Trump vs Hillary

I want Trump to win as much as the next guy, but I'm honestly beginning to worry he isn't the real deal

who should we vote for then? should we just wait for hitler? i think all of us are willing to do that.

we know who you are

Oh no, some faggot is threatening me over the interwebz. I'm so scared

I'd rather vote for Hitler at this point. At least we know he can fix a country

wtf I hate trump now.

so cool Holla Forumsro, gore will not make dedicated shills Leave, it'll only scare off normies.

forgot to sage

Honestly I don't think there's any point at all in voting. Especially since there's a chance Hillary and Trump are in this together

The more you sage, the more I bump

I got all night, and I can change my IP

...

come up with something new please

Whose images made it into my post?
I thought this shit was fixed, chodemunkey?

cool gore bro. Got any more fap material?

Cruz is out of the election. Go shill somewhere else.

...

kek

I think it's already well established that it's going to be Hillary or Trump. I'm not Shilling, I'm trying to determine if it really matters. Try broadening your mind, half-wit

You're posting gore because…?

I watch almost nothing but horror movies and love Fall Out's bloody mess perk. If you want to get rid of me, you'll have to do better than that.

kek shilling was capitalized. what an obvious fuck up.

anyway anons we should stop posting in this thread really. ctr shill's pocketbook is getting lined to the tune of fractions of a cent per reply. easier to get the mods to lock the thread if it's just a bunch of self bumps by the shill.

hope you campaigned for $15/hr minimum wage though shill, you're gonna need it with this career

It will matter a lot, Trump is a Nationalist anti globalist who is against the TPP and NAFTA, said "I'm not here to pander" at AIPAC, has fucking Goebbels as a policy adviser, and doesn't want us to start world war 3 over some shithole in the middle east.

Because cuckchan users can't handle gore and we're being flooded.
You seem a smidgen more seasoned though.

Yeah, I capitalized a random word in my sentence. That totally means something.

no

Buddy I remember when you could scroll down on Holla Forums and see nothing but gore on 4chan. The fuck are you talking about?

Remember also that it was posted there for a similar purpose but never actually worked?

it's still within the realm of possibility. denying at least that would be foolish.

one has to remember what is important and never give up on it. no matter what happens the quest for true liberty must be pursued as the forefathers intended.

there is nothing too complicated about freedom.

Lock the thread; I'll repost it. Ban my IP; I'll just switch to another one. If I were getting paid to do this, I'd be out getting high right now.

That better be a fucking morgue and not a hospital.

If that was my patient I'd throw my hands up in the air and ask them what the fuck they'd expect me to do.

Forgot to sage.
Fuck.

I think we just need a violent revolution

Anyways Trump is plan A, he's our only hope to end this peaceably. No one wants war.

If Trump loses we go to plan B, which is violence.

If you hadn't noticed, the average cuckchan user becomes physically distressed/sick/upset at the sight of gore.
I encourage you to try it over there, the results are amusing given how much has changed.

Sure OP, that's why Hillary kept campaigning against Jeb until well after he was done. Because the God Emperor was her planned opposition all along :^)

To conclude, we're banking on Trump and seeing where he takes us first before we deliberate on further action. I would like to see a plan B thread but there have been a few of them already.

i would expect nothing less knowing the people i know. how bad it has to get in order for that to happen: that is what truly scares me. i don't think i have it in me to turn my back on this republic. i know many who feel the same.

Hey, I'm not saying the entire election was their idea. I'm just saying given Trump's history of friendship with the Clintons, it's possible they planned him running away with the Republican nomination. Trump was a liberal until 5 minutes ago politically speaking. He even supported Obama in 2008

I haven't been there in a while; I'll try it sometime.

Would you want your dirty laundry from 2008 to be publicly aired?

No one *wants* to be exposed for fraud. That's why Hillary deleted those emails.

consider that he wasnt a politician until 5 seconds ago too. he was a businessman making remunerable relationships. his true loyalties will show if he is elected. he will be weighed and measured by his constituency who by every metric is flared up by his campaign rhetoric. maybe that was the intent. who knows. all i can say though, if he goes back on his word his supporters will be the first to call for his head.

Hell I distinctly remember Trump saying Hillary was doing a great job as secretary of state a few years back. Now he says she's the worst in history. I can't really argue with that, but what's he really believe?

i was already put off a little by his endorsement of Ryan. i can't understand that one.

I meant, if you were a shitlib in 2008 and changed your opinion when you found Holla Forums, would you want what you said in 2008 to be used against you?

no they won't, the god-emperor meme has passed the point of people actually giving a shit whether or not he follows through with his promises

No one wants stuff like that used against them. Especially when they're involved in politics. Isn't it a citizens job to analyze such things though?

as i recall, his message today is consistent with what he's been saying since the 80s and 90s. if it's a long con then it's a masterful one. i wouldn't give the establishment that much credit, honestly.

Consider that Trump is an older man. Older people don't normally have radical changes in ideals like Trump has.

report, sage, hide, move on

Stop.
Just post redpills.
One OP on cuckchan admitted he quit CTR when he became redpilled on Corruptillary's record.
Dump an image that summarises her corruption - e.g. that 47 people end up dead or whatever.

i sincerely hope not. people still don't like being lied to.

dude he used to be in favor of free health care. If anything his ideals from the 2000s are more inline with Bernie than they are his current ideals

Ive been offline for a few weeks, so what is CTR? I assume its another group of faggot shills

correct the record, clinton IDF

I keep telling you faggots; it's pointless to ban me

...

Trump is mentally and physically young for his age.

i can see the biggest threat being Neocons co-opting his platform. i'm just not quite to the point of understanding how.

hah no

Oligarchy is rule by a select few. It's well established that America has become one. The only people who won't see it are Americans and naive fools

Did you even read my post faggot?

So CIDF? What does the correct the record mean in this context?

I'm not buying into that.

The republican party is the neocon party, that's the problem.

no not free. a well administered system would possibly seem "free". but cmon. econ 101 TINSTAAFL. wanting to get to the root cause of,ridiculous healthcare costs doesn't make one a socialist. maybe a pragmatist at best.

He's the youngest behaving 70 year old I've ever seen.

oh i agree 100%. since maybe bush sr it's been a zog fest. sickening.

Never said he was socialist; I said he was liberal. Bernie is barely a socialist. You want socialist; look at fucking Venezuela.

Maybe that you've seen, but not I.

TOTALLY NOT ASTROTURFING GUISE

have CTRs jimmmies been rustled by us having them under surveillance?

hahahahaha
no

That's a fucking sweet dagger user. Obviously Arab in origin, but do you have any specific information on it?

