How does the left eradicate pedophilia?

How does the left eradicate pedophilia?

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/16/how-germany-treats-paedophiles-before-they-offend
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

With therapy.

Paranoid witch hunts only help propagate child molestation. My experience with suburban parents has convinced me that procreating causes you to grow an extra chromosome.

Fun research into it that is not being shunned because the topic is taboo. Develop genetic engineering more.

Find out what causes it and prevent it. If its genetic, remove the genes that cause it.

Other than that, therapy. I still think we should offer a refuge away from children. A child free zone on a large island or something.

Gulag solves all problems.

You don't. As long as pedos aren't raping people there isn't anything wrong with it. Tankies fuck off.

Child abuse = bad
Paedophilia = who gives a shit

We should instead eradicate sexual assault and rape.

With animes. Japanese pedos hardly molest because they have their visual novels in which they care about/fug their imoutos and otoutos

By sending the League of Superlolitas after it.

give pedo-kun loli-robots

There's still a lot of ideology surrounding pedophilia and children's sexuality, and it's hard to bring it into question because of how touchy the subjects are.
I read a handful of research papers and articles on these topics and I haven't really seen any evidence that suggests any sexual activity causes any emotional harm to children. I think this paper is a good starting point, and the Discussion section references several similar studies.

this fucking thread again

I didn't open the pdf because I don't really give a shit. But from the quotation your provided it doesn't lead me to believe there is any reason that grown ass men diddling children is healthy or innocuous for them. I could understand kids being curious about other kids and their sexuality. But grown adults engaging in sexual activity with children is still questionable as fuck. Firstly, their sexual lives are at much different stages of development. Secondly, an adult has much more power, both emotional and physical, than a child and that power imbalance cannot be overlooked when you're trying to justify fucking your lolis.

Eradicate? Sadly I don't think anyone can totally eradicate pedophilia at this point in time.

But the radical left already has plenty of great tools to handle pedos. We can send them to Gulags, have them shot by Chekists, or even bash their skulls in with ox-cart axles, Khmer Rouge style. Hell, if we all want to be Posadists we can irradiate the sick fuckers.

genetically engineered super horny lolis for domestic ownership when?

Child-raping mutants roaming the wastelands between low-rad communes would make for epic shooter material if the PCs were all little girls.

Sounds almost like A Boy and His Dog

>>>Holla Forums
>>>/reddit/
>>>/trash/

It's my personal belief that a leftist utopia is a sexual utopia akin to Brave New World, and that the concepts of rape and abuse are merely social constructs. In a public society, everyone should be free for public use. Given the right precautions against STDs and pregnancy, I see no reason for not creating a sexual utopia apart from "muh morals" which were all spooky social constructs anyways

but that's icky and hurts my feelings
muh degeneracy

Don't apologize for pedophilia, especially with the vile bullshit of "well, homosexuality was considered a mental illness, peso's just need to be understood". Fuck you for even thinking that us gays are on the same evil level as pedophiles.
I don't think you can comprehend the level of abuse and mental trauma a child experiences from vile pedos.

Why the Fucking fuck does Leftypol even have dipshits and social retards that defend pedophilia?

WTF are you talking about?
I don't want sick fucks, having sex in the streets, with grown men fucking babies. WTF is wrong with you? Pedophilia is a mental illness.
If being a leftist means accepting and rationalizing pedophilia, I would rather be a bourgeoise Republican.
BTW, rape isn't a "social construct".
I wonder if, once I smash your legs, and cut off your arms, that the pain you feel is a "social construct".

...

pffft. is this pic related or are you confusing 'utopia' with 'magical realm'? that you, Butts? this shit needs to be a snowclone


nice strawman.

This is exactly the kind of visceral reaction I was talking about. My post never brought up homosexuality, and the paper doesn't either. But now that you've brought it up, there is a parallel between how pedophiles are treated today and how homosexuals were treated a century ago.
You're right, I can't. And, excluding instances of rape, neither do children.

you wanna throw in an argument about muh bonobos too?

thread a shit.

