Children do not have enough rights.
They should have more rights.
Free universal healthcare.
The right to have their voices heard.
Access to an unjewed education.
Freedom to choose their sexual partner.
Unrestricted access to pornography.
The right to possess naked images of themselves.
Access to fluoride-free drinking water.
The right to say "no" to vaccines.
If you disagree, you're evil.
Other urls found in this thread:
liveleak.com
twitter.com
...
wew
oh forgot to address #4 before pornography
They have to learn somehow.
Who are you to decide what they can and can't post online?
they can't
good one not
i don't, it's the state, and i never said i agreed with it
ya yer probably right
Wow OP you're autistic
Jesus, paranoid much?
Kids can learn about std prevention as easily as brushing their teeth or washing their hands. Society is just too afraid/embarrassed to teach them for some reason.
Right, the kids who aren't responsible enough to pick up after themselves or feed themselves will be jumping to adopt harm reduction and safe sex tactics after retaining the education they've received on the subject.
Nope.
Don't worry, uncle user will help them on their sleepovers.
Wouldn't this mean for everyone not just children?
Bigot.
How about starting with basic respect? The idea that a child cannot consent is utterly preposterous (and I'm not just talking about sex).
Children have distinct desires and opinions, but unlike the rest of us, they haven't been completely brain-washed with society's agenda. Because of this, we should acknowledge and adhere to them MORE, not less.
What do you expect, pedos are retarded. They like children because they're at the same mental level.
Nope. Try some
Some of us like kids because they haven't turned into complete assholes like urself.
kek, was watching embed when I saw this shit
it started good than you completely fucked up.
for a moment i thought a rational person may be browsing Holla Forums
...
self-fag
It's really not that complicated. If you can teach a child how to wash their hands, you can teach them how to practice safe sex.
too lazy to make a screenshot proving you wrong.
kys
This is bullshit.This isn't about rights for the kids this is about being able to molest children without fear of the parents.This is the pedo covering the pedo's ass. kys
What kids actually wash their hands without having to be reminded everyday?
Businesses even have to remind their employees to wash their hands after using the bathroom.
And tons of adults don't practice safe sex despite being taught why it is a good practice
great point, moron
Add being a kid on top of being how incredibly stupid over half of the adult population is, and voila you have a super-retard who doesn't make decisions in their best interest
"molestation" insinuates unwanted touching. Nobody is advocating for that here. The point being made is that if a child wants to engage sexually with an adult, it is currently illegal, thus limiting their rights and freedoms.
Why o why is that so hard for ppl to understand??
Hey everyone! It's the sex boogy-man!
Shit happens. STD's exist. That is not a reason to keep kids from having sexual activity. Better not let them out of the house because x y z… Come on ppl, get real. Take your fucking foot off the brake and live a little
Children do not have the capacity to make that decision. period
Tell that to the pedo shitposters
I like how much mental gymnastics you have to play to try and justify kiddie-diddling
There are not only social issues that would arise from what OP espoused, but also economic pitfalls
CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT
CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT
CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT
CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT
CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT
Why o why is that so hard for ppl to understand??
LET'S JUST LET THE PEDOPHILES RAISE OUR KIDS FOR US!!! OBVIOUSLY THEY ARE ENLIGHTENED ON THIS MATTER.
That's a funny way to spell "children have too damn many rights."
Excellent social cuckery or mediocre troll?
Because children can consent. You are just another sheep falling in line with the doctrine of the herd. Well done.
How can they consent to something they don't understand. Children have innocent minds and don't know anything about sex. Nor should they.
They are always going to do what their father or authority figure tells them do, which means they can be taken advantage of too easily and deserve protection from pedos like you.
By that logic, children can never do anything, therefore no-one can ever do anything.
Your logic literally kills the human race in a single generation.
Sex is actually a really simple concept to understand. I'm pretty sure all children in the current year know what it is.
No, they just can't have sex before they can understand it and consent to it.
Stop trying to move the goalpost, pedo.