You've got it confused. It's normalfags and shills that are bothered by gore. Not discouraging goreposting by any means here, just clarifying that you're not driving away who you think you are by doing so.

Exactly; I used to plaster pages with gore back in the good old days.

true enough.

i can't persecute the guy for having ideas from across the aisle though. negotiation requires some give and take. being good at it means you take more than you give while convincing the other party you've dealt squarely.

Fuck off CTR

Well no one's saying we should label him a lib yet. I'm just saying it's a possibility we shouldn't ignore.

couldn't agree more. eternal vigilance is the mark of a free man.

What are we all going to do if Trump is just more of the same trash we've been dealing with? Our democracy is broken; what can we do?

"Societies exist under three forms sufficiently distinguishable. 1. Without government, as among our Indians. 2. Under governments wherein the will of every one has a just influence, as is the case in England in a slight degree, and in our states in a great one. 3. Under governments of force: as is the case in all other monarchies and in most of the other republics. To have an idea of the curse of existence under these last, they must be seen. It is a government of wolves over sheep. It is a problem, not clear in my mind, that the 1st. condition is not the best. But I believe it to be inconsistent with any great degree of population. The second state has a great deal of good in it. The mass of mankind under that enjoys a precious degree of liberty and happiness. It has it's evils too: the principal of which is the turbulence to which it is subject. But weigh this against the oppressions of monarchy, and it becomes nothing. Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. Even this evil is productive of good. It prevents the degeneracy of government, and nourishes a general attention to the public affairs. I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical." - Jefferson to James Madison, January 30, 1787

we listen to our forefathers

I couldn't agree more. But Americans are probably the laziest and apathetic people on the planet; how can we get them off their couches and fight for their freedom?

things have to get BAD. really really bad. i fear those times more than what would follow.

"If there was hope, it MUST lie in the proles, because only there in those swarming disregarded masses, 85 per cent of the population of Oceania, could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated. The Party could not be overthrown from within. Its enemies, if it had any enemies, had no way of coming together or even of identifying one another. Even if the legendary Brotherhood existed, as just possibly it might, it was inconceivable that its members could ever assemble in larger numbers than twos and threes. Rebellion meant a look in the eyes, an inflexion of the voice, at the most, an occasional whispered word. But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength. would have no need to conspire. They needed only to rise up and shake themselves like a horse shaking off flies. If they chose they could blow the Party to pieces tomorrow morning. Surely sooner or later it must occur to them to do it? And yet ——!"

Orwell's 1984

the words and ideas of the great men who gave us this nation are being buried in the noise of feckless squabbling. THEIR message needs to be revived and amplified.

show me then faggot, how is this not an astroturfing campaign, same shit spammed everywhere

yep, i'm the shill
that was sarcasm, if you didn't catch on you colossal faggot

The media would not attack him like this if that were the case.

Sure they would. The more you attack something; the more fanatic supporters defend it.

No one trusts the media, and I think they realize that

i love orwell but i've never been caused to lose hope. freedom is a state of mind first, then an outward expression. there are many who do not deserve it because they tske it for granted to such a degree it is meaningless to them. but if for my freedom they must have it too snd squander it, i would still fight for mine and my children's.

to clairify; those that do trust the media tend to support Hillary

We can't lose hope. There has to be some way to wake up America. But how?

just because Trump has to submit to a few kikes because he's fucking over "The Order of the Kikes" means little

If it is their plan, it's fucking stupid and is just creating a resurgence of nationalism.. Perhaps they want to accelerate aggression against European-blood? Well.. Thanks for bringing us together I suppose.

inducements. it has to matter more to them than the litany of lies they consume or the vapid distractions that render them inert. you have to take things away to give them something to fight for. decadence has made us weak. you'll notice patriots tend to live simply.

Most of his political stances have been consistent for decades. You're a retarded gay niggerfaggot and I can see your nose from a mile away.

Don't you see? This could be what they want. They already control our politics; what makes you think they won't manipulate us into a nation of ironic fascists?

Then all that has to be done is remove irony.

YES PLEASE

If that's true, how do you explain this?

Marines are denied comforts by design. it is one large thing that makes them fight so well. focused, pissed off, motivated. at least when i was in. don't know how it is now.

Pretty much this dude

If they give us an inch, take a fucking yard. Also, as Napoleon says, “Never interfere with your enemy when he is making a mistake.”

falling for propaganda. tsk tsk.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Come back when you've got a real source, bitch nigger

youtube.com/watch?v=OCabT_O0YSM

Not the good kind of fascist. I mean the fascism that *doesn't* give power to it's people

Colbert's a hack, but there's still plenty of evidence that Trump is playing you like a fiddle

Fucking this

That was the same type of shit Reagan pulled, no matter what he did he was still fucking worshiped by his voting base. So much so that they are still defending him to this day.

Trump wasn't a huge fan of Reagan either, so I think he knows bullshit when he sees it. I'm voting for Trump but we have to realistically hold his feet to the fire without letting the media dominate the narrative.

I fail to see how Colbert matters. All I see is Trump vs Trump

i read his book, you won't sway me, but why is it so unbelievable to you people that someone would choose power over political sentiment?

you ever heard of this dude

machiavelli?

Donald Trump wouldn't be one to fuck over the people no matter how much he must submit.

Perhaps if they brought forward someone else, but do you really think at that point they'd be able to slip through without us calling out on them?

We've been doing this for years on the internet already, if the rise of the people continues then so do we. And with that, we'll cull the illegitimate.

Is this truly the rise of the people, or is it only us sinking so far that we don't remember which way is up?

it depends on what we do with whatever power we manage to claim.

kys

I'm actually voting for Trump even though he is a zionist good goy, Hillary would be much worse…lesser of two evils

This isn't reddit, you faggot. We're not triggered. Hell, I doubt even tumblr would be triggered by your antics.

Given the choice, I'd rather have Trump. At least when he fucks everything up he wouldn't get a pass for being the first woman president. Hillary would be like Obama all over again, with all the libs saying "if you criticize her, you must be sexist!"

I know how you're feeling, but the days of an honest republic of intellectuals are coming to an end. Just take pride in knowing that we gave it a good run.

And remember deep down that might is always right, and that it is always wise to be on the right side of history.

Trump is all we got left at this point.

op is a communist faggot

I just want to preserve my rights. Second amendment is the most important right now. You don't get to be president nowadays without being a globalist shill on some level. The powers that be would never allow it, that being said I do believe Trump will preserve our rights better than Shillary.

pic related is trump touching the kike baby growing in his daughters womb eew

forgot pic

Whenever I bring up machiavelli libshits just tell me it's satire. In one of my college classes we had to discuss how "The Prince" was satire. I feel like we got a shitty translation that was made out to look like that.