I'm more than happy to look at any evidence you can find that contradicts my points.

I don't know how you can honestly believe that children have the mental/sexual maturity to decide whether they should be sexually involved with grown men.

I'm sure at some point in the future you can have your robot loli, though.

>there is a unicorn that only I can perceive, it just pissed on your leg. Prove me wrong you can't lollol checkmate atheists
On the off chance you're serious, your logic is shit because it follows from kids being able to meaningfully consent, which they can't for reasons mentions.

It doesn't take much cognitive ability to understand the physical process of sex itself. Even mindless insects are able to figure it out on their own. So "sexual maturity" has to be something more than an understanding of what body part goes where. Maturity is not a faculty in the brain that develops on its own, it's something that's learned.
When people bring up sexual maturity, they're not talking about anything concrete regarding human brain development, they're talking about an acceptance of general society's attitude toward sexuality. Sexual maturity is simply an internalization of the ideological/cultural constructs we have surrounding sex.
In other words, maturity is a spook.

I give a shit. I don't abuse or want to abuse, and I can't have an intimate relationship, despite being a spooked as fuck romantic. Any way to make me have a boner for women would be wonderful.

get rekt faggot, pedophilia is the same as homosexuality, its merely a sexual preference, and at the rate society is degenerating it will be legal in a few more decades.

Mate we don't even understand pedophilia. Let's figure out how it works and what causes it before we try to decide on a fucking solution. For now let's just do whatever works best to keep them from hurting kids.

nigga
like
at least do apologetics for ephebophilia

for fuck's sake

pre-pubescent kids are not even physically built for sex with adults
it will injure them

lol Holla Forums

little girls are cute and hot, men want to put their dicks in them, whats not to understand?

"pedophilia" is an artificial boogeyman created in the 1800s, and through memes its become exceptionally useful at its purpose.

Daily reminder that people who call men rapists are bigots.

the only reason nobody magically finds child pornography in clinton or trumps computers is because they're both in israels pocket.

why hasn't Bernie been found to have CP then

Why contain it? Western civilization was founded on the physical and intellectual sweat of pedophiles.

Everyone raise your kids to be even more annoying and repulsive and no one will want to approach them, even for rape.

You don't.
Pedophilia is a sexual attraction. It's no more possible to eliminate in a population than homosexuality is.
Also, there's really no reason to want to eliminate pedophilia.

What you actually want to stop is child abuse, and the best way to do that is to create safe, harmless outlets for pedophiles to satisfy their masturbatory needs and offer them a place in our society where they can feel human. Offer them friendship and compassionate mental health care.

Most people on Holla Forums will hopefully appreciate that one of the main reasons crime is more prevalent among the poor is because they are desperate and don't feel included in society. Now, given that, do you really think that excluding pedophiles from society, making them feel hated and outcast, and trying to block every non-harmful route to sexual arousal (eg. loli drawings) is a good idea? Why do people think that the best way to lower rates of child abuse is to push people who fantasize about abusing kids out of society and into depression? Does anyone here honestly believe that making someone feel stressed, isolated, and depressed makes them less of a danger? Any school shooting should tell you the answer to that.

The best (and only) long-term solution is to create artificial child bodies inhabited by adult or AI minds who can consent and form loving relationships with pedophiles. Manage to do that, and pedophilia becomes no more of a problem than homosexuality.

Dude, pedophilia is more than just wanting to diddle kids. I'm sure there are lots of pedos out there who really do want to love and care for these children. Further, sexual contact does not need to be penetrative.

I think the real issue here is consent since children lack the cognitive capacities of adults and we don't want them to be taken advantage of. Personally, I think this is exceptionally difficult territory to maneuver, but I don't think it's impossible, nor do I think that it's inherently "evil" or something.