Bullshit, it's easy to coax a kid. You can cox and adult into sex and you're expecting a kid to be able to understand the lengths a horny perv will go just to get their dicks wet?
You're fucking retarded. That's why the parents are there. Because there is a lot of shit the can't do.
That's why there are entire books on the matter and we are still learning more about it. Because it's a simple concept. Go die somewhere
Don't give me that bullshit. I knew what sex was by age 7. You don't need to read books to understand what sex is dumbass.
...
O my, whatever shall we do?
gayanon
We protect the kids.
moar like this pls
Again,this argument uses children rights as a guise.It's really about the pedophile wanting to be a pedophile without fear of the parents beating the pedo's ass. They don't care about children's rights they care about not getting beat up for being pervs.
...
link?
never mind, found it
...
Feels good watching a pedo get what they deserve
yeah no, keep convincing children that the very method by which humans reproduce is the worst possible thing that could ever happen to them. that'll have entirely positive results and won't damage the species' ability to simply survive.
you're torturing your own children.
Protect them from…sex? But why? Sexaphobic?
Avoiding an ass-beating is nice, but hardly the point. Society has already made advances to protect us from such mindless tyranny.
You are likely simply projecting what you think you would do if you wanted sex with kids. Apparently you are having trouble imagining a person that could want a child to be free to explore their sexuality with people of all ages and assume that if there is someone that does, they must be a psychopathic predator. Open your mind.
That's ok tho. You are doing an excellent job of showing who the true predators are. Thanks for helping us to further the movement!
IF YOU DON'T LET PEDOS DIDDLE YOUR CHILDREN THE WORLD WILL LITERALLY FUCKING END
CAUSE ONLY THE PEDOPHILE FUCKING YOUR CHILDREN CAN TRULY SET THEM FREE AND SAVE THE WORLD
Dude,chill you can fuck them when they turn 18.
...
You can wait till they are of age
ah, ur a troll then
Pedo or hebe?
I'll believe it's about children's rights when I see a mass children's march demanding this right for themselves. All I'm seeing is the pedophiles calling for these rights on behalf of the children. I don't see children asking for this right. The pedophiles are the ones behind this not the kids, this is pedophile astroturfing a children's rights movement.
what could go wrong?
yumm-ee
Hebe if anything. The only girl I find cute is Sandra
That thing's not human
...
I notice pedophiles don't give a fuck about the parent's right to raise their kids the way they see fit.
it's called a joke, he is a comedian.
educate your children. they're smarter than you give them credit for. you're stunting their intellectual and emotional growth. lying to children doesn't protect them, it makes them mistrustful when they eventually discover the truth. tell them of the risks and let them make informed, equipped decisions for themselves.
2D is more human than humans in this perverse kike-run world
that's because any parent raising their kid who doesn't also have a sexual relationship with them is a bad parent in the pedo's eyes (which is all parents)
Thank you for admitting this is YOUR movement. This is a movement of pedophiles fighting their perceived right to be pedos.
hebe > pedo
Rolling for death penalty for pedophilia
ANTI-PEDOS BTFO
HOW CAN THEY RECOVER?
...
...
One day… for now children are far too powerless and shamed to do anything about it tho, unfortunately. That is why there are child advocates like myself.
I am not a pedophile, but these statements are partly true. Many will exaggerate and distort this tho.
Not MY movement. It is OUR movement. SJW for sex with kids is a thing. U mad?
(Heil)
Take your communism elsewhere
Prove that's how they feel cause you're just pulling out your ass now.
IT'S ALL OVER
ANTI-PEDOS PACK YOUR BAGS AND GET LOST
this
Anti-Pedos OUT REEEEEE
whatever
What is the pedo solution should the parents object?
you like pedo > hebe? or are you an 18+fag
In terms of what? Stuff I jerk off to?
Yes, user. Like this age?
They don't understand why they are hated
Yeah. I've jerked it to some young-ish celebs, but mostly I'm 18 and up
Appreciate the honest answer. When you say 'young-ish', do you mean like CandyDoll or something else?