Wow, I wonder why he did that :^)

If Hilldog was Trump's friend the he wouldn't be verbally raping her every chance he gets, shining a massive spotlight on her crimes, getting people to chant "lock her up", and otherwise destroying her reputation.

He hates her and Bill's guts. He was playing the game in that interview because he needed to get shit built.

There is such a thing as acting; and Trump is one hell of a showman

we have each other, user. fatalism is for leftists.

It's not there yet… But, whichever it may be is entirely up to you if you really wish to pursue these goals in the real world. It starts with those who realize they can do something.

The iron is becoming hotter and hotter. It's up to you to strike it or let it grow cold once more. Simply being an advocate for the fight in which you believe in is a great start.

It doesn't have to be whatever normies associate with "fascism", you're American. That in itself is supposed to be a call for what's right for your nation and fighting through thick and thin. How did Alexander the Great conquer the East? How did Attila master most of the known world? How did Rome triumph over insufferable odds? How did Hitler deliver a righteous blow to those that done his people wrong?

It's always about the subjects, the people and how you manifest their true allegiance and union to their kind. If the goals for 'tricking' America is a fake sense of nationalism, then it is not only up to you to set it right, but an utter mistake of stupidity in their part for giving you a chance. So..? Take the chance and inspire some fucking people.

It's almost like he is part of a certain class of people who give donations and lip-service for political pandering :^)

Ivanka isn't a jew, therefore her children can never be jews. Read the kike rules, user.

It isn't fair. I wish we could rise up and kill the fuckers who run our lives. Even if it meant 100 years of poverty, it would make me feel better that the bastards who stole our country are either dead or suffering too.

Tell me why communism is stupid.

Yes. Now he isn't. See how that works?

Yeah, just like how if a coalburner gets knocked up by a nignog the child will be 100% white because "reasons". Also Ivanka converted to Judaism…

Typical Hitlercucks. Everyone knows Adolf is owned by the (((Industrialists))).

Conveniently stops it just like that? Gee I guess years of bribing democrat politicians won't have any effect on his actual politics

That's why I said "we" instead of "I", this is what separates us from the egoistic leftists.

I don't have to. Look at the USSR. They aren't still here, are they?

"Tell me why communism is stupid."

oooo son you hurt my brain

too funny. epic keks.

neither of them were the OP. That's a samefag. They both even saged

You failed to get the point of that post. OP's picture make me skeptical.

There is no samefagging here, we have thread IDs.

A goy who converts to judaism is a goy. You're not a kike unless your mother is genetically a kike.

I'm not a communist. I just want America to be free again. Forgive me for my skepticism, but I'm not sure I trust Trump. He's better than Hillary, but that's not saying much

read the 48 laws of power

it's not satire

it's just like the libshits say Nietzsche is a rayciss and they even claim that the Will doesn't exist

they are denying your god.

That's definitely understandable, but there's been enough discussion to dampen however the OP feels.

Perhaps he's on the cusp of understanding reality and needed to question someone that knew what they were saying?

Think before you post user, communism starts with anarchy.

...

You've made literally no mention to why his policies are better. It's almost as if you aren't a nationalist and don't care about border security or banning muslims.

Does it really make a difference? My point is that Trump and his family have ties to Zionists and he is 100% kosher. If anyone fails to see this it is pure cognitive dissonance because the facts are right in front of your face.

nationalism has its purpose but taken to its logical conclusion is in fact antithetical to the design of the republic. if you have 5 minutes to consider:

americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/nationalism_versus_federalism.html

just as a talking point i suppose. it's fine to have a strong identity which strengthens bonds between countrymen. but centralization of power goes against everything (i assume) the average Holla Forumslack stands for.

It didn't.

Your attempt to sound like an intellectual is noted, leftist.

Ethnic nationalism is meant to preserve the ethnicity. So no.

why would it?

why would HIM buying THEM change his choices?

the master does not bend to the whims of the slave

come on, man you're not even trying.

Would you rather us continue to live as slaves? I want us to rebuild democracy. Capitalism is what drives America, and everyone knows communism doesn't work. Is it just your role to badmouth everyone who suggests Trump may not be who he says he is?

good fucking luck with that one

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

...

I think Trump is more of a rational conservative who wants to govern the nation with common sense while the states do all the debating.

I wouldn't know what I choose. I'd side with nationalism or anything that stands shoulder to shoulder with it. My nature in this is either to lead or to dive face first into it all.

This is the next stage in history, in sake of all our history itself. There's only one place I stand.

I am actually going to ditch the thread now. Good talks man.

I don't care about his policies. I care about freedom. All I see is a lack there of and squabbling over who is right. Well I have news for you; Republicans and Democrats both suck equally.

We're slaves? Democracy is good?

it means the US will never be an ethnostate

It's really not frequently used on 8/pol/.
maybe cuck/pol/.

So you don't care about deporting spics and banning muslims.

Freedom without order is tantamount to slavery.

as it is the States are cucked beyond belief. we owe that to corruption and the engorged federal fiscal teat. i'd like to see that turned around. they are supposed to operate on almost all fronts as sovereign entities.

Yes. Ivanka and her kids will never be accepted as members of the tribe. Goyim are goyim no matter what. Kushner's family is probably pissed as fuck at him for racemixing lel

The God Emperor is 0% kosher. You think the lugenpresse is a blind panic because Trump is a kosher zionist? Rabbi please, your weak trickery insults me.

I am leaving the thread, but I do have this question.

Wouldn't the prospect of a few balkanized ethno-states for the main races of America be effective..?

Not with your defeatist attitude.

...

We're Americans. Democracy is what our nation was founded on. And yes, we are slaves. Open your eyes and see the world around you, user.

Whoever banned me is funny. Did you miss the part where I said I have VPN?

i have no idea. maybe. probably not considering you'd have to relocate millions if not billions of people to establish this.

The US is already segregated for the most part. After millions of shitskins get deported it'll be one step closer to an ethnostate.

One step at a time, user. One step at a time.

wrong, son. read your constitution.

No it isn't. Are you a lolbergtarian? You sound like a lolbergtarian.

That's a blatant lie. We're as much of a Democracy as the Roman Republic was.

THIS

What I want to ban is bribing politicians. You take my 100 years of poverty statement too seriously. Learn about hyperboles, dumbass

You're obviously a huge faggot.

i've had the sense that race wars are a convenient tool to be pushed to throw this place into chaos. chaos ends badly. we know this.

See my earlier post

It's late user, I'll let the other fellas here give you a crash course on democracy and capitalism.