Agreed. The violence, oppression, and alienation of pedophiles is inhumane and I get sick of the hypocrisy of so-called "liberals" who are all about human rights until it involves something they disagree with. Even worse is that this disagreement is largely based on a deep cultural misunderstanding around the issue of pedophilia. I think the first step is to understand the difference between pedophilia and child abuse. The former is what I believe to be a legitimate sexual orientation/paraphilia while the latter is likely the expression of a need to feel in control and to dominate others. Obviously the two aren't mutually exclusive, but people who know anything about rape know that it's less about sex and more about power. I expect that in the future, pedophilia will go through a similar process of growing social acceptance as homosexuality did as we do more research to better understand pedophilia and develop new technologies to afford alternatives for pedos.

pedo fear is a spook

tell that you don't want this face next to you in bed , in love

I want Kimmo Alm to leave

Same thing was said of homosexuality, now we know better. Give it a century or two.


Sex =/= physical harm

Imagine a society where sex was as socially normal as conversation. The very idea of it being forced would be nonexistent, and therefore the mental damage we are told we suffer from it would also not exist.

It's like copyright law - you're told it's bad to break it, and you're made to feel bad for breaking it, but if copyright and personal property didn't exist, but was instead completely communal, there would be no harm in using something you didn't create.

Now imagine sex was equally communal. The idea of required permission is nonexistent, because everyone consenting is the societal norm. The idea of not consenting would then be the unthinkable, as there would be no reason to not consent.

This is obviously over your head, though, as you are unable to disassociate yourself from the spooks society implanted you with. I'd suggest reading an erotic novel by Spidu called The Law - perhaps then you might better comprehend my meaning.

Define.

Set up an education program to explain pedo's that their tastes are shit.

Whatever happened to AnonTalk? I had forgotten about them.

Children are like women: they are a lot easier to appreciate from a distance.

...

You're a Turk, I take it?

Don't fight it. The urge will win in the end.

...

Legalize illustrated cheese pizza and underage sex dolls. It's far more effective to manage pedos with harmless outlets than treat them as the enemy.

Treating those people as targets for hate instead of human beings because of "muh objective morality" is what cuckservatives do. Be smarter than that, manage the symptoms.

theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/16/how-germany-treats-paedophiles-before-they-offend

this, basically

Why am I not surprised.

We dont. It's the same as being gay, they cant help it.

We give them outlets that dont involve child fucking, and we stop treating them as worse than hitler, which is what normally drives them to rape in the first place.

Don't let those sorts of faggots turn you off to leftism all together. If it makes you feel better people like that will be thrown into gulags. Especially considering that 99% of people considering pedophilia to be disgusting.

You are a vile, disgusting piece of shit trying to justify sexually abusing children.
Next thing you probably want to fuck your dog as well, and given your argumentation, you would support bestiality.

hi Mikee. How's your FREEWARE YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT game going?

This comrade gets it.

To be fair, there's absolutely nothing wrong with being a pedo and having a BDSM fetish as long as it never involves real kids. That's actually why I proposed creating artificial/simulated children as partners. You could have a completely healthy, safe, consensual relationship involving BDSM as long as the "child" was actually an adult or AI consciousness. In fact, we're half way there with much of the ageplay fetish scene. The only thing missing is the technology to adequately simulate a child's body.

I think child abuse happens partly because some pedophiles aren't raised to have a sufficiently strong sense of personal ethics, and partly because some pedophiles are hurt so much by society's mistreatment of them that they just give up caring or actively seek revenge. Of course some of those might also be into domination, but the kink community has demonstrated that it's entirely possible to have that fetish without raping anyone.

Not him, but anyone who criticises the ethics of bestiality while eating meat is a huge hypocrite.

DR. PEPPER THIS IS MAJOR CAULIFLOWER.
WE HAVE SAGE IN ALL FIELDS.
I REPEAT, SAGE IN ALL FIELDS.
ENGAGING.

Sage is not a downvote.

Because when you imagine arguments and attribute them to other people those arguments can never be a surprise.

This is posadas-1 to Alpha Centauri, we have maximum revisionism. Requesting full orbital thermonuclear bombardment.

