Sleep all day

sleep all day

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

hey, it's a cat

CHARLES IS A NIGGER

mods mods!!!!

reported via proxy

reported for being a nigger

reported for what? There is no sexual context here.

Wow what an inspiring creature

NOT

kys libre

This slut knows what she's doing.

You are warped.

...

You get this from kittygfs?

what's the new librechan?

thats borderline cp

mfw child porn

No, it isn't. There is no sexual context or suggestiveness here at all. It is not even close to cp.

It most likely fails the DOST test so it most likely is CP depending on the context. In this context it most certainly would be considered CP

Pedos alway try to play innocent with the "Its just an innocent little girl doing nothing wrong!" Approach. Pedos don't understand just how important context can be

this

If you get an erection, it's CP.

Close does not count, faggot.
It passes or it does not, and in this case, it does.

Binary logic is a sign of autism. Have you considered getting yourself diagnosed yet?

Tell that to your PC.

it's cp and here's why
that's all folks!

WTF! How am I supposed to fap if the covfefe runs away?

DOST isn't even a law, it's just a guideline for the actual law


law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256

It's very vague

it is not.
the P stands for Porn.
it is not porn.
it IS suggestive
it IS focused on the vagina and intended with sexual effect by posters.

it SHOULD be illegal, I agree.
but it is not porn.
and therefor not cp.

My computer most likely would be autistic if it could speak. That's the point, most autistic people are social robots tbh

...

It's only your repressed and perverted mind that sees demons in every shadow…


This.

Holla Forums had much worse than OP for 3 years, until Jim put a stop to it.

The sexual context comes from the original poster of this thread by uploading that video to a NSFW board surrounded by porn.

No, it is focused on the cat, which moves out of the shot of its own accord. No one planned that, it was coincidental. The shot is not focused on the vagina, as the vagina is covered with clothing and can not be seen.
It is not a suggestive pose, it is a normal sitting pose that one uses when petting a cat while seated on a bed.

See

you know what is going on, don't play dumb. the reason it's posted is not for some dumb ass cat.
it may not have been HER intention, but it very clearly is OP's intention.

/thread

Yes, right before he put a stop to anonymity and board owner autonomy…you know, those things that made 8ch different than 4chan and reddit.

MODS

"lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person" is very tricky in court. when they bust pedos, they usually have actual CP in their collection. They wouldn't bother with this video.