We were as democratic as a nation our size could be in the 1700s. Not my fault we haven't changed our electoral process.

nice argument.

I guess the words out of Trumps mouth aren't an adequate source. Also if you haven't noticed the media and nearly everything on this planet are controlled by an elite group of globalist and Zionists. The two party system is designed to narrow your choices down to two puppets.

Yet I'm still here. Fuck off faggot

Yes, you're still here, and you should fuck off.

Well I'm not going anywhere; especially if it makes you so butthurt

imagine if legislators could only serve two terms. imagine if lobbies were significantly curbed in how much power they had over capturing the interests of the elected.

If racial strife spins out of control and shit hits the fan, it'll end with white people standing atop a large pile of dead shitskins.

The kikes really haven't thought this through.

Democracy is not a good thing. It's mob rule, most people are fucking stupid. It's a necessary evil, a limited feature. I have no interest in democracy, I prefer aristocracy over democracy and oligarchy. Have you even read Aristotle's Politics? The founding fathers did.

it might be fun to fantasize, but reality usually tastes like shit when that path is chosen

We can just shitpost your entire thread if you want that.

imagine if op was a faggot, it's easy if you try

Perhaps I should've used the term "Republicanism." We can debate about the effectiveness of this system all night; it doesn't change the fact that it served us well in the 20th century

kind of like democracy, sounds nice in theory, but turns out it's pretty ugly in practice

Go ahead buddy. Make things interesting.

A republic, that limits democracy.

nice one.

Do you want to have a real debate or debate semantics?

So he was merely pretending to like the Clintons for business reasons, just he's said? Okay user, glad we could reach an agreement :^)

Trump fucked up the system. Now the choice is a ZOP puppet or a real human bean.

It's not semantics faggot. Democracy is bullshit.

When have the brown hordes not gotten absolutely rekt in a violent conflict against whites?

So you say. Representative Democracy still works.

...

ZOG puppet. How the Christ did I make that typo?

Jesus Christ, Holla Forums, Keep it together

I do find pretty suspicious that whenever whenever any of them get a lead some shit happens, like they are trying to make this the closest possible thing,

Specially considering Trump was a friend of Hillary and a Republican at some point, he even took Bill Clinton's side in the past a couple of times. However I'm also wondering how well is it working in case Trump and Hillary are working together, as it stands now, I would be willing to bet for a ruckus from either side no matter who wins.

With a senate, a house of representatives, and a president, yes. I bet you zero understanding of why those three exist and what they really represent. It's not about democracy.

Notice how you can talk all of this shit and not get arrested for badmouthing our system. That's what I like about America. I fear that freedom of speech leaving us as we spiral further and further into tyranny

Prove he ever was.

I bet you like freedom of religion too.

the fuck should i know? are you prescient now?

Freedom of speech is cancer.

Then what is it about?

billions? we're talking about the US.

Moving niggers in the South to a state in the South (if not voluntarily) and moving/letting European-blooded Americans go to whatever the fuck doesn't sound like such a travesty to me

I don't mean the entire continent either. It could be a voluntary thing procured with funding programs and political action to remove all other races from said ethnostates.

I think letting the stupid black nationalists fuck off to some monkey-hole state for them to try and conspire becoming whatever they think they'd become would be funny, because after time it would just become another shithole. They devolve into terrorists because fuck whitey and then guess what? Holy war against the lesser of their kind.

The ones the stay in the normal states would be so much harder pressed to assimilate and not be niggers, it would be like a massive eugenics program for the African-American.

"Whites" on the other hand, it would just be what we asked for. Because we're not barbarians.

It's just basic logic.

We shouldn't enforce thoughtcrime

Notice how you have the right to say that

Let me rephrase that, user.

Whites have always decimated shitskins when they came into conflict with each other. If an actual race war breaks out, who do you think is going to win?

imagine if every politician had to face trial at the end of every term

Combining aristocracy, monarchy and democracy into one.

Cool :^)

Freedom of speech is cancer.

youtube.com/watch?v=iaBDgPMzLuE

Come on user, everyone knows this already

cool story bro

"Persecution for the expression of opinions seems to me perfectly logical. If you have no doubt of your premises or your power, and want a certain result with all your heart, you naturally express your wishes in law, and sweep away all opposition. To allow opposition by speech seems to indicate that you think the speech impotent, as when a man says that he has squared the circle, or that you do not care wholeheartedly for the result, or that you doubt either your power or your premises.
But when men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas – that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market, and that truth is the only ground upon which their wishes safely can be carried out.
That, at any rate, is the theory of our Constitution. It is an experiment, as all life is an experiment. Every year, if not every day, we have to wager our salvation upon some prophecy based upon imperfect knowledge. While that experiment is part of our system, I think that we should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death, unless they so imminently threaten immediate interference with the lawful and pressing purposes of the law that an immediate check is required to save the country."

theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/what-george-washington-thought-about-the-constitution/247688/

Muslims should be banned because they're exploiting our freedom of religion. Fuck your sense of freedom.

I wasn't even referencing that, I was referencing his views on Israel.

I guess… if you really want to believe that a system that has near total control of the populous would allow that to happen. If you really believe that the matrix is a lie and that the election is really not just a distraction that promotes the illusion of choice to placate you.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the whole point of the United States was to break away from a system that incorporated all of those elements into one; the British Empire

Nope. That's a lie. We didn't have a problem with monarchy, just one bad monarch.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olive_Branch_Petition

We wouldn't have a president if we didn't like one-man rule.

interesting. well i'm going to live wherever the fuck i want.

Explain how freedom of speech isn't cancer, (((user))).

How about we just stop the PC BS and restore our freedom of speech so we have the right to freely bash Muslims for the troubles they cause. We should also wipe out ISIS and make an example of all of their supporters.

You're deflecting. I was talking about freedom of religion, which muslims are exploiting therefore we should stop enforcing it.

That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. The President doesn't hold all of the power in America. He doesn't even hold most. The past few years of Obummer getting cockblocked by congress should be enough evidence of that

Your post is cancerous hate speech, which means you're going to prison.
I too hate free speech.

The system didn't allow us to have a choice between a ZOG puppet or a real human bean. But Trump broke the system and gave us that choice.

Which is why the system is going apeshit.

muslims should be banned because their ideology precludes them from necessary civil loyalties. it really is that simple.

...

Why don't we just use our freedom of speech to call them out on it? Seems like a better solution than giving way towards a Christian ruled nation.

So freedom of religion has it's exceptions . . . which can easily apply to all other freedoms too.

And you probably should, such an event would mean great news for anyone in the normal states.

Words mean nothing without action. They need to be banned and deported.

