How did we as a nation alow the Supreme court, the interpreters of the Constitution, to become political tools...

they died out in the 1950's user

GET THE FUCK OUT

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IS NOT SUPPOSED TO INTERPRET ANYTHING

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH WAVED HANDS AND GAVE THEMSELVES THE RIGHT TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT

THE PURPOSE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IS TO APPLY LAW, NOT MAKE LAW OR CHANGE LAW

As the head of the judicial branch, that can interpret the law. If they say that he law means one thing, who is going to stop them? In the recent gay marriage thing, I remember the new outlets going on and on about how they interpreted gay marriage as a constitutional right. What if they decide that the right to bear arms gets in way with the right to live? If the political theater is leaning that way who is goin gto stop them but the people?

Probably around the time we let them all become Catholics and Jews

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IS THE SINGLE MOST POWERFUL BRANCH IN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT

ALL BECAUSE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW

Judicial review gave the supreme court the ability to ignore constitutional amendments, and even allow the addition of constitutional amendments without following the proper process.

REMEMBER THE AMENDMENT THAT CREATED THE IDEA OF AN AMERICAN CITIZEN?

That was unconstitutional, and should have been stricken down by the supreme court.

They're not supposed to do that but jews have been subverting laws for 6000 years. If the supreme court can just change what the constitution says why do we even have amendments with a strict ratification process? It's obvious the highest court in the land is unlawful.

Any chance that tied into the 1890 shit, or were they just full-on retarded by that point?

You only have the rights you can defend, otherwise they are worthless.

If you don't defend your right, you lose it.

You still do not accept the truth.

THEY ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO INTERPRET

"The United States" is a plural entity comprising of all states in the union. At this point, it is not a singular entity. The shift from a plural to a singular entity is also unconstitutional, as there is no properly passed amendment to identify the shift.

By the constitution's own words, the judicial branch cannot be involved in decisions regarding the powers of the judicial branch. That power would require an amendment to the constitution.

IF IT'S AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, IT REQUIRES A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO BE LEGAL

FORCING GAY MARRIAGE - UNCONSTITUTIONAL
US CITIZENSHIP - UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BLM LAND SIEZURES - UNCONSTITUTIONAL
DOMESTIC SPYING - UNCONSTITUTIONAL
US PASSPORTS - UNCONSTITUTIONAL
GCA AND NFA - UNCONSTITUTIONAL
The Trump wall is unconstitutional

To expand the federal government to the size it is today would have taken 20+ amendments, all of which would remove many god given rights.

Marbury v. Madison is the foundation of everything that's wrong with the federal government, including everything that Lincoln did.

Thomas Jefferson should have hung the justices that voted to allow the expansion of judicial branch rights as traitors.

If you can lose it, is it even a 'right'?

Interesting…

The point of the second amendment is to defend yourself against equal weapons that people can use. And that is the one most hotly contested. So quite literally we are fighting over the right to defend yourself.

God doesn't give you shit.

"Rights" are taken or created by the people who have the biggest weapons.

The people who have the advantage in terms of sheer physical violence are the final arbiter, until someone seller comes along and fucks their shit up.

Aye aye Mr. Rasczak.

Did we ever know if Scalia was killed or simply died?

NIGGER DETECTED

God given rights are an abstract set of goals which all notable organisms attempt to secure.

All organisms strive to stay alive, obtain happiness, defend themselves, live freely, and perpetuate their line.

What is a right?

None of those things are rights.

You have no moral or (meaningful) legal entitlement to staying alive, obtaining happiness, defending yourself, living freely, nor perpetuating your line.

These are universal conditions which all organisms pursue, in constant conflict with one another, nobody exhibiting any sort of divinely-granted entitlement to success or even to pursuit, certainly not that has any meaning - though you may, usually under defense of violence against other organisms, have the privilege of such pursuit, if rarely success.

That means it's not a right if we have to fight for it. Think before you call someone a nigger 0/10 apply yourself.

There is no way we would know.

Scalia died in his sleep on the night of February 12 or the morning of February 13, 2016, following an afternoon of quail hunting and dining at the Cibolo Creek Ranch in Shafter, Texas.

> bigstory.ap.org/article/507b286c0caf4dbab00c245119f66e5d/scalias-body-being-flown-back-he-died-natural-causes

> nytimes.com/2016/02/21/health/antonin-scalia-autopsy.html
> archive.is/CFK36

> military.com/video/guns/pistols/cias-secret-heart-attack-gun/2555371072001

At least one of Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education was decided in error.

But it was okay, after all, there were culture wars to fight.

The minute the Supreme Court gave itself the authority to strike down acts of Congress and Congress didn't slap it down was the minute those nine wearing dresses became the Constitution.

Congress has the authority to tell the Supreme Court what they can and can not rule on. But they don't.

if someone attempts to take this from you, what do you do to stop it? You respond with violence. If you do not resort to violence then your "rights" mean shit because they were just takin from you.

violence is the only thing that holds up "rights". Your "rights" begin and end at your ability to project and maintain violence.

Your post is double think and smacks of Murican-ism. Its okay to admit that the flowery feel good language the founders used was dead wrong.

it took me a long time to accept that. Dont worry, it will come in time if you arent retarded

I think this experiment is over

Short answer; we sided with the Jews in ww1 and 2

Long answer; the north Jew suckers won the civil war

If only the few based founding fathers challenged the cucks to duels before signing that shit instead of after….

internet porn and television.

Kids movies are insidious. Oh look at this evil person he doesnt want the dog and the vampire to be together You dont want that to happen do you? You dont want to be evil like him right? Then you have to let dogs and humans be together. Since you dont want to be like that guy you have to be like the heros in the movie.

rights are simply truths. kikes use language magic to make ideas with no true existence real. you may think you have a right to bear arms inherent from god. in reality, the truth exists that as an able bodied man you are capable of wielding a weapon. you have no divine "right" to the ownership of that arm. might does not make right (true) but might ensures that anybody who seeks to subvert the truth can be challenged. you have no "rights", you have capabilities. dont use them and those "rights" you thought were inherit from birth are gone. realize your capabilities.

You're right. If you would re-read my post, you would see that I wrote, "strive" and "attempt".
Furthermore, our declaration of independence backs me up:

See:

See:

Natural rights and god given rights cannot be taken away by any law or action against them. This is why the founding fathers included their importance in the declaration of independence.

In a prison, a man will dream of freedom.
In a desert, a man will seek water.
In a warzone, a man will fight to defend himself.

No, it smacks of accepting man's place in nature, and how you can only take away a man's rights by destroying the man.

This is exactly what I was pointing at in my post.

That's Mr. Dubois to you.

The reason why you scream and scream and scream is because people are discussing things that you don't want discussed, "Anonymous".

Rather, the point is, since the justices do interpret and things have definitely been going the wrong way, the right thing to do is have justices that agree with Holla Forums and not be disqualified from this game by not playing because Holla Forums and justices are "not supposed to interpret".

Formalism in this particular insitution is libertarian nonsense.

Good writing and good thinking, user.

...

cuckstianity pozzed the minds of Whites, in that manipulatable condition, they let in jews, then jews do what they do, destroy, and here we are.

Right now the court sits at 4 to 4
4 jews to 4 goyim
JUST FUCKING GREAT

Time

That's why Jews hate Christianity with a passion. Fuck off Chaim.

Sectarian violence is often the most passionate kind, see Ireland