yourself you giant degenerate faggot

You can call me he. You can call me she. You can call me Regis & Kathie Lee; I don't care! Just as long as you call me ;)


Last time I checked, you don't get "babaies" from having your dick sucked or eating pussy, either.

i absolutely implied that these were degenerate activities here

the more that a person deviates from consensual sex for the sole purpose of procreation the more degenerate the "sex" activity becomes

gay sex doesnt involve a combination of persons with the required sexual organs to carry out the aforementioned activity, so this is more degenerate than straight oral sex

consider that straight oral sex could be foreplay for a procreative sex act and so would be conducive to that process

exploring sexuality within a loving heterosexual relationship that is part of either an existing or potential family unit could also be beneficial. it could strengthen emotional bonds between a couple which would then benefit their offspring and the wider community. this is not say if they got so bored of sex that they started wearing bat man costumes and tying each other up just to get thrills that the acts wouldnt then be purely degenerate.

lets take another degenerate activity to illustrate this further - recreational drug use. if someone experimented with cannabis when they were 18 years old this could provide some benefit to that individual, expanding their horizons and giving them insight into that aspect of human culture. if they went onto become a heroin addict, stole from friends, family and local business to fund their habit, became a dealer and started getting other people hooked, became ill and then public resources were drained treating their dis-ease, they would contribute to a fairly significant degeneration of society.

a guy getting his dicked sucked by another guy once isnt probably going to end society. if everyone was preoccupied with man on man butt fucking then this could be problematic for society not least for the traditional nuclear family with heterosexual parents.

again to repeat the sentiment, how absurd gay pride is, they are literally parading around in front of society how much they degenerate that society

guess what faglord you can have a fetish for getting your dick sucked, and for tonguing snatch too

let me also just give you some perspective on what you are saying

alot of people, id like to say most people, would was their hands after touching their penis when they go to toilet

and yet you are proposing that it is normal for a person to a put another person penis in their mouth.

eating pussy is pretty unhygienic, the amount of bodily fluids that come from there is not pleasant to think about. this may come as news to you but women are not supposed to clean the inside of their vagina, if they do it can make their vagina worse. you are talking about an unwashed hole filled with bodily fluids and bacteria that you would consider normal to put your mouth upon.

these "sex" acts have only been normalized by porn, which is itself being normalized to subvert cultural morality. embed related

>nhs.uk/Livewell/vagina-health/Pages/keep-vagina-clean.aspx


i think most people would have problem kissing a girl who hadnt brushed their teeth that day

you are proposing its normal to put your mouth in contact with a orifice, thats probably never been washed, that secretes urine, blood and discharge

fag

sorry going a bit to town on this one post but forget to mention

oral sex is pretty much entry level bdsm

there is dominant / submissive aspect to oral sex acts

and bdsm is pretty damn degenerate

being submissive to another human being, a person walking around on hands and knees for another human being, is degenerate, it degrades that person as a human being and so degrades society

this also links into fag "culture" because there is a link between bdsm and faggotry, mainly that they are both fetishes

Is it illegal to go up to a UK cop and ask them loaded questions like "What is best cut boi" and "How many boys have you molsted" and "Is it funny when met get prison raped?" and record their responses? We should harass the police all the time and make it a meme, constantly forcing the homosexuality = pedophilia thing, because guess what; every single homosexual I've ever known either became that way because they were molested as a child or they got molested in prison.

I went down on a Jewish escort a few times. She tasted pretty good, didn't shave regularly and had a strong smell. She told me how many niggers she had fucked, hundreds according to her. It was hot and she let me do it for free. I jacked off afterwards and came like a freight train. Never got any cooties from that slimy well-used fuckhole.

well arent you just the precious little cuck

A mouth is a mouth. An ass is an ass. Regardless of gender.

No reply necessary.

If everyone was preoccupied with MGTOW and nofap that could also be problematic for society. Thankfully that's never going to happen and is a non-issue.

Also, Folsom Street Fair is a BDSM/All around degeneracy free for all. I may take a few fists at Pride every year but I wouldn't be caught dead wearing a cheap dog mask in public.


For most people they aren't fetishes. They're extremely common sex acts that many people enjoy. Licking feet and eating shit are fetishes, with scat being on the WTF extreme end.


I don't. I'm a very hygienic person and expect my partners to practice it as well.

Tell me something I don't know.

Into the oven it goes.


I wouldn't put my mouth down there. But unlike eating shit or getting fucked by a german shepherd, I can see why straight men and lesbians might want to do that. And it's not like it's any cleaner when you put your dick in it versus licking it.


Every sex act can have dom/sub aspects. Initiating foreplay can be seen as dominant. Hell, even proposing can be seen as submissive. But I think there's a dominant and submissive way of viewing oral sex:
One partner is down on their knees, taking the other partner's member into their mouth while looking up at them for signs of approval. Or one partner sitting up, laying back/whatever while the other partner takes initiative by grabbing their member and milking them to the put of orgasm. Maybe even delaying it to make them desperate for release.