While the Convention was intended merely to revise the Articles of Confederation, the objective of its leaders was to create a new government. One vigorous debate surrounded whether the government's executive should be a single person or a board of three. Eventually a clear majority voted for a single executive based on the knowledge that Washington would probably be the first President. As a result, the presidency was written with Washington's honor and patriotism in mind, permitting him to define more clearly the office once he was elected. After the Convention, Washington's strong support convinced many to vote in favor of ratification.

there was almost a presidency consisting of a committee of 3. they trusted Washington so much and he was a veritable bad ass general. the English propensity for a monarch was evident still.

Doesn't mean much in the face of the party of no. Explain why gridlock happens

if there were no exceptions, then there would be nothing to debate for 240 years.

None of what you just said counters anything I said. The US wasn't anti-monarchy, just had a gripe with King George III. I could easily see us having a dictatorship in the future.

Free speech gives me the legel protection to the things that I say. But it also gives kikes and their leftist golems the legal protection to spread cultural marxism.

Free speech is therefore cancer.

It needs to be abolished and leftwing speech needs to become a crime.

Holy shit, you don't know how executive action works, do you?

We don't need to ban anyone, we just need to get rid of those who cause trouble. Muslims were never a problem for America until recent years. The problem is the liberals made people too scared to call out Muslims for the shitty things they do

i was actually attempting to reinforce what you said

Again, we're not talking about debates. We're talking about forceful deportations.

...

Oh.

I do. Will you explain how gridlock happens or not?

Fuck

you wouldn't have to go that far, user. you're imagining the state of affairs in China right now. i can assure you, it is not a happy place.

We need to ban muslims, radical islamic terrorism has caused the bloodiest shootout in American history this year. Fuck your sense of freedom.

so set up a premise. it is either imperative to protect the lives of naturalized citizens, or it is imperative to protect the rights of foreign infiltrators.

the comparison is laughable.

They're already implementing hate speech laws. Freedom of speech doesn't even exist anymore. The bill of rights is fucking dead. The civil war is upon us.

We need to ban all religion, but since no one will agree with that we shouldn't ban any. That's a slippery slope, and I've no interest in living in a Christian theocracy. We should just deport the trouble makers.

So you're arguing for Trump then. Seems like there is a fundamental difference between the canidates.

There shouldn't be any hate speech laws. That ruins freedom of speech. Everyone should be able to say what they will, even if it offends everyone.

No, just Islam, stop being retarded. Christians don't do this shit.

Crusades

Too late. Clinton is totally for it and so is a large amount of the US. It's already happened. Freedom of speech is already dead.

lol, give me an example in the 21st century

Christians don't do this? Is that why we've been leveling their hospitals with drones?

Well that's a problem, isn't it?

That wasn't in the name of god retard.

on this point, yes. it is the center of his campaign. we are at a point where we have to make a choice. this "everything for everyone" happy bullshit is NOT a realizable thing. nations exist to look out for their own. societies survive because of this behavior. it doesn't have to be rooted in fear or hate. simply pragmatism. it could get ugly, but what is really at stake?

The point is that you're arguing for something that's already gone. We've crossed the Rubicon faggot.

It was still mostly Christians

not an argument

Fear isn't always irrational and hate is a form of live.

You say that like we should just give up. If you're going to be such a defeatist, why don't you just kill yourself already?

He asked for an example of Christians murdering people with bombs. He never established for what reason

There were no religious motives, it was secular. You might as well say that the Iran-Iraq war was religious, and that Saddam was a caliphate.

okay fine, we're talking about inducements again. i get that. my point is, whatever it's labeled is has to make sense in some measurable way. which it seems to.

In any case, all religion is bullshit. If we're going to ban one, might as well ban them all. Since we can't do that, leave it alone.

I don't care about freedom of speech though. I just care about the preservation of white people, and fixing up my country. Freedom is nothing without order.

ahhh the all or nothing point of view. so digital.

I'm not sensing any argument remotely relevant to the original point of your OP. Keep to a single train of thought faggot.

are you suggesting that order comes before freedom?

lol, so you're a communist faggot then, that's what I thought, no. Islam is the enemy of the west, not Christianity.

I don't care what you say you freedom hating faggot. As it happens I don't believe in thought crime'

They are actually the same thing: power.

checked and rekt. fuck my life into pieces. okay.

Your priority is freedom, mine is more concrete and practical.

Just because I'm an atheist does not mean I'm a communist. You've got some work to do with your brain there.

I'm an atheist myself. But banning all religions is fucking communist-tier and Islam is the enemy, Christianity has done nothing to induce my intolerance and discrimination towards it.

don't insult people, you might hurt someone's feelings.

Why don't we just kill ISIS and everyone who even shows minor support for them? That seems like a better option than simply sending them all to the middle east where their hatred for us will just grow.

ISIS is just Islam in it's raw form. Moderates are just ISIS in hiding. Frankly banning them is not enough, they need to exterminated.

Well guess what; we can't ban religion. I established this already. There should be no such thing as thoughtcrime. Can you think of a better insult than communist already? This is getting boring

the first step would be punishing our own who allowed them to exist in the first place.

gents, i am bushwhacked. it's been a pleasure.

YES WE CAN FAGGOT, ESPECIALLY THE ONE THAT FORCES YOU TO BE APART OF IT

Or we could just exterminate the radicals and make an example of all who support them. Then the Middle East can go back to normal; the way it was before we screwed everything up

You should be punished for being so fucking retarded.

You mean Christianity? They've been indoctrinating Children since day one, and claim all who do not follow their beliefs will burn for eternity

The 'radicals' are the only ones being consistent with their religion. The whole religion is a threat to our existence.

We should simply kill those who try to force us to follow their ways

Christianity is apart of western tradition and most of their adherents are white.

Would you accept that the Westboro Baptist Church are the only ones consistent with their religion?

The commies in Russia were white too. Your point?

Again, we have entirely different priorities. All I care about is exterminating non-whites so we can take their land. Forcing people doesn't enter the question, they need to fucking die.

Christianity comes from the middle east, lad.

Their anti-faggotry is pretty based. I don't really care in general.

So because it belongs to our culture it's ok? I see how your inward thinking ideals work now

I know. It's a fact of reality that it's now embedded in Western culture.

You want extermination of all other races; I want freedom for Americans. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree

Jews have been a part of western culture for a long time. Should we just accept that as tradition?

Christians acquiesced to captialism, commies don't allow a fucking market to exist.

Non-white americans aren't real Americans to me. They're just visiting.

I thought it was the Jews who ruled over Capitalism. Isn't that what your idol Hitler said?

Why not?

China needs better censorship priorities, but the leftist butthurt they cause makes my dick hard

Yes, it's called preference based on ethnicity, aka racism.