At the moment? Attempt to reason with them and then, most likely, be forced to defend myself. And then be forced to flee from the authorities.
Progress can't be made until popular opinion is corrected.
Is that how you have all of your sex? You have to trick people?
Educate your children about the method by which humans reproduce. Stop stigmatising the method by which humans reproduce. Give your children the information they require to make informed decisions. Just like you should be doing in every other facet of life. Do you lie to them about brushing their teeth? 'If you brush your teeth, you will be traumatised for the rest of your life!'
Sex is a part of life, they need to learn about it eventually, if they're left to discover it themselves they will end up pregnant and/or infected with an STD.
I haven't seen a lot of that child model stuff, but I don't like it. My most depraved shit is probably this girl.
i can't tell if that's jordyn jones or natalie dormer
I see. A safe choice
Your butthurt indicates I am right where I ought to be. I think I will stay. This is anarchy, not communism. I am defending our very nature.
We know children are powerless because this discussion. This thread is wrought with proof of how we are ALL shamed. I would show you more documentation of our carnal desires from an early age, but that is obviously being suppressed.
Safety isn't a factor as I'm not trying to hide anything. I just find her very pretty.
It's JJ, but Natalie is another girl I admire.
Neither. Being attracted to her as an adult is perfectly normal. She is built no differently than most college girls.
...
Part of learning about sex is knowing sexual maturity is not subjective. It happens at around 13. Hebes are a whole other thing because at least at that point they have reached sexual maturity and have a more developed view of the world. This about pedos, you're talking about reproduction as it relates to children who can't even reproduce yet. It's not about that. Children know what sex is, I knew what sex was when I was a kid.
It's about the pedophile, the pedo is the problem
It's about keeping the child safe from the PEDOPHILE not from sex. It's about making sure the kid doesn't end up a child prostitute getting pimped out in some pedo ring or dead. Pedophiles often commit other crime besides pedophilia they are not good people.
No because there is no threat of the tooth brush kidnapping and selling the kid into prostitution or worse. The tooth brush is not a criminal.
Sexual education does not protect them from being kidnapped. Them knowing about sex does not stop the pedophile from potentially doing harm to them.
Get off the sex subject. It's about the pedophiles intentions,motives and character. Not about the sex.
And then…
But she is ~14 y/o there. Doesn't that make one who is attracted to her a hebephile?
we gave 3DPD rights, and look how well that worked out
wasted trips tbh
Her actual age is irrelevant. Her perceived age is what matters. And she looks more or less like a late teen or young adult in those pics.
What does sexual education have to do with the pedo's belief that he has the right to have sex with a minor? How does sexual education change the fact that the pedophile seems to think that they can usurp or at least diminish the parent's authority and rights?
Back to the boogey man syndrome. The paranoia is strong in our society. Pedophile is practically synonymous with rapist/murderer.
How many pedophiles do you actually know? Or do you get your insights into their intentions from the 5 o'clock news spooks?
The lack of sexual education inspires the notion that a child could be better prepared for sexual activity with a pedophile than just scaring them into running away from every stranger that shows them interest. And if the parent and government was more sexually educated about the pedophile, perhaps there would be less of a motive to usurp their authority.
Parents have more rights to decide their children's sex lives than the state. Children have more rights to decide their sex lives than pedos. There is literally nothing wrong with a pedo propositioning a child and being turned down either by them or their parents, or being accepted by both.
Yes it is.
Look, I understand that you want to justify your anger at pedophiles and your urge to hurt or kill us for sullying 'your' women with our mere gaze, but there isn't a rational argument for your position and the first step to solving the problem is you knowing that. Yours is a destructive ideology and you need to examine your beliefs.
This is bullshit. Cause I'm a pedo, yet I have zero interest in raping or hurting anyone. I'm also still attracted to adult women. But I honestly don't even have any interest in relationships anymore at all.
Puberty in girls starts at around age 8
t. pedo
This varies a lot. I think average age is about 10 when it starts.
