Are Fights Over Safe Spaces & Trigger Words PROMOTING Inequality

Wow, bourgeois gamers are so full of themselves and their ideology! Who would've thought that virtual gaming economies embodying and reproducing real patterns of capitalist market structures mediates labor relations such that a gamer, who plays solely for pleasure, thinks like the investors or is deluded about their own possibility of upward mobility, deceiving nothingness for something even more null and void?
GamerGate was a mistake.

...

Liberalism, coherent with ideas of market fairness, are bourgeois whether the person propagating it is a bourgeoisie or not.

lrn2linguistic-derivitives

is*

What the fuck are you talking about? Even if gamers were more right wing like you and that moron from YouTube thinks being a classcuck doesn't make you "bourgeois". Why don't you at least learn to use basic terms before you start spewing nonsense. Nah. Who I'm I kidding? That would be expecting to much from a feminist flag shitposter

>of OR characteristic of the middle class, typically with reference to its perceived materialistic values or conventional attitudes.

Why don't you at least read Marx? ah. Who I'm I kidding? That would be expecting to much from a Holla Forums user.

Also, for your sake

Where did you pull that definition from?
It doesn't matter anyway . It's all inane bullshit. Video game players have never been particularly "bourgeois" compared to the rest of the population. That's just bullshit spread by idpolers and corrupt journalist to silence criticism and worm their way in.

I never implied you were. I said that you and that moron on YouTube seem to think that gamers are "right wing".

And stop making all these fucking replies to one post femnigger. It's really autistic.

god damn you're nearly as insufferable as Freudfag.

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm

Nup, read the manifesto again, bourgeois is always used as to denote the capitalist or something directly pertaining to them

eg.

Note how the bourgeois family is the family of actual bourgeois in this passage

The way you are using it is common mostly in this day and age, to theoretically unsophisticated trots, and liberals trying to sway them to support their pet causes

The French revolution.
What a boring scapegoat.
The problem with taking as a pedagogical goal the writing "valued by the academy," or even "valued by employers" whether that is translated progressively as a facility with code switching or regressively as the maintenance of bourgeois subjectivity—is the lack of intrinsic investment gamers/writers had in that goal hitherto now. Acquiring and maintaining status in a valued community of gamers, initiating and maintaining relationships across a diversity of contexts, being seen as an effective and reliable distributor of information and entertainment are the new rhetorical goals for the users. As students seek not just a grade, but also to be taken seriously by their instructors.
I may be autistic, but at least I'm not boring.

t. Sassenach

here, let me give you a source that's down to your level:
grammarist.com/usage/bourgeois-bourgeoisie/

Really? Where you there? It wouldn't surprise me if a hag like you has been tormenting the left for centuries.

Yes gamers play videogames for achievement and a sense of satisfaction. Since when have those things been fucking bourgeois? Last time I checked being a leftist doesn't mean celebrating mediocrity and shunning the idea of achievement and validation. Besides gamers are looking for recognition from their peers not some authority. The comparison to academia is absolutely silly.

You condescending prick. If I were him I wouldn't even bother answering you.

lol

one clings to trifles such as the honor of so-called "achievements" in order not to realize what they conceal

i care?
remember that you're on an imageboard, kid

You fight like a younger man, with nothing held back. Admirable but mistaken

Ok, time for a basic history lesson young comrade

The bourgeois being middle class comes from feudalism

You had the upper classes, aristocracy, nobility so on so forth

The middle classes, merchants etc literally bourgeois… As in city dwellers

And the lower classes, peasants, the rabble of the city etc

With the shift from feudalism to capitalism the bourgeois, which is to say the middle class, became the new upper class as the capitalist

The strange, rather incoherent, modern notion of the middle class comes as a holdover from this

Follow me so far?

So an example of a bourgeois gamer would be something like what's her name can't even remember the first name Wu, the one that's a closeted tranny yes this is a provocation, I could have used other examples that would be more to your taste here, but I am trying to get you to think. Also, Wu is actually petite bourgeois as they did some work on their stupid iPad game I think, or at least her husband did

Anyway back on track from OT

hepgjournals.org/doi/10.17763/haer.83.3.35054h14l8230574

This paper seems relevant

academia.edu/4572341/McIntosh_as_Synecdoche_How_Teacher_Education_s_Focus_on_White_Privilege_Undermines_Antiracism

Anyone with a google login care to liberate it?

Snaffled.

Still speaking like a true Englishman.