The key difference is judaism is an ethno-religion.

Well at least you're straight up about it

And what of white Americans? Will you simply accept the oppression of our people?

>>>/liberty/

I like Hitler but he's not my idol, I don't have an idol. I don't think jews 'rule' over capitalism, they just own a disproportionate amount of it's businesses. They need to die because they're not white, I don't care if they didn't rule it at all.

Are you lost?

No, I just don't care about racism. You have as much a right to your ideals as I.

Holy fuck you sound so leftypol right now. No, I want white people to rule the world and expand into outer space, with non-whties out of the picture. That's it. This thread is so fucking exhausted.

If you aren't racist then you no right to anything but a lamp post and a shallow grave.

A right is just an arbitrary claim to power. Neither of us have rights that we can't enforce.

...

You're right and I'm wrong. If you're white and you're christian and I'm okay with that, if you're white and a muslim or a jew then you're a fucking traitor. It's that simple.

Well guess what; we're all oppressed. White, black, it doesn't matter; we're all slaves. Anyone who doesn't see this hasn't been paying attention.

This is why we have the 2nd amendment; so we can kill freedom hating fuckers like you

I don't care if non-whites are oppressed. Fuck them, they don't care about me, and I don't care about them. Very little is oppressing me and as soon as that's taken care of I'm happy to not just oppress non-whites but rather just off them out of existence entirely. That seems both logical and the best thing for my people in the long run.

The second amendment doesn't protect you. Owning a gun protects you retard.

lel tell me how I'm oppressed

Nah, we have have the 2nd amendment to protect ourselves against non-whites and a jew-infested government

what about the oppressed whites like you and I?

It's a good thing I have plenty of guns

If you can't see our obvious oppression for yourself, I can't help you. Open your eyes, sheep

I think 'oppressed' is pure leftist hyperbole. And what about us? You aren't fighting on our team if you're going to protect everyone else. You're the one who needs to pick a side.

cool story

Hahahahahahahahahaha

So in other words I'm not oppressed.

picking sides is what divided America in the first place. The oligarchy is playing you two groups of retards against eachother so you don't see how badly they're fucking you together.

...

believe what you want to. we're fed lies on a daily basis, no one can really afford college without some miracle, and our rights are being eroded away. But we aren't oppressed, right? No one controls the country other than white voters, right/

You just sound like a communist faggot when you talk like this. America was meant for white people only. You don't even know who the real Americans are.

npiamerica.org/research/category/what-the-founders-really-thought-about-race

This entire election should be a big fucking wake up call about the state of our nation.

...

Communist communist communist, do you know no other insult? Have some creativity, half-wit

Like how racism is bad. White people shouldn't be allowed to own their own country but Israel, the Chinese, Indian and Africans can?

That means you don't have rights retard. You never had them. Rights are a claim to power. What are you gonna do faggot? Join your local Right-Wing death squad!

so you acknowledge our oppression then?
this dumbfuck doesn't see it

Sure user, I'm just so oppressed you can't explain how I'm oppressed :^)

I'm not oppressed. You're just a retarded lolberg slash commie.

At least read the article. And yes, communist bullshit will not be tolerated, we didn't win the Cold War for nothing.

I'm not oppressed, so no. The jewish oligarchy actually doesn't do anything to oppress me personally.

But they're still going in the oven.

Racism isn't bad; it's retarded. You know someone is stupid when they think one color monkey is better than the other.

I never denied that white people are being limited in this country by the powers that be.

Don't you accept evolutionary theory?

Take a look around you, blind man.

Fuck your article, and fuck you freedom hater.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Time for facts.

...

Your troll is weak, as it has been the whole time. Let the grownups talk, boy

...

...

I do. I don't follow that one color monkey is any better than the other. We're all equally retarded.

So you didn't read the article? Don't be so close-minded. READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE

Well shit.

look at the racist telling me not to be closed mined

I don't care about what people who lived over 200 years ago thought about race. That was a different time

Explain how I'm oppressed :^)

lel

Am I detecting some sodium?

To believe that we're equal is wishful thinking. You sound more like a Christian than you realize.

Racism is open minded. Not being racist is ignorant and close minded.

Unless you want to equate modern Christians to the Crusaders, in which case I'll happily entertain the idea that America was intended to be racist

I'm open to the idea of everyone being equal, it's how I was raised. Science proves otherwise, as well as common sense. Don't be a bigot.

Equality is a funny word. No one is equal, but no one man is more important than anyone else. We're all just humans

Those are the same people who came up with America, surely it can't be all that far-fetched to be a racist and be intellectual about it. Besides, the time we're living in now isn't all that great or as open-minded as theirs.

That's a beautifully relevant quote for my favorite factual falcon

We're all simply another animal. Humans are the only ones so self important to believe that they're the smartest, and so comes the problem with race.

That's where equality ends. There are fundamental differences that separate us, and segregation by race is perfectly natural.

Please watch this, please.

No one's saying white people aren't animals. We're just more sophisticated and conducive towards complex civilization/technology than any other type of human.

I don't believe in equality. Not all men are equal, but all men are men. I do not believe in equality, I believe in tolerance and cooperation. If I were to have a feeling of superiority over anyone, it is the dull minded. They are the real detriment to our society, not racial diversity

Give me a list of animals that achieved manned space flight. I'll start:

1. Humans.

:^)

The problem would disappear if subhumans fucked off back to their own lands. or were purged

So does Sweden. Ask them how well that's going.

Some of us are stronger than others, some of us are smarter than others, some of us are more social and charismatic than others. Skin color is only representative of heritage, not qualities. I won't deny blacks aren't normally as smart as whites, but they are normally more athletic. There are smart blacks, and dumb whites. Equality is a lie, but race isn't what defines our strengths

Equality is on a basis of similarity, so the latter statement is a reinforcement of the former. Not all men are the same and therefore deserve to be treated the same.

Tolerance of what? And why cooperate when it makes more sense to dominate.

this depends on realism, and realistically speaking white people do have the best argument

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and_trust_within_communities

We're also the only animals dumb enough to create a means of destroying ourselves and everything else on this planet.

"Smart" niggers are always the product of white genetic admixture. Show me a purebred nignog that an IQ above literal retard-tier.

You mean smart enough.

Why cooperate? Because that is easier and more practical than domination. Why wage war by race when we can just build side by side?

One is not exclusive to the other. People developed differently in different places, white people somehow came out of a harsh environment with the most advanced society, and everyone else lagged behind. You can't deny that that entails innate differences.

I don't think that's pure coincidence. That's genetic.

Not entirely, but I really doubt your giving it enough credit.

