What does Holla Forums think about Strasserism?

Most of Holla Forums is natsoc but I'm curious about what variation of natsoc most Holla Forumsacks are.

Other urls found in this thread:

americanfreepress.net/bush-rockefeller-rothschild-hitler/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

is that the weirdo russian one where its position shifts to suit the putin regimes autistic choices?

...

not even close

I'm gonna have to be brutally honest with you, user.

Strasserism is autism.

First, while the desire for a "second "revolution" to put the "Socialism" in "National Socialism" may sound appealing, the truth is that, by the time Hitler had consolidated power in Germany, the Reich was effectively socialist, inasmuch as the new issuance of currency through labor certificates and such gave the government effective control over large businesses in all but name, without having to nationalize most domestic industry (though obviously some foreign holdings and assets were nationalized by the new regime). Through this, combined with the new German Worker's Front (the Nazi-sponsored national labor union), Germany had effectively achieved a sort of organic socialism, keeping economic freedom *and* fair conditions/wages for workers while avoiding the pitfalls of Marxist socialism.

Secondly, National Socialism is not only the German-centric version of Fascism (in the wider sense of the word), but is effectively Hitlerism, inasmuch as Hitler served as the lightning rod of the movement, the focal point through which the will of the German people was enacted.

To say that one would've sided with Strasser over Hitler is effectively a denial of everything Hitler achieved, and, unfortunately, is characteristic of the phenomenon of Holla Forums and their alt-right cohorts to craft one's own special snowflake "indieology" instead of throwing one's lot in with an ideology that not only worked, but thrived until Fate decided that Germany was not destined to win the War.

Also, there's the issue that the Strassers may or may not have had ties to the Jewish bankers that Hitler had just finished kicking out of Germany (it depends on what sources you read, there's not a total consensus yet).

soft commies. national socialism still allowed private business to prosper therefor promoting innovation.

I've never heard of this. Any reputable sources I can read over? I'm not a strasserist myself but I'm curious about how many anons could get behind the socialist aspect of national socialism

NONE. UNDERCOVER LEFTYPOL RAID.

national socialism was not the socialist you are thinking of. it was fascist. it saw the problems of early america having a hard time building a strong military because of the constitution and peoples opposition to taxation. it saw communism for the cancer it is. it mixed the free market with a strong state allowing people to innovate freely while still having a powerful military. strasserism would have led to the societal decay that hard socialism causes.

Strassers were Communist plants funded by a jew that actively tried to stop the NSDAP and take it over. Do not call them a "variation of natsoc," their shit belongs on Holla Forums with all the other traitors and reds.

americanfreepress.net/bush-rockefeller-rothschild-hitler/

>>>Holla Forums