Ferme la bouche, SVP; je ne te comprends pas! Connais-tu la différence entre la bourgeoise haute, moyenne, et petty?

Thank you for your dedication to the cause comr8

bahasa inglis bahasa bahasa kecil inu

As I said earlier

And yet, all this rump-rousal from a meme,

which I would argue is rightly so.

Leave it to a tanky to be mean to Trotsky though, kek.

Slow down, you are reading and replying too fast to engage with what you are reading…

Think this through, how would liberals in this day and age influence a theoretically unsophisticated Trotsky given that he's dead Nice first image btw, saved for later use

Therefore the term trots must mean something else, obviously in the context it is not a kind of locomotion of a horse, then what?

The final 's' would indicate that it may be a plural, so a kind of person… Perhaps trostkyites? or trotskyists as they prefer to be called, as they consider trotskyite a slur

Now, one should wonder why would there be unsophisticated trots around, the kind who might stop drinking juice drink juice, it's good for you kids lots of vitamin c because they heard that juice is bourgeois god forbid they find out that hamburger patties were haute cuisine before the development of meat grinding machines because of the amount of labor that went into the preparation of mince meat

The reason of course is that generally speaking trot parties have a vital, youthful element of course there are exceptions where other line parties manage this, but as a general rule

Certainly questions can be raised, that youthful enthusiasm becomes later a youthful indiscretion casually explained away with the old trope "If someone is not a socialist when young they have no heart, and if they are not a conservative when they are old they have no head".

Aside; there is a tendency on the left to valorize the humanities over stem because of the tendency for youthful radicalism, which is mistaken as stem is better preparation for fully understanding marxist theory, so if you get one you get them for life.

However, implying that trots have more youth members can hardly be interpreted as being mean to them

So of course the liberal like a jesuit totally not lying through the use of casuistry will use the term bourgeois in a hoity toity way while fully intending it to be taken by the audience in another

It is of course necessary and useful to correct such usage for the greater edumacation of comr8s

Now, if it pleases you, would you like to offer an opinion on this paper?

In case you haven't realized, I am using your posts as a soap box and a means of keeping this thread bumped, but it is slightly frustrating as I do know you are smarter than this

"One" has to be a pretentious twat to think that someone taking pleasure out of completion or achievements conceals "bourgeois values" . Like I said the comparison to academia is absolutely silly. Gamers aren't looking for validation from an authority but from themselves and their fellow hobbyists.
Hence why gamergate happened. It's the opposite of what you say. Gamergate was a rejection of the value system that the videogames establishment (journalists and publishers) attempted to force on the gaming community in a pathetic attempt to expand their customer base. But that wouldn't fit your narrative because everything you don't like must be "bourgeois" values and be right wing in nature

Fucking hell what is this.

who watches this show? stoners?

They stifle debate and thought.
All of you hate milo, but i bet you could sit down with milo and have a nice debate and become friends.
You can not debate a sjw, they throw tantrums, demand to be taken to a safe space, use appeals to authority.

The left is no longer progressive, they are regressive.

Its why a guy like milo can go to collge campuses and say "I…….DISAGREE" and a sjw's will start screaming like a howler monkey.
When the real way to defeat milo would be to have a nice polite debate with him.

Also RT is obvious Russian propaganda, their motive was to gather all anti western and american elements into one group for ratings.
Buttttttttt, even if it is propaganda, so is cnn.
Just watch everything with a critical eye, and at least the Russians will tell you a few things the west is covering up

also that guy looks like the lead singer of fall out boy

What you say about the whining social liberal pansies is true, but one could not debate to Milo. He has no substance and is pure style and personality. He's egotistical and draws attention to himself as he distracts people with rhetoric and is intentionally "provocative". He's only described for being "based" or "honest" because he says things that cause those aforementioned pansies to lose their shit. People are stupid enough to think that something is "true" just because it "seems disturbing" to some people. In short, he's just a celebrity.

This
Milo is guilty as fuck of coming at any discussion as nothing but a contrarian meant to get a reaction not an honest position.

CNN is frequently critical of the American government.

When was the last time RT criticized Putin?

There's a difference between being beholden to advertisers/political access vs. being actual state propaganda.

I hate RT but let's not pretend CNN has ever offered any kind of substantial critique of the U.S. government.

Wow that guy spews bullshit

These people seriously don't think there's a difference between authoritarianism and leftism.

Wonder why?The Left was crushed.
Anyways, why people so much attention to video games? Who cares?