Hiya, new here.
Most of you are intimately familiar with the cuckoldry of the AGW crowd; even the newly-rebranded "Climate Change" pushers are well aware of the invalidity of their own premises, resorting frequently to outright fraud on multiple levels [see: ClimateGate]. This is an old story.
There is a new story developing rather quietly in the wings. When studying the specific effects of CO2 on the climate, researchers frequently 'rediscover'* CO2 having no causal relationship with temperature, and more, that higher levels of CO2 are actually desirable. Some desirable effects include: the food that feeds our current population is grown on LESS land than the food to feed our population a decade ago / plants grow faster and are measurably healthier [see: Global Greening, pic related].
I'm willing to bet that some of you probably knew that CO2 has no causal link to climate, but I would be genuinely surprised if any of you actually knew that high levels of CO2 are actually beneficial to the environment.
Here is the real kicker: low levels of CO2 may be disastrous. As in, mass extinction event disastrous. Remember the Pleistocene Megafaunal extinctions? Yep, they've now been linked to absurdly low CO2 levels - the lowest levels we've seen in recorded history (levels of about ~170 ppm, our modern level is ~410 ppm).
More details regarding low levels of CO2 and historical extinction events here: scribd.com
And click here to read a former Greenpeace co-founder, now defected, who now calls CO2 'the giver of life': thegwpf.com
Spread the word guys: buy your cars with as many cylinders as you can afford, and use gas/oil instead of electric whereever possible ;)
*It seems that researchers, when given the choice between professional suicide and keeping their mouths shut, tend to keep their mouths shut. To speak of beneficial CO2 is heresy, and so there is no way to 'send the memo'. This will continue to be 'rediscovered' until it is considered safe to discuss the topic publicly.