You'd think that. Most people who don't know me would.

But you see, I was sexually "abused" as a child, but as it wasn't accompanied by violence, do you know what I discovered?

Sex as a child is pretty goddamn awesome, mixed with a kind of wondrous magic that is lost when you become older.

I'd give anything to be a child again, just to experience sex like I no longer can. I didn't need "protecting", nor did I want it. I was a horny little fucker that was more than willing to have sex, and I'm happy someone obliged. I'd hate to know how I'd turn out if my needs were pent up for the sake of " protection ".

That is what you are failing to see - the child is forced by society to abstain from sex until it loses a great deal of what makes it wonderful and often long past the point of sexual frustration.

This is where spanking, ABDLs, age play and even BDSM all spawn from - sexual frustration during childhood.

If we had a society of communal sex in place, nobody would be denied the pleasures I knew, nor would they turn to odder, actually abusive, kinks. The greek pederasts knew this well, and as such did not deny the young what they needed.

Really, it is the attempt to justify denying children these things that is truly baffling. Perhaps if I was forced against my will to abstain from sex as a child like you, I would have a better understanding of the puritanical mindset you and a majority of western civilization has on the matter.

tbh our understanding of child sexuality is incredibly naive, borderline in denial ("durr all kids r pure :DDD"). The real question is whether kids can actually consent to sex as far as I'm concerned.

Kids are stupid after all and not yet fully developed mentally and emotionally. But one could also argue that this is the case for many adults too, and that the age of consent is entirely arbitrary.

Oh boy, seems it's my time to shine!
Lookey what I found on the deep web.

KEK I'm not going to read this while I'm in class but this is kind of interesting. I'm not even a pedo myself (pedos have SHIT TASTE tbh) but the moral posturing in this thread about pedophilia is so preposterous and one-sided. It's conservative-tier shit.

Freud also was right about child sexuality

I'd actually say that the real question is whether there's any unavoidable risk of harming the child.

Kids don't consent to a lot of things. We tend to draw the line at things which could endanger them.

That said, as with all unknowns, it's best if our species approaches the issue carefully and rationally.

Hm, yeah, that's a good point.

I do think anarchy would necessitate giving children a lot more autonomy than they're given in a capitalist society, but you will always need to know when to draw the line before the caregivers of the community and the parents need to kind of assert their authority over children for their own sake.

The main problem is that children are stupid and small, and thus could be taken advantage of more easily than a fully-grown person. The parents would need to in some way be involved (not involved in that way you sick fuck), which is an "icky" thought but also not different from pretty much every other way that parents raise their children. With a reasonable degree of involvement for the sake of protection and guidance. And really, there are all sorts of things kids do where they could be harmed or die, and nevertheless parents take the risk anyways because keeping kids sheltered will lead to them developing poorly. So is this really so different?

There's also the argument that pedos who aren't stigmatized wouldn't themselves develop poorly and become abusive - and they probably would have developed themselves from childhood abuse, and so on and so on.

see

see

children are more easily manipulated than adults, psychologically and physically.

This whole thread is like the four open pedos on Holla Forums samefagging over and over…

MODS MODS MODS MODS!

I don't know about the others, but I don't samefag. It makes me forget about IDs on other boards, which in turn makes me feel like a colossal dumbshit.

Also


>>>Holla Forums

...

Holla Forums: The Post

This is so beautiful comrade ;_;

And mentally handicapped people, the senile, anyone on drugs or alcohol, or even people who are unusually trusting of others are also more easily manipulated than most. This doesn't mean we should bar these people from having sexual relations.

By promoting the patriarchal heterosexual family and cracking down on every perversion and distortion of it.

That's lame.

What could possibly go wrong?

kek'd right there

Worshiping intellectualism, especially degenerate intellectualism of that bourgeois pervert Freud, is a profound stupidity present only in the most reactionary of minds.