Just because it took immense creativity to create something doesn't make it a good idea

White or asian genetic admixture, I should say.

The brown hordes aren't interested in cooperating with you. You're part of the out-group.They're inly interested in killing you and stealing your shit.

You mean smart enough. Power is dangerous, you are right about that.

Not necessarily, you have to actually try to make this argument, at face value it seems like bullshit. If we're the most advanced then everyone else is simply taking up potential lebensraum.

We advanced out of necessity. Given different circumstances, other races could've evolved technology the same way

lel

Just because something is a bad idea doesn't mean it didn't take enormous amounts of intelligence to pull off.

You're arguing with feels. The logical part of your brain is shut off.

The ghetto ones are, and that's because they're uneducated morons. I've no qualms about you exterminating them, but there are decent black people. To deny this is to deny reality

That begs the question as to why others didn't given their similarity to our circumstances. I'd say it has more to do with genetic mutations and culture than mere geography. But let's give in to your argument: why shouldn't I prefer my own people if others are doing the same? Only Europe and North America are doing the whole 'multiculturalism' thing. When we came into other lands that was 'colonialism.' So what's the real difference?

We have creative intelligence and adaptability. Try living the life of a squirrel; it takes more intelligence than you realize. We simply have hands adapted for crafting tools, and brains developed to share thoughts. Humans are the best at cooperation and invention. That's where are superior intellect ends

99% of them are. You can cooperate with a handful of genetically smarter brown individuals, smart enough to realize that killing the caretakers of civilization is probably a bad idea in the long run, but cooperating with them as a group? lolno

Cooperating with the subhuman hordes is not an option because they don't give you that option.

The difference is the rest of the world lagging behind. Notice how Europe and America were the first to embrace multiculturalism

Very few, and they will, by default, breed more low IQ black people. Again, logic necessitates their extermination. I'm not working on logic though, it's a matter of preference, and you haven't been wakened up to 'racial consciousness' yet. I empathize with that.

So we should help them out and send white people over to their continents? Give them some racial diversity? Is that what you're suggesting?

Why not just kill all of the stupid people? That would eliminate low IQ populations, black and white alike

user, stop. The jews have poisoned your mind with hatred for your own species.

I'm hundreds of times smarter than a squirrel by every conceivable measure. Even you're smarter than a squirrel barely lel

They aren't stupid because they're black, they're stupid because stupidity is what drives people to breed like rabbits. This is true among all races

I don't hate my own species. I just appreciate us for what we are, with out the delusion of our superiority

I'm totally cool with eugenics. If your measurement for intelligence is IQ, then we'll just end up kill all the non-whites, besides Asians, anyway.

You'd end up with nothing but whites and asians left, and like 10 niggers.

That's wishful thinking. IQ is inheritable, smart black people still breed stupid ones.

The stupid whites need to go too. Everyone who's stupid needs to die; they hold our species back

Clean the kikery from your brain.

Smart black people who breed with other smart black people will breed smart babies. It's how evolution work. The blacks can evolve too, like any other animal

By stupid, I'm going to guess you mean low IQ, in which case you aren't referring to that many white people. I sense the sarcasm.

Trust me, there is no shortage of dumb whites.

What you're talking about would take way too long for me to care for, and I have no interest in helping them anyway. They're taking up lebensraum and even the few smart ones give birth to stupid ones. They need to go.

I'm talking about IQ, not your pretentious perception of your own people, peekasso.

I ask myself everyday; why are people so fucking stupid? Black, white, it doesn't matter. Stupid is what plagues our society

You know what the bell curve is?

I'm talking about IQ as well. You don't believe there are many stupid whites? Stupid people are the most abundant kind of people; especially in America

Genetic inheritance isn't like Pokemon breeding, you retard.

...

They aren't. People are pretty smart on average. Non-people like niggers, pajeets, and goatfuckers, on the other hand…

Well of course the most backwards parts of the world have low average IQs. Africa is a shitty place, and the people who live there are pretty much useless

The backwards and stupid parts of the world are backwards and stupid because they also happen to be the non-white parts of the world.

They live like it's the god damn stone age there. I'll agree most of the people there need to die. It isn't their race though, it's their backwards culture

They aren't backwards by accident. They were given thousands of years to get on our level and they just can't do it. Which suggests something innate about Africans, does it not? Even in America they revert to a pathetic way of life.

Then why is China smarter?

The latter is a reflection of the former.

Only because they're pushed into the ghettos. Those who live in well off suburban populations act like everyone else there in all of my experiences

They have a backwards culture because they're a backwards race.

They failed to evolve because intellectualism isn't valued in the jungle; breeding and survival is.

A. Your experiences are anecdotal and therefore arbitrary and can be made up, or legitimate counter-examples or made up ones can be used. B. They're not forced into poverty. They have opportunities they refuse to take.

It isn't. Some Chinese are smart. Probably. Who knows with all the cheating they do. But most of them are dog-eating, sewer-oil drinking dipshits.

That map says otherwise. Higher average IQ

They create ghettos.

How do you think intellectualism began? What's the etymology of geometry faggot? We're better at survival than them, and it's survival of the fittest.

What opportunities? Shitty education? Welfare? A biased housing market? Everything is rigged against them. Even the Mexicans are better off than them

On the contrary, we've given them everything and they still can't get on our level.

Go and live in the jungle with a spear then. Lets see how much better you can survive better than them while competing with lions, chimps, and gorillas

The amount of cheating that goes on in China is so bad that China's supposed average IQ is less trustworthy than a jew.

We've pretended to give them everything to get them to shut up. They have everything on paper, bias and racism still remains. You're proof of that

Aryans hunted their dangerous megafauna to extinction.

What about Japan and South Korea?

with guns, not spears

I doubt it's as hard as living in an eternal fucking winter.

who has time to build a gun when they have to hunt for all of their food and fend off predators?

lions don't attack people in Europe

That wasn't pretend. That was real, and they spat on all of it.

It was there all along, you were just brainwashed into unseeing it. They're as naturally racist as we are. They're free to go back to Africa, though I doubt they'll want to go given the insane amount of benefits we give them.

also are you forgetting that not all of Europe is an eternal winter? Places like France and Germany have comperitively nice weather

Legitimately smarter than niggers on average.

lelelel

They hunted them to to extinction with spears, then bows, then guns.

White people.

Of course racism was always there, and of course stupid blacks are racist. Relying on stereotypes is a staple of the stupid mindset

maybe because we killed them all

stereotypes don't appear out of thin air, they do have a basis on common trends, also try and argue why racism is bad, please

I'm comparing Europe to everywhere else.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_lions_in_Europe

except we lived much more comfortable life styles due to our environment. They hunted, we farmed. Also none of the distribution is proven to stretch far north into Europe. That is simple speculation

what the fuck are you talking about

We didn't live in scorching deserts, hot plains, and violent jungles. We lived in places that just got cold. Big fucking deal; put a coat on

White people are the product of living in a frozen hellscape where being stupid or failing to cooperate got you killed.