Not sure if bait, but I definitely remember a 10yo girl I grew up with that had serious cans, minimum B-cup. So this could be true.
...
puberty starts when I fuck them, so there
STOP SEXUALIZING CHILDREN, PEDOSCUM
t. pedophile pervert sicko weirdo basement-dwelling virgin
dang, I shouldn't have revealed my power level
...
...
oh user… you're so naive…
Sorry, I'm not a CPfag like you so I assume that 8 year olds are still innocent
i knew what a vagina was when i was 8
i didn't know what it was for because my parents kept that information from me and society put a massive amount of stigma on the mere word 'sex'. adults would utterly panic as soon as the word 'sex' was uttered in the presence of us children. it was figuratively oppressive, it was an incorporeal pressure on everyone.
Viewed porn when i was nine, thought semen was whipped cream. This proves that children are inherently innocent.
children are inherently ignorant and parents collectively keep them ignorant for no reason.
parents could better protect their own kids if they taught them young about sex and avoiding any contact from strangers. instead, kids remain ignorant and can be taken advantage of because they don't understand what can happen
worse is the fact that sexual contact with children is demonised and criminalised so that it's actually a more beneficial proposition for an adult who has had sexual contact with a child to kill the child afterwards so they can't tell anyone. it's similar to the case with marijuana being a gateway drug because it's treated the same as drugs that actually harm people; if you're already a felon for smoking some harmless weed, why not also do some cocaine? in for a penny, in for a pound and all that.
sexual activity inherently hurts no one. in fact, it feels quite nice. treating it as a crime on the same level as murder or rape is macabre.
Wrong
Explain that. Explain how a penis - which is purpose-built to be put inside a vagina - could harm that vagina and/or vice versa. How does harm occur from that situation?
Within the confines of the law, sure.
But you're talking about sex with children which necessarily involves coercion and taking advantage of their ignorance.
Have you ever been molested? Do you understand what actual molestation is? I'm not talking about some sexy teacher, touching a willing student. I'm talking about an unsightly, ill-hygienic creep touching you in your most private places, licking your ass to taste your shit. Trying to penetrate your anus with his 3.5x2 inch penis.
Can you honestly say that you wouldn't be appalled if something like that happened?
Okay then, the pedophile explains the risks of sex to the child in great detail beforehand, answers all her questions and settles any of her concerns. In what way is it harmful then?
1. pederasty. lol. go away.
2. 'but all pedophiles are the most ugly, disgusting humans that i am capable of imagining! i know because anti-pedos keep telling me!' lol. go away.
stop projecting your own inability to have any sexual contact with another human without thoroughly chloroforming them first on the rest of us.
There aren't creepy pedophiles? Everyone's a gentleman and a scholar, right?
if you do not know what a word means, please google it.
google the word 'pederasty' and then come back and make an informed post.
They are synonymous
Yes, all pedos are so gentle they acutally would do that. Just keep pedos away from kids. Period.
So, um, why are you avoiding the question? It's still unwanted sex on the kid's behalf. Which conflicts with the pedophile mantra that "all kids enjoy sex with all pedophiles".
we can't because even broaching the subject of sex in the mere presence of a child is a stone-able offence in this caliphate we're apparently living in.
...
same person
wasted dubs tbh
these fucking threads
SAVE A CHILD, GAS A PEDO
SAVE A CHILD, GAS A PEDO
SAVE A CHILD, GAS A PEDO
you made that up. 'sexual activity between a man and a boy' is not necessarily unwanted.
not all people enjoy sex with all other people. a gay person doesn't want to have sex with a member of the opposite sex. of course some children - likely most children - won't be interested in sex and they'll just want to continue playing tag and doing kid stuff. but we shouldn't stifle the curiosity of any children who might want to at least find out what the big deal is, figure out whether or not they even would enjoy sex - the best way to do that is to try it, the best way to try it is to first be as informed as possible.
at the absolute least, for fuck's sake don't convince them that having sex as a child is worse than murder like you fucking idiots have been doing all these decades; if something is worse than murder, then the 'victim' would be better off committing suicide than living with the fact that they suffered something 'worse than murder', you fucking psychopaths.
i forgot to address the pederasty point: you've found me, i'm the pedophile who is against male-on-male child sex. penises don't belong in buttholes, least of all under-age buttholes and over-age penises. that's the worst possible butthole/penis combination.
does that mean i'm right?