Before smugly mentioning that Marx was an intellectual, remember that Marxism is not intellectual masturbation, but a guide to action.

if being attracted to anything prepubescent is wrong and evil, why do all women try to imitate the look they had when they were so through make up, shaving, hair products, skin creams, mud baths, deodorants, and other treatments?


that guy looks like he would fatroll and die like a bitch. nice mobility you christcuck.

natural male sexuality is the biggest cause of high birthrates because it is assertive and dominant, repressing it is a MUST-DO if someone were to need to lower the birthrates of a particular race, lets say, whites. that's why today we have so many betas incapable of understanding why they can't get women, because they were born in an age where the powers of the world are constantly trying to eliminate them by reversing the roles, women WILL NEVER EVER make the first move, and men are taught to either wait for it (which will never happen) or try to buy their way through beta-orbiting, which also never works. Women have also been corrupted to think they are unique special snowflakes who should be praised constantly just for existing,

want to double down? repress the male sexuality of one race while giving free reign to the male sexuality of another, say, africans, or middle easterns.

pedo spooking is the ultimate tool of repression of male sexuality. because with enough convincing even the very males you're trying to snuff out of existence will cooperate with you in their confusion and frustration, all while wondering why are their birthrates so low? they will never figure it out, they weren't even alive when birthrates were high and males were allowed to be males, so how could they know any better? combo up the repression of male sexuality with the liberation of female sexuality (the fair gender is incapable of handling freedom without a guiding hand) and you got yourself the perfect recipe for a silent genocide.


1984 is the answer

The mentally handicapped and the senile yes it does. They don't know what they're doing, and could be easily tricked into accepting something they didin't want. Drugs (term is vague and bullshitty since it covers everything from coffee to advil to smack) and alcohol are tougher to draw a line with since everybody's got different tolerances. A quickie in a bathroom on a couple coffees, bong rips, beers or bumps is probably fine, fucking somebody passed-out drunk isn't. Fucking somebody with a moderate buzz on but they're a little drunker but they're older than you but you're more experienced on a second tuesday during a hailstorm, I don't know. Overly-trusting or easily-manipulated or other personality shit if it were up to me I'd vaccinate against by making caveat emptour part of high school lesson plans or something which is the last thing Porky would ever want or let happen in a million years If people are still suckers after that I'd say it's kind of on them.

But that gray area/area it would be impossible to legislate without a totalitarian police state and a lot of false/say-so convictions doesn't mean all the other categories suffer from the same problem. Senility, mental deficiency or unwellness, being a child, and being falling-down drunk or tripping balls are all usually relatively easy to diagnose without cameras and witch trials everywhere.

gee, I wonder who could be behind this post.

Opposing intellectualism, even insightful intellectualism of that lovable bourgeois pervert Freud, is a profound stupidity present only in the most empty of minds.

Remember that Freudian psychoanalysis is not intellectual masturbation, but a guide to self-improvement.

did you actually read the rest of my post?

Yes I did, it was more of the same cancerous shoehorning of your pet issue that I've read a dozen shitposts just like on /n/, /tg/, /furry/, /monster/, /operate/, /r9k/, Holla Forums, Holla Forums and every other board anybody gives a fuck about. None of your other unsourced assertations or your thinly-veiled, plausibly-deniable >imblications that refugees are a joo wite genoside gonsbirasee dispelled my initial impression of you as a tinfoil-wearing Stormcuck, if anything it reinforced it. You sure you don't want to throw in anything on how badly you want to go down on Trump? That's kinda traditional and expected these days

so let me get this right

you got this upset over the fact i said the higher echelons of society are trying to drive white people to extinction, which is a fact. am i right?

nope, just sick of hearing your repetitive unsourced consbiracy theories about muh wite genocide on boards and threads that have fuckall to do with it.
Even by your usual kafkatrapping non-logic that makes no sense. Or are you >imblying I'm one of Le Elders of Zion?

nope, just sick of hearing your repetitive unsourced consbiracy theories about muh wite genocide on boards and threads that have fuckall to do with it.
Even by your usual kafkatrapping non-logic that makes no sense. Or are you >imblying I'm one of Le Elders of Zion?

codemonkey pls

No, you aren't. You're completely full of shit.

consider yourself fortunate, you had the luck of being able to express your developing sexuality without actually getting raped or coerced into it, and neither you had the misfortune of ending up involuntary celibate like /r9k/


i actually wrote a post arguing against you, but i decided to delete it and call you a faggot, you're not worth it.