I disagree. Sexual orientation is macro while fetishes are micro. Unless you're talking about someone so perverted and slutty that they would let literally anyone do anything sexual to them.


Was her name Sarah? Tell her the results came back and that "POZ" load from Jamal wasn't as POZ as it should have been. I want my money back btw.

...

BDSM/latex pro here, anal and fisting is disgusting, whipping and wearing latex and stuff isn't as gross as shoving your hand or other things up someone's shitter.

into the over you go you disgusting degenerate faggot

you do realize that fags were right alongside the jews going into those ovens you ignorant or delusional fuck?


this contradictory non argument

i have already stated why they arent unless you are prepared to provide a counter point you can be considered either retarded or a troll


MGTOW is anti feminism, if everyone was preoccupied with MGTOW then there would be no feminism and MGTOW wouldn't need to exist, everyone could go on having healthy traditional relationships not corrupted by political feminism

feminism is degenerate, MGTOW is the cure for that dis-ease


being a fag and being into BDSM are both degenerate and sexually deviant behaviour so they are much the same thing, there are clearly gay pride flags in that photo

source: wikipedia


this inaccurate paraphrasing

i have stated that it isnt normal for a person to consider putting a penis in their mouth regardless of whether it is washed or unwashed. much the same i wouldnt expect human being to eat off the floor even if it had been cleaned.


didnt your mother ever teach you why you dont put disgusting things in your mouth? your logic is juvenile, 5 years olds know not to put dirty stuff in their mouth.


i have discussed my reasoning for this here

your arguemnt is pretty contradictory, all you have introduced is this term "sexual orientation"

sexual orientation is a myth

being a faggot is a mental health problem

it is a fetish

it is a paraphilia by definition

i dont see how something being either macro or micro changes its nature

whether you are a little faggot or a giant faggot you are still a degenerate fuck

from the wiki article:


we can evidence this easily with "sexual liberation"

one day fags are considered mentally ill

the next they are not

the next thing we know they can marry

then pedophiles start claiming that the should be considered a sexual orientation using the same logic the fags used

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia#Homosexuality_and_non-heterosexuality


medium.com/pedophiles-about-pedophilia/pedophilia-as-a-sexual-orientation-d414e0780f6d

My suspicions that you were a stormderp have been confirmed. I won't waste any more of your precious Aryan time, but allow me to address this one point that's irking me:
Not since DSM-II.
Stop trying to redefine words.
Stop trying to redefine words.

So sticking your dick into another man's ass feels 'awkward and unnatural' to you? Interesting…

Sticking my dick in anything other than my hand feels unnatural to me

How does recognizing something as a sexual orientation justify it though? So what if it happens to be a sexual orientation. Niggerdom is a "mentality" or "mental disposition". Doesn't make it ok.

He's just making shit up. Our resident pedos here on infinitechan use "child's rights" because they know it's a better argument than "If an adult man can fuck another another man, why can't I fuck a child?"

You fucking nigger, stormderps denounce anything remotely related to MGTOW.
But I guess stormderps and MGTOWs are both boogeymen to faggots like you, despite both of their approaches being radically different. But hey, liberalism and faggotry go hand in hand with each other.
Off yourself, faggot.

really not sure how i feel about this trend towards bright colours and comic sans in Modern Authoritarianism

Of course it is. But so what? Doesn't automatically mean you're allowed to go get some. Just like you're still not allowed to rape a woman even though you're heterosexual.

The problem with paedophilia is that there is no way to act on it without causing damage. Just physically doesn't work.

I personally think little girls are the most beautiful things on this planet, but the idea of me so much as touching them turns the whole scenario into something utterly disgusting.

I have no problems with paedophiles. Child fuckers, on the other hand…

You know, shit like ops cop car, the gay parade, and just the shit sjw movement makes me want to vomit. They are trying to normalize and make sexualization of people a normal thing in public (something that isn't even normal with straight people standards). That's the most disturbing thing about it. And this coming from a bi makes me want to run back towards women for good. Tbqh, I've been living in fantasy land and thinking that I could somehow have a wife and fuck cute boys (on the side) at the same time. The japanese, for example, used to think gay men had traits of both women and men, thus making them very valued in society. This went straight to my head and quite a while ago I became deluded about it.

i call you out for being a troll and point out your logical fallacies

in return you offer an ad hominem argument as excuse for you to give up

you are complete failure at constructing an argument, perhaps its becasue your point of view is based on fantasy


just because it was removed as a means to spread degeneracy doesn't mean it stopped being a mental health problem


more contradicting my argument on your part, i havent tried to redefine anything

im going to humour you though as i didnt spell it out although i do feel my original explanation stands on its own merit

i have clearly stated elsewhere in this thread why any deviation for consensual sex for the sole purpose of procreation is atypical and damaging to society

...