Niggers lived in a vastly more comfortable environment which is why didn't evolve any intelligence to speak of. They didn't need it to survive.

How are you even this stupid, holy fuck

You think hunter gatherer societies don't require cooperation? Are you fucking serious? This is how humanity evolved in the first place

Neither do niggers. Aztecs and Mayans lived in jungles and they excelled further than niggers, so no, it's not all environment. Native Americans had that Asian gene which is more conducive to civilization than nigger genes in spite of living in the same enviroment.

cooperating through hunting and gathering is what made humans what they are. It's why we're so enduring and social. Good luck killing a tiger by yourself

Nowhere near the scale of agricultural societies. Niggers can form small groups, but they can't actually form nations or formal governments like we can.

Niggers never evolved past the hunter-gatherer stage

The frozen wastes forced whites to evolve far, far beyond it.

Africans the oldest group of people, so of course they're going to have the most backwards lifestyle

He might take that as a suggestion to breed niggers for millions of years in Canada to see if they can become white people.

So they're past their prime and need to go. Evolution takes it's course.

I'm all in favor of killing off useless populations. I just don't care about race

races are specific populations so you just ate your own words

Only when you separate people by race. I just view all humans as one thing; self important hairless apes

These useless populations happen to be black. It matters little what color they are, just fucking kill the useless people

You said you are in favoring of killing off the useless populations, and africans are obviously the most useless.

With no differences? Congratulations you believe in equality!

Pure coincidence that the dumbest people on the planet are black.

Those backwards villages in the ass end of Africa can be burned to the ground for all I care. They waste resources. I don't care what color they are, I care about getting rid of human waste

But if you care about killing of the useless populations you have a reason to, as ethnicity or race signifies more than skin color it signifies IQ and deeper things than that.

Omfg you fucking idiot. Equality is a lie and dangerous idea. This has been established. You're proof that not all *white* people are equal. My point is we're all just monkeys, and our color is just that; fucking *color* Is a blue crayon superior to a red crayon?

You would be on the list of useless people, my friend

lel

Niggers aren't even the same species as whites. Each "human" race, or species to be more accurate, is more prone to certain diseases because they are, in fact, extremely different.

Niggers are a different color because they're different animals

That suggest the notion that there are no differences, which implies equality. Innate differences such as IQ exist, the bell curve exists, niggers are generally more inferior and stupid, skin color is not superficial because it signifies something deeper.

Based on your pretentious close-minded snark? Well you would definitely be on my list faggot.

cool story bro

He's not trolling, but I'm not sure about you. You aren't even willing to hear my side out. Does racism not entail something deeper than skin? Do not IQ differences correlate directly with race? Are white people simply the most advanced by accident? Why are you ashamed to be white? Are you not proud? Because if you're proud, you are considered to be a racist.

There are differences between all of us, regardless of weather or not we're the same color. That's what fucking makes us human.

Good, I hope we get to kill eachother some day.

I find no shame or pride in what I can't control. I take pride in my accomplishments, strengths and abilities, for that is what truly determines human worth.

My entire point has been that are differences are in regards to our ethnicity, which you seem to call color as to imply something superficial.

I can feel you struggling with the cognitive dissonance, user. But you'll get there. You'll wake up,

Bookmark this. Read it.
whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/

You'll swallow the redpill sooner or later. Might as well make it sooner than later.

What if I told you that you aren't even completely in control of those things either? What if I told you that race actually influences those things? What if I told you that science bears out as much?

How about I just ignore that and tell you to go fuck yourself, troll?

But there are a whole shitload of cognitive differences between two people if they aren't the same color

Don't fight it, user.

Then you would a close-minded bigot.

based on what?

Look who is calling who a bigot

IQ for starters, which has already been established.

I'm not the hypocrite. All my prejudices are on the table.

The genetic differences between races.

It's also been established there are blacks with high IQs, and whites with low IQs. I don't care what race is naturally higher, I care about who can do what.

I fail to see how I am hypocritical. My prejudices are also clear; I hate stupid people.

If you care about who can do what, then you care what race has naturally higher intelligence. You're stuck in a cognitive dissonance loop.

And it's already been established that they are insignificant outliers that do not fall within the general trend.

If you care about the latter then naturally you do care about the former. What you can do is partially based on what genetic qualities you have.

If you aren't a bigot then you are obliged to listen to all of us, or else you are in fact a bigot.

So by default, you must hate niggers above all.

No I don't. I care what *individuals* have higher intelligence. You don't appear to be one of them

On average, the dumbest individuals on the planet are niggers.

Smart people have smart children. This is how evolution works. If we have to kill the majority of blacks because they're stupid; go ahead, stupid people deserve it. Just don't leave out the stupid whites and asians because they need to go too

Then you care about race, because *individuals* are more predisposed to higher or lower intelligence based on their race.

You can trust a white to do something smart more than you can trust a nigger to do something smart.

The truth is you're a racist, but your racism is conflicting with your leftist programming, so you're trying to deny it.

At the end of the day, you are suggesting something that would entail being racist. Because IQ and race have a direct correlation, which you have so far refused to acknowledge.

Except when they don't.

No, I have acknowledged that blacks don't have an average IQ that is as high as whites. How about this for you; we indiscriminately kill everyone who has an IQ below 100. I don't care if that means mostly blacks or whites or anything else dies; I just want an end to human stupidity.

Well then either one of the parents was stupid, or they were terrible parents. In either case, someone is fucking useless and should die. Even if it's just the kid

If you want to kill everybody with an IQ below 100, then you do very much kill about caring niggers lel

Niggers are infamously terrible parents.

When stupid people don't get a chance to make more babies, their shitty genes don't continue to infect the population. When only smart people survive, only smart people will be born.

Kill all of the niggers, crackers, spics, kikes, chinks, and whatever the fuck else you can think of that can't score 100 on an IQ test. Is that clear enough for you?

If you care about killing "people" with sub-100 IQs then you care very much about race :^)

Can't gas the untermensch without being racist by necessity.

no, to kill by race is to ignore the trash within your own race. Just kill everyone who is useless. Keep your outdated ideals of racial supremacy where they belong; in the past.

I'm going to bed. Good night assholes.

wew

It was a pleasure shitposting with you, Hitler

Not friends so much now, are they.

why do you guys think I'm leftist anyway? I'm more center right than anything.

...