...

Holla Forumspls go

You're just reinforcing his point. smh this is why I usually just shitpost and make fun of people on Holla Forums now

When was the last time you saw a child actively seek out sex with an adult?

Do kids not want to fuck adults because they're afraid of being ostracized by their parents or society?

Do you honestly believe that, even if the stigma were gone, that kids would willingly engage in sex with adults?

This whole thread is just about men justifying their attraction to kids. What the kids want is very rarely considered.

I'm not a pedo at all. The moral posturing about muh children is just fucking irritating and one-sided.

But for real, if you think children don't have any kind of sexuality you are fucking delusional. They don't seek out sex with adults, sure, but how could they when they don't even know what the fuck it is?

Not a pedo, but kids are sexual beings. Seriously, children are not innocent precious angels, and that's not even about justifying pedo behavior, it's just the fucking truth.

I never said they weren't sexual beings. I was a kid once too. I understand the process of developing sexually.

But what I did ask was: When was the last time you saw a child actively seek out sex with an adult?

yeah, its only considered when they said "he raped me!", when they say "it didnt bother me, it was fun", total information blackout, adult sent to jail and kid sent to shrink.

but i do agree, nobody even bothers asking the supposed victim, pedo spooking is also very effective because the law, as much as it says it wants to protect children, it doesn't take their word into consideration UNLESS it can be used to punish.


how are they going to seek something they're forbid from knowing?

That could only be known for certain when the stigma around pedophilia is gone.

But even then, I seriously doubt many kids would be interested in having sex with grown adults.

>your just proving my his point lololllol

I just figured out why this thread is a thing, it's so Jim will nuke this board, like how people figured companies would do by posting illegal content to sites that talked shit about them to get the sites taken down if SOPA-PIPA passed. lol

give sherlock holmes here a medal.


ok.

I wouldn't be surprised the Leftypol get's shut down and the IP addresses of the various pedo's are sent to their local law enforcement.
It's so disgusting seeing so many fucking pedophiles on this board.
All I wanted was an anti IDPOL leftist website, and this fucking place has fucking sick in the head morons justifying pedophilia, which is child abuse for men who can't have sex with people their age, so they take it out on defenceless children.
Holy fuck do I want to kill everyone in this thread for defending and justifying pedophilia because of an irrational hatred of sexual limits. Children shouldn't have sex at such an early age, that should be when they are 19, not a fucking 5 year old you perverts.

Why the fuck are people on this shit board more interested in justifying and trying to remove the "stigma" around pedophilia, then work on political change? Pedophilia should have negative stigma, it's child abuse, rape, and a vile, disgusting violation of children. People who commit it, and do so willingly should be killed. People who are pedo's who never touched a kid should received mental illness assistance. And the people in this thread should be outed by the Republican Party and shot dead. Defending pedophilia as it's "normal" because "muh spooks" and "Well, all sexual acts are justified because I said so, what are you, some christian"?

I'm very conservative in this matter, pedophila is a social evil, on the same level as rape and murder.

zero fucks given, i am free to speak my mind and i don't live in a cucked country like russia, america, or any country belonging to the EU.


if you don't like the thread why don't you hide it? its not like it was derailed into pedosexuality discussion, that was the topic of it.

Kids aren't angels, but don't encourage them to whore themselves out to the fucking gross neckbeards on Leftypol that think fucking children is "acceptable".
Children shouldn't be having sex.
Unless the fucking sick leftists here fantasize about having sex with 5 year old or 12 year old girls/boys.

Ugh, it's so revolting why Leftypol still has threads about "Pedophiles just need to be accepted".
I'd rather be a conservative.