I distinctly remember when I was in kindergarten so 5 yo. I was actively seeking sexual contact with my 18 yo babysitter and another neighbor lady who was probably in her 20's. If they had "molested" me, basically fucked me, I would have had a much happier youth, and been more confident with women.
If me at 5 yo fucking a 22 yo woman, and saying "oh, fuck yes!" isn't consent then wtf is?
I'm a pedofag, but I don't let my desires skew my perception of reality. Sex is a big thing, and not just the act. Sex comes with many consequences and in itself, is something that should be well thought out, looking in the presence and future. It requires forward thinking and high reasoning and self advocacy, these are traits that children have not developed, independent of their knowledge of sex. Children do not have the reasoning and brain capacity to make informed decisions on the scale of sex. Sex with children can open the door to non consensual abuse because the child can not advocate for themselves. Self advocacy is a skill developed in full latter on. Children have little to no need of self advocacy at this level because it is up to the parents and guardians to make the big decisions for them until they come of age to have the intellect to do so themselves. To summarize. Kids do not have the brain power to make an informed enough decision to concent
Though, the other pedofag does have a point that I do agree with. We should be more open about sexuality towards kids. Yeah it is a touchy subject, but they have the right to know, and to be given honest answers to their questions. I find the argument, they won't understand, extremely unconvincing, since sex, is not that complicated of a concept, really it could be described accurately in one sentence. as I say this, I do not imply that if kids have knowledge of sex, then they can concent. Early sexuality education is already applied with positive results. Early sex ed leads to fewer teenaged pregnancy, and is the front line defense against sexuality abuse.
One of the main arguing points of my fellow cringe worthy, delusion fellow pedophiles is that children by nature are sexuality creatures. I do believe this is the case, evident by early sexuality exploration in kids in the infamous doctor game, and other pre sexuality education exploration. I argue though that the base cause of these games are out of curiosity more than arousal, but due to arousal from said situation, children can associate their actions with arousal, and repeat these games because of the associated arousal, developing their own type of sex. Children are sexual, but not like how adults are sexual. They can deprive arousal from sexual situations, and enjoy said situations. I say this, as an observation of sexuality in children and not advocating for child abuse. The ability to experience arousal is not a valid argument.
children do not have the mental capacity to concent to sex because of the undeveloped brain and lack of ability to forum rational informed decisions on the scale of sex. This does not negate the fact that children can understand and experience sexuality, and have the right to know about sexuality.
George was the best. I saw him twice in my city before he passed.
It isn't that big a thing, virgin.
You heard consequences and assumed it meant something spiritual when what is meant by that is pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. The first is of course irrelevant. The second is in the category of things parents and responsible adults have to protect children from regardless, along with diseases, predators, accidents, malnutrition, threats to life and well-being in general.
You heard consequences and assumed it meant something spiritual when what is meant by that is pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. The first is of course irrelevant.
Sex is a big thing relative to the decisions made by children, and at the scale of adults, sex normally is a rational decision based off of logic in part. Consequences of sex do not just include stds and pregnancies, but also personal regret based on a hindsight point of view, and the high possibility of abuse.
You are simply going to far to make you ideologies work. To include the parents in their own kids sex lives is preposterous, and thinking that there is a mere possibility of your ideas being integrated into society is idiotic. Do you really believe it would ever happen?
...
this
...
...
when i was young and i first heard of the idea of peadophiles and child porn i though cp should be available for kids but only for kids to consume adults couldn't get involved.
about 8/9 yo
such is life
a serious issue to be dealt with, killing all pedos is not a solution.
What the fuck am I reading.
So, let me get this straight… both sides of this argument are coming from ultra-autistic viewpoints. Is that right?