Big data is like big tobacco. Presumed to be safe for decades and when we understood the cancer it brought...

Big data is like big tobacco. Presumed to be safe for decades and when we understood the cancer it brought, it was hard for people to quit.
– Peter Sunde (@brokep) June 2, 2017

Everything has gone wrong. That’s the thing, it’s not about what will happen in the future it’s about what’s going on right now. We’ve centralized all of our data to a guy called Mark Zuckerberg, who’s basically the biggest dictator in the world as he wasn’t elected by anyone.

Trump is basically in control over this data that Zuckerberg has, so I think we’re already there. Everything that could go wrong has gone wrong and I don’t think there’s a way for us to stop it

We don’t create things anymore, instead we just have virtual things. Uber, Alibaba and Airbnb, for example, do they have products? No. We went from this product-based model, to virtual product, to virtually no product what so ever. This is the centralization process going on

We’re super happy about self driving cars, but who owns the self driving cars? Who owns the information about where they can and can’t go? I don’t want to ride in a self driving car that can’t drive me to a certain place because someone has bought or sold an illegal copy of something there.

...

We lost this fight a long time ago. The only way we can do any difference is by limiting the powers of these companies — by governments stepping in — but unfortunately the EU or the US don’t seem to have any interest in doing this.

So there’s still some chance for a less awful future, but it would require a huge political effort. However, in order to achieve that, the public needs to be informed about the need for decentralization — but historically that’s not likely to happen.

I would say we, as the people, kind of lost the internet back to the capitalist society, which we were hoping to take it back from. We had this small opening of a decentralized internet but we lost it by being naive. These companies try to sound good in order to take over, that they’re actually ‘giving’ you something. Like Spotify gives you music and has great passion for music, and all of the successful PR around it.

But what it does to us in the long term is more like smoking. Big data and Big Tobacco are really similar in that sense. Before, we didn’t realize how dangerous tobacco actually was, but now we know it gives you cancer. We didn’t know that big data could be thing, but now we know it is. We’ve been smoking all our lives on big data’s products and now we can’t quit

And just like with tobacco, it’s governments that need to create the restrictions. However, it’s difficult to see how any government — except for big players like US and EU — are supposed to be able to restrict the powerful tech giants.

The EU could say that if Facebook wants to operate within the EU, they have to agree that all of the data has to be owned by the user, and not by Facebook. Which would be quite simple for the EU to do, but of course that would make Facebook really upset

Then every country would be scared to be the first one to implement the law because Facebook would leave and all of its citizens would be without their tobacco. That’s the problem we’ll always have.

Figures. Enjoy your digital dystopia.

Just don't use these services. There's viable and free alternatives.
Don't call daddy government to make fagbook play nice

Funny guy.

What ISP are you on?

...

Your VPN has an ISP doesn't it? Checkmate.
AI can still detect you based on your computer/browser settings/mouse-keyboard movements.

Funny that you're literally paying a corporation that profits on how unsecured you are.

...

...

...

yeah, and both are known to cause cancer also

that's literally what the quote already says. Good job.

Have you met normal fags? They matter, outliers like us don't matter. I still use a beta max video camera but that doesn't do a thing to effect the world camera industries.

lurk more, faggot

bump

it is all making better yoyos , . . . , computers and coding is all to advance the yoyo , .

aqua teen hunger force taught everyone that , .

attached a picture about how much people like wine , sadly , .

that is the pose people did for wine when jesus was alive , .

No really?

Of course no government is interesting in stopping it. They'd do it themselves if the market wasn't already handing it to them on a silver platter. Hell, most wealthy countries do it redundantly anyway. The US sure does. A panopticon state has been the dream of autocrats everywhere as long as such a thing could have been conceived. Why would they give it up? You live in a democracy? You don't vote on laws. Your elected representatives do. And very few of them will even breach the subject.

There's very little outcry. And who will generate it? ultimately, the people follow the media's direction. The media isn't interested in running a campaign against domestic surveillance. If you're being extremely charitable, those stories don't sell. If you're being realistic, they benefit greatly from this shit themselves. They depend on advertising. Advertising is at the forefront of big data, both using and collecting data on you.

(checked)
we loved your post

the great thing about tobacco is that you're not forced to use it

...

"People who claim to hate furries with such passion, are themselves projecting their own subconscious desire to expose and express their own true inner repressed furry nature against type" - Dr. Alyson Havelock (PsyD, LPCC), 'American Psychology Today' (APA, New York NY), Vol. 47, August 23, 2012, p.34

What is a man?
A miserable little pile of secrets?
Those same piles of misery who can't fend for themselves and keep blaming "those big asses who somehow own the world" for all their problems? but enough talk, we'll gonna throw some shit right here.

...

...

ayyy nice cucklevania reference there ma boi

Exept that smoking cigars is fun, giving away your data for free is not.
Not that Peter Sunde isn't a very intelligent man.

lurk moar, faggit