Adorable that an apologist has crawled out of his mothers basement.
"cucked country"?
Are you a cockroach from Holla Forums?
It would explain the pedo apologist.

And you straw manned my position, and you twist it into defending pedophiles.
I don't fucking care if its 2016, the fact that it's a X current year doesn't justify evil behaviour.
And the Stirner fags will keep sending "Muh spooks" meme's.
Some sexual preferences, like abusing and perverting children should be deserving of death.
Pedophilia is child abuse, and I don't give a damm how much you are so fucked in the head to justify it.

With medicine and educating people with such degenerate desires why it's harmful to children and one's self.
It's interesting seeing so many social misfits and degenerates defending grown men having sex with children.
It isn't "sexual preference" which sounds like some leftist bullshit to justify rape and child abuse. There's a difference between two grown men that want to have a loving relationship and have consensual sex, and some Leftypol/Pol neckbeard creep that wants to justify touching kids with some "It's just muh sexual preference" bullshit.

Given the sheer level of support for pedophiles on Leftypol, i'm surprised Leftypol doesn't defend the Catholic Church and the pedo ring in the UK government.

i agree with your hot opinion.

in fact, nobody should be forced to have sex until they themselves seek it out. however, punishing people and sometimes even permanently ruining their lives because they dared to do so is retarded.

what i said is that im not going to jail for speaking about this stuff, in fact, im not going to jail for speaking about ANYTHING because, as i said, i don't live in a cucked country where thought crimes are a thing, enjoy living in a tyranny i guess.


oh right, i forgot, females are sexually liberated, men are not and should not be, give female pedos a slap on the wrist and send them home, high fives for the 14 year old that scored.

So criminalizing pedophilia is a "thought crime"?
It's incredible the depths you will go, to defend pedo's.
I never trotted out the American or Middle Eastern boogeyman. I've just been saying that pedophilia is wrong, harmful to children and something Leftypol and you shouldn't raise a flag for.
I swear you and pedo apologists sound like My Little Pony creeps who are 20 or 30 something year old men.

Actually you should be executed for defending pedo's. It's like the MRA creeps that say rape doesn't exist or women "deserve it".
I'd kill female, male, or tranny pedo's if that makes things "progressive". Only if they touch kids.
If they want to be cured of pedophilia, then they can have mental health assistance.
If they touched kids, harming them for life, then do a "i'm sorry, I need help", well I'm inclined to kill them.

...

hi Holla Forums

like being put on a watch list so that they can never get a respectable job or have a decent quality of life? they do that to teenagers who commited the "oh so horrible" crime of having sex before the magic random number.

that doesn't ruin lifes at all.

Not actually about the guy in image, but this is actually possible?

Yes, welcome to America

Is it true people end up as sex offenders for being drunk and pissing in public because it's technically flashing or something?

the price of """""freedom"""""

Yeah man. Once I got ticketed for throwing a fucking cigarette out the window and another for not signaling before changing lanes even though the road was basically empty. God damn american laws

Ironically it's the country that pioneered concentration camps that figured out the best way to eliminate repeat offenses.

Well.. That sounds like Stalinism to me… :^)

kek

Yes, yes it is possible.

Also if you serve alcohol to someone at 11:59 A.M. who is 20 years, 364 days old you can and will get arrested and sent to jail.

Yay arbitrary spooks!

P.M*

Step into the killing field lumpenprole scum.

All you fucked need a nice trip to the gulag

kill them when you find them :D

This :^)

b-b-b-but muh spooks!!! deep anal on 5 year olds totally doesn't scar them!!!!!!!

I don't know about that. I remember when I was a kid being hot for a couple of my teachers, not to mention certain adult TV stars.

If you think people should be prevented from loving each other even though they're of different race you should kill yourself

Pedophilia is natural you can't heal a pedophile if he is perfectly normal
Fuck society free my nigga jared

Yes, that's exactly what everyone in this thread has been saying…
Fucking shitposter.