Will there be prostitution under communism? No? How will ugly autistic beta male manlet losers like me get laid then?
Will there at least be porn?
These questions are far more relevant to me than vague notions of exploitation and solidarity with people I have nothing in common with other than my income bracket.
Find an ugly, autistic beta female womanlet girlfriend.
If you base your worldview on what will most effectively gain you access to the means of reproduction, you should probably just kill yourself.
Yes there will, and because there will be no economic need to become a prostitute, it will be known that all prostitution is voluntary, and there will be no feminist moralizing about the subject either.
Only thoes that actually want to be prostitues and porn stars will do so. This will probably reduce in less but they will still exist.
...
How is prostitution exploitative? Prostitutes literally own the means of production.
There likely woundn't be a need for women to prostitute themselves.
However, there's some chance that since the material circumstances and inheritance rights that lay the foundation for a culture of sexual moderation has been abolished, there would be a lot of people who would be… More sexually open-minded.
There's nothing more Porky than commodifying sex. Prostitution implies commodity exchange, with sex taking on a commodity form. One of the goals of socialism is to abolish the commodity form. The only way for it to work would be for the socialist community to recognize the rather blatantly unproductive, unnecessary labor of prostitutes as social labor, which I don't see happening (and I don't think should happen, social labor is supposed to be the labor society requires to function, it shouldn't get muddled with seedy entertainment jobs).
And I meant exploitation in the more general sense, not the Marxist meaning. If it isn't the prostitute's desperation being exploited, it's the man's loneliness being exploited.
vaginas are not a MoP you fucking twat.
whoring, stripping, being a pornstar and exibition, these all fall under the category of prostitution, read engels comrades. Prostitution is the selling or 'renting' of your body for currency, you are exploiting your body for value. In a socialist economy prostitution would not be allowed, as any other form of market buisness.
There will not be a need for prostitution in a socialist, and especially communist, society anyway. With the abolition of the current family model and with the destruction of sex as a commodity, to be seen of something valuable, people will become much more sexually liberal, and you are likely to see far more people hooking up casually. But, with the security a socialist government provides, you are also likely to see more families being formed, as people will no longer fear poverty for themselves or their children.
Prostitution, no.
Porn, yes but it will be closer to amateur stuff than the production company shit.
...
Problem solved
...
So capitalism is the reason I can't get laid?
No, prostitution is born from ptivste property and is literally a hoarding of women by the bourgoise, Engels analizes this in 'On the Origins..'.
Prostitution is a exploitation and negates the women of thwir sexual freedom.
The closest thing to prostitution you will find in Docialism and Communism are freaky girls and boys who line to fuck whoever they can, who have existed since the human species exists and will exist until we all die, so let them be.
There will be porn. There will be so much porn.
Also, in the near future, there will be AI loli waifus. Who could say no to AI loli waifus?
There will likely not be porn if there is no larger push by capitalists to make sex a commodity. Like most other commodities, hypersexuality is pushed on people from childhood to create demand.
...
Fucking hell, people say some stupid things here.
What are you talking about?
Under socialism, people would have their basic needs provided for them, however they would still be able to become 'wealthy' in a sense as of course the time put into labour has the same pay no matter what the labour, and as some people can put in more time than others, some people will have more money than others. This means there will be luxuries you can buy with your money on top of the basic services you already have.
I therefore see no reason why we should not allow people to sell their bodies to earn money. If you want to say 'because it was exploitative under capitalism' then there are a lot of other things you need to ban too. Same goes if you want to say it's not 'actual labour'
...
It's the ideology, silly.
...
Idk about that. Primitive societies wore little to no clothes and it isn't like the men had permanent boners from seeing women naked so frequently.
Nakedness as something that illicits sexual arousal is only in societies that require people to cover up. Remember in medival England, a woman showing her ankle would be sexually arousing.
Basically the sexual arousal you feel when you see a pair of tits is only there because you know that they should be covered up
Joke's on you.
Pic related, the Xingu people.
There is no money to accumulate in socialism you stupid twat.
...
Ugly, autistic beta womanlets are getting fucked by Chad from Tinder fam. They don't want us. If it wasn't for the fact that I have a nice face, I probably would be a virgin. Since I have so many strikes against me (autistic, manlet, unemployed).
I used to see prostitutes semi-regularly when I was employed. I have savings from prior work. But nowadays I feel guilty going to a prostitute while unemployed. Because then I think "man that money could have paid some of my bills." It's nice to be able to have sex with a woman who is unattainable. Seeing a hot slutty club girl suck my dick or take my cock. You get to experience what it's like to be Chad kinda. But it's over-rated. It's not as good as you imagine it. And it's very expensive. The best sex is with a real girlfriend. Though I don't regret seeing prostitutes. I regret spending as much money on that bullshit as I have though.
Yes, nobody ever masturbated before capitalism came along, and no native cultures ever created sex idols or erotic art. The human sex drive is an evil capitalist invention.
Custom-designed companion robots will make human prostitutes obsolete in a future communist society.
I can't wait for Japan to come out with waifu robots
I cannot wait. Finally r9k will stop complaining
accept islam as true already. submit yourself to god, allah, in your heart, inshallah.
You specifically implied nudity is inherently sexually arousing. I gave a counter-example. Fuck off.
In any case,
Sure fap exists in those societies, but they aren't nearly as oversexualized as we are. There's a lot of fabricated societal pressure to make people desire to have sex as much as they do now.
Get that fascist trash out of here weeb: atimes.com
Fair enough, maybe China will beat Japan to the punch. The Chinese are putting the trade surplus money to good use I see.
SoftBank (Japanese company) is going to supply Pizza Hut with worker robots. So I'm pretty sure the Japanese have already started working on sex robots, if not full-blown waifus.
But what about the people who want to fuck other people and not sex objects.
Shit, I guess you're right. Our pre-capitalist ancestors were only born because their parents slipped and had an anime fall where the penor ended up in the vagoogoo. Nobody was keen on having sex, they were just really really clumsy which is why it was so common to have like a dozen kids.
For so-called "progressives", socialists sure are keen on regulating other people's sex lives.
wut
Ignore the trip fagging TERF no one respects her or her opinions on here. She's a moron.